Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Other Needs
Learning Style
Special Courses
Physical ability
Age
Sex
Characteristics of learners
YES
NO
YES
NO
YES
NO
Proof/Evidence
Means of validating
In reviewing the documents submitted by the prospective Trainee, the following should be considered:
Current Competencies
Training Gaps/Requirements
Current Competencies
Training Gaps/Requirements
Current Competencies
Training Gaps/Requirements
Using Form No. 4.4, convert the Training Gaps into a Training Needs/Requirements. Refer to the CBC in
identifying the Module Title or Unit of Competency of the training needs identified
Training Needs
(Learning Outcomes)
Training Needs
(Learning Outcomes)
Special Instructions
Print Materials
Non-print
materials
Tools
Equipment
Print Materials
Non-print
materials
Tools
Equipment
Print Materials
Non-print
materials
Tools
Equipment
SESSION PLAN
Sector:
Qualification Title:
Unit of Competency:
Module Title:
Learning Outcomes:
A. INTRODUCTION
B. LEARNING ACTIVITIES
LO 1:
Learning Content
Methods
Presentation
Practice
Feedback
Resources
Tim
e
Methods
Presentation
Practice
Feedback
Resources
Tim
e
Methods
Presentation
Practice
Feedback
Resources
Tim
e
LO 2:
Learning Content
LO 3:
Learning Content
C. ASSESSMENT PLAN
PACKAGING A CBLM
Evidence Plan
Competency
Standard
Unit of
Competency
Portfolio
Interview
Exam Written
Module Title
Date:
Checked
by:
Date:
TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS
TEST ITEM DISTRIBUTION
Content/Objectives
TOTAL
Factual
Knowledge
Comprehension
Application
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
ITEMS
PERCENTAGE
(%)
Module Title:
Competency standards:
Date of assessment:
Time of assessment:
Instructions for demonstration
[insert the instructions for the candidate]
Materials and equipment:[insert details of materials and equipment needed for the demonstration]
OBSERVATION
During the demonstration of skills, did the
candidate:
[insert the evidence requirements]
to show if evidence is
demonstrated
Yes
No
N/A
Not Satisfactory
Demonstration [continued]
QUESTIONS
Satisfactory
response
Yes
No
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
The candidates underpinning knowledge was:
Satisfactory
Not Satisfactory
Feedback to candidate:
Not Satisfactory
Candidate signature:
Date:
Assessor signature:
Date: