Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AT OAR ESSALAAM
MARIAMU MASHAURI. . . . . . . . . . . . ..
APPELLANTY
VERSUS
THE REPUBLIC
RESPONOENTS
SHAIOI,
J.
for
{2)of the
At the
appellants advocate
consolidate the first three grounds of appeal into one and the
other two grounds into the second ground so only two grounds
of appeal were argued.
Mr. Mmanda on
be explained to be the
accused in his language or in a
language he understands.
(ii)
(i)
(ii)
. sImp
. Ie h urt
causmg
."
1st Court:
OFFENCE, SECTION OF THE LAW.
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
at
The
appellant
being
if the
offence
the
to charge the
complainant with.
This is my evaluation
of the
was found
the
mentioned.
said
false declaration
should
have
been
Had the
supported
by any document.
an
of
option
imprisonment,
imposing
fine
or
must
of a
then
sentence
of
authority.
Regrettably the
I have
I see no extreme or
aggravating
circumstances
because
the
charge
was
fatally
valid
Immigration Department
established.
The appellant
is in
the
is
\J1.~j
G.P. Shaidi