Professional Documents
Culture Documents
que les e lites sont (de plus en plus) caracterisees par un e ventail de gouts
Gerry Veenstra, Department of Sociology, University of British Columbia, 6303 N. W. Marine Drive,
Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z1. E-mail: gerry.veenstra@ubc.ca
C 2015 Canadian Sociological Association/La Soci
ete canadienne de sociologie
135
136
137
The middle class, striving for distinction but lacking the capital and
habitus needed to fully appropriate upper-class lifestyles, in turn valorizes
asceticism, rigor, legalism (Bourdieu [1979] 1984:331). In contrast with
the bourgeois habitus which conveys an ethos of ease, a confident relation
to the world and the self, the petit bourgeois habitus presents an ethos
of restriction through pretension (Bourdieu [1979] 1984:339). The tastes
of necessity, finally, most common in the lower class, derive from the need
to produce labor at the lowest cost; people with low levels of (especially
economic) capital tend to valorize tastes of necessity out of material necessity. Enjoyment and fun, impropriety, and fulfilling material needs are
virtues in lower class space because the functions rather than the forms of
cultural objects are of central importance here.
Bourdieu asserted that nothing more clearly affirms ones class,
nothing more infallibly classifies, than tastes in music (Bourdieu [1979]
1984:18). Upper-class people, free from the strictures of necessity, tend to
have a taste for difficult, abstract music, especially difficult classical music. For example, appreciation for Bachs The Well-Tempered Clavier was
prevalent among the most highly educated members of Bourdieus survey sample from the 1960s. As legitimate culture, classical music gathers
around it the highest values of aesthetic formalism associated with Kantian distinterestedness (Prior 2013:183). The French upper class also
rejected with disgust the most popular and most vulgar singers, such
as Les Compagnons de la Chanson, Mireille Mathieu, Adamo or Sheila
(Bourdieu [1979] 1984:60). Middle-class space in turn tends to foster appreciation for popularized forms of legitimate music (Gershwins Rhapsody in Blue was especially popular among engineers and technicians in
Bourdieus data) whereas the members of the lower class tend to consume
music with simple, repetitive structures (such as the popular waltzes of
Strauss) which are typically imposed on them by experts and artists in the
field of musical production (Atkinson 2011). From the standpoint of Bourdieus homology framework, then, musical tastes and distastes, seemingly
personally idiosyncratic in nature, are in fact reflections of class-based
habitus.
This represents what I think of as the strong form of the homology
thesis. It describes a multidimensional space of positions prescribed by a
specified complex configuration of capitals, namely, the sum total of economic capital and cultural capital on the primary axis and the relative
composition of these forms of capital on the secondary axis. It is a relational visioning of entwined spaces of positions and cultural tastes that
requires relational statistical techniques, such as multiple correspondence
analysis (MCA) or latent class analysis (LCA), to illuminate the character of the spaces in quantitative data. In the weak form of the homology
thesis, the space of positions and the spaces to which it is homologous
are not configured in as complicated a manner. For instance, while evidence suggests that the sum total of economic capital and cultural capital
138
CULTURAL OMNIVORISM
Most incarnations of the cultural omnivorism perspective in the sociology
of culture similarly identify social class as a fundamental basis of cultural
tastes and practices. They depart from the homology framework, however,
by claiming that breadth of cultural tastes has supplanted possession of
specified highbrow/lowbrow tastes as the notable cultural delimiter of class
boundaries. It is argued that, while the Bourdieusian homology storyline
may have held in past eras, elites in contemporary societies are now better
characterized as cultural omnivores than as highbrow aficionados. These
omnivores consume and practice culture speaks of many different kinds,
from hip hop to heavy metal to classical music, from grungy, muddy team
sports such as rugby to ascetic, individual pursuits of body and mind such
as yoga and tai chi, and so forth (Veenstra 2010). They seek variety and
eclecticism and are intrinsically inclusive and tolerant in their tastes, in
contrast with univores, who, displaying taste for a narrow range of activities or objects, are intrinsically exclusivist and intolerant. Members of the
upper class are therefore distinguished from members of other classes by
the breadth of their cultural repertoires rather than their possession of
any specified highbrow cultural tastes or practices. Members of the lower
class are in turn distinguished from others by the relatively narrow focus
of their cultural repertoires, by their propensities to be univores, not by
their allegiances to any specified lowbrow cultural tastes or practices. It is
the desire and ability to consume a multitude of diverse cultural forms, including diverse musical styles, that now distinguishes higher class people
from lower class people in contemporary societies.
If the highbrow snob has been replaced by the cultural omnivore and
the lowbrow slob has been replaced by the univore then the principles,
processes, and mechanisms underlying the stratification of cultural tastes
have likely changed as well. In particular, the distinction between tastes
139
140
bursting with diverse musical tastes and the lower class section is bereft
of them, a multidimensional space of positions homologous to a top-heavy
space of (omnivorous) tastes. Alternatively, breadth of tastes might simply
be associated with one or both of economic capital and cultural capital in
linear-causal regression models.
The distinction between omnivorism by volume and omnivorism by
composition (Warde et al. 2007) can also designate strong and weak forms
of the omnivorism thesis. In regard to the former, omnivorism is defined
by indiscriminate liking of any and all cultural forms, a strong statement
of the omnivorism thesis. In regard to the latter, however, some distinctive status orientation is entailed in the patterns of cultural preferences
involved (Warde et al. 2007:145). For example, the definition of musical omnivore employed by Peterson and Simkus (1992) required that they
like traditionally highbrow classical musical and opera. Achterberg and
Houtman (2005) operationalized musical omnivorousness as the status
distance between the most highbrow music and the most lowbrow music
chosen by a person. Explicitly incorporating dislikes into her operationalization, Bryson (1996) depicted musical omnivores as people who consumed
many different musical genres while simultaneously rejecting the music
genres with the least educated fans, these being country, heavy metal, and
rap music. In these formulations, musical omnivorism is prescribed in the
breadth of its manifestation.
Finally, strong and weak forms of the omnivorism thesis can be distinguished by the degree to which breadth of taste has supplanted specified highbrow tastes among elites. Some scholars suggest that highbrow
tastes are a thing of the past and the omnivore now reigns supreme in a
post-Bourdieu era of cultural sociology (Vander Stichele and Laermans
2006). Others contend that the omnivorism framework represents an evolution rather than a repudiation of the homology framework where the
former has not (yet) overthrown the latter (e.g., Emmison 2003; Garca
Alvarez,
Katz-Gerro, and Lopez-Sintas 2007; Lopez-Sintas and Zerva 2005;
Peterson 2005; Peterson and Kern 1996). They suggest that elites can
in fact be split into two groups: exclusive highbrows with a univorous
and exclusive highbrow taste; and inclusive highbrows with an omnivorous taste inclusive of middlebrow and lowbrow tastes (Emmison 2003;
Garca-Alvarez
et al. 2007; Peterson 2005).1 Lowbrow taste, a popular taste
that nearly everyone likes, is no longer associated with any specific class
(Garca-Alvarez
et al. 2007). In short, the strong form of the omnivorism
thesis does away with highbrow snobs entirely while the weak form accommodates the existence of highbrow snobs and omnivorous elites, with
1.
Research in this vein suggests that exclusive highbrows tend to be older and inclusive highbrows tend
to be younger (Ollivier 2008). This age- or cohort-related factor speaks to the notion that aggregate
changes in elite tastes from highbrow to omnivore are generationally prescribed, with younger omnivore
elites replacing aging highbrow exclusivist elites.
141
ANALYTICAL PLAN
The analysis proceeds in four stages. First, I investigate whether diverse
musical tastes are widely dispersed, as the homology approach might predict, or tightly clustered, as might be consistent with musical omnivorism.
To accomplish this, I apply MCA and LCA to a set of 21 musical likes
and dislikes, illuminating contours of a musical field that distinguishes
between people who like most musical genres, people who dislike most
musical genres, and people who are ambivalent about most musical genres. Second, I investigate the degree to which and how this patterning
of musical tastes is structured by various markers of inequality, namely,
city of residence, age, gender, racial identity, immigrant status, economic
capital, and cultural capital. In particular, I seek to determine whether
this Canadian musical field is structured by the sum total of economic
capital and cultural capital and the relative composition of economic and
cultural capitals as the field of cultural tastes was structured in France
of the 1960s. I find that the patterning of musical tastes previously identified is partly reflective of age, racial identity, and immigrant status but
mostly unreflective of possession of economic capital and cultural capital. Third, I determine whether a measure of breadth of musical likes
is predicted by one or more of the markers of inequality in an Ordinary
Least Squares (OLS) regression model. I find that women, middle-aged
people, and native-born Canadians are relatively likely to be musical omnivores but wealthy and/or highly educated elites are not. Finally, I investigate whether individual musical likes and dislikes are associated with
the markers of inequality in binary logistic regression models. Consistent with the weak form of Bourdieus homology thesis, I find that elites
142
and lower class people are linked with distinct sets of musical likes and
dislikes.
METHODS
Survey Sample
Between January and June of 2009, the Survey Research Centre (SRC) at
the University of Victoria in British Columbia conducted telephone interviews with 732 adults living in the city of Toronto and 863 adults living in
the Vancouver Census Metropolitan Area. The SRC used random-digit dialing techniques to obtain residential telephone numbers, a next-birthday
strategy to select one resident per household aged 19 or older to interview,
and a computer-aided telephone interviewing system to conduct the interviews. The introductory script from the callers informed prospective interviewees that all adults aged 19 and older were eligible for this study, that
there were potential risks of an emotional kind from questions pertaining
to racial and ethnic identity, experiences of discrimination in everyday life
and sexual orientation, and that the ultimate goal of the study was to help
to improve the health of Canadians. No incentives, monetary or otherwise,
were provided for participation. In total, callers spoke with 17,060 people
and successfully recruited 1,595 interviewees, representing a cooperation
rate of 9.3 percent.
Demographic characteristics of the survey samples and the cities from
which they were obtained are described in Table 1. Comparison of the city
samples to the 2006 Census by gender, age, racial identity, immigrant
status, and educational attainment indicates that both city samples are
biased toward women, older people, Whites, native-born Canadians, and
people with a university degree. Comparison of cases with complete data (n
= 1,503) with those with missing data (n = 92) indicates that the missing
cases are relatively likely to be non-White immigrants.
Musical Tastes
Unlike most research of its kind (but see Bennett et al. 2009; Bryson 1996,
1997; Carrabine and Longhurst 1999; Savage 2006; Sonnett 2004; Tampubolon 2008b), this study focuses on musical likes and dislikes. The cultural omnivore is identified by her liking of diverse cultural forms. From
the homology perspective, however, the tastes of elites and lower class
people are as or more likely to be manifested as distastes than as tastes
(Bourdieu [1979] 1984). My respondents were asked about their likes and
dislikes in regard to 21 musical genres. For each of the following types
of music, please tell me whether you like or dislike or perhaps feel neutrally about each type: classical music, hip hop, choral music, folk music,
rap, opera, country music, pop, jazz, easy listening, reggae, rock, heavy
143
Table 1
Variable
Categories
Gender
Male
Female
Aged 1934
Aged 3544
Aged 4554
Aged 5564
Aged 65 and older
Asian
Black
South Asian
White
Other
Born in Canada
Immigrated to
Canada
Less than high
school
High school
Community college
or technical
school diploma
Bachelors degree
or higher
Less than $40,000
$40,00059,999
$60,00079,999
$80,00099,999
$100,000149,999
$150,000 or more
Missing
Age
Racial identity
Immigrant
status
Educational
attainment
Household
income
Survey
sample
N = 732
%
Vancouver
Census
2006
%
Survey
sample
N = 863
%
Census
2006
%
35.4
64.6
20.4
18.5
23.6
19.6
17.8
3.0
6.4
4.1
79.3
7.1
65.3
34.7
47.3
52.7
29.7
21.0
18.3
13.0
17.9
13.3
8.4
12.1
53.0
13.2
47.8
52.2
32.8
67.2
12.5
16.4
23.7
26.9
20.5
6.1
0.2
5.1
82.7
5.9
72.3
27.7
48.2
51.8
28.6
21.2
20.3
14.1
15.8
23.5
1.0
10.9
54.7
9.9
56.5
43.5
5.2
20.4
5.2
17.5
24.7
15.3
24.3
25.8
35.4
18.6
26.9
30.5
54.8
29.5
40.7
25.0
15.4
12.3
14.3
10.1
14.3
16.9
16.5
15.4
11.5
11.6
10.4
18.0
14.3
18.9
metal, musical theater, gospel, blues, new age, big band, golden oldies,
world/international, disco. Respondents were also asked Youve mentioned that you like <list of likes>. Which one of these is your absolute
favourite? and Youve mentioned that you dislike <list of dislikes>.
Which one of these do you dislike the most? Distributions of these musical tastes variables for the 1,543 respondents who provided information
for them are described in Table 2.
Classical
Rock
Pop
Blues
Golden oldies
Jazz
Easy listening
Musical theater
Folk music
Big band
World/international
Reggae
Gospel
Country music
Choral music
Disco
Opera
New age
Hip hop
Rap
Heavy metal
74.3
67.6
65.1
63.4
62.1
61.7
59.1
57.1
55.5
52.6
52.0
46.5
44.6
43.6
42.5
41.0
39.8
30.7
27.1
16.6
15.0
Like (%)
8.0
16.1
13.1
15.8
15.1
17.0
17.3
19.4
19.2
22.0
13.5
28.4
27.9
27.4
25.8
33.0
30.5
35.2
44.6
60.7
66.3
Dislike (%)
17.7
16.4
21.8
20.8
22.7
21.2
23.6
23.5
25.3
25.4
34.5
25.2
27.6
29.0
31.8
26.1
29.7
34.1
28.3
22.7
18.7
Neutral (%)
Rock
Classical
Pop
Jazz
Golden oldies
Country
Easy listening
Blues
Folk music
Hip hop
Opera
Gospel
World/international
Musical theater
Reggae
Big band
Disco
Choral music
Heavy metal
New age
Rap
Most liked
20.1
15.2
8.1
7.8
6.4
5.8
5.5
4.7
4.1
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.5
2.1
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.2
1.1
0.8
0.5
Heavy metal
Rap
Country
Hip hop
Opera
Gospel
Disco
New age
Easy listening
Reggae
Musical theater
Choral music
Jazz
Rock
Folk music
Classical
Golden oldies
Pop
Big band
World/international
Blues
Most disliked
Table 2
33.7
26.5
7.0
6.0
5.0
2.8
2.5
2.3
2.0
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.2
1.2
1.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.4
0.3
144
CRS/RCS, 52.2 2015
145
RESULTS
Musical Field
In a relational musical field, musical tastes attain their meaning primarily in relation to one another. Table 3 describes bivariate relationships
between the 21 musical likes/dislikes variables. Although most of the associations are positive, some of the stronger positive associations, such as
those between rap and hip hop, choral and gospel, choral and folk, opera
and classical, reggae and rock, and jazz and blues, may reflect blurred
or overlapping boundaries between genres. Negative associations between
musical tastes are few and far between, the strongest of which are between
hip hop and choral, hip hop and folk, heavy metal and choral, heavy metal
and easy listening, and heavy metal and golden oldies.
Bourdieu ([1979] 1984) used correspondence analysis to craft his depictions of the fields of capitals, lifestyles, and habitus in France. To create
a visual rendering of a relational musical field in this study, I applied
the Burt method approach to MCA to the 21 musical likes/dislikes variables and plotted the primary dimensions derived from it in a multidimensional space. The first two dimensions extracted by the MCA explained
78.3 percent of the total variability, with 53.2 percent of the variability attributable to Dimension 1 and 25.2 percent of the variability attributable
to Dimension 2. The variable categories are plotted visually in Figure 1,
with Dimension 1 forming the vertical axis and Dimension 2 forming the
horizontal axis. The predominant pattern of musical tastes in Figure 1 is
the presence of distinct clusters of categories that illuminate three collectives of people: the members of Quadrant 1 who like most, if not all, musical
genres (inclusive musical omnivores); people located in the lower half of
the field who dislike most genres; and the members of Quadrant 4 who are
ambivalent about or unfamiliar with many of the genres.
Next, I applied LCA to the set of 21 musical tastes. The loadings of the
variable categories for the three classes produced by the LCA are presented
in Table 4. Class 1 closely resembles Quadrant 1 of Figure 1, with high loadings for liking all genres excepting hip hop, rap, and heavy metal (nearly
inclusive musical omnivores). Class 2 strongly overlaps with Quadrant
3 of Figure 1, with high loadings for disliking all genres excepting classical and easy listening but also for liking classical, easy listening, golden
oldies, pop, and rock. Class 3 strongly overlaps with Quadrant 4, with high
loadings for ambivalent attitudes toward all but classical and rock and
for liking classical, pop, jazz, rock, and blues. The LCA therefore illuminates characteristics of the clustering of musical tastes that are perhaps
not readily apparent in the MCA, namely, that liking classical, liking pop,
liking rock, disliking rap, and disliking heavy metal effectively traverse
all three classes and that liking hip hop, liking rap, liking heavy metal,
disliking classical, and disliking easy listening do not meaningfully fit in
0.106
0.108
0.233
hip hop
classical
0.203
0.131
0.073
0.266
0.167
0.163
0.100
0.107
0.144
0.158
0.164
0.149
0.485
0.062
0.208
0.109
0.172
0.136
0.192
0.142
0.238
0.169
0.073
0.086
0.253
0.203
0.076
0.319
0.058
0.068
0.204
choral
0.172
0.098
0.150
0.112
0.155
0.272
0.324
0.184
0.168
0.244
0.191
0.208
0.128
0.303
0.110
0.295
0.163
folk
0.215
0.234
0.236
0.139
0.237
0.254
0.226
0.123
0.106
0.166
0.225
0.109
0.185
0.109
0.130
0.078
rap
0.101
0.068
0.139
0.090
0.074
0.246
0.172
0.242
0.080
0.093
0.105
0.136
0.132
0.113
0.099
0.168
opera
0.143
0.104
0.169
0.080
0.116
0.080
0.091
0.224
0.182
0.165
0.122
0.185
0.141
0.218
0.135
country
0.198
0.109
0.218
0.123
0.199
0.094
0.190
0.219
0.121
0.087
0.176
0.243
0.091
0.146
pop
0.171
0.220
0.184
0.333
0.096
0.174
0.130
0.192
0.188
0.145
0.172
0.110
0.260
jazz
0.116
0.200
0.137
0.091
0.192
0.188
0.427
0.153
0.266
0.149
0.179
0.122
easy
listening
0.094
0.113
0.131
0.236
0.129
0.089
0.176
0.171
0.277
0.112
0.196
reggae
0.313
0.219
0.130
0.202
0.255
0.237
0.188
0.152
0.221
0.234
rock
0.268
0.107
0.091
0.218
0.187
0.154
0.143
0.118
0.224
heavy
metal
0.102
0.110
0.123
0.167
0.120
0.125
0.112
0.116
musical
theater
0.290
0.182
0.184
0.299
0.281
0.201
0.224
gospel
0.235
0.163
0.246
0.222
0.217
0.161
blues
0.220
0.271
0.184
0.211
0.184
new
age
0.208
0.150
0.247
0.231
big
band
0.402
0.231
0.217
golden
oldies
0.201
0.213
Notes: Each cell contains a Cramers V value. Cramers V ranges from a low of zero, representing no relationship, to a high of one, representing a perfect relationship.
Values in bold are positive relationships wherein people who liked the one genre tended to like the other and/or people who disliked the one genre tended to dislike the other.
Values in italics are negative relationships wherein people who liked the one genre were relatively unlikely to like the other and/or people who disliked the one genre were relatively unlikely to dislike the other.
Values in neither bold or italics are not so straightforwardly described and empty cells in the table indicate relationships that were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
hip hop
choral
folk
rap
opera
country
pop
jazz
easy listening
reggae
rock
heavy metal
musical theater
gospel
blues
new age
big band
golden oldies
world/international
disco
Table 3
0.210
world/
int.
146
CRS/RCS, 52.2 2015
147
Figure 1
Quadrant 4
neutral rap
neutral heavy metal
neutral hip hop
like new age most
neutral reggae
neutral disco
neutral golden oldies neutral gospel neutral choralneutral opera
neutral new age
neutral big band
dislike new age most
neutral country
neutral folk
neutral musical theater
neutral rock
like new age
like musical theater most
like jazz most
neutral easy listening like world/international most
like folk most
like blues most like big band
neutral blues
pop
dislike blues most neutral
like musical theater
dislike world/international most like reggae
like big band most
neutral world/international
like disco
like
jazz
like
blues
neutral jazz
gospel
dislike easy listening most
like world/international likelike
like pop most
like pop like
like rock
neutral classical
classical like folk like opera
choral
like rock most
dislike heavy
dislike musical theater most
like most
heavy metal like golden oldies
like easy listening
most metal
dislike jazz most
like hip hoplike easy listening like country
dislike choral most
like golden oldies most
Dimension 2
dislike folk most
dislike golden oldies most
like rap
dislike gospel most
like opera most
dislike rap most
like disco most
dislike big band most
dislike heavy metal like classical most
dislike country most
dislike hip hop most like gospel most
dislike rap
dislike disco most
dislike reggae most
like country most
like choral most
dislike hip hop
like reggae most
dislike opera most
dislike country
dislike easy listening
dislike disco
dislike opera
dislike new age
like hip hop most
like heavy metal most
dislike gospel
dislike choral
dislike folk
dislike reggae
dislike rock
dislike jazz
dislike musical theater
dislike big band
like rap most
dislike golden oldies
dislike pop
dislike world/international
dislike blues
dislike classical
Legend
musical like/dislike (active)
most liked genre (supplementary)
Quadrant 3
Dimension 1
Quadrant 2
any of them. That is, the predominant pattern evident in the MCA of musical tastes, that distinguishing between liking musical genres in general,
disliking musical genres in general or feeling ambivalent about musical
genres in general, is not monolithic in its manifestation.
To further investigate this point, the most liked and most disliked
musical genres were overlaid on the MCA plot as supplementary variables
(Figure 1). When pushed to declare their strongest musical allegiances, the
inclusive musical omnivores of Quadrant 1 are relatively likely to favor big
band, blues, folk, jazz, musical theater, and new age over all others and to
dislike easy listening, heavy metal, new age, and world/international most
of all. The denizens of Quadrant 3 are relatively likely to favor heavy metal,
hip hop, reggae, and rap over all others and to dislike classical, opera, and
rock most of all whereas the inhabitants of Quadrant 4 are relatively likely
to favor pop, rock, and world/international and to dislike blues and musical
theater most of all. Again, tastes in music are not perfectly captured by
the predominant pattern evident in Figure 1.
Class 2
0.615
0.232
0.320
0.444
0.309
0.420
0.531
0.420
0.592
0.301
0.523
0.378
0.295
0.402
0.203
0.322
0.514
0.394
0.284
Class 1
0.899
0.279
0.667
0.827
0.580
0.633
0.812
0.864
0.770
0.605
0.766
0.855
0.742
0.890
0.464
0.857
0.900
0.731
0.622
0.430
0.262
0.569
0.243
0.361
0.426
0.412
0.296
0.282
0.258
0.592
0.536
0.418
0.456
0.704
Class 3
0.688
0.288
0.257
0.373
classical - dislike
hip hop - dilike
choral - dislike
folk - dislike
rap - dislike
opera - dislike
country - dislike
pop - dislike
jazz - dislike
easy listening - dislike
reggae - dislike
rock - dislike
heavy metal - dislike
musical theater - dislike
gospel - dislike
blues - dislike
new age - dislike
big band - dislike
golden oldies - dislike
world/international - dislike
disco - dislike
0.262
0.700
0.573
0.402
Class 1
Class 2
0.210
0.680
0.528
0.410
0.786
0.550
0.424
0.335
0.411
0.280
0.621
0.374
0.814
0.487
0.574
0.453
0.652
0.551
0.382
0.376
0.615
0.251
0.204
0.232
0.517
0.515
0.278
0.298
0.313
0.208
Class 3
Notes: To facilitate interpretation of the classes, values greater than 0.500 are in bold and values less than 0.200 have been deleted
.
classical - like
hip hop - like
choral - like
folk - like
rap - like
opera - like
country - like
pop - like
jazz - like
easy listening - like
reggae - like
rock - like
heavy metal - like
musical theater - like
gospel - like
blues - like
new age - like
big band - like
golden oldies - like
world/international - like
disco - like
classical - neutral
hip hop - neutral
choral - neutral
folk - neutral
rap - neutral
opera - neutral
country - neutral
pop - neutral
jazz - neutral
easy listening - neutral
reggae - neutral
rock - neutral
heavy metal - neutral
musical theater - neutral
gospel - neutral
blues - neutral
new age - neutral
big band - neutral
golden oldies - neutral
world/international - neutral
disco - neutral
0.231
0.274
0.219
0.230
0.266
0.237
0.319
0.228
Class 1
0.230
Class 2
Loadings on Three Classes from the Latent Class Analysis of Musical Likes/Dislikes
Table 4
Class 3
0.273
0.399
0.534
0.456
0.346
0.440
0.444
0.358
0.365
0.422
0.409
0.217
0.333
0.454
0.505
0.368
0.553
0.513
0.469
0.536
0.453
148
CRS/RCS, 52.2 2015
149
Figure 2
Quadrant 4
$150 or more
Black
Asian
19 - 34
45 - 54
$60 - 79,999
55 - 64
postgraduate born in Canada
university
female
35 - 44
high school White
$100 - 149,999
immigrated > 20 years $80 - 99,999
< $40,000
male
$40 - 59,999 community college or technical school
65 and older
other racial identity
Dimension 2
South Asian
Quadrant 3
Dimension 1
Quadrant 2
150
151
Table 5
City of residence
Vancouver
Toronto (reference)
Gender
Female
Male (reference)
Age
Age in years
Age age
Racial identity
Asian
Black
South Asian
Other
White (reference)
Immigrant status
Immigrated >20 years ago
Immigrated 20 years ago
Born in Canada (reference)
Education
Less than high school
High school
Community college or technical school
University
Postgraduate degree (reference)
Household income
<$40,000
$40,00059,999
$60,00079,999
$80,00099,999
$100,000149,999
$150,000 or more (reference)
N
F(p)
R2
Beta
0.234
....
0.027
....
0.559
....
0.056
....
***
0.249
0.002
***
0.629
0.374
1.009
0.215
....
0.032
0.016
0.052
0.013
....
1.006
0.591
....
0.099
0.042
....
0.316
0.514
0.242
0.183
....
0.017
0.058
0.022
0.020
....
0.354
0.769
0.472
0.629
0.571
....
1,503
4.95 (<0.001)
.063
0.031
0.061
0.039
0.047
0.052
....
***
Notes: Musical omnivorism is coded as the number of musical likes (maximum 21) professed by each
respondent.
*p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.
metal. That is, the vast majority of the 21 musical likes are classed, often
strongly so, with positive and negative relationships both well represented.
Table 6 also summarizes results from binary logistic regression models applied to recoded versions of the musical tastes variables that combine the like and neutral categories. They indicate that highly educated
White, postgraduate
Born in Canada
Classical
Hip hop
Choral
Heavy metal
Gospel
Musical theater
Reggae
Rock
Jazz
Easy listening
Pop
Country
Opera
Folk
Rap
Musical style
Table 6
152
CRS/RCS, 52.2 2015
Blues
Disco
World/international
Golden oldies
New age
Big band
Musical style
Continued
Table 6
154
DISCUSSION
This study is situated in mostly virgin territory in regard to investigating class position and musical tastes, namely, urban English-speaking
Canada. Previous research indicates that attending classical music performances, choral concerts, and operas and playing musical instruments are
highbrow activities in English-speaking Canadian society (Veenstra 2010)
and that classical music, opera, jazz, soul, rhythm and blues, country music, and pop are popular tastes among upper-class high school students in
Toronto (Tanner, Asbridge, and Wortley 2008). Among adults in Englishspeaking Canada, however, the class bases of musical tastes have not yet
been investigated. An MCA applied to 21 musical tastes in my sample
of adults from Toronto and Vancouver revealed a cluster of musical likes
and dislikes wherein people who liked one form of music tended to like
many others as well. Upon further examination, however, the coherence
and salience of this musical omnivore fell away. For one, when pushed
to choose a favorite musical genre, the musical omnivores were relatively
likely to favor some musical stylesbig band, blues, folk, jazz, musical theater, and new ageover all others, indicating that not all musical tastes
were equal in their eyes. More to point, the number of musical genres liked
by the survey respondents was not associated with class position.
These results call to mind insights emerging from Will Atkinsons (2011) interviews in Bristol, England regarding specious
omnivorousness. Atkinson found that, when the topic of musical tastes
155
was first broached in his interviews, the opening response of many interviewees, from all kinds of different class positions, was to explicitly
present their predilections as varied [..], diverse [..] and almost comically
eclectic [..]. They listened to all sorts [..], they said, a fair range [..], a
mish-mash [..]in short they listened to pretty much anything [..] and
a scoop of everything (p. 174). That is to say, they claimed to be musical
omnivores. Delving further into interviewees musical preferences, when
pushed to elaborate on their musical tastes the upper-class omnivores
tended to speak more often and in more depth about classical and opera
than did the other omnivores. These people, many steeped in classical music as children (perhaps by learning to play a noble instrument such as
the piano or violin), demonstrated quite sophisticated understandings of
these highbrow musical forms. In short, Atkinson found that the musical
omnivorism apparent in his interview sample was in fact specious; beneath
peoples claims for cosmopolitanism sensibilities reposed tastes that were
perfectly in line with the highbrow/lowbrow distinction foundational to
the Bourdieusian homology framework. In my study, having almost equal
numbers of relatively highbrow and lowbrow musical tastes in my survey
questionnaire was a happenstance that allowed the epiphenomenal qualities of the musical omnivorism to emerge in the statistical analyses. It
may be that musical omnivorism is as specious in Toronto and Vancouver
as it is in Bristol.
Peterson (2005) questions whether music remains an adequate index
of status in any conceptualization, arguing that the
status-giving value of all kinds of musical tastes has been deflated by musics
increasingly widespread use in commercial advertisements, movie soundtracks, and as ambient sound to control mood in public spaces. The appreciation of classical music, rock, techno, and country can hardly be expected
to retain their status-making value if they are increasingly commodified and
easy to acquire. (P. 266)
156
157
delineated or maintained by them in social interactions. Follow-up qualitative inquiry into modes of musical appreciation and consumption and their
class underpinnings is required in order to fully understand the nature of
the stratification of musical tastes in urban English-speaking Canada.
Finally, the degree to which musical tastes in Canada are prescribed by necessity remains opaque. Tony Bennett (2011) claims that
Bourdieus account of the working-class choice of the necessary deprives
working-class culture of any possible positive content except for purely defensive practices (p. 532). It is true that, for Bourdieu, neither highbrow
nor lowbrow culture is equated with the best that has been thought and
known in the world as it was for Matthew Arnold in 1889. Highbrow culture in particular does not necessarily reside in the realms of philosophy,
literature, or the arts nor does it possess universal or timeless qualities
simply by definition. Highbrow tastes are not necessarily intrinsically sophisticated or common but rather adopt these qualities by virtue of their
locations in relationally defined social spaces of capitals within which social classes are potentially made manifest. And there is movement in and
out of the brow categories over time as well: members of the middle class
seek to adopt aspects of upper-class culture, members of the upper class
try to outflank the middle class by appropriating lowbrow culture, and
so forth. A depiction of a homology between class position and taste that
relies upon freedom from necessity to explain what constitutes highbrow
or lowbrow tastes does something of an injustice to lower class people. Future research that uncovers the joyous complexity inherent to the ways in
which country, disco, easy listening, golden oldies, heavy metal, and rap
music (and others) are revealed in the lives of lower class Canadians would
also be welcome.
References
Achterberg, P. and D. Houtman 2005. The Politics of Omnivores: Cultural Capital, Multicultural Capital, and Political Tolerance. In: Annual Meetings of the International Institute
of Sociology, Stockholm.
Atkinson, W. 2011. The Context and Genesis of Musical Tastes: Omnivorousness Debunked,
Bourdieu Buttressed. Poetics 39:16986.
Bennett, T. 2011. Culture, Choice, Necessity: A Political Critique of Bourdieus Aesthetic.
Poetics 39:53046.
Bennett, T., M. Savage, E. Silva, A. Warde, M. Gayo-Cal and D. Wright. 2009. Culture, Class,
Distinction. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P. [1979] 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge:
Harvard University Press.
Bryson, B. 1996. Anything but Heavy Metal: Symbolic Exclusion and Musical Dislikes. American Sociological Review 61:88499.
Bryson, B. 1997. What about the Univores: Musical Dislikes and Group-Based Identity Construction among Americans with Low Levels of Education. Poetics 25:14156.
158
Carrabine, E. and B. Longhurst. 1999. Mosaics of Omnivorousness: Suburban Youth and Popular Music. New Formations 38:12540.
Coulangeon, P. and Y. Lemel. 2007. Is Distinction Really Outdated? Questioning the Meaning
of the Omnivorization of Musical Taste in Contemporary France. Poetics 35:93111.
Emmison, M. 2003. Social Class and Cultural Mobility. Journal of Sociology 39:21130.
Erickson, B.H. 1996. Culture, Class, and Connections. American Journal of Sociology 102:217
51.
Erickson, B.H. 2008. The Crisis in Culture and Equality. Pp. 34362 in Engaging Art: The
Next Great Transformation of Americas Cultural Life, edited by W. Ivey and S.J. Tepper.
New York, NY: Routledge.
Gans, H.J. 1974. Popular Culture and High Culture. New York: Basic Books.
Garca-Alvarez,
E., T. Katz-Gerro and J. Lopez-Sintas. 2007. Deconstructing Cultural Omnivorousness 1982-2002: Heterology in Americans Musical Preferences. Social Forces
86(2):41843.
Garnett, B., N. Guppy and G. Veenstra 2008. Careers Open to Talent: Educational Credentials,
Cultural Talent and Skilled Employment. Sociological Forum 23:14464.
Gayo-Cal, M., M. Savage and A. Warde. 2006. A Cultural Map of the United Kingdom, 2003.
Cultural Trends 15(2):21337.
Gebesmair, A. 1998. Musical Taste and Social Structure: The Theory of Omnivore in American
Sociology of Culture in the 1990s. Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 23:522.
Goldberg, A. 2011. Mapping Shared Understandings Using Relational Class Analysis: The Case
of the Cultural Omnivore Revisited. American Journal of Sociology 116(5):1397436.
Kahma, N. and A. Toikka. 2012. Cultural Map of Finland 2007: Analysing Cultural Differences
Using Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Cultural Trends 21(2):11331.
Le Roux, B., H. Rouanet, M. Savage and A. Warde. 2008. Class and Cultural Division in the
UK. Sociology 42(6):104971.
Lizardo, O. and S. Skiles 2012. Reconceptualizing and Theorizing Omnivorousness: Genetic
and Relational Mechanisms. Sociological Theory 30(4):26382.
Lopez-Sintas, J. and K. Zerva. 2005. Exploring the Omnivorousness Trend in the Musical
Taste Space. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Marketing and
Development, July 811, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Ollivier, M. 2008. Modes of Openness to Cultural Diversity: Humanist, Populist, Practical, and
Indifferent. Poetics 36:12047.
Peterson, R.A. 2005. Problems in Comparative Research: The Example of Omnivorousness.
Poetics 33:25782.
Peterson, R.A. and R.M. Kern. 1996. Changing High-Brow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore.
American Sociological Review 61:900907.
Peterson, R.A. and A. Simkus. 1992. How Musical Tastes Mark Occupational Status Groups.
Pp. 15286 in Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality,
edited by M. Lamont and M. Fournier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prior, N. 2013. Bourdieu and the Sociology of Music Consumption: A Critical Assessment of
Recent Developments. Sociology Compass 7(3):18193.
Rimmer, M. 2012. Beyond Omnivores and Univores: The Promise of a Concept of Musical
Habitus. Cultural Sociology 6(3):299318.
Savage, M. 2006. The Musical Field. Cultural Trends 15(2/3):15974.
159
Sonnett, J. 2004. Musical Boundaries: Intersections of Form and Content. Poetics 32:24764.
Swartz, D. 1997. Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Tampubolon, G. 2008a. Distinction in Britain, 20012004? Unpacking Homology and the Aesthetics of the Popular Class. European Societies 10:403428.
Tampubolon, G. 2008b. Revisiting Omnivores in America Circa 1990s: The Exclusiveness of
Omnivores? Poetics 36(23):24364.
Tanner, J., M. Asbridge and S. Wortley. 2008. Our Favourite Melodies: Musical Consumption
and Teenage Lifestyles. British Journal of Sociology 59(1):11744.
Vander Stichele, A. and R. Laermans. 2006. Cultural Participation in Flanders: Testing the
Cultural Omnivore Thesis with Population Data. Poetics 34(1):4564.
van Eijck, K. 2001. Social Differentiation in Musical Taste Patterns. Social Forces 79(3):1163
84.
Veblen, T. [1899] 1994. The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New
York: Penguin Books.
Veenstra, G. 2010. Culture and Class in Canada. Canadian Journal of Sociology 35(1):83111.
Warde, A., D. Wright and M. Gayo-Cal. 2007. Understanding Cultural Omnivorousness: or,
the Myth of the Cultural Omnivore. Cultural Sociology 1(2):14364.