Professional Documents
Culture Documents
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Objectives
This study sought to:
a) Determine the proximate composition of Jatropha curcas
seeds ;
b) Determine the free fatty acid content of Jatropha curcas
oil from 3 different provenances;
c) Compare the properties of 3 Jatropha curcas oils from
other oils accepted for potential uses as biodiesel and
for other industrial applications
lobed,
hypostomatic
and
stomata
are
of
paracytic
occurs
flowers. Ten stamens are arranged in two distinct whorls of five each
in a single column in the androecium, and in close proximity to each
other. In the gynoecium, the three slender styles are connate to
about two-thirds of their length, dilating to massive bifurcate stigma
(Dehgan and Webster, 1979). Each inflorescence yields a bunch of
approximately 10 or more ovoid fruits. With good rainfall conditions
nursery plants may bear fruits after the first rainy season, and
directly sown plants after the second rainy season. Three, bivalved
cocci is formed after the seeds mature and the fleshy exocarp dries.
The seeds mature about 34 months after flowering. Under optimal
conditions, jatropha usually flowers about 3 to 6 months after the
seeds have been sown. The time from flower induction to fruit
maturation is 90 days. The female flowers produce fruits that are
first green, and turn yellow when ripening. Later the yellow fruit hull
turns brown nd black when they dry (The Jatropha Handbook: From
Cultivation to Application. 2010).
Because of the vast semi-wild distribution of J. curcas in
different parts of the world there should be a considerable amount
of
genetic
variation among
gas
accumulation
in
the
atmosphere.
These
of
the
product
(http://www.aescl.missouri.edu/Prox.html.)
Gubitz et al reported that analysis of Jatropha curcas
seeds shows that it contains; moisture 6.62; protein 18.2; fat 38.0;
carbohydrates 17.30; fibre 15.50; and ash 4.5% (Gubitz et al, 1999).
The oil content is 35 to 40% in the seeds and 50 to 60% in the
kernel (Gubitz et al, 1999). The oil contains 21% saturated fatty
acids and 79% unsaturated fatty acids (Gubitz et al, 1999). It has
also been found that there are some chemicals element in the seeds
which possess poisonous and purgative properties and render the oil
non edible for human consumption. It is also been stated that
technologies are now available, whereby it could be possible to
convert Jatropha oil into an
edible oil which could prove to be a boon for developing countries
(Gubitz et al, 1999). The oil is obtained from decorticates seeds by
expression or solvent extraction and is known in trade as Jatropha.
In general, the oil is reported to be mixed with groundnut oil for
adulteration. This indicates the possibilities of obtaining edible oil
from Jatropha oil base (Gubitz et al, 1999).
9
is
important
for
removes them from the organism, and obesity and even cancer.
According to data, up to 13-14 %of crude fiber is found in seeds
(Tarek et al., 2001). Crude fiber contains cellulose, lignin and
hemicelluloses, but not necessarily all of these are present in a
sample (AOAC 1984). There are several methods of fiber analysis,
among other methods of crude fiber, detergent method and the
enzymatic methods each have advantages and disadvantages.
2.2.5 Carbohydrates
Total
carbohydrate
consists
of
sugars
(mono
and
oils, containing a low FFA level, are currently used for commercial
biodiesel production. Although waste greases such as yellow grease
and brown grease, containing a FFA level of 15% and 33%
respectively, are considered as the attractive feedstocks for
biodiesel synthesis because of its wide availability and low cost
compared to food-grade vegetable oils.
reported that if the feedstock has a high amount of free fatty acids,
much higher than the maximum amount suitable to be used with
basic homogeneous catalyst, high amount of soap would be
produced
simultaneously
with
the
transesterification
reaction.
exposing the oil to open atmospheric air and sunlight for long time
would cause the concentration of FFA to increase significantly. The
FFA content of the oil would vary and depend on the quality of
feedstock. Furthermore, other researchers have worked with raw
materials having higher FFA levels using alternative processes,
which included pretreatment step to reduce the FFA of these raw
materials.
Increased levels of FFA in fats have been shown to reduce the
digestibility and thus energy content of fats. On the average, each
increase of 10 percentage units in FFA results in a corresponding
reduction in digestible energy of 1.3 and 1.5 percentage units in
weanling and growing pigs, respectively, (Powles, et al. 1995.
Journal of Animal Science 61:149). A common source of vegetable
fat used in blended feed fats is acidulated soapstock. This byproduct of edible oil refining has very high FFA since it was
intimately exposed to water and acid during its production. High
levels of FFA should be considered when estimating energy content
of fats for feeding.
will
vary and depend on the quality of feedstock. The FFA and moisture
contents have significant effects on the transesterification of
glycerides with alcohol using catalyst (Goodrum, 2002). The high
FFA content (>1% w/w) will happen soap formation and the
separation of products will be exceedingly difficult, and as a result,
it has low yield of biodiesel product. The acid-catalyzedesterification
of the oil is an alternative (Crabbe et al., 2001), but it is much
slower
than
the
base-catalyzed
trans-esterification
reaction.
18
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Seed Samples
Hereunder is the list of the three (3) Jatropha curcas
provenances that were entrusted to the researcher by the Science
Department of Mindanao State University General Santos City.
Indicated are the names and the country of origin.
Name
Country
1.) Tubao-PhilBio
Philippines
2.) India-D1
India
3,) Mexican-PhilBio
Mexico
19
mortar and pestle. The collected kernels were then pulverized using
a Waring blender.
20
x 100
21
23
which mean that there are slight differences between the chemical
compositions of seeds from different provenances used in the study.
Composition
Tubao-
India D1
Phibio
Moisture
6.6
MexicanPhibio
6.38
5.69
24
Ash
4.57
4.92
4.41
Crude fat
37.03
36.76
35.86
Crude fiber
12.93
13.88
13.83
Crude protein
15.7
16.71
16.64
Carbohydrates
21.18
19.35
21.52
reported
by
Berchmans
and
Hirata,
an
important
than
1%
so
that
the
oil
can
directly
be
utilized
in
in
transesterification
reaction.
The
Mexican-Philbio
26
Analysis
value
value
Moisture
0.0147
Ash
0.0690
F crit
Remarks
9.2208
5.1432
Significantly different
4.3124
5.1432
Not significantly
different
Not significantly
Crude Fat
0.3898
1.1066
5.1432
different
Not significantly
Crude Fiber
0.1393
2.7863
5.1432
different
27
Not significantly
Crude Protein
0.2139
2.0162
5.1432
different
Not significantly
Carbohydrates
0.3336
1.3253
5.1432
different
0.0059
9.0538
4.0661
Significantly different
28
can be converted into biodiesel. The oil from its seeds is the most
valuable product since it can be converted into biodiesel. Biodiesel
has become more attractive as an alternative to fossil diesel
because of its environmental benefits and the fact that it is made
from renewable resources. J. curcas L. is a promising source of
biodiesel since its seeds contain high amount of oil and the species
29
of
J.curcas
are
currently
underutilized/
LITERATURE CITED
30
Adebowale,
K.O.
and
C.O.
Adedire.
2006.
Chemical
of
experimental
conditions
for
biodiesel
Goering CE, Schwab AW, Daugherty MJ, Pryde EH, Heakin AJ.
Fuel properties of eleven oils. Trans ASAE 1982;25:147283.
Klass, D. L. Biomass for Renewable Energy, Fuels, and
Chemicals. Academic Press, London. 1998, p. 335
31
oil
seed
plant
Jatropha
curcas
L.
Bioresource
Makkar,
H.P.S.,
Aderibigbe,
A.O.,
Becker,
K.,
1998.
Wang, P.S. M.E. Tat and J.V. Gerpen. 2005. The production of
fatty acid isopropyl esters and their uses as a diesel fuel. J.
Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 82: 845-849. (Received for publication 7
March 2009)
32
33
Appendix A
Procedures
Sample preparation
Ash and Moisture Determination
Equipment/ Apparatus
Tare. Distribute the sample evenly on the pan. Close the dryer.
Press START.
34
35
Run the blank using the same size of the filter paper.
Subtract the weight obtained from the weight of the fat
in the sample.
% Crude Fat = corrected weight of the fat x 100
Weight of the dry sample
Gooch crucibles
Oven
muffle furnace
dessicator
36
x 100
Appendix B
Documentation
Sample Preparation
38
Constant Weighing
39
40
Appendix C
Raw Data
41
Replicate
No.
Moisture
Ash
Fat
Fiber
Protein
Carbohydra
tes
1
2
6.6
6.59
4.56
4.64
37.2
35.48
12.8
13.42
14.54
16.22
23.3
21.65
12.56
12.92667
16.34
15.7
18.58
21.1766666
7
3
Ave
6.62
4.5
38.4
6.603333 4.566667 37.02667
Table 2 India-D1
Replicate
No.
1
2
Moisture
Ash
Fat
Fiber
Protein
Carbohydrates
6.2
6.43
5.3
4.56
37.7
36.32
13.43
13.62
17.1
16.53
19.27
20.54
6.5
4.9
36.25
14.6
16.5
18.25
Ave
6.376667
4.92
36.75667
13.88333
16.71
19.35333333
Table 3 Mexican-PhilBio
Replicate
No.
Moisture
Ash
Fat
Fiber
Protein
Carbohydrates
6.2
4.4
36.35
13.43
16.6
22.02
2
3
5.43
5.43
4.43
4.4
35.74
35.5
13.62
14.6
16.12
17.2
22.66
19.87
Ave
5.686667
4.41
35.86333
13.88333
16.64
21.51666667
Appendix D
Statistical Analysis
42
MOISTURE
Let the following be:
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
3
3
Sum
19.81
19.13
Averag
e
6.603
6.377
Varian
ce
0.000
0.025
17.06
5.687
0.198
Count
SS
1.3677555
56
df
MS
P-value
F crit
0.684
9.221
0.015
5.143
43
Within Groups
0.445
Total
1.8127555
56
0.074
6.
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
44
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
3
3
Sum
13.70
14.76
Average
4.57
4.92
Varian
ce
0.00
0.14
13.23
4.41
0.00
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
SS
df
MS
0.409
0.285
2
6
0.205
0.047
Total
0.694
Pvalue
F crit
4.312
0.069
5.143
6.
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
45
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
3
3
Sum
111.08
110.27
Average
37.03
36.76
Varian
ce
2.15
0.67
107.59
35.86
0.19
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
SS
df
MS
2.22
6.03
2
6
1.11
1.00
Total
8.25
Pvalue
F crit
1.11
0.39
5.14
6.
FIBER
Let the following be:
46
1. Hypothesis:
Level of significance:
2. Test Statistic:
3. Critical Region:
4. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
3
3
Sum
38.78
41.65
Average
12.93
13.88
Varian
ce
0.20
0.39
41.65
13.88
0.39
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
SS
df
MS
1.83
1.97
2
6
0.92
0.33
Total
3.80
Pvalue
F crit
2.79
0.14
5.14
5.
PROTEIN
Let the following be:
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
3
3
Sum
47.10
50.13
Average
15.70
16.71
Varian
ce
1.01
0.11
49.92
16.64
0.29
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
SS
df
MS
1.91
2.84
2
6
0.95
0.47
Total
4.75
Pvalue
F crit
2.02
0.21
5.14
48
6.
CARBOHYDRATES
Let the following be:
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
Anova: Single
Factor
SUMMARY
Groups
Tubao-Philbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
3
3
Sum
63.53
58.06
Average
21.18
19.35
Varian
ce
5.74
1.32
64.55
21.52
2.14
49
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within Groups
SS
df
MS
8.12
18.38
2
6
4.06
3.06
Total
26.50
Pvalue
F crit
1.33
0.33
5.14
6.
1. Hypothesis:
2. Level of significance:
3. Test Statistic:
4. Critical Region:
5. Computations:
SUMMARY
50
Groups
TubaoPhilbio
India D1
Mexican PhilBio
Count
Sum
Average
0.1566666
67
1.0266666
67
0.1933333
33
Variance
3.33333E05
0.0006333
33
0.0002333
33
MS
0.7263444
44
Pvalu
F
e
2421.1481 1.9E
48
-09
0.0018
0.0003
1.4544888
89
0.47
3.08
0.58
ANOVA
Source of
Variation
Between
Groups
Within
Groups
Total
SS
1.4526888
89
df
6.
7. Conclusion: At 5% level of significance, based on sample
results, there is sufficient evidence to claim that not all
population mean moisture content of the three J. curcas
provenances are equal.
51
F crit
5.1432
53