Professional Documents
Culture Documents
System
Manual Template
Version 3
For (Organisation Name)
Intentionally Blank
Page 2 of 34
1 INTRODUCTION
This Safety Management System (SMS) Manual has been developed to direct all personnel in
the safe operations of the organisation, in terms of all aspects of the business including flight
safety and environmental safety. The manual defines the policy that governs the operation of
the organisation. SMS is a proactive, integrated approach to safety management and is part
of an overall management process that the organisation has adopted to achieve its goals and
objectives. It embraces the principle that the proactive identification and management of risk
increases the likelihood of achieving safe outcomes. Hazards can be identified and dealt with
systematically through the Hazard Reporting Program that facilitates continuing
improvement and professionalism. Auditing and monitoring processes ensure that operations
are carried out in such a way as to not only minimize the risks inherent in the operation, but
meet best practice in terms of other legislative responsibilities including environmental
responsibility under the Resource Management Act 1991 and the Hazardous Substances and
New Organisms Act 1996.
Compliance with this manual is intended to be the cornerstone of allowing the business to
grow in a managed fashion, and coupled as it is with the AIRCARE Management System
and the sector specific codes of practice, should enable the organisation to meet the
expectations of all our regulators. To achieve a truly sustainable future this organisation must:
Operate in compliance with the Civil Aviation Act and the Civil Aviation Rules and
other applicable laws
Maintain accreditation under the AIRCARE Program
Keep all personnel, visitors and customers free from harm
Manage a realistic profit strategy
I invite all company personnel to adopt the rules, procedures and philosophies detailed in this
manual.
Dated
Page 3 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 4 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 5 of 34
Page 6 of 34
1.2 Index
1
INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................3
1.1
Compliance Flowchart....................................................................................4
1.2
Index................................................................................................................5
1.3
Record of Amendments....................................................................................7
1.4
1.5
Abbreviations..................................................................................................9
1.6
Definitions.....................................................................................................10
1.7
Document Control.........................................................................................12
1.8
Scope.............................................................................................................13
1.9
NZ Legislation...............................................................................................13
1.10
Compliance...................................................................................................14
1.11
Referenced Documents..................................................................................14
2.1
2.2
Safety Policy..................................................................................................16
2.3
Safety Principles............................................................................................17
2.4
2.5
2.6
Rewards.........................................................................................................18
2.7
Safety Promotion...........................................................................................18
Organisation Structure.................................................................................................19
Safety Accountabilities..................................................................................................19
4.1
CEO Responsibilities:...................................................................................19
4.2
4.3
4.4
Reserved........................................................................................................................21
Page 7 of 34
Occurrences...................................................................................................................24
7.2
7.1
8.1
9
Management Reviews....................................................................................26
10
11
12
Continual Improvement...........................................................................................29
Page 8 of 34
PAGES CHANGED
EFFECTI
VE DATE
DATE
ENTERE
D
New
Manual
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
1 October 2011
Page 9 of 34
1 October 2012
2011
ENTERED BY
(SIGNATURE)
1.4
1.5 List of Effective Pages
This table specifies the effective pages for this manual
Page No
Date
Page No
Date
01.10.12
26
01.10.12
01.10.12
27
01.10.12
01.10.12
28
01.10.12
01.10.12
29
01.10.12
01.10.12
30
01.10.12
01.10.12
01.10.12
01.10.12
01.10.12
10
01.10.12
11
01.10.12
12
01.10.12
13
01.10.12
14
01.10.12
15
01.10.12
16
01.10.12
17
01.10.12
18
01.10.12
19
01.10.12
20
01.10.12
21
01.10.12
22
01.10.12
23
01.10.12
24
01.10.12
25
01.10.12
Page No
01.10.12
1.6 Abbreviations
Page 10 of 34
1 October 2012
Date
Page No
Date
AMC
CAA
CAR
CEO
CPD
DGPS
EMS
EO
Executive Officer
FLT TRG
GIS
HSE
IAW
In Accordance With
NZAAA
NZHA
PC
Personal Computer
QA
Quality Assurance
R&D
RMA
SMS
SOP
TALO
TFO
Page 11 of 34
1 October 2012
1.7 Definitions
AIRCARE
Accreditation
Aircraft
Amenity Values
Approved Pattern
Tester
AIRCARE
Management
Committee
Controlled
General Aviation
Hazard
Occurrence
Organisation
Page 12 of 34
1 October 2011
Risk
Safety
Safety Management
System
Safety Officer
Page 13 of 34
1 October 2012
QA Manual
Operations
Manual
Maintenance
Manual
Aircraft Flight
Manual
Aircraft
Manufacturers
Maintenance
Forms
Register
Risk
Assessment
Register
Risk
Management
Manual (SoPs)
Page 14 of 34
1 October 2012
AIRCARE Codes
of Practice
1.9 Scope
This SMS Manual details what we will do to meet SMS requirements. It is the
management system for managing safety in the air and on the ground. This
management system embraces the following performance standards:
Risk Management Standard NZS ISO 31000 (current issue)
AIRCARE Accreditation Rules
NZS8409 Management of Agrichemicals (GROWSAFE current
issue)
SPREADMARK Code of Practice Aerial
AIRCARE Code of Practice for Aerial Application of Vertebrate
Toxic Agents
AIRCARE Code of Practice for Noise Abatement
AIRCARE Code of Practice for Flight Training
Air Ambulance / Air SAR Standards
AIRCARE Code of Practice for Fire Fighting
(Delete the ones that dont apply to you)
In terms of the RMA the first four codes are about managing discharges. Noise
abatement is about preserving amenity values whilst Flight Training, Fire Fighting
and Air Ambulance codes are performance standards that represent best pracrice in
those disciplines.
1.10 NZ Legislation
This SMS Manual is intended to facilitate compliance with the CAA Act 1990 and
Civil Aviation Rules, and other applicable legislation (which is referred to in the
respective codes of practice).
The principles laid out in this manual or any of the codes of practice do not replace,
repeal or override any laws (including statutes, regulations and rules), contractual
common or otherwise that may be in force from time to time, nor do they prejudice
any other remedies available to any party at common law.
Organisations need to have robust methods to ensure that they become aware of
changes in laws and the effects that those changes may have on their operations.
Page 15 of 34
1 October 2012
1.11 Compliance
For the purposes of this manual the word shall refers to practices that are mandatory
for compliance with the SMS Manual and the word should refers to practices that
are advised, recommended or are industry best practice.
Page 16 of 34
1 October 2012
2 SMS Manual
In the past under HSE Regulations we have identified hazards and treated those so as to
eliminate, minimize, or isolate their risks. Under a previous QA Program we have done the
same but have also recorded incidents that have created risk, for example to our finances, our
reputation, ourselves, our customers or the environment. Our SMS not only includes both of
these but builds on them. The whole point of SMS is that we identify things that could go
wrong before they go wrong. The following diagram shows how we do this.
This is the framework for our SMS
Mandate &
Commitment
Design of
framework
for managing
risk
Continual
improvem
ent of the
framework
Implementi
ng risk
manageme
nt
Monitoring
and review of
the
framework
Page 17 of 34
Page 18 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 19 of 34
1 October 2012
2.6 Rewards
Reward systems sometimes send the wrong message. Reinforced bad behaviour
breeds continued bad behaviour and that is unacceptable. This organisation is
committed to the principle that people should be rewarded for normal, positive
performance of their duties that comply with organisation standards. Personnel shall
not be rewarded for getting the job done by breaking the rules.
The organisations reward for demonstrating compliance with operations in
accordance with relevant AIRCARE Codes of Practice is Accreditation under the
AIRCARE program.
Page 20 of 34
1 October 2012
2011
3 Organisation Structure
The organisations structure detail follows. (The example is representative of an
organisation that operates four or more aircraft) Manual holders shall amend this
flow chart to represent their own circumstances
CEO
Safety Officer
Maintenance
Controller
Operations
Manager/
Chief Pilot
Company Pilots
Maintenance
Organisation
Competency
Manager
Part 141 Training
Organisation
Ground Crew
4 Safety Accountabilities
The following responsibilities listed are those individuals safety responsibilities and
these are additional to those detailed in the other manuals that make up the manual
suite.
Page 21 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 22 of 34
1 October 2012
5 Reserved
6
The systematic identification and control of all major hazards is the foundation. The
success of the organisation depends on the effectiveness of the Hazard Management
Page 23 of 34
1 October 2012
Sample Risk Assessment Forms and Occurrence and Hazard Identification Reports
appear as Annex D of the AIRCARE Accreditation Rules and the AIRCARE
Risk Matrix appears at Appendix E.
In this organisation we do not use the Risk Matrix for every situation because that is
not appropriate. All of the day to day risks that we have identified are managed
through training, personal protective equipment and adherence to the standard
operating procedures we have developed.
The following table is the guide we have adopted to determine when
the risk matrix will be used.
Matrix Not Suitable
Matrix Most
Matrix Partially
Page 24 of 34
1 October 2012
Nothing is new or
unusual
The job is well
understood as
are the risks
There are
established
procedures and
standards in
place
There is a
typically high
level of control
In emergency or
urgency
situations
So instead of matrix:
Identify hazards
eliminate /
avoid / protect
Standard
procedures
Professional
judgement
Good airmanship
Mindfulness
There is change.
(This can be
change internal
to the
organisation or
external) e.g. We
consider
extending our
fleet with a new
type or there is a
new regulation
Something is
new or unusual
Something is not
well understood
Procedures are
incomplete
There is
uncertainty
Risk tradeoffs are
being made
There is limited
control
Combine with:
Professional
judgement
Good practice
Group input
(discuss /
challenge /
debate)
Page 25 of 34
There is
technical
complexity
There is a very
high level of
risk
A procedure is
being designed
There is a very
high level of
uncertainty
7 Occurrences
When the Safety Officer is required to complete an occurrence investigation, all staff
shall be invited to make comment but senior personnel are required to make
comments. The Safety Officer is responsible to ensure all these relevant comments
from other personnel and the safety actions they have agreed are recorded in the
report. The report therefore, shall include all the relevant comments and also the
agreed remedial actions. Reports are closed when all remedial actions have been
taken. Occurrences shall be reviewed at the regular meetings. Personnel may
anonymously report hazards using the same report. Personnel who report shall be
treated fairly and justly, without punitive action from management except in the case
of known reckless disregard for regulations and standards, or repeated substandard
performance.
The Just Culture Process shown is used when deciding if disciplinary action is
appropriate.
Page 26 of 34
1 October 2012
2011
Page 27 of 34
28 of2012
34
1Page
October
Page 29 of 34
Page 30 of 34
1 October 2012
2011
Revie
w
Do work
under
normal
authority
No
Aircraft
or
Maint.
Yes
QA
LAME Assignment
Change
Field Maintenance
Crew Scheduling
Maint. Controller, QA
Maint. Controller, QA
Maint. Controller, QA
Perform
work
Processes
Change
Effect?
Yes
No
Do work
under
o
normal
authority
Design Change
Impleme
nt
New Equipment
Yes
Screen
for
MOC
Certification Team
Yes
Propose
d
Change
Approve
Yes
Ops.
No
Do work under normal
authority
Initiate MOC
Procedure
New Operation
Operations Manager
Chief Pilot
Facility Change
Operations Manager
Operations Manager
Crew Scheduling
Geographic Location
Change
Operations Manager
31 of2012
34
1Page
October
12 Continual Improvement
Continual improvement to safety and exemplary service to customers is a core value.
Delivering quality services with minimal environmental impact is another.
Safety performance is measured by the following performance measures:
Reduce the number occurrences that cause damage and the amount of damage
Reduce the number of occurrence per 1,000 hours flown
Reduce the number of Injuries to employees, visitors and passengers
Increase the number of actions raised from safety meetings
Reduce the number of nearmiss events
Increase compliance with the safety occurrence management process
(reporting, classification, root cause investigation, and implementation of
corrective actions)
Reduce the number of noncompliances with standard flight operations
procedures as measured by observation or flight data monitoring
Reduce the number of complaints received in respect to diminished amenity
values and discharges to land, air and water
The CEO is responsible for ensuring that the organisation performance is reviewed
annually and employees are adequately informed of the results of the review.
Page 32 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 33 of 34
1 October 2012
Page 34 of 34
1 October 2012