Professional Documents
Culture Documents
we are not just black writers, we are black people and as black people
we live every day of our lives in an anti-black world. A world that defines itself in a
very fundamental ways in constant distinction from us, we live everyday of our lives
in a context of daily rejection so its understandable that we as black writers might strive
for acceptance and appreciation through our writing, as I said this gets us tangled up in the result.
black writer because
The lessons we have to learn as writers resonate with what I want to say about literature and political struggle. I am
hold my political beliefs and my political agenda loosely. I want to look at my political life the way I might look at a
be able to explore forbidden territory, the unspoken demands that the world come to an end, the thing that I cant
say when I am trying to organize maybe I can harness the energy of the political movement to make breakthroughs
in the imagination that the movement can't always accommodate, if its to maintain its organizational capacity.
case a structural injunction sponsored by a lingering and recurring anxiety regarding the authority of
epistemologies can translate other's bodies of knowledge into comprehensible and useful concepts and constructs.
And yet, we must begin where we are, not where we hope to be . Hence, I want
to make two modest and one not-so-modest suggestions for how Communication Studies in general and Rhetorical
static , but are movable and moving configurations. The Afro-Pessimist in Wilderson's
account must agree that when a non-Black person is thrust toward the horrible
condition approximating (but not identical to) the Black's structural position, that
adjustment can rightfully be called a Blackening. As a happeningand not an
event that has simply always already happened this racialized procedure
makes itself felt and knowable in the dense social fabric of the everyday. If the Black
is in a structural position that delimits the impossibility of capacity, might we enjoin
an analysis of the vocabulary of that impossibility itself? And since a Blackening
receives intelligibility from the structural position of the Black, might we gain some
productive understanding from a scrutiny of key discursive and material forms of
Blackening? Was not Michael Brown Blackened in and through (and not only
a priori to) his bodily encounter with state violence?
the Zombie, I am willing to concede that an Afro-Pessimist might claim that Brown was, at the moment he was shot
to death, the dead but sentient thing, the Black struggling to articulate in a world of living subjects.28 This
concession functions as an assertion: the Zombie is not wholly outside Western intelligibility; it haunts the nether
regions between Human and Black. Its undead existence is material and social, and supplies some vital resources
for inventing a new languagea grammar of (Black) suffering. Perhaps there is no way to Africa through the
Black,29 but maybe there is a route through the Zombie. I have argued for such a project using the terminology of
reanimating Zombie voices.30
are said to
the
symbolic and the imaginary give way because non-identity (the real of the social) is
immediately inscribed in the lived experience (vcu) of the colonised subject. The colonised
is traversing the fantasy (Zizek 2006a, 4060) all the time; the void of the verb to be is the very content of his interpellation. The colonised
is, in other words, the subject of anxiety for whom the symbolic and the imaginary never
work, who is left stranded by his very interpellation.4 Fixed into non-fixity, he is eternally suspended
between element and moment5 he is where the colonial symbolic falters in the
production of meaning and is thus the point of entry of the real into the texture
itself of colonialism. Be this as it may, whiteness and blackness are (sustained by)
colonial symbolic is that the real is not screened off by the imaginary in the way it is under capitalism. At the place of the colonised,
involve the reactivation (or de-sedimentation)7 of colonial objectivity itself. No matter how
sedimented (or global), colonial objectivity is not ontologically immune to antagonism. Differentiality, as Zizek insists (see Zizek 2012, chapter 11, 771
n48), immanently entails antagonism in that differentiality both makes possible the existence of any identity whatsoever and at the same time because
it is the presence of one object in another undermines any identity ever being (fully) itself. Each element in a differential relation is the condition of
possibility and the condition of impossibility of each other. It is this dimension of antagonism that the Master Signifier covers over transforming its outside
Turn: The neg understands race relations in terms of the blackwhite binary that papers over anti-Latino racism.
Linda Martn Alcoff, 3-02-2010, Professor of Philosophy at Hunter College and the
CUNY Graduate Center, Latinos Beyond the Binary,
http://www.alcoff.com/content/beyondbinary.html
The idea
that a black/white racial binary can account for all forms of racism in the United States
is an example of such a pernicious simplification, as well as the idea that Latinos, or whites, have
Contradictory binaries ourish in climates where simplifications are preferred over complex analysis.
homogeneous political effects on our shared public culture. In this paper I want to redress such simplifications by
The
first concept is anti-Latino racism, as a specific form of racism distinct in some
developing three concepts that are especially relevant for understanding the conditions of Latinos in the U.S.
regards to antiblack racism and thus lost in racial discourses that remain
exclusively focused on the black-white binary. The second concept is ethnorace, a
hybridized identity category that bridges racial and ethnic categories and enhances
our ability to conceptualize the treatment of most if not all Latinos in the U.S.. And the third
concept involves an expansion of identity categories--ethnic and racial and ethno-racialthat I argue
will help us to understand the economic and political realities and transformations in
the current era. Each concept offers an alternative to binaries either through a larger set of conceptual
resources or through transcending given binaries in a bridge concept. But the overall point is that, as we address
each of these issues,
political projections, as if we could empower only one set of forces in this tug of war.
We need, rather, to chart the likely contradictory effects of every step that is taken.
on a continent with 20 others all speaking languages other than English and having the right not to be dominated.
Such arrogant indifference extends to Latinos within the U.S. The mass media complain, "people can't relate to
relations have defined racism for centuries . Today the composition and culture of
the U.S. are changing rapidly. We need to consider seriously whether we can
afford to maintain an exclusively white/Black model of racism when the
population will be
neither
Black nor white - by the year 2050. We are challenged to recognize that multi-colored
racism is mushrooming , and then strategize how to resist it. We are challenged to move
beyond a dualism comprised of two white supremacist inventions: Blackness
and Whiteness. At stake in those challenges is building a united anti-racist force
strong enough to resist contemporary racist strategies of divide-and- conquer.
Strong enough, in the long run, to help defeat racism itself. Doesn't an exclusively Black/white
model of racism discourage the perception of common interests among
people of color and thus impede a solidarity that can challenge white supremacy?
Doesn't it encourage
the
isolation
of African Americans
advise all people of color to spend too much energy understanding our lives in