Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Un nouveau modle de plasticit est propos sur la base de la mise en uvre d'un modle multistratifi de surface
englobante dtats critiques. Le modle de surface de dlimitation d'origine est dfinie par les quatre surfaces suivantes:
(i) surface de rupture (ii) surface de dlimitation; (iii) surface de chargement et (iv) surface plastique de dilatance. Ces
surfaces sont dfinies dans le cadre du comportement multistratifi afin d'introduire un nouveau modle de
comportement. Dans ce cadre, les surfaces de rupture, dtats limites, de chargement et de dilatance plastique sont
formules sur 2 x 13 plans locaux avec des orientations variant sur une sphre unitaire virtuelle autour d'un point de
contrainte. Un facteur de pondration est affect chaque plan par rapport au volume de la sphre unitaire. La rponse
globale du matriau quand il est soumis une charge est ensuite intgr par sommation des contributions de tous les
plans. Les paramtres du modle sont calibrs par la modlisation de neuf essais triaxiaux sous diffrentes densits et
contraintes de confinement. Lapplication du nouveau modle de comportement est ensuite tudie par sa mise en
uvre dans un code en diffrences finies et par la modlisation d'un essai de laboratoire sol-canalisation. Il est conclu
que le nouveau modle de comportement pourrait prdire avec prcision les essais triaxiaux et de laboratoire.
INTRODUCTION
MODEL
IN
Normal Axis
Table 1. Planes unit vector components and weight coefficients for numerical integration.
Plane
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
wi
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
ni
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
27
840
27
840
27
840
27
840
32
840
32
840
32
840
32
840
32
840
32
840
40
840
40
840
40
840
3
3
3
3
2
2
13
mi
3
3
12
li
11
3
3
2
2
2.3
{ } = { 11 22 33 12 21 13 31 23 32 }T
{ } = { 11 22 33 12 21 13 31 23 32 }T
{ } = {1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0}T
{} = { e } + { p }
(5)
(6)
[C ep ]T = [C e ]T + [C p ]T
(1)
1
1
1
[ I ] +
2Gi
9
K
6
G
i
i
[C p ]i =
1
{Q}i {P}Ti
Hi
{ } { }T
(7)
1
2
2
2 = [Ti ] { }, = 1 + 2
n i
(2)
{Q} and {P} are defined as the unit normal to the loading
surface and the unit direction of the plastic strain rate,
respectively. [C e ]T and [C p ]T are calculated based on
numerical integration as follows:
[C p ]T = 8 i =1 wi [C e ]i
13
L x x
i
[Ti ] = L yix
L
zix
L xi y
L yi y
L zi y
L xiz li
L yiz 0
L ziz 0
0
mi
0
0
0
ni
mi
0
0
0
li
0
ni
0
0
0
0
li
0
ni
0
0 (3)
mi
(4)
[C e ]T = 8 i =1 wi [C e ]i
13
(8)
Failure Surface
Bounding Surface
F =
N n0
R
R 1 2
n
n0
1
=0
R
(9)
N n0
R n
AR
1 +
F =
1
n0
R
N
2
AR 2
+
= 0 (10)
N
F = r
nr =
T
n
n0
1 1
nr
n0 T 2 ( / 2 )
1 + 2 n0 T ( / 2 )
r =2
(1 (1 + (T
n0
nr
)) )
2
=0
(1 + (AR N ) )
(14)
2.6
N n0
AR
1 + (AR N )2
1 +
R
N
J2 =
(15)
Loading Surface
(16)
)(
= n0 (1 R 1) n0 R n
(17)
f =
( R 1) 2
n
n0
1
=0
1
R
N n0
R
(18)
2
N n0
AR
R n AR
1+
f =
1
+
= 0 (19)
n0 N
R
N
f = r
T
n
n0
1 1
nr
=0
(20)
f , .{ n , } + f , { , }
{ f , }
deviatoric
hydrostatic
(11)
{Q} =
(12)
2.7
(13)
(21)
1
g =
Rg
Rg 1
ng
=0
(22)
{P} =
{g , }
g , n .{ n , } + f , { , }
(23)
LABORATORY TESTS
5.1
Experimental Setup
Laboratory Test
Type I
Soil Type II
Particle Size
Distribution
(ASTM D422)
Cu=1.51
Cc=1.29
D60 = 0.65 mm
D30 = 0.60 mm
D10 = 0.43 mm
Cu=13.75
Cc=0.79
D60 = 4.85 mm
D30 = 1.17 mm
D10 = 0.35 mm
Gs = 2.67
emin = 1.12
3
d max = 1.26 gr/cm
emin = 0.55
3
d max = 1.72 gr/cm
Specific Gravity
(ASTM D854)
Minimum Index
Density and Unit
Weight
(ASTM D4254)
Maximum Index
Density and Unit
Weight
(ASTM D4253)
Modified Proctor
Maximum Dry
Density
2
Figure 6. Loading pattern (stress of 5.5 kg/cm )
through the time
72%
5.5
57%
220
2.5
Figure 8. Settlement-time and settlement-load for relative density of 57% and applied stress of 2.5 kg/cm2.
2
Figure 7. Settlement-time and settlement-load for relative density of 72% and applied stress of 5.5 kg/cm .
Figure 9. Settlement-time and Settlement-load for relative density of 57%, burial depth of 220 mm and applied stress of
2
2.5 kg/cm .
Figure 10. Vertical diametric strain-time and vertical diametric-load for relative density of 57%, burial depth of 220 mm
2
and applied stress of 2.5 kg/cm .
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The writers would like to acknowledge Dr. Omid Khalaj
for providing the laboratory test results.
REFERENCES
Drucker, D.C., Gibson, R.E., and Henkel, D.l. 1957. Soil
mechanics and work-hardening theories of
plasticity. Trans., ASCE, 122, 338-346.
Prevost, J-U. 1978. Plasticity theory for soil stressstrain behavior. Journal of Engineering Mechanics
Div., ASCE, 104 (5), 1177-1194.
Mroz, Z., Norris, V.A., and Zienkiewicz, O.C. 1981. An
anisotropic, critical state model for soils subjects to
cyclic loading. Geotechnique, London, England, 31
(4), 451-469.
Ghaboussi, J. and Momen, H., 1982. Modeling and
analysis of cyclic behavior of sands, G. N. Pande
and O. C. Zienkiewicz (eds), Soil MechanicsTransient and Cyclic Loads, Wiley, New York, 313342.
Desai, C.S., and Faruque, M.O. 1984. Constitutive
model for (geological) materials. Journal of
Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 110 (9), 1391-1408.
Poorooshasb, H.B. and Pietruszczak, S. 1985. On
yielding and flow of sand; a generalized two-surface
model, Computers and Geomechanics, 1, 33-58.
Dafalias, Y.F. and Herrmann, L.R. 1986. Bounding
surface plasticity. II: Application to isotropic
cohesive soils, Journal of Engineering Mechanics,
112 (12), 1263-1291.
Frantziskonis, G., Desai, C.S., and Somasundaram, S.
1986. Constitutive model for non-associative
behavior. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE,
112 (9), 932-946.
Crouch, R.S. and Wolf, J.P. 1994. Unified 3D Critical
State Bounding Surface Plasticity Model for Soils
Incorporating Continuous Plastic Loading under
Cyclic Paths. Part I: Constitutive relations,
International Journal of Numerical and Analytical
Methods in Geomechanics, 18, 735-758.
Taylor G.I. 1938. Plastic strain in metals. Journal of
Industrial Metals, 62, 307-324.