Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The rings of Saturn are a series of planetary rings orbiting around the planet.
The major rings are labelled. They consist largely of ice and dust. There are
several gaps between the rings, all of which are caused by the gravitational pull
of one or more of Saturn’s moons affecting the orbits of the tiny particles that
comprise the rings. Icy particles spread out into large, flat rings and make up
Saturn’s ring system that can be seen with even low-power telescopes on the
Earth’s surface.
Improved telescopes have allowed astronomers to better ‘resolve’ the images of
the rings. In fact, one of the large rings was resolved into two rings (B and C),
and it was found that the A ring shows a gap (the so-called Encke division). The
presence of another ring (the so-called D ring) closer to the planet than the C
ring was also observed.
*renato.fedele@na.infn.it
One contribution of 20 to a Theme Issue ‘James Clerk Maxwell 150 years on’.
1718 R. Fedele
In 1610, Galileo Galilei was the first person to observe Saturn’s rings, although
with his weak telescope he could barely resolve them, and thought they were two
moons on either side of the planet.
After 45 years, in 1655, Christian Huygens was the first scientist to propose
that there was a ring surrounding Saturn (the rings were actually discovered by
him in 1659). He proposed that Saturn was surrounded by a solid ring.
In 1660, the poet Jean Chapelain, a friend of Huygens, suggested that Saturn’s
rings are made up of a large number of very small satellites. Chapelain’s
suggestion did not receive enthusiasm among the astronomers. However, 200
years later, James Clerk Maxwell arrived at similar conclusion.
A valuable discovery of Giovanni Cassini in 1675 showed the existence of a gap
between the two large (A and B) rings, now called the Cassini division in honour
of this astronomer.
During the period between 1856 and 1859, the theoretical studies of Maxwell
showed that the rings could not be solid, but rather a swarm of particles. A solid
ring would become unstable and break up. He carried out a careful theoretical
treatment and concluded that the rings could not be solid or liquid, since the
mechanical forces acting upon rings of such immense size would break them up.
He suggested that, instead, the rings were composed of a vast number of
individual solid particles rotating in separate concentric orbits at different
speeds. He reported this theory in his final article on the subject entitled ‘On the
stability of the motion of Saturn’s rings’, published in the Proceedings of the
Royal Society of Edinburgh in 1859 (Niven 1890).1
Maxwell supposed that the dust particles move around the planet at the angular
frequency that decreases when the energy increases. Under the action of the
gravitational field of the planet, the dust particles move along closed orbits. But
this is not sufficient to have a stable motion. In fact, what confines the dust is the
mutual gravitational interaction between the particles: this way he proved that
dust forms a stable system forced by Saturn’s gravitational field to execute
revolutions. In 1895, James Keeler proved that Maxwell’s hypothesis was correct
when he measured the Doppler shifts of different parts of the rings and found that
the outer parts of the ring system orbited at a slower speed than the inner parts.
The rings obeyed Kepler’s third law and, therefore, must be made of millions of
tiny bodies each orbiting Saturn as a tiny mini-Moon.
One century later, in the period between 1958 and 1959, an analogous
mechanism was put forward by Nielsen et al. (1959). It was pointed out that
Maxwell’s mechanism would be more interesting if the particles repel each other.
An example of this kind was given by the above authors in particle accelerators
(for an historical review, see Lawson (1988)).
1
Most of the historical information given in this article are available at the following web
sites: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rings_of_Saturn; www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/
astronomy/planets/saturn/saturnrings.shtml. Craig Howie, http://heritage.scotsman.com/pro-
files.cfm?cidZ1&idZ39592005 (article). Nick Strobel, www.astronomynotes.com/solarsys/s16.
htm#A9.5.1 (article). Calvin J. Hamilton, www.solarviews.com/eng/saturnbg.htm (article).
Due to their electric charges, the particles of the beam repel each other.
Consequently, one could think that in this case, due to the space charge
repulsion, the beam motion is unstable. In reality, the physical conditions in an
accelerating machine are richer than the ones occurring in the mechanism
proposed by Maxwell, because the angular frequency variation is related to the
energy variation through a threshold called the ‘transition energy’. But,
nevertheless, Maxwell’s idea was very useful for Nielsen, Sessler and Symon
and constituted the basic idea of their mechanism. Maxwell’s idea was, in fact,
extended to the collective behaviour of a charged particle system in a circular
accelerating machine (e.g. a storage ring).
1720 R. Fedele
Table 1. Coherent instability scheme of a monochromatic ½ f 0 ðpÞf dðpÞ coasting beam in the case
of a purely reactive impedance Z I h XL K XC . (The instability corresponding to h!0 is usually
referred to as ‘negative mass instability’.)
In the case of perfectly conducting walls and coasting beam, the Lorentz–
Maxwell system of equations easily leads to the following expression for the total
longitudinal force per unit length acting on the beam (Lawson 1988)
vl
F Z k 0 ðXL K XC Þ ; ð3:11Þ
vz
where k 0 is a positive constant proportional to the square of q and XL and XC are
the inductive reactance (magnetic effect of the beam current) and capacitive
reactance (space charge effect) per unit length, respectively. Note that F does not
depend on the sign of the particle charge.
1722 R. Fedele
(a) (b)
Figure 1. Longitudinal perturbed density of a coasting beam: (a) periodic density perturbation
plotted with respect to the longitudinal direction and (b) periodic density perturbation as seen
around the orbit of the synchronous particle.
0 0
Figure 2. Physical mechanism of the coherent instability of a coasting beam below transition
energy (hO0): (a) for a capacitive impedance, the force is acting longitudinally towards the minima
of the perturbation, but it accelerates (decelerates) the particles located at the front (back) of the
maxima and therefore stabilizes the system and (b) for an inductive impedance, the force is acting
longitudinally towards the maxima but it decelerates (accelerates) the particles located at the front
(back) of the perturbation and therefore destabilizes the system.
equations comprising the Vlasov equation and Maxwell’s equations, the so-called
Vlasov–Maxwell system, govern the motion of the particles under the action of the
e.m. fields that they actually generate.)
By introducing the first-order perturbations in the physical quantities
(e.g. distribution function and e.m. fields) the Fourier analysis of the Vlasov–
Maxwell system in the case of a coasting beam leads to the following dispersion
relation (Chao 1993):
ðN
Z df0 =dp
1 Z ia0 h dp; ð4:1Þ
k KN pKu=k
where fZf0(p) is the equilibrium momentum distribution ( p being the longitudinal
conjugate momentum coordinate); Z is the complex longitudinal coupling
impedance of the system; and a0 is a positive real constant. To obtain equation
(4.1), the first-order perturbations of the physical quantities have been assumed to
be proportional to exp[i(kzKut)]. The real part of Z accounts for the resistive
properties of the walls of the machine’s vacuum chamber. The inclusion of the
0 0
Figure 3. Physical mechanism of the coherent instability of a coasting beam above transition
energy (h!0): (a) for a capacitive impedance, the force is acting longitudinally towards the minima
of the perturbation, but it decelerates (accelerates) the particles located at the front (back) of the
maxima and therefore destabilizes the system and (b) for an inductive impedance, the force is
acting longitudinally towards the maxima, but it accelerates (decelerates) the particles located at
the front (back) of the perturbation and therefore stabilizes the system.
1724 R. Fedele
(a) VI (b)
I1 I2 I3
I
I=0
–1 0 1 VR
0
Figure 4. Qualitative instability chart in the VR–VI plane, as described by the Vlasov–Maxwell
system, for a non-monochromatic coasting beam. (a) The region inside the curve with gIZ0 plus
the adjacent straight line located above on the imaginary axis represents the stability region. For
increasing values of gI (gIO0), the curves plotted cover the entire instability region. They are a
sort of ‘deformed parabolas’. However, as gI increases, their shape becomes more similar to the
parabolas. The deformation of the parabolas is due to the stabilizing effect provided by the Landau
damping that exists for a p-distribution with non-negligible spread. (b) Qualitative plot of
f0(p) f(1Kp2/4)2 corresponding to the chart displayed in (a ).
accelerators by means of the so-called thermal wave model (TWM; Fedele &
Miele 1991). In particular, within the TWM framework, the longitudinal
dynamics of particle bunches is described in terms of a complex wave function,
J(z, s), where s is the distance of propagation (i.e. sZct) and z is the longitudinal
extension of the particle beam measured in the moving frame of reference.
The particle density, l(z, s), is related to the wave function according to
l(z, s)ZjJ(z, s)j2 (Fedele et al. 1993; Anderson et al. 1999a) and the collective
longitudinal evolution of the beam in a circular high-energy accelerating machine
is governed by the following Schrödinger-like equation for J, viz.
vJ e2 h v2 J
ie C KU ðz; sÞJ Z 0; ð5:1Þ
vs 2 vz 2
1726 R. Fedele
>0 ZI
ZR
I3
I1 < I2 < I3
I=0 I2
I1
Figure 5. Qualitative plots of the MI curves in the plane ZR–ZI of a coasting beam below the
transition energy, i.e. hO0 (Anderson et al. 1999a). The bold face vertical straight lines represent
the stability region (uIZ0).
l Z l0 C l1 ; jl1 j/ l0 : ð5:9Þ
By introducing (5.8) and (5.9) in the pair of equations (5.5) and (5.6), after
linearizing, and assuming that V1, l1 f expðikz K iusÞ, we finally get the
following dispersion relation:
u 2
Z a2 k 2
K V0 Z ial0 C ; ð5:10Þ
k k 4
where we have introduced the complex quantity Z Z RC ikX h ZR C iZI ,
proportional to the longitudinal coupling impedance per unit length of the
beam. In general, in equation (5.10) u is a complex quantity, i.e. u h uR C iuI . If
uIs0, an instability takes place in the system. It has been recently proven that
such an instability is a sort of MI predicted by the integro-differential NLS
equation (5.2) (Fedele et al. 1993; Anderson et al. 1999a). If now we substitute
the complex form of u in equation (5.10), separating the real from the imaginary
parts, the dispersion relation can be cast as
ekl 1 u2I ek 3
ZI ZKh 20 ZR2 C Ch : ð5:11Þ
4uI h ekl0 4l0
This equation fixes, for any values of the wavenumber k and any values of
the growth rate u I, a relationship between real and imaginary parts of the
longitudinal coupling impedance. For each uIs0, running the values of the
slip factor h, it describes two families of parabolas in the complex plane ZRKZI.
Each pair (ZR, ZI) in this plane represents a working point of the accelerating
machine. Consequently, each parabola is the locus of the working points
associated with a fixed growth rate of the MI. According to figures 5 and 6,
below the transition energy (g!gT), h is positive and therefore the instability
parabolas have a negative concavity, while above the transition energy (gOgT),
since h is negative, the instability parabolas have a positive concavity (negative
<0 ZI
I1 I2
I=0
I1
< I2
< I3
I3
ZR
Figure 6. Qualitative plots of the MI curves in the plane ZR–ZI of a coasting beam above the
transition energy, i.e. h!0 (Anderson et al. 1999a). The bold face vertical straight lines represent
the stability region (uIZ0).
mass instability). Let us suppose that hO0. From equation (5.11) one can easily
see that, approaching uIZ0, the parabolas reduce asymptotically to a straight
line lower unlimited located on the imaginary axis, as shown in figure 5. If h!0,
in the same limit, parabolas reduce to a straight line upper unlimited located on
the imaginary axis, as shown in figure 6. The straight line represents the only
possible region below (above) the transition energy where the system is
modulationally stable against small perturbations in both density and velocity
of the beam, with respect to their unperturbed values l0 and V0, respectively.
(Note that density and velocity are directly connected with amplitude and phase,
respectively, of the wave function J.) Any other point of the complex plane
belongs to an instability parabola (uIs0).
In the limit of small dispersion, i.e. ek/1, the second term of the r.h.s. of
equation (5.10) can be neglected and equation (5.11) reduces to
ekl0 2 1 u2I
ZI zKh ZR C : ð5:12Þ
4u2I h ekl0
Furthermore, for purely reactive impedances (ZRh0), equation (5.11) reduces to
the cubic NLS equation and the corresponding dispersion relation gives (note
that in this case uRZV0k)
u2I ZI a2 k 2
Z ehl 0 K ; ð5:13Þ
k2 k 4
from which it is easily seen that the system is modulationally unstable (u2I O 0)
under the following conditions:
hZI O 0 ðhX I O 0Þ; ð5:14Þ
ehk 2
l0 O : ð5:15Þ
4X I
Condition (5.15) implies that the instability threshold is given by the non-zero
minimum intensity l0m Z ehk 2 =4X I .
1728 R. Fedele
Then, using this identity, equation (5.19) can be easily cast in the following form:
ð ð
Z 1 f0 ðp1 C ak=2Þdp1 f0 ðp2 Kak=2Þdp2
1 Zi K ; ð5:20Þ
k k p1 Ku=k p2 Ku=k
1730 R. Fedele
In this section, we describe the impact that Maxwell’s theory of Saturn’s rings
has produced on the physics of the twentieth century. To this end, we present a
summary of the above results in the form of a historical discussion.
In this paper, we have outlined that, 100 years later, by replacing the
gravitational interaction with the e.m. one, Maxwell’s theory of Saturn’s rings
was extended to the more rich context of charge particle beam dynamics in high-
energy circular accelerators. With this extension, an important transfer of
knowledge from planetary physics to accelerator physics allows one to conceive
the physical mechanism of coherent instability (including the negative mass
instability). During the sixth and seventh decades, this mechanism soon
stimulated the development of the general theory of coherent instability based
on the kinetic theory (Vlasov–Maxwell system). Another important process
meanwhile already known in physics was the MI. Since the 6th decade, the MI
(also known as the Benjamin–Feir instability, Benjamin & Feir 1967; Zakharov
1968; Yuen 1982) was already referred to as ‘a general phenomenon encountered
when a quasi-monochromatic wave is propagating in a weak nonlinear medium,
whose dynamics is governed essentially by a NLS equation coupled with a set of
equations accounting for the interaction between the wave and the medium’. It
was discussed and even observed experimentally in many fields of physics, such
as deep waters physics (ocean gravity waves), plasma physics (electrostatic and
e.m. plasma waves) and nonlinear optics (Kerr media, optical fibres). More
recently, it has also been studied in electrical transmission lines, matter wave
physics (Bose–Einstein condensates), lattice vibrations physics (molecular
crystals) and in the physics of anti-ferromagnetism (dynamics of the spin waves).
For a review of the above developments of the MI studies, see Karpman
(1975), Sulem & Sulem (1999) and Abdulaev et al. (2002).
For a long time, the theories of coherent instability and MI were neither
compared, one to the other, nor connected to each other. Around the beginning
of the 9th decade, a quantum-like theory of charged particle beam dynamics was
proposed in the literature. On the basis of valuable physical analogies, the TWM
was formulated (Fedele & Miele 1991). Later on, by means of the TWM, a
connection with the conventional description of a particle accelerator in the
presence of collective effects was given for the first time in terms of a standard
cubic NLS equation (Fedele et al. 1993) and an integro-differential cubic NLS
equation (Anderson et al. 1999b). In this way, the coherent instability was easily
re-described as a sort of MI process. It is worth pointing out that this discovery
has shown, in particular, that Maxwell’s original idea on Saturn’s ring stability
was also imported and extended to a new context where the ‘elements’ involved
in the dynamics of the system were not the particles but the waves.
Classical statistical approaches or Vlasov-type kinetic equations to describe
systems of waves were used since the 1960s to describe wave interactions and/or
the phenomenon of the Landau damping (see Dawson 1960; Hasselmann 1962;
Vedenov & Rudakov 1965; Bingam et al. 1997; Zakharov 1999). More recently,
within the context of the quantum-like kinetic description based on the Wigner
quasidistribution, a statistical approach to MI has been formulated (Anderson
et al. 1999a; Fedele & Anderson 2000; Fedele et al. 2000, 2006). Remarkably, this
approach, which has been applied to a number of physical problems, unifies the
classical descriptions of coherent instability and MI in one general approach to the
instability of any weakly nonlinear system in which the propagation of partially
incoherent waves is involved (Fedele et al. 2002; Hall et al. 2002; Helczynski et al.
2002; Onorato et al. 2003; Santos et al. 2007). Consequently, it can be thought as
the generalization of Maxwell’s original idea to a random wave system.
The studies of the extreme physics exhibited by astrophysical objects, such as
the superfluid two-stream instability neutrons stars (Andersson et al. 2003),
Bose–Einstein condensation properties in collapsing and exploding stars (Ball
2001), density waves in spiral structures (Lin & Bertin 1995) and the quasi-linear
kinetic approach to the planetary rings (Griv et al. 2003), have already imported,
directly or indirectly, the basic idea of Maxwell’s theory.
The very rapid developments in quantum gravity have recently shown
valuable applications of the quantum formalism in astrophysics and cosmology
(Penrose 1996, 1997, 1998; Moroz et al. 1998; Tod & Moroz 1999). It is reasonable
to assume that suitable Schrödinger-like equations, coupled with a set of
equations describing the gravitational interaction, govern the collective dynamics
of the astrophysical systems in terms of a complex wave function as it has been
assumed for the entire Universe (Hartle & Hawking 1983; Hawking 1984).
As a natural consequence, the quantum-like kinetic description of the
coherent/MI and the related statistical approach may provide a random version
of Maxwell’s theory whether applied to planetary problems or to different
astrophysical environments. In particular, a kinetic theory, based on the
Schrödinger–Newton (Schrödinger–Einstein) system or Wigner–Newton (Wigner–
Einstein) system, is underway and it would provide a more general description of the
instability of such systems.
It should be noted that, when the knowledge of the quantum-like formulation
of the coherent/MI is transferred back to astrophysics and cosmology, it is
natural that one would need to determine, in the gravitational context, a
possible counterpart of the e.m. repulsion. The latter has been detected through
the accelerated expansion of the Universe and might be interpreted as an
effective ‘repulsive gravitation’. A suitable theory of MI including this effect is
also underway.
References
Abdulaev, F. Kh., Darmanyan, S. A. & Garnier, J. 2002 Modulational instability of electro-
magnetic waves in inhomogeneous and discrete media. Prog. Opt. 44, 303–365.
Alber, I. E. 1978 The effects of randomness on the stability of two-dimensional surface wavetrains.
Proc. R. Soc. A 363, 525–546. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0181)
Anderson, D., Fedele, R., Vaccaro, V. G., Lisak, M., Berntson, A. & Johansson, S. 1999a
Modulational instabilities within the thermal wave model of high-energy charged-particle beam
dynamics. Phys. Lett. A 258, 244–248. (doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00374-6)
Anderson, D., Fedele, R., Vaccaro, V. G., Lisak, M., Berntson, A. & Johansson, S. 1999b
Quantum-like description of modulational instability and landau damping in the longitudinal
dynamics of high-energy charged-particle beams. In Proc. 1998 ICFA workshop on Nonlinear
Collective Phenomena in Beam Physics, Arcidosso, Italy, 1–5 September 1998 (eds
S. Chattopadhyay, M. Cornacchia & C. Pellegrini), p. 197. New York, NY: AIP Press.
Andersson, N., Comer, G. L. & Prix, R. 2003 Are pulsar glitches triggered by a superfluid two-
stream instability? Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 091101. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091101)
1732 R. Fedele
Landau, L. 1927 Das Dämpfungsproblem in der Wellenmechanik. Z. Phys. 45, 430–441. (doi:10.
1007/BF01343064)
Landau, L. D. 1946 On the vibrations of the electronic plasma. J. Phys. USSR 10, 25–34.
Lawson, J. D. (ed.) 1988 The physics of charged particle beams, 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.
Lighthill, M. J. 1965 Contributions to the theory of waves in non-linear dispersive systems. J. Inst.
Appl. Math. 1, 269–306. (doi:10.1093/imamat/1.3.269)
Lighthill, M. J. 1967 Some special cases treated by the whitham theory. Proc. R. Soc. A 299,
28–53. (doi:10.1098/rspa.1967.0121)
Lin, C. C. & Bertin, G. 1995 Global wave patterns in galaxies: their generation and maintenance in
waves in astrophysics. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 773, 125–144. (doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1995.
tb12166.x)
Madelung, E. 1926 Quanten theorie in hydrodynamischer form. Z. Phys. 40, 332.
Marklund, M. 2005 Classical and quantum kinetics of the Zakharov system. Phys. Plasmas 12,
082110. (doi:10.1063/1.2012147)
Moroz, I. M., Penrose, R. & Tod, K. P. 1998 Spherically-symmetric solutions of the Schrödinger–
Newton equations. Class. Quantum Grav. 15, 2733–2742. (doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/9/019)
Moyal, J. E. 1949 Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 45, 99–124.
Nicholson, D. R. 1983 Introduction to plasma theory. New York, NY: Wiley.
Nielsen, C. E., Sessler, A. M., & Symon, K. R. 1959 In Proc. Int. Conf. on High Energy
Accelerators and Instrumentation, CERN, Geneva, 14–19 September 1959 (ed. L. Kowarski).
Geneva, Switzerland: CERN Scientific Information Service.
Niven, W. D. (ed.) 1890 The scientific papers of James Clerk Maxwell, vol. 1, pp. 288–377.
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Onorato, M., Osborne, A., Fedele, R. & Serio, M. 2003 Landau damping and coherent structures in
narrow-banded 1C1 deep water gravity waves. Phys. Rev. E 67, 046305. (doi:10.1103/
PhysRevE.67.046305)
Penrose, R. 1996 On gravity’s role in quantum state reduction. Gen. Rel. Grav. 28, 581–600.
(doi:10.1007/BF02105068)
Penrose, R. (ed.) 1997 The large, the small, and the human mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge
University Press.
Penrose, R. 1998 Quantum computation, entanglement and state reduction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A
356, 1927–1939. (doi:10.1098/rsta.1998.0256)
Santos, J. E., Silva, L. O. & Bingham, R. 2007 White-light parametric instabilities in plasmas.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 235001. (doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.235001)
Sulem, P. & Sulem, C. (eds) 1999 Nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Tod, P. & Moroz, I. M. 1999 An analytical approach to the Schrödinger–Newton equations.
Nonlinearity 12, 201–216. (doi:10.1088/0951-7715/12/2/002)
Vedenov, A. A. & Rudakov, L. I. 1965 Interaction of waves in continuous media. Sov. Phys. Dokl.
9, 1073.
Ville, J. 1948 Theorie et applications de signal analytique. Cables Transm. 2, 61.
Visinescu, A. & Grecu, D. 2003 Statistical approach of the modulational instability of the discrete
self-trapping equation. Eur. Phys. J. B 34, 225–229. (doi:10.1140/epjb/e2003-00215-3)
Weyl, H. 1931 Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik. (Transl. The theory of groups and quantum
mechanics). New York, NY: Dover Publications.
Wigner, E. 1932 On the quantum correction for thermodynamic equilibrium. Phys. Rev. 40, 749.
(doi:10.1103/PhysRev.40.749)
Yuen, H. C. 1982 Nonlinear dynamics of deep-water gravity waves. Adv. Appl. Mech. 22, 67.
Zakharov, V. E. 1968 Stability of periodic waves of finite amplitude on the surface of a deep fluid.
J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 9, 190–194. (doi:10.1007/BF00913182)
Zakharov, V. 1999 Statistical theory of gravity and capillary waves on the surface of a finite-depth
fluid. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 18, 327–344. (doi:10.1016/S0997-7546(99)80031-4)