Course Outline

Partnership, Agency and Trusts

Section 173 II-E U.P. College of
Law
First Semester, SY 2013-2014
Rocky L. Reyes
Course Outline[1]
I. Introduction II. Partnership

10.Pascual vs. Commission of

Internal Revenue, 166 SCRA 560
11.Ona vs. Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, 45 SCRA 74
12.Gatchalian vs. Collector of
Internal Revenue, 67 Phil. 666
13.Sardane vs. Court of Appeals,
167 SCRA 524

A. General Articles 1767 to 1783

14.Deluao vs. Casteel, 26 SCRA 475
Cases:
1. Commissioner vs. Burroughs 142
SCRA 324
2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v. Suter and Court of Tax Appeals, 27
SCRA 152

15.Kiel vs. Estate of Sabert, 46 Phil.

198
16.Jo Chung Cang vs. Pacific
Commercial Co., 45 Phil. 142
17.Agad vs. Mabolo, 23 SCRA 1223

3. In the Matter of the Petition for

Authority to Continue Use of Firm
Name Sycip, Salazar, etc./Ozaeta,
Romulo, etc. 92 SCRA 1

18.Tuason vs. Solanos, 95 Phil. 107

4.Ortega vs. Court of Appeals, 245

SCRA 529

B. Obligations of the Partners

among Themselves Articles
1784 to 1809

19.Auerbach vs. Sanitary Wares,

180 SCRA 350

5.Estanislao, Jr. vs. Court of

Appeals, 160 SCRA 830

Cases:

6.Campus Rueda & Co. vs. Pacific

Commercial & Co., 44 Phil. 916

20. Lozana vs. Depakakibo, 107 Phil.

728

7.Vargas & Co. vs. Chan, 29 Phil.

446

21.Sancho vs. Lizaraga, 55 Phil. 60

22.Uy vs. Puzon, 79 SCRA 598

8.Ngo TianTek vs. Phil. Education

Co., 78 Phil 275
9.AngPue& Co. vs. Sec. of
Commerce and Industry, 5 SCRA
645

23.U.S. vs. Clarin, 17 Phil. 84

24.People vs. Campos, [C.A.] 54
O.G. 681
25.Martinez vs. Ong Pong Co., 14

Phil. 726
26.Ramnani vs. Court of Appeals,
196 SCRA 731

38. Phil. National Bank vs. Lo, 50

Phil. 803
39.Co-Pitco vs. Yulo, 8 Phil. 544

27.Moran, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals,

133 SCRA 88
28 Ng Ya vs. Sugbu Commercial
Co., [C.A.] 50 O.G. 4913
29.Teague vs. Martin, 53 Phil. 504
30.Santos vs. Villanueva, [C.A.] 50
O.G. 175
31.Bachrach vs. La Protectora, 37
Phil. 441
32.Machuca vs. Chuidian, 2 Phil. 210
33.Fue Leung vs. Intermediate
Appellate Court, 169 SCRA 746
34.Sison vs. H. Mc Quaid, 94 Phil.
201

40.Island Sales, Inc. vs. United

Pioneers Gen. Construction Co., 65
SCRA 544
41.CompaniaMaritima vs. Muoz, 9
Phil. 326
42.Dietrich vs. Freeman, 18 Phil. 341
43.Santiago Syjuco, Inc. vs. Castro,
175 SCRA 171
44.Liwanag and Reyes vs.
Workmens Compensation
Commission, 105 Phil. 741
45.McDonald vs. National City Bank
of New York, 99 Phil. 156

35.Ornum vs. Lasala, 74 Phil. 241

46.Pioneer Insurance & Security

Corporation vs. Court of Appeals,
175 SCRA 668

C. Property Rights of a Partner

Articles 1810 - 1814

47.Viuda de Chan vs. Pen, 53 Phil.

906

Cases:

E. Dissolution and Winding Up

Articles 1828 to 1842

36. Clemente vs. Galvan, 67 Phil.

565
37. Leyte-Samar-Sales and K.
Tomassi vs. S. Cea and O. Castrilla,
93 Phil. 100
D. Obligations of the Partners to
Third Persons Articles 1815 to
1827

48.Yu vs. National Labor Relations

Commission, 224 SCRA 75
49.Testate Estate of Mota vs. Serra,
47 Phil. 464 [1926]
50.Bearneza vs. Dequilla, 43 Phil.
237
51.Lota vs. Tolentino, 90 Phil. 829

Cases:

52.Goquiolay vs. Sycip, 108 Phil.

947
53.Goquiolay vs. Sycip, 9 SCRA 663,
Resolution of Motion for
Reconsideration
54. Ng Cho Cio vs. Ng Diong, 1
SCRA 275
55. Lichauco vs. Lichauco, 33 Phil.
350
56.Soncuya vs. De Luna, 67 Phil.
646
57. Singsong vs. Isabela Sawmill, 88
SCRA 623
58. Po YengCheo vs. Lim Ka Yan, 44
Phil. 172
59.Laguna Transportation Co., Inc.
vs. Social Security System, 107 Phil.
833
60.Sison vs. McQuaid, 94 Phil. 201
61.De La Rosa vs. Ortega Go-Cotay,
48 Phil. 605
62.Magdusa vs. Albaran, 5 SCRA
511
63.Lim Tanhu vs. Remolete, 66
SCRA 425

III. Agency
A. General Articles 1868 to 1883
65. Orient Air Services & Hotel
Representatives vs. Court of
Appeals, 197 SCRA 645
66.Rallos vs. Felix Go Chan & Sons
Realty Corp., 18 SCRA 251
Death extinguishes agency except
when the agency is coupled with
interest and the agent and the third
person acted in good faith or without
knowledge of the death of the
principal.
67. Air France vs. Court of Appeals,
126 SCRA 448
Teresita was an agent to the Ganas.
What was told to her by Lee Ella was
considered told to the Ganas.
68. Santos vs. Buenconsejo, 14
SCRA 407
power of attorney was void since the
parents of the buenconsejo children
were still alive and even granting that
the poa was valid, he can claim that
the land was for himself and that he
cannot ask for the division of the land
without the concurrence of the coowners.
69. Albaladejo y Cia vs. Phil.
Refining Co., 45 Phil. 556
Plaintiff was not an agent as alleged.
70. Thomas vs. Pineda, 89 Phil. 312

64.Bonnevie s. Hernandez, 95 Phil.

175
F. Limited Partnership Articles
1843 to 1867

71. Palma vs. Cristobal, 77 Phil. 712

72.Valera vs. Velasco, 51 Phil. 695
73.Cui vs. Cui, 100 Phil. 913
74. Allied Free Workers Union
[PLUM] vs. CompaniaMaritima, 19

SCRA 258
75. Far Eastern Export & Import Co.
vs. Lim TeckSuan, 97 Phil. 171
76. Nielson & Co., Inc. vs. Lepanto
Consolidated Mining Co., 26 SCRA
540

92.Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA

131 [1971]
93.Siasat vs. Intermediate Appellate
Court, 139 SCRA 238
94.German & Co. vs. Donaldson,
Sim& Co., 1 Phil. 63

77. Shell Co., of the Phil. Ltd. vs.

Firemens Ins. of Newark, N.J., 100
Phil. 755

95.Municipal Council of Iloilo vs.

Evangelista, 55 Phil. 290

78. Sevilla vs. Court of Appeals, 160

SCRA 171

96.Caballero vs. Deiparine, 60 SCRA

136

79.Lim vs. People, 133 SCRA 333

97.Phil. National Bank vs. Sta. Maria,

29 SCRA 303

80.San Diego, Sr. vs. Nombre, 11

SCRA 165
81.De la Pea vs. Hidalgo, 16 Phil.
450
82.Conde vs. Court of Appeals, 119
SCRA 245
83.Harry E. Keller Elec. Co. vs.
Rodriguez 44 Phil. 19
84.Rallos vs. Yangco, 20 Phil. 269
85. Macke vs. Camps, 7 Phil. 553
86. Jimenez vs. Rabot, 38 Phil. 387

98.BA Finance Corp. vs. Court of

Appeals, 211 SCRA 112
99.Director of Public Works vs. Sing
Juco, 53 Phil. 205
100.Philippine Sugar Estates
Development Co., vs. Poizat, 48 Phil.
536
101.Rural Bank of Bombon, Inc. vs.
Court of Appeals, 212 SCRA 25
102. Commercial Bank & Trust Co. of
the Phil. vs. Republic Armored Car
Service Corp., 9 SCRA 142

87.Lian vs. Puno, 31 Phil. 259

88.Katigbak vs. Tai Hing Co., 52 Phil.
622

103. Lim Tiu vs. Ruiz y Rementeria,

15 Phil. 367

89.Danon vs. Brimo& Co., 42 Phil.

133

104.Phil. National Bank vs. Agudelo

y Gonzaga, 58 Phil. 635

90.Infante vs. Cunanan, 93 Ohil. 693

105.Syjuco and Viardo vs. Syjuco,

40 Phil. 634

91. Manotok Brothers, Inc. vs. Court

of Appeals, 221 SCRA 224

106.National Food Authority vs.

Intermediate Appellate Court, 184

SCRA 166

Products, Inc. vs. Intermediate

Appellate Court 133 SCRA 697

107.Awad vs. Filma Mercantile Co.,

49 Phil. 816

120. Metropolitan Bank Trust Co. vs.

Court of Appeals, 194 SCRA 169

B. Obligations of the Agent

Articles 1884 to 1909

C. Obligations of the Principal

Articles 1910 to 1918

108. Phil. National Bank vs. Manila

Surety & Fidelity Co., Inc. 14 SCRA
776

121. Prudential Bank vs. Court of

Appeals 223 SCRA 350

109.Ramos vs. Caoibes, 94 Phil. 440

122. Cuison vs. Court of Appeals,

227 SCRA 391

110.Gutierrez Hermanos vs.

OriaHermanos, 30 Phil. 491

D. Mode of Extinguishment of
Agency Articles 1919 to 1932

111.Domingo vs. Domingo, 42 SCRA

131

123. Rallos vs. Felix GoChan& Sons

Realty Corp., 81 SCRA 251

112.U.S. vs. Reyes, 36 Phil. 791

124.Diolosa vs. Court of Appeals,

130 SCRA 350

113.Villa vs. Garcia Bosque, 49 Phil.

126
114. Development Bank of the Phils.
vs. Court of Appeals, 49 SCAD715,
231 SCRA 370
115. Phil. Products Co. vs.
PrimateriaSocieteAnonyme Pour Le
Commerce Exterieur: Primateria
[Phil.] Inc., 15 SCRA 301
116. National Power Corp. vs.
National Merchandising Corp.
117 SCRA 789 117.Albert vs.
University Publishing Co., 13 SCRA
84
118.Eugenio vs. Court of Appeals,
239 SCRA 207
119. Green Valley Poultry & Allied

125.Philippine National Bank vs.

Intermediate Appellate Court, 189
SCRA 680
126.DyBuncio& Co. vs. Ong Guan
Gan, 60 Phil. 696
127.Infante vs. Cunanan, 93 Phil.
693
128.Coleongco vs. Claparols, 10
SCRA 577 fraud principal
129.Herrera vs. Luy Kim Guan, 1
SCRA 406 principal died in China,
date of death was not proven
130.Buason and Reyes vs. Panuyas,
105 Phil. 795 extinguishment not
applicable since the agent does not
know of that his principal died

139. Cuaycong vs. Cuaycong, 21

SCRA 1192
IV. Trusts
A. General Articles 1440 to 1442
131. Salao vs. Salao, 70 SCRA 65
[1976]
132.De Leon vs. Molo-Peckson, 6
SCRA 978
133.Government vs. Abadilla, 46
Phil. 642
134.Cristobal vs. Gomez, 50 Phil.
810
135.Araneta vs. Perez, 5 SCRA 338
136.Mindanao Development
Authority vs. Court of Appeals, 113
SCRA 429
137.Roa, Jr. vs. Court of Appeals,
123 SCRA 3 [1983] under Art. 1456

140.Sinaon vs. Sorogon, 136 SCRA

407
C. Implied Trust Articles 1447 to
1457
141. OLaco vs. Co Cho Chit, 220
SCRA 656
142. Special Services Corporation
vs. Centro La Paz, 121 SCRA 748
143.ChiaoLiong Tan vs. Court of
Appeals, 46 SCAD 435, 228 SCRA
75
144.Homena vs. Casa, 157 SCRA
232
145.Heirs of Candelaria vs. Romero,
109 Phil. 500
146. PNB vs. CA, 217 SCRA 347

138. Perez vs. Araneta, 4 SCRA 430

B. Express Trust Articles 1443
to 1446