You are on page 1of 21

UNIVERSITY OF ORADEA

FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGICAL


ENGINEERING
PROGRAM OF STUDY

ADVANCED MECHATRONICS SYSTEMS

Analysis Report

DISCIPLINE
DIAGNOSIS AND MAINTENANCE
OF MECHATRONICS SYSTEMS
Course holder

Prof.PhD.Eng. Pater Sorin


StudentEng. Nilgesz Arnold

2016

Nilgesz Arnold

Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................ 2
2.Transmission without defects..................................................................................3
3. Defective gear....................................................................................................... 7
4. Defective pinion................................................................................................ 11
5. Defective pinion and gear.................................................................................... 15
6. Conclusion............................................................................................................ 19
7.References............................................................................................................. 20

Nilgesz Arnold

1. Introduction
The purpose of this report is to analyze a gear system with the help of vibroacoustic
analysis, the measurements were made with the help of a piezoelectric vibration
transducer and there have been 4 different type of measurements based on the
state of the system:

Normal state
Defective gear state
Defective pinion state
Defective pinion and gear state

The analysis was made with the help of Matlab in which based on the initial
measurements we have generated different types of plots of the spectrum of the
signal, sceptrum of the signal, also we have generated the RMS, the maximum peak
to peak value and the maximum peak value.
Based on this data we have to analyze and indentify the elements which
describe the defectiveness of a certain part.
The analysis is based solely on comparison data between the different
defects compared to our baseline and between each other.
Our analysis data is from machine number4.
In order to complete this analysis we shall ad the plots for every single case of
defectiveness and draw our conclusion in the end.

Nilgesz Arnold

2.Transmission without defects


This is our baseline we will compare all other data to this.

Figure 1. Piezoelectric transducer signal for transmission without defects

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 2. Signal spectrum for transmission without defects

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 3. Cepstrum for transmission without defects

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 4. RMS, Peak to Peak and Peak values for transmission without
defects

Nilgesz Arnold

3. Defective gear

Figure 5. Piezoelectric transducer signal for defective gear.

As we can see the accelerations in this graph are around +7 and -40 which is
10 times higher then our baseline.

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 6. Signal spectrum for defective gear


A
Also here we can see the our spectrum is much greater in intensity on much wider
spectrum compare to the baseline.

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 7. Cepstrum for defective gear.

And as we can notice our maximum peak is 4 higher than the baseline and is drifted
in the approximate time of 0.01 seconds.

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 8. RMS, Peak to Peak and Peak values for defective gear.

Here we can also see that all of our measured values are much greater than our
baseline.

10

Nilgesz Arnold

4. Defective pinion

Figure 9. Piezoelectric transducer signal for defective pinion.

Here we can observe that although we don't have so high peaks we have much
more of them then in the case of the defective gear an much more than our
baseline.

11

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 10. Signal spectrum for defective pinion.

Here we can observe to higher peaks in the lower end of the spectrum different
from our gear defect and also different from our baseline.

12

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 11. Cepstrum for defective pinion.

The cepstrum here has a 3 times higher peak then our baseline which appears
faster than in our gearbox defect at aroound 0.005 seconds.

13

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 12. RMS, Peak to Peak and Peak values for defective pinion.

And of course our values are still higher than our baseline but not as high as the
gear defect.

14

Nilgesz Arnold

5. Defective pinion and gear

Figure 13. Piezoelectric transducer signal for defective pinion and gear.

Here we can see a combination of the two defects, a high number of


peaks with a high acceleration s well.

15

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 14. Signal spectrum for defective pinion and gear.

As we can see there are 3 major peaks in the graph and we can
observe the higher end of the spectrum being a bit taller as well. which
indicates our double defects.

16

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 15. Cepstrum for defective pinion and gear.

Here we have a cancelation of the vibrations compared to the individual


defects but nevertheless we still have to peaks which are higher than
normal

17

Nilgesz Arnold

Figure 16. RMS, Peak to Peak and Peak values for defective pinion and gear.

And as we can se our measured values are the highest from all cases
indicating major failure of both elements.

18

Nilgesz Arnold

6. Conclusion

Case
Baseline no defects
Defective gear
Defective pinion
Defective Gear and
pinion

RMS
1.0715
6.1242
4.5818
8.9795

Peak to Peak
11.4568
118.9326
68.7409
216.5883

Peak
5.7284
59.4663
34.3704
108.2942

250
200
150
100
50
0

RMS
Peak to Peak
Peak

So as we can see from our graph all of our measured variables follow the same law
based on the type of defect we have:
Defective gear - is higher then baseline and defective pinion but smaller then
defective pinion and gear.
Defective pinion is higher than our baseline but smaller than all other defects.
defective pinion and gear have the highest values far above all the other
cases.
Also we can make an approximate observation in the case of peak to peak values
and peak values:

19

Nilgesz Arnold
Peak to Peak values in the defective gear case are 10 bigger then baseline, in
the defective pinion 5 times and 200 bigger in the case of defective gear and
pinion.
For peak values in the defective gear case 510 times bigger the baseline,
defective Pinion 5 times bigger and in the defective pinion and gear case 20
times bigger.

7.References

DIAGNOSIS AND MAINTENANCE OF MECHATRONICS SYSTEMS


by Sorin Marcel PATER.

20

You might also like