Inter-Agency Rapid Flood Assessment

WFP-UNICEF-Save the Children Alliance

Nepal - August 2007

Executive summary
Heavy rain for a period of two weeks caused major flooding in the Terai at the end of July. In mid-August, a second
period of rain resulted in renewed flooding in many areas. By the end of August most flood water had receded and areas
were accessible again, however continued rain since then may cause further flooding and hardship for poor Terai
communities. Flooding is a recurrent problem during the monsoon period in the plains of Nepal and there is an urgent
need for a longer-term solution to mitigate the impact of flood water in the these districts through river training
programmes, river drainage, embankments, building of higher shelter houses and disaster preparedness programmes for
the most vulnerable areas.
In order to assess the impact of the flood on peoples livelihoods, food security, education, health and nutrition status and
to formulate appropriate short- and longer-term responses, an inter-agency assessment was organized by WFP, UNICEF
and Save the Children Alliance with field level support provided by the Nepal Red Cross Society. Highlights of the findings
include the following:

The flood affected a very large number of households. Across the 13 districts assessed, an estimated total of 25,254

households were severely affected, 40,000 were highly affected and 17,236 moderately affected. With an average
household size of 5.6 people per households, this translates in a total of almost half a million people affected by the
floods. Most of the affected are amongst the poorest, marginalized and landless Dalits, Madhesi, Tharu, Muslim and
Janajati groups.

The flood had the biggest impact on housing, particularly those of poor households made of bamboo, straw and

mud. More than 23,000 houses were completely destroyed. Crop land near rivers and in low-lying areas was heavily
affected with high or total crop losses. In other areas the standing paddy crop has benefited from the temporary
immersion and an overall surplus production in these areas is expected. Vegetable production has suffered the biggest
impact with prices for green-leaf vegetables having more than doubled.

The household food security status is expected to deteriorate in the coming months due to the impact of the flood.

Although food stocks could mostly be saved, the affected population is currently heavily borrowing to satisfy their food
needs and food intake has deteriorated with nutritious food such as vegetables and lentils out of reach for poor
households due to sharp increases in market prices.

As per the Demographic and Health Survey (2006) data, malnutrition in the flood affected areas is acute and

widespread. The flood emergency has caused an additional risk for further deterioration in the nutritional status of the
already very vulnerable (child) population. However, beyond seasonal deterioration in malnutrition indicators, no increase
in the number of severely acute children can be observed as yet. The underlying causes to the very poor nutritional status
include food insecurity, poor child feeding and care practices, very poor sanitation and hygiene conditions, and poor
health environment. These issues have been compounded by the impact of the floods which have caused increased food
insecurity with a change in food composition towards less nutritious foods, concentration of defecation area on foot paths
near to communities and a high incidence of diarrhoea among the population.

No epidemics are reported as yet. The government health system seems to be quite well prepared and is sending

rapid response teams to areas with diarrhoea outbreaks to quickly contain further contamination. The potential spread in
vector-born diseases needs to be closely monitored as stagnant flood water provides a perfect breeding ground for
mosquitoes.

-1-

In almost all districts, health posts are functioning normally, although accessibility was a problem during the flood

and is still an issue in some heavily affected areas. Most schools affected by the flood are functioning again. Where
schools and classrooms were destroyed or damaged by the flood, there is a lack of adequate classrooms and teaching
materials which is likely to have a long-term impact on the ability to provide education to children in these areas.
A series of recommendations regarding response options based on the findings of the assessment is provided in the final
section of this report.

Objectives of Rapid Assessment

To collect information on the immediate response

and identify gaps.

Two weeks of incessant rains beginning in mid-July and

continuing into August, resulted in heavy flooding in the
plain areas of Nepal, known as the Terai, at the end of
July and beginning of August 2007. Although the flood

Process and Methodology

water started to recede in most areas by mid-August, a

The assessment covered 13 of the most affected

second period of rain resulted in renewed flooding

districts in the Terai. Six teams covered 2 to 3 districts

especially in areas that suffered the most damage from

each. The assessment in the Western districts of Kailali,

previous flooding. Over the next few weeks, more rain

Banke, Bardiya, Rupandehi and Nawalparasi took place

is expected which is likely to lead to further flooding

from 14-18 August 2007. Due to security concerns in

and continued hardship for the affected population.

the Central and Eastern Terai districts of Parsa, Bara,

Minor floods are a recurrent phenomenon in the Terai

Rautahat, Sarlahi, Mahottari, Dhanusha, Siraha and

during the monsoon period, which normally lasts from

Saptari, and lack of guarantee for unhindered access by

June until September. However, this years flood was

the different activist groups operating in this area, the

more intensive, covered a much wider area, caused

assessment mission could not take place until 21 to 25

more widespread damage to houses and had an

August 2007.

extensive impact on peoples livelihoods compared to

In each district, two days were available to complete

the impact of flooding typical in these areas.

the assessment. On the first day, consultation meetings

In order to assess the impact of the flood on peoples

were held with relevant stakeholders, including staff

livelihoods, food security, education, health and

from the Nepal Red Cross Society (NRCS), Chief District

nutrition status and to formulate appropriate short and

Officer (CDO), District Disaster and Response

longer-term responses, an inter-agency assessment

Committee (DDRC), District Health Officer (DHO),

was organized by WFP, UNICEF and Save the Children

District Agricultural Department Officer (DADO) and

Alliance with field level support provided by the Nepal

District Education Officer (DEO), and relevant (I)NGOs

Red Cross Society.

working in the respective districts. The second day was

Specific objectives of the rapid assessment were:

used for field visits to one or if possible two of the most

highly affected VDCs in the district.

To identify and map out flood affected areas.

To collect and verify available data on the severity

A standardized checklist was used by all field teams for

of the flood impact in terms of numbers of

the assessment (Annex I). This checklist was sent to

affected population and areas of crop loss.

the districts prior to the arrival of the assessment

To assess the impact of the flood on household

teams. In districts covered by the WFP Food Security

food security status, the nutrition and health

Monitoring and Analysis System (FSMAS), the locally

situation, agriculture and market conditions, and

based WFP field monitor in collaboration with the NRCS

education.

District Chapters compiled the required data and

prepared draft maps. This allowed the assessment

-2-

3.

teams to focus on cross verification of the data and

Area submerged under water and degree and

extent of water logging.

information with various stakeholders. During DDRC

meetings an effort was made to find consensus on the

Although in general consensus was found at the district

draft flood impact maps and solve issues based upon

level regarding the maps produced, further cross-

inconsistent data.

checking with available data afterwards showed that

In all districts the teams were accompanied to the field

the classification and the reported numbers of affected

by field staff of the NRCS. In affected communities,

households do not always correspond. Some VDCs with

interviews were held with displaced households,

high numbers of affected households have been

women, VDC secretaries, police, teachers and health

identified as moderately impacted areas while other

workers. The crop conditions were observed in affected

VDCs with low numbers of affected households were

areas and farmers were interviewed. At local markets,

identified as highly affected. It may be the case that in

traders were consulted about the current market

these instances only some wards within the VDC are

conditions.

heavily affected and not the whole VDC (as was the
case in one of the identified severely affected VDCs in
Sarlahi district and one VDC in Bara district visited by

Extent of the Flood Impact

the assessment mission)..Unfortunately, except in some

The NRCS has collected data on flood impact in most

districts (e.g. Sarlahi) at this stage, ward level

VDCs. CDO and DDRC also compiled numbers on

information is not readily available.

affected households in some districts by ward. In

Map 1 shows the flood affected areas. The most

several districts (Dhanusa, Mahotarri, Banke, Bardiya)

affected districts include Siraha, Dhansusha and

additional data was available from NGOs working in the

Mohattari in the East and Kailali in the West of Nepal.

area. Definitions of flood-affectedness varied across

Detailed maps for each district can be found in Annex

various sources, resulting in inconsistent data when

II.

compared. Data are mostly based on extent of damage

(fully or partially) to peoples homes, the overall area

There are several highly affected areas which are

submerged under water, estimated crop losses and the

currently still not accessible by road either due to very

number of people temporarily displaced. Some level of

bad road conditions or water logging. These, often

data inflation is to be expected due to political pressure

remote VDCs, are marked with symbol in the maps

and expectation for relief support by households. In

in Annex II.

most districts, available NRCS data was closely aligned

Although there is a general security concern across the

to the observations of the assessment teams in the

Terai 1 , based on relief distributions successfully

field and are therefore the primary data used

conducted by NRCS, there is the expectation at the

throughout this report to estimate the extent of the

district level that security issues will not affect the

flood impact.

overall provision of humanitarian assistance. However,

there have been incidences of UN vehicles being

Area affected

obstructed by activists, hampering the transportation of

Consensus was sought among different stakeholders at

large amounts of food aid.

the district level to develop a flood impact map

identifying the most flood-affected areas. The following
criteria were used to categorize the VDCs into worst
affected, highly affected, moderately affected, lightly
affected or not affected:
1.

Percentage of households affected

2.

Extent of crop loss

1
All Terai district (except for Chitwan) are currently in phase 3 of the UN
security system.

-3-

Map 1 Flood affected areas

-4-

Number of affected people

Segregated data for specific population groups were

Table 1 summarizes the total number of affected

not available. However, in general there was consensus

population in the 13 districts. Details by district and for

that certain groups (Dalits, Janajatis, Muslims) and poor

each affected VDC in that district can be found in the

landless households living in mud-constructed houses in

tables presented in Annex III.

low-lying areas were the most severely affected. A

Based on the NRCS data, supplemented by data on

second highly affected group included small farmers

crop losses and information on vulnerable groups,

near main rivers whose land was washed away or

estimates were derived for three levels of affectedness:

covered by huge amounts of sediment, causing loss of

severely, highly and moderately.

income and livelihood.

A household was classified as severely affected if the

As mentioned, there is inconsistency between different

household was landless (defined as owning less than 1

available data sets. It is likely that to some extent

Kattha 2 ), depending on wage labour and the flood had

inflation in the number of flood affected people has

completely damaged their house. Severely affected also

occurred. This was also confirmed by field visits to

includes those households owning more than 1 Kattha,

severely affected communities where in some cases

but who had completely lost their standing crops and

less than the reported number of fully destroyed

house.

houses was observed. The announcement by the

Highly affected households include landless households

government to compensate flood affected people for

whose house was partially damaged and landowners

house damage and a supply of three months food

whose houses were either partially or fully damaged

ration may have resulted in more people on the

and all or part of their crops were lost.

affected list in anticipation of relief assistance. In

Moderately affected households include those who lost

addition, pressure from political parties and other

their transplanted paddy crops and whose house

constituencies may also have resulted in higher

suffered damage due to water logging.

numbers. Careful ground-level verification in affected

areas is therefore required to ensure that relief and

Table 1 Number of Affected Population

SN

Districts Name
(East to West)

No. of
affected
VDCs

recovery assistance reaches those most in need.

Number of affected households

Severely

Highly

Moderately

Saptari

89

3,381

5,340

Siraha

83

2,334

1,952

2,863
5,718

Dhanusha

102

4,907

9,732

6,222

Mahottari

61

4,242

5,310

Impact on Housing
The flood had the biggest impact on housing,

Sarlahi

42

1,321

3,619

particularly on mud-built houses of poor households in

Rautahat

95

1,481

1,166

2,406

low-lying areas. The incessant rain and the slow rising

Bara

62

864

598

Parsa

65

1,788

572

27

Nawalparasi

19

654

1,983

many houses to eventually collapse or caused extensive

water levels followed by days of inundation caused

10

Rupandehi

32

922

damage to floors and walls. The mission did not find a

11

Banke

45

1,122

4,828

concentration of damaged houses in one particular

12

Bardiya

32

957

3,475

13

Kailali

27

1,281

1,429

754

25,254

40,004

17,236

Total

area, except in some areas near main rivers. In

general, damage was scattered across the affected
areas with a somewhat higher concentration in low-

* For districts in the west (Kalaili, Banke, Bardiya, Rupandehi and Nawalparasi) estimated
numbers on severely and highly affected households are based only on fully and partially

lying waterlogged areas and poor communities.

destroyed houses.

Table 2 shows the estimated number of houses fully or

Across the 13 districts an estimated total of 25,254

partially damaged according to NRCS data by district.

households were severely affected, 40,000 were highly

affected and 17,236 moderately affected.

One Kattha equals 0.034 hectare

-5-

Table 2 Number of Affected Houses and IDPs

Number of affected houses
Districts

Completely
destroyed

Partly
destroyed

Table 3 Displaced families

District
Dhanusa
Mahottari
Kailali

No. of
displaced
families

Displaced from
Inarwa VDC
n/a
Thapapur,
Bhajani, Lalbhoji
&
Joshipur
VDCs
Bhimapur VDCs
Rajapur

Temporary camp
2 schools in Inarwa
5 7 schools
Mohnyl
Higher
Secondary School
and its nearby
forest area
Belasa, Bhimapur
Chediya, Rajapur

Mohamadpur
Thapuwa

Bikri cotton farm

School

Padnaha
Suryapatuwa

Padnaha-8
Community forest,
Bhagaraiya

No. of families
n/a
n/a
More than 300
families

4000
3367

1774

5000

Siraha

5137

1680

Dhanusha

3272

7779

5311

Mahottari

4028

5588

2300

Sarlahi

1155

3276

1127

Rautahat

1206

1041

718

Bara

590

375

n/a

Parsa

1600

687

n/a

Nawalparasi

632

50

632

Rupandehi

n/a

n/a

700

Banke

1429

5009

n/a

Bardiya

911

3113

595

shelter in schools, public buildings or community relief

Kailali

1332

428

440

Total

23518

34246

18503

shelters. For example 40 out of 76 households from

Saptari

Bardiya

30
About
60
families
88
7
landless
families
10
40

Source: NRCS

During the height of the flood, many more people took

ward no. 8 of Rampurkhadauna in Rupandehi, took

Source: NRCS

refuge in community shelters for two days.

It was observed by the assessment mission that most

With water levels decreasing, people have returned to

households with damaged or destroyed houses had

their houses. Those who have lost their house have

already been provided with tarpaulins. The Government

moved in with their neighbours or family members. In

is planning to compensate the families with NRs 10,000

several areas they are residing under makeshift shelters

if their house is completely destroyed and with NRs

made of tarpaulin or recovered remnants of their house

5,000 in case their house is partially destroyed.

such as roof parts. For people still living in a makeshift

Financial support however has not yet materialized.

shelter, more permanent shelter is an urgent priority (in

In general, flood affected families do have cooking

ward 4 of Harine VDC, Dhanusha, at least 10 families

utensils and access to firewood or other fuel for

were found constructing and living in makeshift shelters

cooking purposes. In most cases, flood affected

after recently having received tarpaulins).

families that have lost cooking and household goods

Looking at the conditions of the temporary camps and

during the floods have received NFIs, including cooking

people living in makeshift shelters, insufficient food,

utensils from the NRCS or other agencies.

poor shelter conditions and lack of access to safe and

clean drinking water are major challenges faced by the

Internally Displaced People (IDP)

displaced. It is expected that people in the temporary

Table 2 shows the estimated number of displaced

camps in Bardiya and Kailali will soon return to their

people based upon available data. At the time of the

villages after the water level recedes. However, return

assessment most displaced people were no longer

for the landless and homeless poor will be very difficult

residing in temporary IDP sites, except for those in

without additional support.

Bardiya and Kailali. In Kailali, more than 300 displaced

families coming from Thapapur, Bhajani, Lalbhoji and

Impact on Water and Sanitation

Joshipur VDCs are in the Mohnyl Higher Secondary

Water supply

School and in the nearby forest area. In Bardiya, NRCS

According to data from WFPs Food Security Monitoring

reported that there are about 235 displaced families

and Analysis System almost 70 percent of households

staying in temporary camps (see Table 3). Although no

in the Terai are dependent on tubewells for their

exact figures of IDPs were made available in Dhanusha

drinking water supply. Less than 1 percent of

and Mahottari, it was reported by the NRCS and DEOs

households get their water from unprotected wells and

that several families were still residing in a number of

about 28 percent depend on the use of public taps. As

schools.

drinking from unprotected wells and open source water

-6-

bodies is not common practice and most households

In many of these locations, crops were swept away and

depend for their water supply on tubewells, access to

heavy sand deposits have rendered the land useless for

safe drinking water does not seem to have been

the remaining of this agricultural season. Several rivers,

affected by the flood waters. However, no data were

for example the Kamala and Rapti rivers, eroded large

available to the mission on the quality or infection load

areas of cultivated land in some areas and pose a

of water from tubewells and this may well be a

severe risk to communities alongside the rivers.

problem. Also before flood waters receded, access to

In many parts of the Terai, transplanting of paddy was

safe drinking water was restricted as many tubewells

late and only part of the cultivable land was planted.

were submerged in water.

The prolonged period of the flood delayed planting

UNICEF and other organizations provided water

even further, resulting in over-mature paddy seedlings

treatment like bottles of water guard, bleaching powder

which when transplanted are more vulnerable to

or puro and aqua tablets for distribution to the flood

diseases and lead to lower production (about 20-30

affected population. Distribution was handled by DPHO,

percent less). In addition, late transplanting requires

NRCS and other partner organizations, targeting areas

denser planting of the seedlings, and therefore results

with an increased number of diarrhoea cases or areas

in higher seedling and labour costs. In Saptari and

where the population depends on open wells for their

Siraha, farmers informed the mission that cost of paddy

water supply. However, quantities were limited and not

seedlings for transplanting is normally around NRs 160

enough to ensure access to sufficient safe drinking

per Kattha. Currently, the cost ranges between NRs 250

water for an extended period of time.

to 300 per kattha. In Dhanusha and Sarlahi cost were

estimated at NRs 500 per kattha. When cost of labour

Sanitation

and transportation is included total investment adds up

Sanitation is very poor in the Terai districts. More than

to around NRs 2,000 per Kattha.

80 percent of the people defecate in the open (77

Where damaged, farmers are replanting paddy in the

percent report using open fields and 4 percent use

hopes of making up losses due to the flood. Because

ponds, rivers or lakes). The mission visited a village in

farmers in low-lying areas traditionally cultivate

Dhanusha without any latrines. Flood waters have

additional paddy seedbeds as insurance for crop loss,

exacerbated sanitation problems by considerably

paddy seedlings are mostly available. However, in

reducing the space available where people can go for

higher lying areas, seedlings are in short supply so

defecation. This particularly affects women and the

farmers must travel greater distances, adding to the

elderly. Footpaths leading to communities were covered

transportation cost. For some farmers, the cost of a

with human faeces. As most people, especially children

second or third planting is prohibitive, resulting in

walk barefoot on these paths, this poses a serious

fallow land.

health hazard.

Table 4 provides some preliminary estimates by DADO

on paddy areas planted and destroyed. Map 2 shows

Impact on Agriculture and Markets

preliminary estimates of crop losses at the VDC level in

Agriculture

9 districts for which data is available.

A large area of agricultural land was submerged by

flood waters during the height of the flood. In some
districts, 80 percent of planted area was under water
for some period of time. Depending on the maturity of
the paddy plants, paddy can withstand up to 10 days of
submersion. Prolonged water logging however causes
anaerobic conditions that result in plant rot. Agricultural
land near the main rivers has been severely affected:

-7-

Map 2 Crop loss

-8-

Table 4 Crop losses (ha)

Aquaculture was highly affected. In Bara, Parsa and

Rautahat districts combined about 70 Mt of fish was

Cultivable
area
70000 ha
n/a

Area
planted
63000 ha

Area
destroyed
1415 ha

n/a

n/a

Dhanusha

n/a

31000 ha

14800 ha

affected, losing up to 95% of fish production. In

Mahottari

n/a

27050 ha

13760 ha

n/a

24647

7325

Dhanusha, 627 ha out of 660 ha of fish ponds was

Rautahat

62,818 ha

44,891 ha

11,249 ha

Bara

69,958 ha

62,818 ha

850 ha (?)

Parsa

57723 ha

46700 ha

2500 ha

Nawalparasi

n/a

n/a

n/a

Rupandehi

n/a

n/a

n/a

The main district markets were not affected by the

Banke

n/a

n/a

8208 ha

n/a

floods and supplies are moving at pre-flood levels.

Bardiya

42000

n/a

Kailali

n/a

n/a

46758 qtl

Districts
Saptari
Siraha

Sarlahi

lost from a total area of about 110 hectares of fish

ponds. Mahottari reported 260 ha of fish ponds

affected by the flood.

Markets

Except for vegetables, no price increases specifically

related to the floods were observed. The local hatia-

Source: DADO

It should be noted that the data that DADO collected

bazaars were affected for a period of about 2 weeks

was gathered when much of the agricultural land was

during the floods due to rain and problems of

submerged and inaccessible, which may have resulted

accessibility. They have however been re-established

in higher levels of estimated crop loss. Observations by

and are currently functioning as usual.

the mission suggest that eventual crop losses may not

The price of coarse rice has risen slightly between NRs

be as extensive as these preliminary figures indicate.

2 to 4 per kg in flood affected Terai districts. Wheat

Much of the submerged paddy appears to not be as

prices have increase by approximately NRs 1-2 per kg.

affected as initially reported, and replanting is likely to

However, this is not unusual for this time of the year.

make-up for a significant portion of loss. For example,

Table 5 compares current prices from several district

in Parsa, affected VDCs in the south were reported to

markets in the Terai with those of 2 months ago.

have lost more than 60 percent of their paddy

Table 5 Market prices

production. However, when calculating the actual area

Market prices in flood affected districts (NRs/kg)

Sellected commodities

planted with paddy and the area damaged by floods it

Rice coarse

became evident that these losses had only occurred in

Rice Fine

Wheat

June July Aug June July Aug

5 percent of the area. Conversations with DADO staff

reveal that surplus production may be achieved in the
non-affected rain fed areas as a result of abundant
rainfall. This may well have a positive affect on the
total paddy production at the district level.

June

July

Aug

Saptari

21

20

22

23

22

24

17

18

18.5

Siraha (Lahan)

20

20

23

22.5

22

25

17

18

19

Udayapur

20

23

25

24

26

30

14

15

18
18

Dhanusha

20

22

23

40

45

45

15

18

Parsa

20

22

24

35

40

40

14

16

18

Rupandehi

19

19

20

24

24

25

16

16

17

Banke

20

21

21

24

28

38

14.75

17

17

Potato

Vegetable production has been severely affected with

Lentil

Green Vegetable

June July Aug June July Aug

July

Aug

for example an estimated 80 percent of crop lost in

Saptari

16

19

20

54

56

60

12

20

26

Siraha (Lahan)

16

17

20

52

55

58

10

16

20

Banke district alone. Mahottari reported 180 ha of

Udayapur

16

24

26

50

60

70

15

30

50

Dhanusha

15

24

28

40

50

55

12

25

45

Parsa

16

20

24

50

50

50

10

15

20

Rupandehi

14

17

20

50

50

50

18

20

40

Banke

20

21

22

50

52

54

20

22

25

vegetable crop lost.

Livestock and aquaculture loss

June

Note: all price are DHQ prices unless otherwise mentioned in the parenthesis

Livestock losses seem to be minimal mainly consisting

Source: WFP FSMAS

of small livestock such as goats and chickens. A total of

450 livestock was lost in Dhanusha (CDO data). In

The major impact is noticed in the availability and price

Mahottari a total of 498 livestock, primarily goats, were

of vegetables. Prices have doubled and for some items

lost (DLO). In Saptari 226 livestock was reported lost.

even gone up fourfold. Onions now cost NRs 35 per kg

as compared to NRs 17 previously. In Dhanusha green
leafy vegetables cost as much as NRs 45 per kg

-9-

compared to NRs 10-15 two months ago. In Bardiya

marginal farmers who have lost part or all of their crops

and Kailali district, the price for 1 kg of bottle guard has

have been severely affected. They are in need of

increased from NRs 10 to 30. These price increases are

supplementary resources and/or employment to sustain

not normal for the season.

them until the next cropping season.

Migration

Impact on Household Food Security

and Livelihoods

Labour migration is widely practiced in the Terai.

According to information from the WFP Food Security

Food Stocks

Monitoring and Analysis System, more than 41 percent

The monsoon floods occurred at the start of the lean

of households have one or more family members away

season. For many of the poor households this meant

for labour purposes during some period of the year. On

that food stocks were low or already depleted prior to

the one hand this secures a certain level of remittances

the floods. At the district level many claims were made

and therewith food security, on the other hand many of

that food stocks had been completely lost. For

these families may still be indebted for a loan taken out

example, in Banke and Bardiya it was reported that

to send a family member abroad to work. The money

about half of the affected population had lost all of its

required for house reconstruction will greatly decrease

food stocks. However, at the household level there was

the ability to repay any existing loans. Seasonal

no evidence of such impact. Food stocks are kept in

migration normally peaks during the November

special bamboo, mud and dung storage containers

January period, after harvesting of the paddy fields and

(Bhakari) which are reasonably water-resistant. In most

planting of the winter crop. There is some evidence of

areas the onset of the flood was gradual, so

early migration in some districts. For example, around

households were able to save their remaining food

75-80 persons had already left an affected village in the

stocks. In Banke, Dhanusha and Mahottari, areas near

Rampurkhauda VDC in Rupandehi to find work outside

the main rivers (Rapti, Kamala, and Bagmati)

the VDC.

experienced sudden floods due to broken dams and

However, the flooding has not caused a widespread

embankments and as a result a higher percentage of

increase in distress migration across the affected areas

households in these areas lost their existing food

in the Terai. At this stage, male family members opt to

stocks.

stay at home to attend to rebuilding and securing their

housing before moving out. Food aid and the initial

Vulnerable Groups and Livelihoods

relief support provided may also have reduced the need

The most affected population groups are the very poor,

to migrate. However, with the prospects of decreased

marginalized and landless households, who depend on

agricultural labour opportunities due to less land being

daily wages for their income. Out of the total

cultivated, the regular out-migration during the period

population affected by flood, approximately 70 percent

of November - January is expected to be higher than

are from Madheshi, Dalits, Janajati and Muslims

usual.

communities. Many of these poor households live from

hand to mouth, often facing difficulties in finding

Coping Strategies

enough work to meet their basic needs.

In the Terai, the most used coping strategies in times

of food shortage are reliance on less preferred

At the time of the assessment the demand for

(cheaper) food and borrowing. Other main coping

agricultural labour had increased somewhat for

strategies, in order of prevalence, include spending

replanting activities. However, the reduction in the

savings on food, reducing the frequency and amount of

overall planted area in the affected areas may result in

food consumed and sale of small household assets.

decreased labour demands for day labour from now

The mission observed a shift in food composition

through the harvest period in November/December

toward cheaper foods with many households simply

2007. In addition to the landless, the livelihood of

- 10 -

surviving on rice and bread complemented by salt and

RTE package does not include food items well suitable

chilies (see section on food intake). There were also

for young children or to meet the additional needs of

reports of reduced food intake. Borrowing food and

pregnant and lactating women. Hence, it would be

buying food on credit is currently heavily practiced. This

recommended to modify and accommodate items

however, can be considered a normal coping practice

suitable to meet the special requirements of these

around this time of the year, the difference being that

vulnerable groups.

the number of households doing so has dramatically

The food basket planned for general food ration

increased due to the impact of the floods.

distribution consists of 4 food items (rice, lentils, oil,

No excessive distress sale of household assets (utensils,

and iodized salt) and provides almost 1900 kcal,

jewellery, etc.) or agricultural assets (tools, livestock

assuming additional food resources at the household

etc.) was observed.

level. This is not enough to meet the nutritional needs

of vulnerable groups such as children under 5 years

Food intake

and pregnant and lactating women.

As mentioned above, food composition has changed

considerably due to the flood. Normally, most families
consume green vegetables and/or daal (lentils) with
rice or roti 3 . As witnessed during the assessment, the

Impact on Nutrition and Health

price of lentils has increased by about 20 percent from

NRs 50 to NRs 60 per kg. Because flood waters

Nutrition

destroyed most of the vegetable plots, the prices of

Prior to the flooding, malnutrition in the flood affected

vegetables have more than doubled in the local food

areas was acute and widespread. According to the DHS

markets, putting vegetables out of reach for most poor

(2006) data, the prevalence of acute malnutrition of

families this season. This shift in food intake may have

children under the age of five in the Terai averages at

longer-term affects on the nutritional status of the

16.6 percent, which is higher than the national average

population and especially children.

(13.4 percent). Prevalence is higher in the Central and

Far Western Terai districts, while it is lower in the

In the Western districts of Banke, Bardiya and Kailali

Eastern Terai. Except for the Eastern Terai, the

almost all flood affected populations have received

prevalence of severe wasting ranges from 3.7 to 4.8

ready-to-eat food (RTE) for five days during the first

percent (see Table 6). These very high figures indicate

weeks of the flood. The RTE food contained beaten

a prolonged emergency situation that needs to be

rice, chow-chow, sugar, biscuits and salt. The existing

addressed.

food basket and the quantity of food distributed should

be reviewed against the needs of the population. The
Table 6 Prevalence of malnutrition in Terai

Sub-region

Height-for-Age
Weight-for-Height
Weight-for-Age
Percentage
Percentage below Percentage below Percentage below Percentage below Percentage below
below -2 SD
-3 SD
-2 SD
-3 SD
-2 SD
-3 SD

Eastern Terai

37.0

12.5

11.2

0.7

32.3

7.9

Central Terai

52.8

22.5

20.7

4.6

50.2

17.2

Western Terai

52.2

24.9

13.8

4.2

44.6

13.7

Mid-Western Terai

42.1

15.2

15.7

3.7

37.9

10.5

Far-Western Terai

43.1

11.2

19.6

4.8

41.1

9.6

Terai

46.3

18.0

16.6

3.4

42.3

12.6

Nepal

49.3

20.2

12.6

2.6

38.6

10.6

According to the WFP FSMAS, almost 80 percent of households consume

green vegetables, 42 percent lentils/pulses, and 92 percent rice at least 5
days of the week.

- 11 -

The flood emergency has caused an additional risk for

providing infant formula but discarded the idea based

further deterioration in the nutritional status of the

on the unavailability in the market and lack of safe

already very vulnerable (child) population. No

water for the beneficiaries. This shows that awareness

anthropometric data were collected during this rapid

on the inappropriateness of distribution of such supplies

assessment. However, beyond seasonal deterioration in

needs to be strengthened.

malnutrition indicators, no increase in the number of

Health

severely acutely malnourished children was found by

the mission, based upon the limited data available.

Major health concerns at the moment are the increased

According to the assistant DPHO in Dhanusha, under

incidence of viral fever, diarrhoea, skin diseases, and

normal conditions about 30% of hospitalized children in

eye infections. Main causes for morbidity include

Jaleshwar Hospital suffer from malnutrition and this has

drinking of contaminated water, very poor sanitation

not significantly increased since the floods. In

and hygiene practices, lack of nutritious food intake, as

Rampurkhadauna and Bujawa VDCs of Rupandehi,

well as consumption of small fish from paddy fields

growth monitoring sessions were conducted before and

contaminated from open field defecation.

immediately after the flood. Based on the community

The potential spread in vector born diseases needs to

records underweight rates were about 35% and have

be closely monitored as stagnant flood water provides a

not yet increased. The next growth monitoring session

perfect breeding ground for mosquitoes. Although data

was scheduled at the end of August and data needs to

are incomplete the first cases of malaria for this season

be reviewed to check if malnutrition rates have

have already been reported. In the Terai, among poor

increased due to the impact of flood.

households use of mosquito nets is not common. NRCS

Observations by the mission also did not yet reveal an

received 2,000 mosquito nets from UNICEF. According

increase in the number of malnutrition cases, however

to NRCS, 1,000 will be distributed in Banke and 1,000

with the worsening diet and deterioration in the

in Bardiya district. Further supplies of mosquito bed-

sanitation and health environment, it is likely that the

nets are being procured for distribution to affected

already existing problem of malnutrition in the Terai will

population by UNICEF.

be further exacerbated due to the impacts of flooding

In total 39 people died due to flood (see Table 7).

on food consumption, health and hygiene. Changes in

Main causes are drowning, snake bites and diarrhoea,

food composition may further aggravate micronutrient

Mortality might be underreported, since not all cases

deficiencies like anaemia.

come to health facilities and are being registered.

Breastfeeding
Table 7- No. of deaths

No indication was found that breastfeeding practices

Districts

had been affected by the floods. Interviews with

Saptari

Dead
3

mothers revealed that breastfeeding frequency had not

Siraha

been affected by the flood. However, some mothers

Dhanusha

reported that the quantity of their breast milk had

Mahottari

decreased due to poor diet, sickness, abdominal pain

Sarlahi

and diarrhoea.

Rautahat

As for the concern over possible replacement of

Parsa

breastfeeding by the use of infant formula or milk

Nawalparasi

n/a

powder, or even practicing bottle feeding, this was not

Rupandehi

n/a

Bara

Banke

observed nor reported by any of the stakeholders. No

infant formula has been distributed as a part of the
relief efforts. However, NRCS in Kailali did consider

Bardiya

Kailali

Total
Source: NRCS

- 12 -

n/a

39

Table 8 Number of Affected Schools

No epidemics have been reported at the time of this

writing. The health system seems to be well prepared

Districts

and is sending rapid response teams to areas with

Saptari
Siraha
Dhanusha
Mahottari
Sarlahi
Rautahat
Bara
Parsa
Nawalparasi
Rupandehi
Banke
Bardiya
Kailali

diarrhoea outbreaks to quickly contain further

contamination.
In almost all districts health posts are functioning
normally, although accessibility was a problem during
the flood and is still an issue in some heavily affected

Number
of
schools
n/a
n/a
300
250
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a

Heavily
affected

n/a

Partially
affected

Total
affected

1
0
16
4
1
1
n/a
11
11

4
5
5
5
84
100*
43
196*
n/a
30
31
n/a
n/a
11
n/a
11
n/a
Data currently being compiled by DEO
7
7
77
n/a
11
11

areas. In Saptari mothers of Sakarpura and Rampura

* Based on survey conducted by NGO Aasman. In Mahottari 149 schools

Malhaniya VDCs reported problems accessing the

were lightly affected

health posts due to water logging and slippery paths.

Source: DEO

In Kailali, the sub-health post of Lalbhoji VDC and the

Schools constructed from less durable material such as

health post of Thapapur VDC were damaged due to

mud, straw and bamboo have suffered the brunt of the

flood, however services have been provided via schools

damage. Most schools affected by the flood are

within the catchment areas. In Banke, three health

however functioning again. In some of the most

facilities in Holiya, Gangapur, and Bethani VDC were

affected areas education delivery is affected due to lack

also affected. In Saptari, the health post of Sakarpura

of class rooms and teaching materials. However,

VDC (one of the most flood affected VDC in this

teachers are expected to run classes in alternative

district) was damaged as was the Public Health Center

locations.

of Nawarjpur in Siraha.

Flood impact to schools did affect physical facilities

Insufficient medicine stock was reported as an issue

such as furniture, blackboards, playgrounds, toilet

due to irregular supply chains, further affected by bad

facilities, drinking water and compound walls. Student

road conditions and frequent bandhs. The worry of

educational material (books, notebooks, school bags

DPHO staff is focused around medicines (antibiotics,

and uniforms) was damaged. For instance, in the

ORS, IV saline fluid) required to contain outbreaks of

Western districts of Banke and Bardiya. In Banke

infectious diseases such as bacillius dysentery as

preliminary information indicates that 1,796 children

current stocks are not sufficient.

have lost their education material. In Bardiya it was

reported that 1,500 school going children completely

Each district has formed Rapid Response Teams for the

lost their school uniform, educational material and text

management of outbreaks in case of emergency.

books. A further 6,105 children in Bardiya partially lost

Similarly, agencies working in districts and regions have

their educational material and text books 4 . In Mahottari

also provided technical and material supports for

75 children lost their books and stationary.

regular health services and provision of mobile health

camps.

The majority of Early Childhood Development (ECD)

centres are attached to government run schools.
Consequently, it is assumed the impact on ECDs was

Impact on Education

similar to the impact on primary schools. Two ECD

Schools were closed for regular holidays during the

centres in Mahottari were reported to have been

height of the flood. They were scheduled to reopen

destroyed.

again from 11 August onwards. Available data across

the 13 flood affected districts on damage to school
buildings are presented in Table 8.

Since these data are not consistent with reports from other districts,

they need to be further verified.

- 13 -

Non-formal education has not been affected by the

although the re-planting provides some alternative job

floods. Classes are normally run by the VDC and most

opportunities for the landless. Longer-term prospects

often take place in community buildings.

are worrisome as less agricultural land has been

planted, translating into fewer employment

Immediate Relief Provided

opportunities from now through the harvest period. A

surplus harvest in non-affected areas may offset this to

The Nepal Red Cross Society has been very effective in

a certain extent but it is likely that out-migration will be

delivering immediate relief assistance to the flood-

higher than normally this year for highly affected VDCs.

affected populations. Relief support was also provided

Prior to the floods, the nutrition situation in the Terai

by the CDO through the DDRC, DADO, DEO and DPHO.

was already at an emergency level with 17 percent of

In addition, (I)NGOs and UN agencies such as Aasman,

children under 5 suffering from acute malnutrition. The

CARE, CARITAS, World Vision, Save the Children, ICRC,

underlying causes to the very poor nutritional status

IRC, FNCCI, RRN, Fida International, Plan, LWF, ADRA,

include food insecurity, poor child feeding and care

UNDP, UNICEF and WFP have provided support. Details

practices, very poor water, sanitation and hygiene

are provided in the district tables in Annex III 5 .

conditions, and poor health environment. These

problems have been exacerbated by the impact of the

Conclusion and Response Options

floods on livelihoods, food composition, sanitation

Flooding in the Terai is a recurrent problem. However,

practices, and the incidence of diarrhoea among the

according to the communities, the flood intensity has

population. Therefore, although there is no evidence

been increasing over the last few years. There is an

that these figures have further deteriorated, there is an

urgent need for a longer-term solution to mitigate the

increased risk of deterioration the near term without

impact of flood water in the Terai districts through river

immediate intervention.

training programmes, river drainage, embankments,

building of higher shelter houses and disaster

On the positive side, the immediate health needs in

preparedness programmes particularly. For immediate

terms of outbreak control seem to be addressed by the

relief programmes it is essential that the DDRCs

DPHO. The health emergency response system with

become more pro-active in standardized data collection

rapid response teams and mobile health camps seem to

in disaster-affected communities.

be well organised. However, there is a concern about

adequate medical supplies and preposition of

A very large number of households were affected by

emergency stocks at the district level to effectively

the flood this year. Most of the affected people are

respond to any disease outbreaks.

marginalized, poor, landless, Dalits, Madhesi, Tharu and

Janajati. The flood had the biggest impact on housing,

Short term response options

particularly for poor people with houses made of

bamboo, straw and mud. Crop land near the main

Following the RTE food ration provided by the

NRCS and others, it is essential that severely affected

rivers and in low-lying areas was heavily affected with

households be provided with short term food rations of

high or total crop losses. In other areas the standing

at least one to two months to cover their immediate

paddy crop has benefited from the temporary

food needs and prevent further deterioration in the

immersion and an overall surplus production in these

nutrition status of vulnerable people, particularly

areas is expected.

women and children. It is recommended to limit the

In most areas, the water level increased gradually,

food assistance to only the severely and highly affected

enabling households to save their food stocks.

VDCs (see Map 1) to prevent inflation in the number

Employment opportunities in affected areas are limited

of beneficiaries. Severely affected households in

moderately and lightly affected VDCs may need support

For most up-to-date information on assistance provided see also OCHAs

flood and landslide updates at www.un.org.np

but this is best provided through local NGOs.

- 14 -

children suffering from severe acute malnutrition (SAM)

The biggest impact of the flood was the damage

to or complete destruction of houses, especially those

needs to be strengthened.

constructed of poor building materials belonging to the

poorest segment of the population. To re-build these

messages on nutrition, specifically on infant and young

houses will cost between NRs 4,000 10,000. The

child feeding, water, sanitation and hygiene, and health

government announced a provision of NRs 10,000 to

messages should be introduced soonest.

people who had completely lost their house and NRs

5,000 to those whose house was partly damaged. It is

education materials. The schools/ECD centers affected

essential that this relief support reach the poor as soon

by floods need physical improvements and renovations

as possible to avoid further deterioration of their health

such as classroom, toilets, furniture, drinking water,

and livelihoods.

playground, and blackboard, etc.

Mass communication programmes providing

In affected schools, there is a need to provide

Most households who have lost their houses have

already been provided with tarpaulin or temporary

Longer-term response options

shelters. However, conditions within temporary shelters

are harsh and people are unprotected from rain and

damage each year during the monsoon. A food-for-

sun. Many people have moved in with neighbours in

work or a cash-for-work or food-voucher programme is

already crowded houses. A more permanent solution to

recommended to address the longer-term

re-build houses is urgently required. The issue is

reconstruction and flood prevention needs. The priority

particularly relevant for landless people who do not

requirements include river training and drainage,

have a place to go back to.

recovery and maintenance of embankments,

homestead raising, road re-construction and irrigation

For small-farmers who have lost their crops,

Floods are a recurrent event causing misery and

subsidies for seeds and fertilizer are recommended to

rehabilitation.

reduce the huge additional investment that they have

to make for re-planting or land preparation. The MoAC

nutritional status of mother and children is most

has made an amount of NRs 5 million available for

urgent. A longer-term integrated mother and child

immediate relief.

health nutrition programme, including elements of food

security, nutrition promotion with particular attention

The response of the health system has been

As mentioned above, improvement in the

adequate and seems to be able to cope with the

on proper infant and young child feeding practices, as

situation in terms of disease outbreaks. Additional

well as interventions to increase awareness regarding

supplies of medicine for pre-positioning to contain

the use of clean water, sanitation and hygiene

potential outbreaks of water-born and vector born

awareness training is strongly recommended. The focus

diseases need to be made available, and distributed

of these efforts should be on disadvantaged

effectively.

communities with high rates of acute malnutrition.

To ensure that the nutritional needs of vulnerable

Community disaster response and preparedness

groups such as children under five and pregnant and

programmes in highly vulnerable areas should be

lactating women are met, supplementary food ration

promoted to mitigate the impact of floods.

consisting of fortified blended food is strongly

recommended for the worst and highly affected VDCs.

accountable system for rapid registration of affected

Those efforts should be combined with a nutrition

populations needs to be promoted.

awareness programme.

In the most affected areas the health surveillance

system should be strengthened to incorporate nutrition

monitoring to detect early signs of an increase in the
incidence of malnutrition. The referral system for

- 15 -

Support to DDRC in setting up a proper and

Acknowledgment
This inter-agency rapid flood assessment was conducted by the World Food Programme, UNICEF and Save the Children
Alliance with field level support provided by the Nepal Red Cross Society. This report was prepared by the following
mission members:
WFP:
Siemon Hollema, Pushpa Shrestha, Moti Thapa, Kanta Khanal, Krishna Kanal, Laxmi Chaudhary, Ramesh Sah, Raju
Chhetri, Birendra Shahi, Rajkumar Yadav, Digambar Dahal, Monika Shrestha
UNICEF:
Monique Beun, Pragya Mathema, Sunita Shrestha, Sabrita Kafle, Govind Chhetri, Sundar Gurung, Naveen Paudyal,
Eleonora Genovese, Silvia Kaufmann
Save the Children Alliance:
Punita Mandal, Rajendra Tuladhar
The mission team is grateful to NRCS for their excellent support provided and for making available and reorganizing the
flood impact data to the mission. The mission would also like to thank the support provided by the different CDOs, DDRC
committees, DADO staff, DHO and DEO.
Detailed reports prepared by assessment teams are available for the following districts:

Saptari and Siraha

Mahotarri and Dhanusha

Rautahat, Bara and Parsa

Rupandehi and Nawalparasi

Banke, Bardiya and Kailali

- 16 -

Annex I Field Check List

Inter-Agency Rapid Assessment

Nepal - 2007 Flood
Field check-list
District ______________________

Map 1

1 - Context
Using a map of the district, identify the VDCs/Communities that are affected by the flood
Use the following criteria:
1.
Worst affected (all hh affected)
2.
Highly affected (> 50 % of HH affected)
3.
Moderately affected (25 50% of HH affected)
4.
Lightly affected ( < 25% of HH affected)

Map 2

Map 3
T1

See attached map

template for each
district

5. Not affected
On the same map indicate which of the affected VDCs/communities cannot be reached by vehicle due to
flood.
On the same map indicate which areas have serious security concerns and due to this are not accessible.
How many people are approximately affected/displaced?

Use attached table

format

2 Nutritional status
Note: this section, only based on health worker key informants and health records. If there is no health care system or health workers in this site, collect information from
community members
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4

Are there individuals at higher risk of malnutrition?

Infants
Children
Elderly
Handicapped
Women/mother
Socially excluded (specify)

Q5

Is there indication of decreased/interrupted breastfeeding?

Q6

If so, what are the reasons?

Q7








___

What is replacing breastfeeding?

Diluted cow/goat milk
Infant formula
Regular milk powder

Littho/Jaulo
Other

Q8





Are there cases of acute malnutrition?

Has the number of acute malnutrition cases increased in the past 3 weeks?
To what factors is increased acute malnutrition attributable?

Has there been any donation of distribution of Infant Formula? By whom?

- 17 -

___





Provide details
Provide details

Age groups <6

months;
6-24 months
Describe based on
observations in
highly and worst
affected areas.

3 Health status
Q9

What are the main causes of morbidity and mortality

Source: _______________________________
Period of reference: ______________________

Q 10

Morbidity

Mortality

Cause 1. ____________________
Cause 2. ____________________
Cause 3. ____________________

Cause 1. ____________________
Cause 2. ____________________
Cause 3. ____________________

Provide details

Are there reports of outbreaks?

Source: _______________________________
Period of reference: ______________________

Provide details

Possible diseases: ______________________

______________________
______________________
Q 11

Q 12

Q 13

Map 4
Q 14

Q 15
Q 16
Q 17
Q 18
Q 19

Are there non-operational health facilities due to the floods?

What aspect of the health facility has been affected by the floods?
Building
Staff
Supplies
Do people face physical problems to access the health posts?
4 Housing, shelter, water and sanitation
Indicate on the map location of temporary shelter camps and the approximate numbers of IDPs in each camp.
Tick the main constraints in the IDPs camps in order of priority.
Shelter
Clothing
Blankets
Food
Clean water
Overcrowding
Sanitation
..
.
Is it likely that any off the above constraints will change in the short term?
Are there safe place for mothers to breastfeed?

___
___
___

















Q 20

Percentage of affected households that have access to cooking facility and cooking fuel?

___

Q 21

Percentage of affected households that have access to mosquito net?

___

Q 22

Q 23

1 is highest
priority

Provide details




Is access to clean water for people in affected areas a problem?

Will this change in the short term?
How many houses are completely / partially damaged?
Fully
Partially

Map 5

Provide details

Use table 1

5 - Agriculture and markets

Using a map of the district, identify VDCs where crops have been affected by the flood.
Use the following criteria:
1. Completely lost (More than 60% loss)
2. Highly affected (40-60 % loss)
3. Affected (20-40% loss)
4. Little affected (10 20% lost)
5. Not affected
Can paddy be replanted in affected areas?

If yes, do people have the means to do so?

See attached
map template.

- 18 -

Q 24

Seedlings
Tools
Manpower

___
___
___

Cows/buffalos
Goat / sheep
Chicken

___
___
___

Provide details

Have people lost their livestock?

Q 25

Are markets functioning?

Q 26

What are the problems faced by traders in bringing food to the markets?

% lost


Roads are impassible
Lack of trucks
Insecurity
Other
Q 27

Q 29
Q 30

Q 31

6 - Household Food Security

In flood affected areas have people lost their food stocks?
What percentage of households has access to food stocks?
Are there social groups facing specific food access problems

___
___
___
___

Socially excluded (specify)

Female-headed HH
Elderly
Handicapped
Land-less
Daily wages

Can people access their traditional means of earning an income?








___
____
____
____
____

Is there evidence of distress migration?

Q 34

Has the size of daily meals decreased?

Q 35

Has composition of daily meals changed, e.g. number/type of aliments?

Q 36

Has the number of daily meals decreased?




Adults
Children under 5
7 Education
What is the status of the schools?
Partially /fully damaged classroom facilities
Partially /fully damaged sanitation facilities




How is the current condition of learning environment?

Classroom
Teaching /learning material
Availability of teachers
Playing Space

Q 39

provide details





Q 33

Q 38

Approximate
percentage based
on observations
in highly and
worst affected
areas.

Is there evidence of distress sale of assets?

HH assets (jewellery etc.)
Agricultural assets
Extensive borrowing

Q 37

Provide current
and last months
price.


___

Agricultural activities
Sale of goods
Remittances
Business etc.
Daily wages
Q 32

In order of
priority. 1 being
highest.

Have prices of staple foods increased?

Coarse rice
Wheat
Lentils
Availability and prices of vegetables

Q 28






Are basic facilities available for all children?

Text books/note book
School dress/bag

Q 40

- 19 -








Indicate %
increase
compared to
normal migration
pattern

specify

Is the Early Childhood Center (ECD) affected? Provide details

Q 41

Is there need for non formal education?

Q 42

Are there particular issues related to different groups?

Ethnic / Geographic
Gender




8 Aid Provided
Q 43

Q 44

What
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

assistance is currently provided, by whom?

Shelter
Water
Sanitation
Hygiene promotion
Essential non-food items
Food distribution
Supplementary feeding
Therapeutic feeding
Infant and young child feeding
Health

Provided

9 - Response options
Is a Feeding Programme required?
Which beneficiaries?
How many?
What type?
Where?

Q 45

Is food aid / cash / vouchers urgently required?

Which beneficiaries?
How many?
Where?
For how long?

Q 46

Q 47

What are the urgent Wat-San requirements?

What is required?
Which beneficiaries?
How many?
Where?
When?

What are the urgent shelter needs?

What is required?
How many?
Where?
For who?
When?

Q 48

What are the most immediate health needs?

What is required?
How many?
Where?
For who?
When?

Q 49

Is agricultural assistance required?

What is required?
How many?
Where?
For who?
When?

Q 50

What is the long-term recovery assistance required?

What is required?
How many?
Where?
For who?
When?

- 20 -

Institution

Description

Annex II District maps

- 21 -

- 22 -

- 23 -

- 24 -

- 25 -

- 26 -

- 27 -

- 28 -

- 29 -

- 30 -

- 31 -

- 32 -

- 33 -

Annex III People affected

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Kailali District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

Name of Flood affected

VDC

Flood
affected
Wards

Total
numbers of
Households

Dhansinghpur
Narayanpur
Tikapur
Patharaiya
Durgauli
Chuha
Baliya
Bhajani
Lalbhoji
Khailad
Munuwa
Thapapur
Bouniya
Joshipur
Hasuliya
Basauti
Pavera
Chaumala
Janakinagar
Dhangadhi
Dododhara
Darakh
Kotatulashipur
Ramshikharjhala
Sandepani
Pratappur
Sugarkhal
Total

Total
Population

1768
2097
7324
3432
2553
2818
6838
1905
2260
1590
1979
2199
2097
2981
2190
934
896
3446
923
13674
2537
1973
1563
2125
3019
2208
2488
79817

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

11224
13466
45108
22990
15483
19095
37104
13185
12611
11725
13908
15795
15453
22490
16355
7270
7241
21782
5998
78570
17007
14178
11848
15796
20917
14947
14867
516413

123
30
79
74
49
22
3
75
5
40
15
448
7
177
4
5
14
3
9
14
4
17
7
4
38
15
1281

Population

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged
community
Water Source

Remarks

(Types, location
and number)

191
138
167
59
54
44
2
214
2
9
67
315
1
88
16
7
5
1
16
8
6
4
3
9
3
1429

* For Kailali severely and highly affected households are based only on fully or partial damage houses
Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Banke District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Kanchanapur
Mahadevpuri
Baijapur
Binauna
Fattepur
Gangapur
Matehiya
Laxmanpur
Narainapur
Kalaphanta
Katkuina
Holiya
Betahani
Bankatti
Kamdi
Belahari
Manikapur
Ganapur
Karkando
Kohalpur
Naubasta
Chisapani
Rajhena
Bankatawa
Shamshergunj
Bageshwori
Indrapur
Khajurakhurda
Sonpur
Raniyapur
Udharapur
Sitapur
Saingaun
Radhapur
Belbhar
Paraspur
Jaispur
Piprhawa
Bhawaniyapur
Hirminiya
Udayapur
Puraina
Puraini
Basudevpur
Nepalgunj Municipality
Total

Flood affected
Wards
Tikulipur
7
NA
9
Paneriya-8
1-9
1,2,3,6
NA

1-9
1-9
4,7,9
Kapasi & Manikapur

Piprhawa
4

4, 6, 9

Chamakdarpur
1-9
Shivarpuri

7,8,9

1
1-17

Total
numbers of
Households

Total
Population

1478
1429
1473
981
2350
1103
1331
837
862
749
995
1,063
1163
879
1665
882
1747
1,016
1,454
4,364
3,009
999
3,235
3,123
1,342
2,682
1,389
1,032
1,396
1,060
1952
1747
985
685
840
751
1009
806
724
1343
585
1002
719
962
11926

8996
8746
12375
7412
16698
6088
7278
5191
5203
4299
5866
5,799
7306
5,641
9544
5235
8849
5,697
6,927
22,674
17,531
5,552
16,774
18,549
7,840
13,976
7,551
5,832
8,002
6,248
10186
9194
6082
3742
5010
4239
6606
4672
3913
8058
3406
5539
3988
5369
64781

73124

418464

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

1
3
8
5
3
57
0
0
0
0
0
183
39
23
3
8
34
22
11
4
9
2
3
10
7
28
22
15
25
10
32
5
2
3
6
12
7
13
7
73
10
10
13
13
381
1122

24
59
32
20
47
226
0
0
0
0
0
572
71
50
8
22
52
4
13
20
14
51
82
23
9
6
3
34
69
41
63
15
6
42
157
4
16
25
196
25
12
23
41
2651
4828

* For Banke severely and highly affected households are based only on fully or partial damage houses

- 34 -

Population

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Duration
Households
(Days)

Name of
agency

Damaged
community
Water Source
(Types, location
and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Bardiya District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Name of Flood affected

VDC

Flood
affected
Wards

Gulariya Muni.
Mohammadpur
Kalika
Mainapokhar
Sorahawa
Jamuni
Padnaha
Baniyabhar
Bagnaha
Neulapur
Suryapatuwa
Dhodhari
Magragadi
Dhadhawar
Motipur
Belwa
Deudakala
Thakurdwara
Shivapur
Rajapur
Bhimmapur
ManpurTapara
Manau
Khairichandanpur
Gola
Pashupatinagar
Nayagaon
Badalpur
Sanoshree
Taratal
Patabhar
Daulatpur
Total

Total
numbers of
Households

Total
Population

8852
1742
2020
1532
2461
2423
1257
2128
1834
1958
1376
1540
3208
2886
3508
2247
3068
1360
1102
2092
1516
1457
1204
1153
1024
1078
856
1091
3315
1713
2152
1210
66363

51305
11731
11095
9489
14355
12888
9566
16501
13077
13080
10248
10157
20830
19713
21619
13642
18950
8608
8277
14113
11115
10587
7866
7695
7447
6969
6484
7513
17598
9505
15728
8080
425831

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

86
61
4
20
14
13
4
25
169
152
13
10
24
8
9
1
10
14
247
11
17
12
10
12
6
5

957

Population

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged
community
Water Source

Remarks

(Types, location
and number)

121
277
100
22
28
20
115
223
551
489
40
48
77
15
20
11
153
22
755
38
8
115
45
43
46
5
15
25
20
22
6
3475

* For Bardiya severely and highly affected households are based only on fully or partial damage houses
Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Rupandehi District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.
Name of Flood affected VDC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

Majhgawa
Bairghat
Bogadi
Hati Bangai
Betkuiya
Roimihawa
Devdaha
Kerwari
Siddarthanagar Municipality
Raypur
Semara
Karauta
Thumawa Piprahawa
Asuraina
Farena
Bagauli
Padsari
Tikiligarh
Basantapur
Bagaha
Dhamauli
Chhipagah
Pazzerkatti
Pokhabhini
Patkhauli
Siktahan
Chhotko Ramnagar
Dhakdhai
Bodbar
Bhagwanpur
Ama
Sitauliya
Total

Flood
affected
Wards
3-6,9
1-9

1-9
1-9

2-6
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9

Affected Households

Total
Moderately affected (C)
Severely affected (A)
Highly affected (B)
Total
numbers of
Population Households Population Households Population Households Population
Households
788
4648
16
803
4739
7
1418
8368
1248
7362
784
4625
24
678
3999
19
2996
17676
7
1823
10756
2
10295
60735
19
1677
9893
152
1023
6034
33
1460
8612
109
670
3955
25
1088
6420
140
634
3738
59
1326
7824
33
1258
7423
12
1772
10453
6
933
5505
24
705
4162
75
845
4983
1
1016
5996
20
696
4107
4
811
4785
5
800
4719
6
1608
9484
2
707
4526
3
895
5278
16
1300
7669
1671
9859
39
1497
8830
22
1279
7545
42
46504
274708
922

* For Rupandehi severely and highly affected households are based only on fully or partial damage houses

- 35 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged community
Water Source (Types,
location and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Nawalparasi District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Ramgram Municipality
Badhara Dubauliya
Rampur Khadauna
Guthi Suryapura
Baidauli
Guthi Prasauni
Sonamai
Pratappur
Makar
Jahada
Jamuniya
Rupauliya
Harpur
Rampurwa
Kudiya (37 ha)
Narsahi
Paklihawa (34 ha)
Thulo Khairatwa
Kushma
Bhujahawa
Sukrauli
Haku
Sanai
Gairmi
Palhi
Manari
Sarwal
Devgawa
Total

Flood
affected
Wards

9
9
2,3
1-9

Affected Households

Total
Severely affected (A)
Highly affected (B)
Moderately affected (C)
Total
numbers of
Population Households Population Households Population Households Population
Households
3893
22630
103
325
1072
6594
36
151
668
4874
85
462
739
4945
5
14
756
5036
3
12
984
6563
1
19
898
6022
94
91
991
6480
16
51
4003
20594
1
7
1483
8122
11
1474
8505
2
1494
8400
7
856
5508
20
52
695
4402
4
52
1533
9361
13
153
863
5485
5
16
1371
9248
22
73
632
4155
18
54
955
6102
37
28
889
6387
60
148
783
4937
18
83
882
5770
12
125
978
6442
55
366
869
5708
58
62
778
5216
22
31
919
5697
14
782
4862
26
63
738
4815
44
127
32978
202860
758
2599

* For Nawalparasi severely and highly affected households are based only on fully or partial damage houses

- 36 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged community
Water Source (Types,
location and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Parsa District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Birgunj Municipality
Sambhauta
Tulshibarwa
Dhobini
Auraha
Bhabanipur
Prasauni Birta
Jagarnathpur Sira
Langdi
Hariharpur
Harpatganj
Shreepur Pachgwa
Bahuwari Pidari
Bhauratar
Gamahariya
Nagardaha
Pakahamainpur
Bairiya Birta
Bisharampur
Supauli
Belwa
Alau
Surjaha
Lakhanpur
Maniyari
Lal Parsa
Shreesiya
Pokhriya
Seba Brwa
Bhedihari
Basantpur
Biranchibarwa
Mirjapur
Bhishwa
Jayamangalapur
Bairiyabirta D.P.
Dewarbana
Sakhuwa Prasauni
Kauwawan Kataiya
Mahuwan
Udayapur ghurmi
Sugauli Birta
Bindwashni
Pacharukhi
Bahuwarabhata
Remgadhwa
Khalwatola Sresiya
Lahawarthakari
Lipanibirta
Biruwathi
Basdilwa
Harpur
Bagbana
Amarpati
Prasaunibhata
Chorni
Dhore
Bageshori Titrawana
Bhikhampur
Ghoddaudpipra
Mudali
Jhauwaguthi
Gobindapur
Dakaila Bahuri
Bagahi
Total

Total
Flood affected
numbers of
Wards
Households
1-3, 9-10, 12-19

1-9
1-9
1-9
1, 2
4
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
5
1-9
3,4
1-9
4
3,4
5
1-9
1-9
5,7
2,3,7
1-9
4
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
3
8
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
3
1-9
4
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
9
9
1-9

10628
850
496
581
717
736
608
846
495
625
549
639
746
1075
518
436
394
743
880
464
133
998
513
660
1070
464
442
899
693
739
1008
409
543
627
684
613
639
1065
513
658
854
848
631
689
876
591
709
492
862
1826
765
789
1053
562
656
1266
615
822
601
453
732
837
384
477
762
55548

Affected Households

Total
Population
74396
5950
3472
4067
5019
5152
4256
5922
3465
4375
3843
4473
5222
7525
3626
3052
2758
5201
6160
3248
931
6986
3591
4620
7490
3248
3094
6293
4851
5173
7056
2863
3801
4389
4788
4291
4473
7455
3591
4606
5978
5936
4417
4823
6132
4137
4963
3444
6034
12782
5355
5523
7371
3934
4592
8862
4305
5754
4207
3171
5124
5859
2688
3339
5334
388836

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

340
24
35
19
10
4
93
11
19
6
11
2
7
62
25
23
26
45
61
1
16
3
22
1
8
11
8
20
2
5
10
2
22
33
26
39
15
43
30
46
20
18
26
26
7
77
5
1
15
34
18
26
13
60
90
2
13
1
23
25
2
55
3
2
40
1788

2380
168
245
133
70
28
651
77
133
42
77
14
49
434
175
161
182
315
427
7
112
21
154
7
56
77
56
140
14
35
70
14
154
231
182
273
105
301
210
322
140
126
182
182
49
539
35
7
105
238
126
182
91
420
630
14
91
7
161
175
14
385
21
14
280
12516

Population

105
10
16

735
70
112

12

84

35

25
12

175
84

21

49

11
28
5

77
196
35

40

280

16

112

20

140

3
2

21
14

33

231

15
16
12
5
5
2
3
29
18

105
112
84
35
35
14
21
203
126

38

266

56

392

15

105

35

25

175

14

572

4004

27

189

- 37 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

Damaged
distribution
community
Coverage
Water Source
Name of
Duration (Types, location
agency
Households
and number)
(Days)
NRCS
340
13
NRCS
24
1
NRCS
35
1
NRCS
19
1
NRCS
10
1
NRCS
4
1
NRCS
93
1
NRCS
11
1
NRCS
19
1
NRCS
6
1
NRCS
11
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
7
1
NRCS
62
1
NRCS
25
1
NRCS
23
1
NRCS
26
1
NRCS
45
1
NRCS
61
1
NRCS
1
1
NRCS
16
1
NRCS
3
1
NRCS
22
1
NRCS
1
1
NRCS
8
1
NRCS
11
1
NRCS
8
1
NRCS
20
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
5
1
NRCS
10
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
22
1
NRCS
33
1
NRCS
26
1
NRCS
39
1
NRCS
15
1
NRCS
43
1
NRCS
30
1
NRCS
46
1
NRCS
20
1
NRCS
18
1
NRCS
26
1
NRCS
26
1
NRCS
7
1
NRCS
77
1
NRCS
5
1
NRCS
1
1
NRCS
15
1
NRCS
34
1
NRCS
18
1
NRCS
26
1
NRCS
13
1
NRCS
60
1
NRCS
90
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
13
1
NRCS
1
1
NRCS
23
1
NRCS
25
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
55
1
NRCS
3
1
NRCS
2
1
NRCS
40
1
1788
77

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Bara District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Inarwamaal
K.N.P.
Baghwan
Dharmanagar
Purainiya
Hardiya
Prasauni
Basatpur
Balirampur
Maheshpur
Pipradhi
Pheta
Raghunathpur
Prastoka
Telkuwa
Bariyarpur
Sisahaniya
Haraiya
Karaiya
Laxmipur Kotwali
Bisunpur
Paterwa
Amritganj
Golaganj
Uchidiah
Shreenagar Bairiya
Kachorwa
Hariharpur
Bhatauda
Bhodaha
Batara
Rauwahi
Piparpati Jabdi
Babuaain
Barainiya
Chatawa
Tedhakatti
Dewapur
Mahendra Aadarsha
Bhagawanpur
Matiarwa
Bhaluhi Bharwaliya
Dohari
Badaki Fulbariya
Gadahal
Narahi
Itiyahi
Umjan
Sihorwa
Kabahi Goth
Piprabirta
Prashurampur
Bagahi
Madhuri jabdi
Kabahi Jabdi
Dakshin Jhitkaiya
Buniyad
Bishrampur
Ganjbhawanipur
Dahiyar
Fattepur
Uttar Jhitkaiya
Total

Flood
affected
Wards
1-9
1-9
1-8
1,2,4,6,9
1,2,3,4,6,9
1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
6
1,3,4,5,6,9
1-8
1,2,3,7,8
9
2,3,4,5,6,7
1,4,5,8,9
3,4,5,7,8
2,3,7,9
4,5,6,8,9
1,2,6,7,8
3,6,7,8,9
3,9
1,2,3
7,8,9
1,4,5,6,8,9
1,2,4,5,7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,
1,2,3,4,6,
1
1,2,3,5,6,7,9
1,2,3,6,7,8,9
1,7
3,8
2,3,5
1,2,5,7
4, 5
1,5,9
1,4,5,8,9
4,7,8,9
7
7
7
1,7
1,3,5,6,7,8,9
1,6,7,8,9
2,3,8
1,2,3,9
9
1,3,4,6,7
1,4,5,7,9
2,4,6,
7
2,5,6,7
1,2,6
1,4,6,8,9
1,2,3
8,9
5,6
4,5
1,4,6
8,9
1,2,3,8,9
1,2,3,5,6,9
9
3,5,7

Total
numbers of
Households
1005
5113
638
606
734
601
1086
850
781
1043
341
854
581
1174
665
1413
398
1352
743
649
438
527
1211
530
550
531
1418
655
748
852
452
428
338
427
738
636
604
509
783
641
715
782
550
790
488
656
762
854
620
781
492
679
548
423
530
1014
621
717
896
981
1178
780
49500

Affected Households

Total
Population
6140
32260
4112
4460
5600
4236
7321
5867
5475
7120
4337
6000
4130
8248
4477
9668
2626
7763
4414
4388
3354
3238
7813
3846
3730
3748
9134
4417
5252
5461
3055
2786
2617
2728
3973
4660
3808
3385
4016
4181
4959
5414
3872
6147
2948
4072
5500
4839
3814
5291
3335
5091
2744
2824
3794
7335
4534
4779
5979
6260
7517
5132
330024

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

55
95
39
14
32
33
2
25
22
9
5
16
18
8
16
9
15
8
2
10
9
20
38
24
43
2
21
27
3
4
7
10
8
4
14
8
4
1
1
2
14
19
16
9
4
9
8
15
1
13
11
7
7
6
3
3
7
5
10
1
1
12
864

399
603
209
81
203
196
17
153
159
52
56
96
135
40
113
53
81
37
14
89
75
130
240
155
268
16
128
186
23
26
45
61
69
21
82
58
23
12
6
13
85
120
190
71
45
56
41
73
10
70
74
53
42
47
24
29
48
32
79
6
6
63
5687

123
25
1
77
7
10
43
27
23
6
10
10
30
21
22
26
55
31
9
7
12
3
5
3
12
598

- 38 -

Population

Agencies involved in Food Aid

Damaged
distribution
community
Coverage
Water Source
Name of
Duration (Types, location
agency
Households
and number)
(Days)
55
2

DDC, KNP,
FNCCI,
NRCS Sub
Branch
Amalekhga
nj, Kreepa
Daily,
Janjagrity
Yuwa
Summiti
Jeetpur

43
51

1
1

33

14

10
9
20
38
24
43
2
21
27

2
2
2
2
22
2
2
2
2

4
1
1
2

2
2
2
2

11
11
1
7

2
2
2
2

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Rautahat District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Auraiya
Rampurkhap
Mathiya
Jokaha
Narkatiya
Dumariya
Jhunkhunwa
Karuniya
Banjaraha
Piprabhagwanpur
Jingadwabelbichhwa
Phatuwa Maheshpur
Sharmujawa
Inrawa
Tejapakad
Laukaha
Debahi
Basanpatti
Chandranigahpur
Dumariya Matiyon
Santpur Mathiyon
Bairiya
Akolwa
Rajpurpharhadwa
Bhediyahi
Laxmipur Belbichhawa
Basatpur
Rajpur Tulshi
Sakhuwaba
Jetharahiya
Hajminiya
Ramauli Bairiya
Baluwamadanpur
Samanpur
Haraiya Paltuwa
Gamariya Parsa
Dharampur
Sangrampur
Jatahara
Mithuawa
Barharwa
Saruatha
Rajdevi
Piprarajwada
Bhalohiya
Basbitijigadiya
Gamahariyabirta
Bishrampur
Raghunathpur
Sakhuawadhamaira
Mudwalwa
Barahampuri
Gaur Municipality
Bishunpurwa
Jaynagar
Gangapipra
Pachrukhi
Malahi
Gadudabairiya
Gedahiguthi
Bariyarpur
Madhopur
Dharhari
Prempurgonahi
Pothiyahi
Hathiyahi
PipraPokhariya
Marydpur
Sitalpur Barganiya\
Karkach Karmahiya
Tengraha
Sonarniya
Kankpur
Birti Prostaka
Katahariya
Bhasherewa
Laxminiya
SantpurDostiya
PhatuhaHarsaha
Pautaura
Bagahi
Ajagaibi
Inarwari
Gaudhau
Rangpur
Laxmipurdostiya
Mahamadpur
Pipariyadostiya
Pratpurpaltuwa
Simrabhawanii
Dipahi
Khesarahiya
Matsari
Pipariya paroha
Pathara Budharma
Total

Flood affected
Wards
1-9
2,3,4,8
5,8
1, 4-9
1, 3-7, 9
3,4,1,2,6,7,8
5,6,7,8,9,4
1,2,4,5,6,7,8
1,2,3,4,5,8,
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
2,3,4,7,8,9
4,5,7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,9
3,5,6,8,9
1,3,7,8
1,2,3,4,5,6,8
2,3,4,8
3
2,3,6,7
6
5,6,7,3,1
1,2,3,4,5,6,9
1,8,9,2,4,3,5,6,7
1,2,3,4,5,7,6,8
1,2,3,5,6,7,9,8
7,3,8,6,2,1,9,4,5
1,2,3,4,5,6,8,9
4
3,4,6,7,8
2,3,4,5,6
8,9
1,2,3,9
2,3,4,5,6,7,8
2,5,6,8
2,5,3,4,7,8,9,6
3,9,8,2,6,1
1,2,3,4,5,
7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6
1,3,4,6,5,2
1,2,3,6,8,4,5,9,7
1,3,4,5
1,4,5,6,7,8,9
5,2,7,8,6,4
6,7,8,1,4,5,9
1,2,3,4,7,8,9
4,5,1,7,2
2,5
5
6,7,8
5,6,2,9,8,7,1,3,4
1,2,3,5,6,7,9
1-13
1,9,3,6,7,8,4,2
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
1,3,5,7,8,9
6,7,8,9
1,2,3,5,6,8,9
7,6,9
1,5,6,8,9,7,4
5,6,8,9
8,9,5,6,7,3,4,2,1
2,1,8,3,4,5,7,9,
1,2,4,3,5,7,8
1,3,5
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,8,9,4,5,6
2,3,4,8,9,5,6,1,7
1,2,4,5,3,6,7,8,9
1,4,5,3,2,9,7,8
3,4,5,6,7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
1,2,3,4,5,6
8,1,3,4,9,5,2,6,7
3,7,9,2,8,1,6,4,5,
3,6,9
2,4,6,7,9
3,4,5
1,2,3,4,7,8
1,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
1,3,5,8
1,2,6,7
2,4,6,7,8,9
1,2,3,4
1
4,5,6,7,9
3,4,8
1,4,8
1,6,7,8,9
1,4,5,6,7
5,6,8
1,5,6
9,7,6,4,1,3,8
3,2,5,4,1,6,9
7,1,3,6,5,4,9

Total
numbers of
Households
64
31
38
54
41
43
351
65
21
34
124
26
19
77
6
6
30
53
16
188
2
18
365
78
170
35
88
22
1
18
33
10
16
13
9
49
96
16
46
22
47
76
32
29
30
84
294
10
6
10
91
51
106
61
147
35
7
13
136
20
156
83
24
15
12
26
43
68
59
48
15
51
36
44
47
10
19
7
17
58
9
4
42
37
1
99
26
9
26
22
97
6
99
17
42
5053

Total
Population
476
202
259
341
302
261
2118
675
113
283
797
214
103
480
47
40
174
305
91
1144
2
119
2218
596
1166
232
619
200
10
126
272
63
108
81
69
393
723
103
339
179
373
457
249
264
194
526
1753
65
38
70
603
310
676
487
1115
220
28
93
822
152
938
560
167
96
72
198
273
503
406
376
118
317
184
429
294
66
116
50
111
386
64
27
237
262
20
666
177
45
183
134
588
44
610
137
195
33587

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

35
4
4
6
3
2
10
30
8
15
30
26
15
10
4
4
27
2
13
1
1
7
8
35
11
7
12
7
1
9
13
10
5
13
9
49
60
16
12
17
25
7
18
10
20
11
15
10
6
6
6
6
29
33
42
8
7
12
1
6
24
15
17
13
12
19
38
44
59
21
13
31
23
3
39
10
18
7
17
31
4
4
11
5
1
16
15
9
18
19
8
6
23
17
42
1481

254
30
33
40
24
14
53
287
39
136
217
214
81
75
36
27
145
8
73
10
1
45
52
284
142
38
94
51
10
73
89
63
37
81
69
393
507
103
106
141
185
32
128
95
109
88
79
65
38
46
53
39
185
235
369
56
28
87
3
48
136
89
124
77
72
152
252
243
406
133
106
197
128
34
242
66
110
50
111
195
24
27
45
41
20
155
111
45
108
120
54
44
154
137
195
10346

Population

29
26
34
22
29
10
9
35
10
19
42
0
3
18
2
2
3
6
0
8
1
11
21
43
24
22
40
15
0
3
20
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
22
4
22
3
14
19
10
0
0
0
0
0
85
3
77
28
65
1
0
0
6
14
22
57
5
2
0
7
5
24
0
27
0
1
13
41
8
0
0
0
0
16
5
0
2
25
0
5
0
0
8
3
0
0
7
0

222
166
226
145
224
61
73
388
56
147
268
0
16
111
11
13
29
27
0
60
1
74
150
312
214
158
309
149
0
17
183
0
23
0
0
0
0
0
161
32
188
29
121
169
85
0
0
0
0
0
550
19
491
252
506
8
0
0
45
104
142
405
31
19
0
46
21
260
0
243
0
6
56
395
52
0
0
0
0
125
40
0
18
179
0
43
0
0
75
14
0
0
42
0

0
1
0
26
9
31
332
0
3
0
52
0
1
49
0
0
0
45
3
179
0
0
336
0
135
6
36
0
0
6
0
0
8
0
0
0
36
0
12
1
0
66
0
0
0
73
279
0
0
4
0
42
0
0
40
26
0
1
129
0
110
11
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
19
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
0
0
29
7
0
78
11
0
0
0
89
0
69
0

0
6
0
156
54
186
1992
0
18
0
312
0
6
294
0
0
0
270
18
1074
0
0
2016
0
810
36
216
0
0
36
0
0
48
0
0
0
216
0
72
6
0
396
0
0
0
438
1674
0
0
24
0
252
0
0
240
156
0
6
774
0
660
66
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
114
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
66
0
0
174
42
0
468
66
0
0
0
534
0
414
0

1166

8805

2406

14436

- 39 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Duration
Households
(Days)

Name of
agency

Damaged
community
Water Source
(Types, location
and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Sarlahi District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Achalgadh
Arnaha
Atrouli
Balara
Belhi
Bhadsar
Chhataul
Chhatona
Dhungrekhola
Dhurkauli
Fulparasi
Gamhariya
Godeta
Gourishankar
Haripur
Hathiyol
Karmaiya
Khirwa
Khutauna
Kodena
LaxmipurSu.
Madhubani
Mahinathpur
Malangawa N.P.
Manpur
Mirjapur
Noukailawa
Pidariya
Pipariya
Rajghat
RamnagarBahaur
Sakraul
Salempur
Sasapur
Shreepur
Sikhauna
Simara
Sisotiya
Sisout
Sudama
Sundarpur
TribhuwanNagar
Total

Flood
affected
Wards

Affected Households

Total
Highly affected (B)
Severely affected (A)
Moderately affected (C)
Total
numbers of
Population Households Population Households Population Households Population
Households
15
94
42
56
23
55
62
15
69
142
15
118
50
100
39
150
21
67
7
66
24
68
24
65
17
27
12
26
28
25
100
175
23
45
75
175
24
75
45
117
42
77
13
75
75
102
50
75
25
556
45
162
5
19
27
54
15
64
7
21
40
150
18
64
21
42
9
35
37
82
35
65
14
54
17
55
25
60
25
19
27
64
34
63
0
0
1321
0
3619

- 40 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged community
Water Source (Types,
location and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Mahottari District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Gauribas
KishanNagar
Bijalpura
Singyhi
Banauta
Bangaha
Laxminiya
Dhamaura
Harinmari
Hatisarwa
Dharampur
Mahadaiya
Banaulidanauli
Pipara
Padaul
Matihani
Sahodawa
Ekrahiya
Nainhi
Simardahi
Sugabhawanipatti
Parsapataili
Badiyabanchauri
Dhirapur
Pigauna
Mahottari
Prakaulifulhatta
Majhaurabisanpur
Jaleshwar nagar
Bhamarpura
Ratauli
Sandha
Itaharwakatii
Siswakattaiya
Ankar
Halkhori
Gaidabhetpur
Damhimadai
Bhatoliya
Gonarpura
Sarpallo
Balwa
Samsi
Ramgopalpur
Ekdarabela
Kolhuwabagiya
Bathnaha
Pokharvinda
Manra
Sonaul
Shreepur
Parsadewad
Khopi
Belgachi
Nigaul
Gaushlla
Khairbanni
Raghunathpur
Baspitti
Bharatpur
Aurahi Phulvariya
Total

Flood
affected
Wards

Total
numbers of
Households
1
11
6
23
24
37
92
445
85
80
414
150
145
52
115
337
150
315
164
182
142
120
66
112
59
144
125
101
1395
200
96
95
454
92
135
182
374
202
149
417
183
185
112
82
20
275
120
83
77
120
15
62
31
17
8
18
118
145
105
15
10
9289

Total
Population
5732
7943
6924
7760
6013
11745
9443
12116
6217
6676
4830
4969
7884
6014
7619
5531
9085
7112
5072
5180
3322
6568
8213
3814
9815
5136
5638
22046
8239
5405
4335
6508
7195
5228
5867
5217
9410
4490
8669
8104
6632
9705
8341
6497
8138
8816
5740
3678
9598
9527
6940
5542
6419
13655
6870
5060
5497
8323
7068
429130

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households

1
9
6
23
11
4
50
150
36
64
178
112
53
40
40
185
109
259
164
30
110
48
22
72
59
104
81
34
342
97
65
23
80
68
39
142
79
63
131
102
80
97
21
67
15
117
92
44
45
69
14
62
26
11
0
7
45
50
82
3
10
4242

3
49
33
126
61
22
275
825
198
352
979
616
292
220
220
1017
299
1424
1141
165
605
264
121
396
397
572
486
187
1881
533
357
126
440
374
214
781
429
346
720
561
440
533
115
368
83
643
506
242
247
389
77
508
143
61
0
38
247
275
451
19
55
23547

0
2
0
0
13
33
42
295
49
16
236
38
92
12
75
152
41
56
0
152
32
72
44
40
0
40
44
67
1053
103
31
72
374
24
96
40
295
9064
18
315
103
88
91
15
5
158
28
39
32
51
1
0
5
6
8
11
73
95
23
12
0
13972

- 41 -

Population
0
11
0
0
72
141
231
1623
270
88
1298
209
506
66
412
836
226
308
0
836
176
396
242
240
0
240
242
368
5791
566
170
396
2057
132
528
220
1623
1903
99
1732
557
440
455
90
30
869
154
214
176
300
6
0
30
32
45
60
401
522
126
72
0
28833

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged
community
Water Source
(Types, location
and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Dhanusha District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Singiyahi Madan
Bala Bakhar
Balaha Saghara
Balaha Goth
Balaha Kathal
Lakker
Chora Koilpur
Inaruwa
Raghunath pur
Dhanuji
Dewari Parbaha
Aurahi
Sabaila
Lakhauri
Sugamadhukari
Lohana
Jhoji Kataiya
Patnukka
Itharwa
Dhanusha Gobindpur
Jhatiyahi
Anrudpatti Katrait
Mansing patti
Bafai
Bharatpur
Labtoli
Godar
Kurtha
Kharihani
Chakkar
Pachaharaba
Mithileswormauhai
Lauwakhor parsai
Khajuri chanha
Pra.kheMahuwa
Ekrahi
Mithileswor Nikas
Gopal pur
Yadukuha
Dhabauli
Harine
Dhanusha Dham
Sapahi
Umaprempur
Bhutahi Paterwa
Satokher
Thera Kachuri
Hanspur Kathpulla
Baghchaura
Tarapatti Sirsiya
Thadi jhijha
Ghorghas
Depura Rupaitha
Mukhiya patti
Tulsiyahi Jabdi
Tulsiyahi Nikas
Bahera Bela
Fulgama
Basahiya
Bindhi
Basbitti
Nagrain
Kanakpatti
Paureshwar
Pra ko Mahuwa
Lagma Garha Guthi
Nathpati Bisarbhora
Puspwalpur
Digambarpur
Naktajhijh
Laxminiwash
Bateshwar
Bahuarwa
Hathipur Harbara
Laxmipur Bagewa
Santipur
Suganikash
Bengadawer(Lalgadh)
Duhabi
Nannupatti
Goth Koilpur
Ramdaiya
Debdiha
Machi Jhitkaiya
Dubarkot Hatletwa
Hariharpur
Baniniya
Janakpur
Total

Flood
affected
Wards
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1.2.4.7.8,10,11,16

Affected Households

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)
Moderately affected (C)
Total
Total
numbers of
Population Households Population Households Population Households Population
Households
496
2776
295
1550
201
1226
280
1665
175
1067
105
598
458
2864
205
1271
253
1593
320
1963
125
774
195
1189
338
2111
135
877
203
1234
389
2492
180
1134
209
1358
261
1637
66
409
195
1228
182
1032
56
302
126
730
125
732
42
243
83
489
273
1634
101
585
172
1049
182
1049
58
330
124
719
92
529
42
239
50
290
60
369
29
182
31
187
123
700
42
231
81
469
77
474
24
142
53
332
113
720
29
182
84
538
192
1087
25
152
167
935
75
438
24
143
51
295
56
335
20
123
36
212
309
1808
57
347
252
1461
161
926
36
208
125
718
44
256
17
92
27
164
80
507
14
78
66
429
180
1128
56
347
124
781
83
486
15
92
68
394
66
360
45
243
21
117
74
425
27
153
47
272
145
867
32
200
113
667
161
964
76
463
85
501
147
891
84
520
63
371
149
907
54
318
95
589
96
580
33
202
63
378
79
457
27
150
52
307
166
1029
31
192
135
837
189
1123
35
199
154
924
95
591
32
201
63
390
79
498
28
174
51
324
68
413
23
138
45
275
141
838
63
386
78
452
97
595
35
217
62
378
498
3124
235
1468
263
1656
164
991
52
307
112
684
79
506
22
134
57
372
167
968
64
346
103
622
69
403
22
136
47
267
86
533
30
183
56
350
71
418
23
140
48
278
94
585
35
221
59
364
80
492
25
154
55
338
45
266
13
72
32
194
297
1747
105
634
192
1113
110
650
35
209
75
441
127
749
31
192
96
557
560
3489
178
1121
382
2368
440
2627
128
693
312
1934
450
2964
123
774
327
2190
439
2752
135
837
304
1915
412
2589
62
384
350
2205
72
445
25
154
47
291
78
513
21
189
57
324
114
673
27
152
87
521
327
1930
64
365
263
1565
269
1703
54
338
215
1365
75
462
28
175
47
287
164
1040
29
182
135
858
125
806
27
169
98
637
148
933
35
217
113
716
58
319
13
75
45
244
81
487
19
120
62
367
33
201
11
67
22
134
52
301
17
98
35
203
72
447
21
132
51
315
75
451
28
157
47
294
101
632
26
163
75
469
63
404
17
111
46
293
46
284
25
152
21
132
60
379
25
153
35
226
76
374
23
122
53
252
175
969
117
643
58
326
79
444
28
154
51
290
150
955
45
293
105
662
40
259
13
82
27
177
177
996
32
176
145
820
159
970
49
302
110
668
350
2187
125
781
225
1406
38
226
13
72
25
154
52
334
17
110
35
224
432
2298
122
640
310
1658
14630
88531
4907
29405
9723
59126

- 42 -

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged
community
Water Source
(Types, location
and number)

Remarks

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Siraha District

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)
SN.

Name of Flood affected

VDC

Total
Flood affected
numbers of
Wards
Households

Affected Households

Total
Population

Severely affected (A)

Highly affected (B)

Moderately affected (C)

Households Population Households Population Households Population

1 Majhauliya

1-9

127

638

27

165

15

88

85

385

2 Bhediya

1-9

97

574

25

14

84

79

465

3 Chikna

1-9

384

2032

73

441

43

257

268

1334

4 Sikron

1-9

212

1212

35

20

122

186

1055

16

92

32

11

60

5 Bhokraha
6 Kalyanpur Jawdi

1-9

309

1655

63

378

51

304

195

973

7 Bishnupur (Pra.ra.)

1-9

213

1007

21

127

29

187

851

8 Lagdi Goath

1-9

219

1432

34

204

37

224

148

1004

9 Lagdi Gadiyani

1-9

285

1997

67

345

35

610

183

1042

10 Harkatti

1-9

411

1509

58

345

101

610

252

554

11 Itatar

1-9

291

1913

22

134

44

265

225

1514

12 Aurhi

1-9

268

1800

39

234

51

308

178

1258

13 Gautari

1-9

65

325

18

105

15

91

32

129

14 Bariyarpatti

1-9

300

1954

66

394

62

371

172

1189

15 Hakapada

1-9

194

1077

65

390

39

231

90

456

16 Siraha Municipality

1-9

579

2618

155

860

91

540

333

1218

17 Barchhawa

1-9

159

916

36

215

34

117

667

18 Thalha Kataha

1-9

106

614

30

182

25

148

51

284

19 Inarwa

1-9

451

2670

115

688

101

600

235

1382

20 Madar

1-9

180

1155

53

315

37

223

90

617

21 Badaharamal

59

310

17

105

53

33

152

22 Sitapur
23 Siswani

8
41

38
310

4
18

18
130

4
17

20
122

0
6

0
58

24 Itari parsahi

1-9

133

772

29

35

122

708

25 Kurwa Hanuman Nagar

26 Hanumannagar Pra.m.
27 Maheshpur Gamahariya

1-9

27
268
30

192
1059
162

8
61
0

47
256
0

2
19
3

11
84
25

17
188
27

134
719
137

28 Ramnagar Mirchaiya

1-9

120

577

21

125

10

61

89

391

29 Rampur Birta

1-9

83

410

14

86

18

111

51

213

30

154

45

41

15

68

30 Raghopur
31 Malhaniyakhori
32 Krishnapur
33
34
35
36
37
38

23

102

29

43

30

141

830

60

362

16

98

65

370

38
46
62
15
33
10

263
248
304
99
204
39

18
11
15
6
16
3

126
67
87
42
96
14

10
9
12
2
14
7

68
56
68
13
85
25

10
26
35
7
3
0

69
125
149
44
23
0

12

49

14

16

19

1-9
1-9

66
343
132
73
212
121
78
103
70
208
67

444
2140
867
448
955
734
526
809
427
1565
460

9
112
14
23
48
48
12
9
21
46
41

64
698
90
142
275
291
79
75
129
325
256

29
71
40
18
10
14
19
31
15
89
16

195
439
252
111
51
85
127
220
95
621
106

28
160
78
32
154
59
47
63
34
73
10

185
1003
525
195
629
358
320
514
203
619
98

1-9

144

908

60

381

25

161

59

366

32

155

14

71

26

12

58

34

14

20

1-9

Tenuwapatti
Belaha
Sarshwar
Sonamati Majhaura
Bhadaiya
Bashtipur

39 Bishnupur Katti
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50

Gauripur
Arnama Pra. Pi.
Sukhachaina
Malhniya Gamhriya
Chatari
Khirauna
Kabilashi
Bhagabanpur
Silorwa Pachhwari
Pipra Pra. Pi.
Tulsipur

51 Laxmipur

1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9

52 Phulabariya
53 Karjanaha
54 Laxaminiya

1-9

132

720

45

60

366

65

309

55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67

1-9

336
97
40
28
98
28
94
82
72
23
16
56
109

1398
725
245
170
825
154
532
545
405
126
67
373
552

56
9
9
9
10
11
23
14
23
16
8
7
28

265
70
58
53
78
63
140
86
136
90
34
35
168

76
32
13
18
10
8
6
43
6
1
2
46
5

360
240
84
110
76
45
38
302
41
6
9
322
31

204
56
18
1
78
9
65
25
43
6
6
3
76

773
415
103
7
671
46
354
157
228
30
24
16
353

68 Ashanpur

52

310

39

224

13

86

69 Betauna

38

230

37

31

186

121
48
12
4
49
106
143
45
254
16
16
20
107
62
10004

697
286
70
18
298
606
921
226
1413
93
66
140
575
467
57037

80
29
8
2
27
13
31
14
77
4
0
9
28
26
2334

468
172
52
7
164
72
180
74
371
26
0
63
168
162
13743

36
14
0
1
10
23
37
0
30
12
7
2
37
20
1952

204
86
0
6
58
123
216
0
160
67
28
14
218
138
12283

5
5
4
1
12
70
75
31
147
0
9
9
42
16
5718

25
28
18
5
76
411
525
152
882

70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83

Sanhaitha
Bhagawatiur
Naharararigol
Gadha
Itaharwa kalyanpur
Sakhuwanankar katti
Bhawanipur kalabanjr
Mahadeva portaha
Brahman Gaurchhari
Padariya
Bhawanipur Pra. Dha.
Mahanaur
Arnama baniniya

Devipur
Durgapur
Chandraudaypur
Chandralalpur
Chandraayodhyapur
Nahara Ballkawa
Sothiyain
Dhangadhi
Lahan municipality
Janakinagar
Kharukyahi
Mauwahi
Jijhaul
Kachanari
Total

1-9

1-9

1-9

1-9
1-9
1-9

1-9

- 43 -

38
63
189
167
31011

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)
NRCS/SCF/
20
2
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

Damaged community
Water Source (Types,

Remarks

location and number)

22

89

17

382

46

146

15

29

65

23

69

21

103

23

35

104

48
25

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

19

44

194

145

31

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

23

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

123

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

28

19

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

10

79

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

12

55

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC
NRCS/SCF/
DAO/DDC

18

1802

55

50

11

33

395

Nepal Red Cross Society

Impact of Flood in Saptari District

Affected Households

General Information (Affected VDCs and Population)

SN.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89

Name of Flood affected

VDC
Badgama
Bakduwa
Baghangama Katti
Baunula
Banarjhula
Barhi Sirpur
Barmajhiya
Baswalpur
Basbitti
Bathnaha
Belhi
Belhi Chapena
Bhangha
Bhagwatpur
Bhardah
Bhutahi
Bbjshhariya
Bode Barsain
Boriya
Barahmpur
Chhinmasta
Dadha
Daulatpur
Deuri
Deuri Bharuwa
Dhangadhi
Digwa
Farsaith
Fulkahi
Gamhariya Parwaha
Gobargadha
Goithi
Hanumannagar
Hardiya
Haripour
Inwara
Inwarwa Fulwariya
Ithari Bishnupur
Jagatupur
Jamuni Madhepura
Jandoul
Joginia-1
Joginia-2
Kabilasa
Kalyanpur
Kanchanpur
Kataiya
Khadakpur
Khojpur
Khoksar Prawaha
Kochabakhari
Koiadi
Kushaha
Lalapati
Loniya
Loizara
Malwapur
Mandewa
Malekhpur
Maleth
Malahania
Malwaha
Manraja
Mohanpur
Nargho
Odraha
Pakari
Paterwa
Pathargada
Pato
Fakira
Fatepur
Piprapurw
Patha
Pipra Pachim
Rajbiraj Municipality
Ramnagar
Rampur Jamuwa
Rampur Malahaniya
Rauthat
Nakti Raypur
Sakarpura
Sarswar
Sambhunath
Simraina Sigiyoun
Tarhi
Tikuliya
Tilathi
Ko-Barsain
Total

Flood
affected
Wards
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9
1-9

Total
numbers of
Households
150
192
150
154
30
305
200
55
54
46
65
136
91
25
268
198
275
105
30
41
70
46
97
200
81
115
195
25
15
135
195
103
198
85
75
95
21
210
119
71
91
67
107
105
69
177
240
65
27
12
268
460
77
16
2
17
5
205
25
50
340
84
25
92
25
325
201
120
104
223
25
310
105
322
145
143
35
210
410
23
55
335
171
98
305
42
255
85
120
11539

Total
Population
689
1392
643
924
129
1517
998
335
297
289
397
531
459
112
1678
892
2475
633
177
173
434
241
598
1081
377
667
919
145
87
702
897
529
997
595
457
683
105
1277
714
418
546
402
642
630
414
1082
1198
380
165
73
1142
2858
472
94
15
104
32
1120
150
305
2040
500
150
565
150
1948
1267
725
613
1343
160
1860
630
1932
870
870
217
1277
2478
143
340
2010
1029
627
2104
259
2014
510
735
67853

Severely affected (A)

Moderately affected (C)

Highly affected (B)

Households Population Households Population Households

30
25
17
11
6
98
18
9
7
3
5
17
13
2
12
30
35
13
17
9
15
6
31
16
4
9
21
3
2
11
81
17
18
7
11
13
17
7
9
3
9
11
7
14
4
21
26
7
7
5
60
115
40
12
2
11
5
75
15
32
57
39
9
41
14
209
108
98
16
98
20
198
76
201
86
109
12
85
109
11
15
243
96
35
56
6
98
25
55
3381

182
150
105
68
37
588
108
53
40
18
30
105
65
15
72
185
209
78
103
52
91
36
184
92
23
51
124
12
10
64
482
105
110
45
62
78
40
66
18
54
65
42
84
24
126
156
40
45
32
360
690
250
65
15
66
32
460
90
192
342
230
54
250
84
1250
652
590
99
591
125
1188
456
1208
516
660
75
525
658
68
95
1458
579
215
336
39
588
150
335
20260

Population

Agencies involved in Food Aid

distribution
Coverage
Name of
Duration
agency
Households
(Days)

Damaged
community
Water Source

40
64
49
74
9
55
72
23
7
6
27
34
13
11
132
83
58
31
27
14
25
18
32
89
37
51
85
10
5
59
55
41
38
38
31
40
95
98
110
68
42
56
100
91
65
156
214
58
20
7
55
90
37
4

246
385
300
448
56
335
438
140
46
22
166
225
75
69
795
499
350
186
165
86
160
108
192
534
220
304
511
66
35
355
336
246
528
232
185
245

80
105
85
72
15
151
105
25
28
27
33
85
55
12
74
85
92
61
86
18
30
22
34
95
40
55
89
12
8
65
59
45
92
40
33
42

261
857
238
408
36
594
452
142
211
249
201
201
319
28
811
208
1916
369
91
35
183
97
222
455
134
312
184
67
42
283
79
178
359
318
210
360

50
10
5
20
25
22
5
6
10
5
17
10
8
33

600
600
400
252
300
600
546
390
936
780
340
120
41
330
540
222
26

105

637

40

240

9
5
13
4
19
4
6
10

38

130
10
18
283
45
16
51
11
116
102
22
28
125
5
112
29
121
59
34
23
125
301
12
40
92
75
56
212
36
109
22
65
5340

660
60
113
1698
270
96
315
66
698
615
135
175
752
35
672
174
726
354
210
142
752
1820
75
245
552
460
340
1272
220
654
135
400
31241

10
12
5
5
9
15
8
7

5
6
3
4
3
8
13

3
153
255

452
1628
5
6

- 44 -

7
10

7
3

60

330

27
5
6
38
15
48
5
3
53
8
16

72
37

7
496

48
38

772
225

2863

15897

Remarks

(Types, location
and number)

10
7

703

Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell
Tubewell