You are on page 1of 6

 Introduction

This is an open letter to all you people that have been duped into believing in the Global Warming. By
hook and by crook you have been lied to and drawn into supporting something that is nothing more for
the rich and powerful to find another way to steal from you yet again. The big problem is the LAME
Street Media is nothing more than a propaganda tool for the Progressive movement.

 AL Gore and his “An Inconvenient Truth” Lies.

I start here because this is where the scam starts. Al Gore and Barack Obama and other influential
people from around the world have devised a Carbon Credit scheme as a means of reducing Greenhouse
gas. When in fact they nothing more than derivatives tools to make considerable amount of profit for
those that control the market. What are derivatives? They are what caused the banking collapse of
2008 that was masked over but not solved by the bailouts. But back to Al Gore and his pack of lies.

What are the “eleven inaccuracies”? (the following is from the UK New Party's website) The page has
another link were there were actually 20 false hoods told by Gore.

1. The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The
Government’s expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
2. The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature
increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the
rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
3. The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by
global warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that it was “not possible” to attribute
one-off events to global warming.
4. The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming.
The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case.
5. The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic
ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this
was because of a particularly violent storm.
6. The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice
age: the Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
7. The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The
Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
8. The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise
dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
9. The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact
increasing.
10. The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people.
In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred
years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
11. The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New
Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this
appears to be a false claim.
This is indisputable fact a British court has rule the movie is full of falsehoods and is nothing more than
propaganda.

So I ask this where was this story in the Lame Street Media? Should Gore be charged with Grand
Larceny and hit with a RICO charge for conspiring to commit global fraud on a grand scale?

 Next how do AL and Barack Profit? This will take some time to unravel.

I am not a person that believes in Conspiracy Theories like the Rothschild, Committee of 300, 911 was an
inside Job to name a few. So please read this and understand I am not one of those. I just see the
pieces coming together and it does not look good. I had seen all the pieces but did not make the
connection until I was asked to look into this connection. I had seen it happen from the beginning back
in the 70’s and it appeared as a noble concept. But then Man being Man the movement was corrupted
by greed and power hungry people looking to control the masses. Along with that some pretty extreme
views and resolutions to what they believe the perceived problem is.

It is a web of loosely fitted, seemingly unrelated things until you at the catalyst and it falls into place.
The key word in this web is “Global Governance”. This is the key that will unlock all the doors to their
agenda. Some portions a driven solely by greed, some by an Earth first agenda, some just acting without
truly realizing what the underlying goal of the core group is. This movement started as an inconspicuous
fringe group and has come to evolve with the influence of some wealthy, the influence of Politicians has
grown into a mainstream movement. The masses are being led down a predetermined path without
realizing the core groups’ end game resolution.

It starts with a person you may or may not have ever heard of. Maurice Strong A business man that is
relatively unknown to the masses. The Linked article above shows he was the organizer of the First
Earth Day. He was a business man turned environmentalist that is tied to the UN. I found an article
that point out IN 1992 he headed up Earth Summit and stated "the United States is clearly the greatest
risk to the world's ecological health," and wrote in an UNCED report in August 1991 that: "It is clear
that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class...involving high meat
intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, ownership of motor vehicles,
small electric appliances, home and work place air-conditioning, and suburban housing are not
sustainable... A shift is necessary toward lifestyles less geared to environmental damaging
consumption patterns." It is clear he has an agenda and will do almost anything to achieve his goal.

He is Also Tied to another Group seemingly unrelated being the Club of Rome. The Club of Rome
founded in 1968 is a Think Tank group of like minded environmentalist. They grew in influence during
the 70’s in academia and political clout. During the 80’s they expanded. According to their own History
statement. “At the same time, the Club of Rome broadened the scope of its work and advanced the
global agenda in the fields of education, welfare and environment.” Simply put education or
indoctrination? Stop for a moment and think not of college campuses, this is where they moved into
educating the young across the globe from the grade school level on. They have created a religious ideal
in these young minds. I do mean Religion, of Mother Earth or as it is called GAIA. This Religious
foundations is easily found in the words of their chief advocate Al Gore in his Nobel Prize acceptance
speech. "We face a true planetary emergency. The climate crisis is not a political issue, it is a moral
and spiritual challenge to all of humanity.” Spiritual?

The Club has some interesting members that include Al Gore, Javier Solana, Bill Clinton, Mikhail
Gorbachev, Tony Blair, Jimmy Carter, Stephen Scheider, Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, George Soros, Ted
Turner. So this is not some fringe element that you may have heard about. Its members have a varying
degree of expertise and influence. The alarming thing is the control that some seek. Other seeks to
control the population and reduce it. Others want to reshape who does what where and when. But
make no mistake Global Governance is global control. The Club works with and is directly connected to
the UN. Working with Council on Global Governance produced a report entitled Our Global
Neighborhood. They included 12 recommendations.

1. Consolidation of all international agencies under the direct oversight of the United Nations.
2. Regulation by the United Nations of all transnational organizations and financial institutions.
3. Independent source of revenue for the United Nations and taxes on aircraft and shipping fuels, and
licensing the use of the global commons.
4. Eliminate the veto power and the permanent member status on the Security Council.
5. Authorize a United Nations ready reaction force.
6. Require United Nations registration of all arms and the reduction of national armies as a part of a
multilateral global security system under the authority of the United Nations.
7. Require individual and national compliance with all United Nations Human Rights treaties.
8. Activate the International Criminal Court, make the International Court of Justice compulsory for
all nations, and give individuals the right to petition the courts to remedy social injustice.
9. Create a new institution to establish economic and environmental security by ensuring sustainable
development.
10. Create a new international environmental court.
11. Adopt a declaration that climate change is an essential global security interest that requires the
creation of a high-level action team to allocate carbon emission based on equal per-capita rights.
12. Cancellation of all debt owed by the poorest nations, global poverty reductions, and for equitable
sharing of global resources as allocated by the United Nations.

It basically creates world governance within the UN. So they have started to set up the pieces within the
UN.

Next they need something they can rally the world around. Again this is an environmental group.
Working with another group The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is a scientific
intergovernmental body tasked to evaluate the risk of climate change caused by human activity. The
very name show that they have predisposed to a line of though on Climate Change. Would it not be
reasonable to consider them biased? Back in the 71 Stephen Schneider found a home in the
Environmental movement when he co authored a report saying that we were heading into the next ICE
age. Then in 1976 it became Global Warming. He is one of the founders of the global warming
movement. Here are some of his quotes.
"A cooling trend has set in, perhaps one akin to the Little Ice Age." - Twenty-year-old Schneider quote
cited in the Washington Times, June 12, 1992

"Temperatures do not increase in proportion to an atmospheric increase in CO2... Even an eight-fold


increase... might warm earth's surface less than two degrees Centigrade, and this is highly unlikely in
the next several thousand years." - from paper Schneider co-authored in 1971 cited in Environmental
Overkill by Dixy Lee Ray (1993) Ok He like to take both sides.

"[Global warming linked to emissions of CO2, methane and other gases] is a scientific phenomenon
beyond doubt. It's only a question of how much warming there will be." - Quoted by David L. Chandler
of the Boston Globe, January 23, 1989 This is debunked by the recent Suppressed EPA report. I will
come back to this below.

""It is journalistically irresponsible to present both sides [of the global warming theory] as though it
were a question of balance. " - Quoted in the Boston Globe, May 31, 1992. Really, irresponsible to
report both sides?

"Looking at every bump and wiggle... is a waste of time.. I don't set very much store by looking at the
direct evidence." -Quoted in the Washington Times, June 12, 1992 Why do they still call him an expert?

"[We] have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified dramatic statements and make little mention
of any doubts we may have. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective
and being honest." -Quoted by Dixy Lee Ray in Trashing the Planet (1990) I believe him, this is exactly
what this movement has done.

 What Profit?

Next the profit motive is set up. There are around the world Carbon Credit Trading boards. . The Joyce
Foundation had Barak Obama on its board of Directors from 1998 to 2001. The institution that is today
the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX) began with a grant in 2000 from the Joyce Foundation. The Primary
investor in CCX is Al Gore’s Generation Investment Management, is the largest shareholder in CCX. This
is where the need for Cap & Trade comes into play. It is being sold as a must do when even the EPA’s
own scientist says the Manmade Global Warming is not true. The sole purpose is to take money or
transfer wealth.

 Climate-GATE

I found it truly hilarious to hear Barbara Boxer, Senator from California chime in on Climate-Gate that
she was more concern about the break in rather than what it revealed. It is an intriguing espionage case
that might possibly have included Russian intelligence officials, but that is a separate story. This was
largely unreported by the Lame Street Media. I clearly should have been front page news that the Data
at the foundation of the Global Warming theory was being manipulated. It even has one of Obama’s
Czars involved. Dr. John P. Holdren known for a book he co-authored a 1977, “Ecoscience: Population
Resources, Environment,” advocating compulsory abortion for purposes of population control, mass
sterilization, government-dictated family size like China’s one-child policy, and a “planetary regime” to
be policed by the United Nations. Some of his emails were reveal s to be a bias for Warming and now he
is in a position to influence policy. Canada Free Press has revealed that the former Harvard professor
and Al Gore global warming adviser features prominently in the thousands of e-mails and other files
made public after the hacking of a computer server used by the University of East Anglia Climate
Research Unit.

One of the most damming things is the Hockey Stick Graph made famous by Al Gore is nothing but bunk.
The data was completely manipulated and a corrected graph appears below.

Note the temperature rise in the Medieval Period that was originally missed. Note that we are still
below the high of the Medieval Period. Clearly the Science has become influenced by the Politics of the
issue.

 Himalayan Glacier melts

Another one of those Inconvenient Lies is the yarn spun about Peer Reviewed research and the
Himalayan Glacier melting by 2035. The UK Telegraph reports “Last week, we learnt that an assertion
that glaciers in the Himalayas were melting so fast that they would disappear by 2035 (always a far-
fetched notion) was based on a single quote in a science journal news story, never repeated in peer-
reviewed literature.” This is yet another lie revealed as a result of the Climate-Gate emails.

 Al caught in a Lie … AGAIN!

When at the Global Warming Summit in Copenhagen recently Al Gore boldly stated the following,

““These figures are fresh. Some of the models suggest to Dr [Wieslav] Maslowski that there is a 75 per
cent chance that the entire north polar ice cap, during the summer months, could be completely ice-
free within five to seven years.” Really Al? Al what about this quote from “It’s unclear to me how this
figure was arrived at,” Dr Maslowski said. “I would never try to estimate likelihood at anything as
exact as this.” Al’s Office later released a statement that is a “BallPark” figure from a private
conversation. Sounds like an how do I say an “Inconvenient Truth”

In closing this joins all the pieces. Global Warming is without a doubt the Largest Scam in the History of
the World.

 Ref Maurice Strong http://www.afn.org/~govern/strong.html


 Strong Article http://www.discovervancouver.com/forum/who-is-maurice-strong-t131259.html
 Al Gore Acceptance Speech http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/10/12/2058573.htm
 Club of Rome http://www.clubofrome.org/eng/home/
 Club of Rome Members http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html
 Our Global Neighborhood http://www.gdrc.org/u-gov/global-neighbourhood/index.htm
 IPCC http://www.ipcc.ch/organization/organization.htm
 Schneider Quotes http://www.nationalcenter.org/dos7123.htm
 Suppressed EPA
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/26/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5117890.shtml
 CCX http://www.chicagoclimatex.com/index.jsf
 Corrected Hockey stick Chart. http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/fraudulent-hockey-sticks-
and-hidden-data/
 UK Telegraph story on IPCC and Glacier Melts
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/climatechange/7074540/Climate-change-give-
us-science-we-can-trust.html
 Al Caught in a lie
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/copenhagen/article6956783.ece

You might also like