Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cutting the weeds only eliminates the symptom as it may grow back.
If there are more than one root causes discovered after analysis, all the causes have to be addressed
at sufficiently satisfactory level for the success of the RCA. A root cause analysis is considered
successful when the problem does not recur again.
RCA is mainly a reactive type of action where the corrective action and the analysis takes place after
the happening of the event or problem.
The most common approach to solve problems for us is to rush and find an immediate action to solve
the problem. This approach will not help in the long run. Here we are not taking any steps to
understand the reason why it occurred. We are not taking any steps to prevent it from occurring
again. A better approach would be to think beyond the obvious and find an effective way to eliminate
the root cause that led to this problem.
A critical requirement of ISO 9001 is corrective & preventive action (Sec. 8.5.2-3), and we are often
asked the difference. Here is a quick evaluation and example to help you:
ISO 9000:2005 Sec. 3.6 defines them as follows:
1.
Correction: When a problem occurs, you need to keep several aspects in mind.
You could call this Damage Control. Although this correction takes steps to correct the problem it
has no bearing on cause.
2.
Corrective Action: Now determine if the importance of the situation requires further action:
The causes need to be looked into to prevent recurrence if it was a big deal.
3.
Preventive Action: First you need to assess the risk and mitigate it based upon severity. The
following tools are helpful: Source: Carnegie Mellon University
Checklists
Difference between:
HIGH risk/impact/frequency
Corrective & Preventive Action - the damage is already done in corrective action
ISO 9001 requires the organization to have a documented procedure for corrective an preventive
action.
Note: The combination of corrective action and preventive action documented procedures into a single
QMS document is acceptable, but is not recommended. If these are combined, then it is important to
verify that the organization understands clearly the difference between the intent of corrective and
preventive actions.