Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Oct 13
PART IA
GENERAL LEARNING OUTCOME: Students who complete the Critical Thinking
lesson are better prepared to lead and manage work centers.
TERMINAL COGNITIVE OBJECTIVE
1. Explain how critical thinking impacts NCO effectiveness.
2. Give examples of critical thinkings impact on NCO effectiveness.
3. Predict the impact of critical thinking on NCO effectiveness.
ENABLING COGNITIVE SAMPLES OF BEHAVIOR
1. Summarize characteristics that embody a proficient critical thinker.
2. Describe hindrances to critical thinking.
CF02SG - 2
PART II
STUDENT READING
MP 1. Characteristics that Embody a Proficient Critical Thinker
The first step to becoming a proficient critical thinker is developing the proper attitude.
Such an attitude embodies the following characteristics: open-mindedness, healthy
skepticism, intellectual humility, free thinking, and high motivation.
The first two characteristics may appear contradictory, but they are not. The critical
thinker must be willing to investigate viewpoints different from his or her own, but at the
same time recognize when to doubt claims that do not merit such investigation. A critical
thinker must be neither dogmatic nor gullible. Being both open-minded and skeptical
means seeking out the facts, information sources, and reasoning to support issues we
intend to judge. Examining issues from as many sides as possible, rationally looking for
the good and bad points of the various sides examined, accepting the fact that we may be
in error ourselves, and maintaining the goal of getting at the truth (or as close to the truth
as possible) all support effective critical thinking and the intent of achieving a desired
outcome. However, too much skepticism will lead one to doubt everything and commit
oneself to nothing, while too little will lead one to gullibility and credulousness.
Having intellectual humility means adhering tentatively to recently acquired opinions,
being prepared to examine new evidence and arguments even if such examination leads
one to discover flaws in ones own cherished beliefs, to stop thinking that complex issues
can be reduced to matters of right & wrong or black & white, and to begin thinking in
terms of degrees of certainty or shades of grey. Sometimes saying, I dont know can be
the wisest action to take on an issue. As Socrates notes, Arrogance does not befit the
critical thinker.
A critical thinker must also have an independent mind, i.e., be a free thinker. To think
freely, one must restrain ones desire to believe because of social pressures to conform.
This can be quite difficult or even impossible for some. One must be willing to ask if
conformity is motivating ones belief or opinion, and if so, have the strength and courage
to at least temporarily abandon ones position until he or she can complete a more
objective and thorough evaluation.
Finally, a critical thinker must have a natural curiosity to further ones understanding and
be highly motivated to put in the necessary work sufficient to evaluate the multiple sides
of issues. The only way one can overcome the lack of essential knowledge on a subject is
to do the necessary studying to reach a sufficient level of understanding before making
judgments. This may require the critical thinker to ask many questions, which can be
unsettling to those asked to respond. A critical thinker cannot be lazy.
CF02SG - 3
CF02SG - 4
CF02SG - 5
CONCLUSION
This reading covered critical thinking and the following concepts: Characteristics that
Embody a Proficient Critical Thinker, Essential Intellectual Traits, Universal Intellectual
Standards, Hindrances to Critical Thinking, Approaches for Evaluating Information, and
Critical Thinkings Use/Application. Keep this in mind, and be prepared to discuss how
these critical thinking concepts can be used throughout this course.
Optional Reading
Universal Intellectual Standards:
And questions that can be used to apply them
Universal intellectual standards are standards which should be applied to thinking to
ensure its quality. To be learned they must be taught explicitly. The ultimate goal, then, is
for these standards to become infused in the thinking of students, forming part of their
inner voice, guiding them to reason better.
Clarity:
Could you elaborate further on that point? Could you express that point in another way?
Could you give me an illustration? Could you give me an example? Clarity is a gateway
standard. If a statement is unclear, we cannot determine whether it is accurate or relevant.
In fact, we cannot tell anything about it because we dont yet know what it is saying. For
example, the question What can be done about the education system in America? is
unclear. In order to adequately address the question, we would need to have a clearer
understanding of what the person asking the question is considering the problem to be. A
clearer question might be, What can educators do to ensure that students learn the skills
and abilities which help them function successfully on the job, and in their daily decisionmaking?
Accuracy:
Is that really true? How could we check that? How could we find out if that is true? A
statement can be clear, but not accurate as in, Most dogs are over 300 pounds in weight.
Precision:
Could you give me more details? Could you be more specific? A statement can be both
clear and accurate, but not precise, as in Jack is overweight. (We dont know how
overweight Jack is, one pound or 500 pounds.)
Relevance:
How is that connected to the question? How does that bear on the issue? A statement can
be clear, accurate, and precise, but not relevant to the question at issue. For example,
students often think that the amount of effort they put into a course should be used in
raising their grade in a course. However, effort does not measure the quality of student
learning, and when that is so, effort is irrelevant to their appropriate grade.
Depth:
How does your answer address the complexities in the question? How are you taking into
CF02SG - 6
account the problems in the question? Are you dealing with the most significant factors?
A statement can be clear, accurate, precise, and relevant, but superficial (that is, lack
depth). For example, the statement, Just Say No which is often used to discourage
children and teens from using drugs, is clear, accurate, precise, and relevant. Nevertheless,
it lacks depth because it treats an extremely complex issue, the pervasive problem of drug
use among young people, superficially. It fails to deal with the complexities of the issue.
Breadth:
Do we need to consider another point of view? Is there another way to look at this
question? What would this look like from a conservative standpoint? What would this
look like from the point of view of? A line of reasoning may be clear, accurate, precise,
relevant, and deep, but lack breadth (as in an argument from either the conservative or
liberal standpoints which gets deeply into an issue, but only recognizes the insights of one
side of the question).
Logic:
Does this really make sense? Does that follow from what you said? How does that
follow? Before you implied this and now you are saying that, I dont see how both can be
true. When we think, we bring a variety of thoughts together into some order. When the
combination of thoughts are mutually supporting and make sense in combination, the
thinking is logical. When the combination is not mutually supporting, is contradictory in
some nature, or does not make sense; the combination becomes illogical.
Fairness:
Are we considering all relevant viewpoints in good faith? Are we distorting some
information to maintain our biased perspective? Are we more concerned about our vested
interests than the common good? We naturally think from our own perspective, from a
point of view which tends to privilege our position. Fairness implies the treating of all
relevant viewpoints alike without reference to ones own feelings or interests. Because we
tend to be biased in favor of our own viewpoint, it is important to keep the standard of
fairness at the forefront of our thinking. This is especially important when the situation
may call on us to see things we dont want to see, or give something up that we want to
hold onto.
CF02SG - 7
Attachment 1
Critical Thinking Hindrances
Basic Human Limitations
1. Physical & Emotional Hindrances: Stress, fatigue, drugs, and related hindrances can severely affect
our ability to think clearly and critically
2. Confirmation Bias & Selective Thinking: The process whereby one tends to notice and look for what
confirms ones beliefs, and to ignore, not look for, or undervalue the relevance of what contradicts
ones beliefs.
3. Testimonial Evidence: Relying on the testimonies and vivid anecdotes of others to substantiate ones
own beliefs, even though testimonies are inherently subjective, inaccurate, unreliable, biased, and
occasionally fraudulent.
4. Personal Biases & Prejudices: We each have personal biases and prejudices, resulting from our own
unique life experiences and worldview, which make it difficult to remain objective and think critically.
5. False Memories & Confabulation: Being unaware that our memories are often manufactured to fill
in the gaps in our recollection, or that some memories of facts, over time, can be unconsciously
replaced with fantasy.
Use of Language
1. Doublespeak Jargon: The use of technical language to make the simple seem complex, the trivial
seem profound, or the insignificant seem important, all done intentionally to impress others.
2. Meaningless Comparisons: Language that implies that something is superior but retreats from that
view.
3. Assuring Expressions: Using expressions that disarm you from questioning the validity of an
argument.
4. Ambiguity: A word or expression that can be understood in more than one way.
5. False Implications: Language that is clear and accurate but misleading because it suggests something
false.
6. Emotive Content: Intentionally using words to arouse feelings about a subject to bias others
positively or negatively, in order to gain influence or power.
CF02SG - 8
"unmotivated seeing of connections" accompanied by a "specific experience of an abnormal meaningfulness", but it has come to represent the human tendency to
seek patterns in random nature in general, as with gambling, paranormal phenomena, religion, and even attempts at scientific observation
CF02SG - 9
Attachment 2
A Self-Test For Critical Thinkers
Place a check mark next to each item that you believe is true (most of the time) of your
personal thinking patterns.
____I think for myself and am not easily manipulated by others.
____I recognize my own values and perspectives, and I can talk insightfully about the
influences on my beliefs.
____I do not simply accept conclusions; I evaluate and critique the underlying reasons.
____I recognize irrelevant facts and false assumptions, and I discount them.
____I am able to consider the strengths and weaknesses of my own point of view and that of
opposing positions.
____I admit my tendency toward egocentrism and my capacity for self-deception, and I work
to overcome them.
____I am able to distinguish what I know from what I don't know; and I am not afraid when
"I don't know."
____I am willing to consider all available information when working on problems or making
decisions, and I am also flexible and willing to try any good idea whether it has been done
before or not.
____When evaluating the behavior of myself and others, I am conscious of the standards I
use, and I am especially concerned with the consequences of actions.
____I am a good questioner. I like to probe deeply into issues, to dig down to root ideas, to
find out what's really going on.
____I am comfortable being questioned, and I do not become defensive, confused, or
intimidated. I welcome good questions since they help to clarify my thinking.
____I am a critical reader. I read with healthy skepticism, while reserving judgment until I
fully understand the author's perspective.
CF02SG - 10
Attachment 3
Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric (HCTSR)
CF02SG - 11