Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Alfredo.camara@city.ac.uk
Dr Alfredo Camara
L1-EPM707
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Context
Context
FEM is a numerical method that solves:
Structural mechanics problems: calculation of the field of stresses
and displacements in structures subject to static or dynamic loads
and/or strains, in linear or nonlinear range, with small or large
displacements or deformations.
Soil mechanics: similar to structural mechanics but considering a
different type of material in which the pore pressure should be
considered.
Fluid dynamics: solution of the Navier-Stokes equations in
compressible or incompressible fluids.
Heat and other diffusion problems.
Magnetic problems.
Coupled problems: involving two or more of these aspects at the
same time (e.g. fluid-structure interaction).
Solution of differential equations.
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Context
Context
It is impossible to solve complicated problems with a continuum model of
the structure
Elements
Nodes
Continuum model
Discrete model
FEM
FEM philosophy
Discretise the continuum by dividing it into different elements
connected by nodes
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Context
Element
e:
u6
u2
1
u5
u1
u4
2
u3
x1
Introduction
Context
Shell elements
with embedded reinforcement
Truss elements
Truss elements
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Context
Detailed analysis
of the connections:
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Types of elements
Types of elements
The geometry and kinematic assumptions differ between elements.
The material properties in the element can be linear or nonlinear.
x3
x2
x1
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Types of elements
Types of elements
The geometry and kinematic assumptions differ between elements.
The material properties in the element can be linear or nonlinear.
x3
x2
x1
Introduction
Types of elements
Types of elements
The geometry and kinematic assumptions differ between elements.
The material properties in the element can be linear or nonlinear.
x3
x2
x1
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Types of elements
Types of elements
The geometry and kinematic assumptions differ between elements.
The material properties in the element can be linear or nonlinear.
z
r
Line of
axisymmetry
Introduction
Historical background
L1-EPM707
Introduction
Notation
Notation
Nodal quantity
Displacement
Forces
Global level
U
P
Element quantity
Internal distortion
Internal force
Boundary force
Displacement
Discrete
e
s
-
L1-EPM707
Element level
u
p
Continuum
t
r
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
x2
EA1
L1
EA2
L2
x1
L1-EPM707
x2
x1
"
p1
p2
| {z }
p1
"
k1 k1
=
k1 k1
|
{z
k1
#"
u1
u2
} | {z }
L1-EPM707
u1
}|
p1
k1 k1 0
u1
p2 = k1 k1 0 u2
p3
0
0
0
u3
Element 2
p1
}|
0
0
u1
k2 k2 u2
0 k2 k2
u3
0
p2 = 0
p3
Assembly:K=e ke
p1
k1
p2 = k1
p3
| {z }
P
}|
k1
0
u1
k1 + k2 k2 u2
u3
k2
k2
{z
K
L1-EPM707
} | {z }
U
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
The shape functions are chosen by the analyst. They always represent
the displacement within the element continuously thus satisfying
compatibility there. However, the displacement continuity between
adjacent elements may be violated.
The interpolation of the displacement field with the shape functions is
an approximation. Furthermore, the integrals are evaluated
numerically.
By concentrating equivalent forces at the nodes, equilibrium is
satisfied only in the overall sense. Local violations of equilibrium
within the element and on its boundaries usually arise. This is why it
is known as weak formulation.
... and this gives many opportunities to the skill or ingenuity of the user to
be employed, as the choice of the element architecture and shape
functions strongly influences the degree of accuracy of the solution.
L1-EPM707
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
(Boundary Conditions)
Assumptions:
Small displacements: The equilibrium in the displaced configuration is
adequately described by the geometry in the original (undeformed)
configuration.
Small strains: The second order derivatives of the strain have small
effect
Linear and elastic material properties: The material is elastic (path
independent) and the stress is a linear function of the strain.
L1-EPM707
1. Equilibrium
The Cauchy stress tensor is defined on a differential element:
22
21
23
12
32
11
x2
x3
33
31
13
x1
11 12 13
= 21 22 23
31 32 33
The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the stress tensor give the principal
stresses and planes at the point in which the tensor is considered.
L1-EPM707
1. Equilibrium
The traction t on a plane with normal n will be used to define the
tractions at the boundaries of the structure with internal stresses. It is
defined from the stress tensor as: t = T n
Practical example:
Calculate t in the stress state below (remember that they are stresses in a
differential element, and not forces) with respect to the plane .
3 MPa
n
3 MPa
10 MPa
10 MPa
3 MPa
3 MPa
45
x2
MPa
n
10 MPa
x3
x1
MPa
3 MPa
3 MPa
Check equilibrium
45
L1-EPM707
1. Equilibrium
Rotational equilibrium:
ij = ji The stress tensor is symmetric
(1)
11
22
33
=
12
13
23
L1-EPM707
(3)
2. Kinematic relationships
displaced
original
x2
x1
x3
Assumed
small displacements
11 12 13
= 21 22 23
31 32 33
L1-EPM707
(4)
2. Kinematic relationships
1
ij =
2
ri
rj
+
xj
xi
(5)
ii is the normal strain and describes the change in length with respect
to the original length of the differential element in direction xi .
ij = 2ij (with i 6= j) is the engineering shear strain and denotes the
angular distortion of the differential element in the plane (xi xj )
The strain tensor is symmetric:
11
22
= 33
12
13
23
L1-EPM707
(6)
3. Constitutive relationships
Elastic material: is a unique function of , regardless on how is
achieved (path independent). It means that the strain energy function
only depends on and .
Linear elastic material: = D, Hookes law. More generally:
= D( 0 ) + 0
Homogeneous material: D is constant for all the points of the
body.
Isotropic material: the same material properties in all directions.
L1-EPM707
3. Constitutive relationships
In these conditions, D is defined by two material constants, usually the
Youngs modulus E and the Poissons ratio
1
E
11
22 E
33 E
=
12
0
13
0
23
| {z }
E
1
E
E
0
E
1
E
0
0
0
0
1
G
0
{z
D1
0
1
G
0
0
11
22
0
33
0
12
13
0
23
| {z }
1
G}
(7)
4. Boundary conditions
The previous 3 relationships are focused on the interior of the elastic body.
In order to complete the governing equations, Boundary Conditions
(BC) are needed to describe the perimeter.
Types of BC:
ts
ds
Traction (force)
tn
rs
rs
rn
ds
ts
tn
ds
rn
ds
Displacement
Mixed
The rule is that one and only one normal and tangential BC are applied at
every node of the perimeter
L1-EPM707
Fixed boundary:
rn=rs=0
tn=ts=0
Continuum model
Continuum model
FE model
ts=0
Continuum model
FE model
L1-EPM707
FE model
Equilibrium:
1
Kinematic: ij =
2
Constitutive: = D( 0 ) + 0
Boundary Conditions
ri
rj
+
xj
xi
Important
Unfortunately, in practical cases it is very difficult to obtain the
closed-form solution of the governing differential equations, which require
the strong satisfaction of equilibrium at every node and portion of the
body. The FEM formulates the equilibrium in a Weak form that is much
easier to solve but it is an approximation.
L1-EPM707
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
r
Virtual displacements
applied to the body
in equilibrium
stress field in equilibrium
with body forces and
boundary tractions
WI =
T dV
(8)
WE =
rT b dV +
rT t dS
(9)
(10)
Disadvantages of PVW
PVW is in the core of the FEM but it is difficult to use because:
1
Solution in FEM:
r and are determined by selecting an appropriate finite element
mesh and element typology.
The satisfaction of the material constitutive or the
strain-displacement relationships can be accounted for by using the
Principle of Minimum Potential Energy.
L1-EPM707
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
Assumptions
Assumptions of MPE
1 Elastic material, for which the stress is described by a unit strain
energy function (u)
u
(11)
=
U=
u dV
(12)
WI =
V
T dV =
Z
V
u
dV =
u dV = U
(13)
Assumptions
WE =
r b dV +
V
Z
r t dS =
S
r b dV +
| V
r t dS = V
{z S
(14)
Where the Potential Energy, V , is:
V =
r b dV
rT t dS
L1-EPM707
(15)
Theorem
Using the PVW in Eq. (10) with Eqs. (13) and (14):
WI = WE U = V (U + V ) = = 0
(16)
Where is the Total Potential Energy. It is the sum of the elastic Strain
Energy and the Potential Energy due to the applied loads:
=U +V
(17)
(r)
Equilibrium
stable
Minimum
L1-EPM707
Theorem
1
2
T DdV
(18)
Or more generally:
1
U=
T D dV
T D0 dV +
2 V
V
And the total potential energy is: = U + V =
Z
1
2
Z
V
T D dV
Z
V
T D0 dV +
T 0 dV
T 0 dV
(19)
Z
V
rT b dV
rT t dS
(20)
L1-EPM707
Theorem
1
2
T D dV
T D0 dV +
T 0 dV
rT b dV
(21)
r t dS = 0
S
Weak formulation
This formulation of equilibrium is referred to as weak because it is
satisfied in an average manner over the volume (V ) and boundary (S) of
the body. It is much simpler to solve than the strong formulation and it is
what allows FEM to solve complicated problems, although it is an
approximation.
L1-EPM707
Summary
Index
1
Introduction
Summary
L1-EPM707
Summary
Learning Outcomes
Understand the philosophy of FEM: discretise the continuum in a
finite number of elements connected by nodes
Overview the basic procedure in the FEM and the connection to the
Stiffness Method
Review of essential concepts in the SM and continuum mechanics
applied to linear elastic materials: the governing differential equations
are given by equilibrium, kinematic and constitutive relationships, as
well as Boundary Conditions, conforming the Strong Formulation
Understand of the Weak Form based on energy principles that are
employed by FEM to re-formulate the equilibrium equations and
approximate the solution.
Generalise the Principle of Virtual Works to continuum problems
and formulate the Principle of Minimum Potential Energy
L1-EPM707
Summary
Disclaimer
Disclaimer
These notes have been prepared based on the following references [Fenves, 1992,
Zienkiewicz et al., 2005, Camara et al., 2013, Camara et al., 2014, Abaqus, 2014]. They
have not been subjected to the usual scrutiny reserved for formal publications. They
may be distributed outside this class only with the permission of the Lecturer.
Abaqus (2014). Finite element analysis program; version 6.14. Providence USA.
Camara, A., Nguyen, K., Ruiz-Teran, A., and Stafford, P. (2014). Serviceability limit
state of vibrations in under-deck cable-stayed bridges accounting for vehicle-structure
interaction. Engineering Structures, 61:61 72.
Camara, A., Ruiz-Teran, A., and Stafford, P. (2013). Structural behaviour and design
criteria of under-deck cable-stayed bridges subjected to seismic action. Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 42(6):891912.
Fenves, G. (1992). Lecture 1. In Finite Element Methods: Lecture Notes, University of
California at Berkeley.
Zienkiewicz, O., Taylor, R., and Zhu, J. (2005). The finite element method: Its basics
and fundamentals. Elsevier, 6th edition.
L1-EPM707