1.

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS vs CTA 224 SCRA 665 July 21, 1993 ->
Charge of berthing fees
2. Conte v COA 264 SCRA 19 - Nov. 4, 1996 -> Retirement R.A 660 as
amended, RA 1616
3. DIU V COURT OF APPEALS 251 SCRA 472, December 19, 1995 - Presidential
Decree No. 1508 also known as Katarungang Pambarangay Law.
4. Erectors, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Commission, 256 SCRA 629 retroactive effect worked at abroad
5. Frivaldo Vs. COMELEC - 257 Scra 727 - June 28 1996 - Repatriation uner P.D
725
6. GLORIA V. COURT OF APPEALS 306 SCRA 287 APRIL 21, 1999 - Teachers
constest that they should get their salaries during suspension
7. IBP v Zamora 338 SCRA 81 August 15, 2000 - Estrada asked marine to join to
the force of PNP to solve the increasing crime
8. Ajero v CA 236 SCRA 488 (September 15, 1994) - hologgraphic will
9. Amatan v Aujero 248 SCRA 511 - September 27, 1995 - Amatan sends a letter
of complaint to chief justice which aujero liable for gross incompetence, gross
ignorance of the law, and gross misconduct.
10. Bautista v SB 332 SCRA 126

Facts: Bautista charged by the Ombudsman for violation of RA 3019 or Anti-Graft

and Corrupt Practices Act. The Ombudsman filed against the petitioner before the
Sandiganbayan. Petitioner Bautista filed a Motion to Quash but it was denied.
Issue: WON the Sandiganbayan erred in denying the petitioners Motion to Quash.
Held: No. The Court affirmed the resolution of Sandiganbayan. Bautista assailed that
there was no legal basis for the conduct of preliminary investigation as the
Ombudsman failed to reduce their evidence into affidavits before requiring him to
submit his counter affidavit. However, the court observed that the petitioner had
already filed his counter-affidavit and only questioned the Ombudsmans
noncompliance with the affidavit requirement after the preliminary investigation
had ended and a case was already filed before the Sandiganbayan. The issue
therefore has become moot and academic.
11.CATUBAY v NLRC, 330 SCRA 440, April 12, 2000 - appeal
12. Claudio vs Comelec 331 SCRA 388 May 4, 2000 the members of PRA set a recall
for Claudio for loss of confidence.
13. Carceller v. CA and State Investment Houses, Inc., 302 SCRA 718 (1999) Option to
purchase within the contract period.
14. Enrique v CA 229 SCRA 180 January 10, 1994 Enrique charged with csc motu propio
or for dishonest and misconduct.
15. FRANCISCO v BOISER - 332 SCRA 792 - May 31, 2000 who has the right for legal
redemption
16. In Re: Valenzuela and Vallarta 298 SCRA 408 November 9, 1998 president
appointed the two in the judiciary is void.
17. KILOSBAYAN v. MORATO - 246 SCRA 540 - November 16, 1995 entering ELA
between PGMC and PCSO

18. LLDA v Court of Appeals - 251 SCRA 42 December 7, 1995 authority on the laguna
lake; general law vs special law; special law shall prevail; special law cant repealed
by general law.
19. LAND BANK v CA - 249 SCRA 19 - October 6, 1995 petitioners whose holdings
acquired by DAR and questioning the validity of DAR AO Nos. 6 and 19
20. Melendres vs. COMELEC - 319 SCRA 262 - November 25, 1999 Melendres filed an election protest and
find out that he did not pay a filing fee. The court said that payment of docket fee is not necessary because
it is merely an administrative procedure and not jurisdictional.
21. NPC v Province, 264 SCRA 271, November 19, 1996 questioning of tax exempt of
NAPOCOR
22. Pahilan v Tabalba - 230 SCRA 205 - February 21, 1994 Pahilan filed an election
protest against Tabalba and the docket fee he paid was insufficient. Then the election
protest dismissed due to non-payment of docket fee on required period.
23. EVANGELISTA vs. PEOPLE - 337 SCRA 671 (August 14, 2000) ad valorem tax; tax
credit
24. PEOPLE vs. QUIJADA - 259 SCRA 191 - July 24, 1996 the cause of the death of the
victim was caused by quijada. Quijada was charged for the crime of murder and
illegal possession of firearms in its aggravated. The two charged are separable
offense. Therefore, the offense of illegal possession of firearms is aggravated not the
murder.
25. Pimentel, Jr. vs. Aguirre - 336 SCRA 201 - July 19, 2000 A.O no. 372 section 4 is
constitutional?
26. PNOC v CA - 297 SCRA 402 October 8, 1998 payment inflicted greater than it was
before
27. Republic v. CA 324 SCRA 237 - February 1, 2000 - ?
28. Romualdez v Comelec 248 SCRA 300 September 18, 1995 questioning of domicile
of Imelda marcos; domicile follows domicile of his/her parents.
29. ST. MARTIN VS. NLRC 295 SCRA 494 September 16, 1998 30. Tan vs. People 290 SCRA 1171998 accused charged for the crime of illegal
possession of lumber.
31. UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN vs. CA 324 SCRA 52 January 31, 2000
32.

33.