Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2013 -
-0-
) (
2013 -
-1-
+ ,
*
& %
# $
)
12 /#17 - .
-2-
:
-3 4#6 7- 5
# 68 ,/
:
) (
"
"
"
MBAP F12
"
-1 62 &16 /
......... -......... .........
-2 62 &16 /
......... -......... .........
-3 &16 /
......... -......... .........
+*)
2 =3
:
-.........
"#! & %
-.........
"#!
-.........
"#!
2013 /
? >6 A 6 - 2# B
2013 / /
2013 / /
1 D=4 -C 1 - =+ D=4 -C -3 4
2013 / /
2013 / /
-3-
...
.
-4-
...
... ...
... ...
... ...
... .
... ...
-5-
) (
"
"
MBAP F12
156 135
.%86
SPSS
) (
-6-
( .
:
.
(.
.
Key Words :
.
-7-
12
)(
14
16
17
18
21
22
22
23
:
:
25
26
25
28
29
30
55
-8-
28
56
57
58
61
64
79
:
:
86
86
87
91
91
94
86
113
116
120
124
124
-9-
1
2
3
4
89
91
92
93
95
97
97
98
98
10
11
13
99
100
101
101
14
102
15
102
16
17
18
19
103
105
105
107
20
107
21
Ranks
109
22
Test Statistics
109
- 10 -
23
Ranks
110
24
Test Statistics
111
25
Ranks
112
26
Test Statistics
112
18
)(
- 11 -
126
- 12 -
- 13 -
)(:
- 14 -
.
:
"
"
.
-
- 15 -
:
(1
- 16 -
(2
(3
(4
(5
(6
:
:
(1
(2
.
- 17 -
(3
(4
)
.
(5
.
(6
:
(-1 :
:
.
- 18 -
.
(-2 :
(.
(.
(.
(.
(-3 :
- 19 -
)(
)
(
:
( -1
( -2
( -3
( -4
- 20 -
( -5
:
:
: :
.
: :
.
- 21 -
:
: :
.
: :
23/ 2012
08/ .2013
) (1:
) (1
- 22 -
:
) :(Burned out
"1 4 5 .
%-
. /+
)
.(301 :2005
:
.(24 :1995
:
)(
) :
() .(26 :2003
:
) () .:1991
(13
:
- 23 -
) .
.(257 :2004
- 24 -
.
)(Stress on the job- 25 -
Stress
.
Strain
.
.
:
)
1991 . (180.
.
) 2004 -399
.(400
- 26 -
:
-1
www.internetjfs.org/articles/ijfsv6-2.pdf
.
.
- 27 -
) .(Burn out
)
(18: 2008
.
.
) .(116 :2001
- 28 -
:
.
.
.
)
:2009 .(10
:
:
- 29 -
) . :2008 .(49
:
-1 :
:
):(Affiliation
.
- 30 -
):(Involvement
.
):(Teacher support
.
):(Goal orientation
):(Competition
-1 :
-
.
-
-2 :
.- 31 -
. . - .
-3 :
.
:
.
%80
6
.
:
.
.
.
.
- 32 -
.
.
.
:
.
- 33 -
-2 :
Educational Administration
.
:
.
- 34 -
Educational Administration
.
:
.
.
- 35 -
Leonard R. Sayles
:
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
) Paedagogik(
- 36 -
.
-3 :
:Educational Administration "
"
)(
"
" :
- 37 -
(
.
"
"
-1
(
-3
-2
) (
.
- 38 -
.
" .
"
"
)
( ) (
) (.
Education
Educational Administration
.
- 39 -
.
:
.
.
.
:
- 40 -
.
.
:
1963
.
1969
- 41 -
.1979
-
(35
.
- :
- 42 -
(1998
1396(:
-
) (.
.
-
- 43 -
.
-
.
-
.
-
) (41
-
- 44 -
)(1411
(36
:
1343 ) (
1373/1377.
1378-1377:):(
1397/ 1378
.
1384:) (
)
- 45 -
.
) : (
1387 :
o .
o
1394
:
www.moe.gov.sabgu
:
o
.
- 46 -
.
: :
.
:
:
- 47 -
.
:
.
:
.
:
- 48 -
). 1998 (213
:
.
:
.
:- 49 -
-1
.
-2 .
-3
.
-4 .
-5
.
-6 .
-7
.
-8 .
-9
.
-10
) 1419 .(16
-11 .
-4:
:
.
:
- 50 -
-1
.
-2
.
-3
.
-4
.
-5
.
-6
.
: .
.
- :
- 51 -
.
.
.
:
.
- 52 -
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- 53 -
-5 :
.
: :
.
.
.
.
- 54 -
.
.
:
.
:
) (Maslach & Jackson , 1981 :109
:
(-1
Emotional Exhaustion
(-2 Depersonalization
(-3 Lack of Personal
Accomplishment
- 55 -
:
:
) (301 : 2005
:
.
:
.
:
:
.
) : :2008 (45
Involvement
.
Stagnation
- 56 -
.
Detachment
.
Juncture
)(
.
:
. . . . .- 57 -
. .
.
. . ):2000 .(128-127
:
.
.
.
:
- :
- 58 -
) : 1994 (125
) : 1994 . (24
) :2000 .(69
- :
.
.
.
:
.
- 59 -
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
) :2008 ( 37
:
.
-
- 60 -
:
.
.
).
:2006.(41-40
:
.
.
.
.
:
.
) : 2000 .(127
:
" "
- 61 -
) .(113-58
) :
.(186
) (24-22 : :
- 62 -
.
.
.
:
- 63 -
:
(-1 ) (1995
"
"
184
.
:
.
.
-2 ) 1995 ( :
:
.
) (457
:
- 64 -
.
.
.
-3 ):(1995
)(240
)115
125 (
.
:
- 65 -
.
.
):(1995
-4
)(184
92] :
45 ) (7
47
) (7[
] 92 ) (7
49 7[.
:
Gordon Willard Allport
Seidman & Zager
1986(
.
:
- 66 -
.
.
.
-5
) (1995
"
"
)
(
) (184 .
) (92
) (92
.
- 67 -
[
.
) : (1995
-6
"
".
(110)
)(309
)(199
)(24
.
:
: )(1979
: )(1991
- 68 -
.
-7 ) :(1996
" :
"
. 309
:
.
-8
): (1996
) (309 ) 199 110 (
) (24
) (16
:
- 69 -
.
- 9 ): (
) (.
.
:
.
- 10 ) : ( 1997
- 70 -
.
) (420
) (9.
.
:
.
- ): (1998
) (
- 71 -
)
(
. )(29
:
-1 :) (11
-2 :) (9
-3 : ) (9.
.
:
.
.
-12
: (1998
"
"
- 72 -
)(138
77 (.
)61
:
)(1993
)1994
) (1989.
]
]
[
.
.
- 73 -
-13 ) : (2004
"
)(
"
)(
)( .
])(253
)(408
(155) [
:
Cooper & Wiliams
: )(1998
)( )(2002
) (1966 :
) (1999
(1988)
&
)(1998
)(
)(
)(
- 74 -
)(
.
- 14 ) : (2004
)
( . ) ( 138
) ( .
:
.
.
30
.
5
- 75 -
.
.
-15 ( 2007 ) "
) ( "
( )
.
240
Seidman & Zager
) :
.( Carver et.al
:
1.
.
2.
- 76 -
.
3.
.
4.
) ( .
5.
.
6.
.
7.
.
8.
.
:
-1
.
-2
-3
.
- 77 -
-4
.
-5
.
:
-16 ) : (2005
"
"
(.
)(444
( )228
216 (.
:
( :
)(1998
) (2005.
- 78 -
:
.
.
.
:
1- Babcock (2003) ," Burnout Among Licensed Master Level Social
"Workers in Maine
)(600
) (Maine
208 . %35
- 79 -
%14-25 .
.
)
( .
)
(.
.
.
.
:
.
.
:
)
(.
- 80 -
203
)44
56
49 54
.
:
-
.
-
- 81 -
) 55 (
2003
.
:
75. 0.05
.
:
- 82 -
.
4- Gurbuz & Others,(2007 ) , " Burnout levels of executive lecturers : a
comparative approach in three universities
108
.
(
)
(
.
:
:
- 83 -
.
5- Doganer & Alparslan (2009 ) , " Relationship between levels of
burnout of midwives who work in Sivas, Turkey province center and
"identified socio-demographic characteristics
)(
257
110
147
28
.
:
:
(
)
.
:
-
.
-
- 84 -
- 85 -
:
:
:
:
) (
:
:
.
:
:- 86 -
.
:
\
.
:
)(170
)(156
) (135
.
- :
( - :
:
(-1 :
( :
.
(-2 :
- 87 -
) (93
) (8 :
) (5 )
(
:
-1 /16/
-2 /6/
-3
/12/
-4 /31/
-5 /6/.
) (3
" "
) (3 :
-1 ) (9.
-2 ) (5.
-3 ) (7.
( - )
(:
.
- 88 -
(
) (1:
)(
1
2
3
4
5
Opinion
Completely agree
Agree
Neutral
Disagree
Completely disagree
) :(1
:
)(SPSS
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences
:
-1
:
.
-2
Alpha
Cronbach's
- 89 -
-3
.
.
-4
Sign Test
.
-5 Mann-Whitney Test
.
-6 Kruskal Wallis Test
:
:
- 90 -
:
) (2
)
(:
62
%45.9
73
%54.1
20 29
38
%28.1
30 39
44
%32.6
40 49
31
%23.0
50
22
%16.3
85
%63.0
50
%37.0
33
%24.4
86
%63.7
13
%9.6
%2.2
42
%31.1
5 15
55
%40.7
15
38
%28.1
) :(2
.
) (validity
.
16
%74.2
%86.1
%65.4
%80.8
12
%65.3
%80.8
31
%66.9
%81.7
%64.7
%81.4
70
%87.7
%93.6
%86.8
%93.1
%67.1
%81.9
%70.9
%84.2
21
%70.0
%83.6
93
%89.9
%94.8
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
-
) :(3
)(3
.
)(
%93.6
- 92 -
%83.6
.%94.8
)(4
16
2.80
0.55
56
2.82
0.70
56.4
12
2.74
0.57
54.8
31
2.68
0.37
53.6
)
(
2.61
0.70
52.2
70
2.72
0.39
54.4
3.21
0.88
64.2
3.60
0.77
72
2.17
0.64
43.4
)
(
21
2.96
0.44
59.2
) :(4
) (4
:
- 93 -
: (- :
.
.
.
Group Statistics
Mean
.03922
.38822
2.7710
98
.06557
.39883
2.6156
37
.04453
.44086
2.9851
98
- 94 -
.07651
2.8983
.46537
37
) : (5
) (5.
2.7710
= 2.6156
.
)(t(133)= 1.004, p> 0.05
.
(- :
(.
- 95 -
(.
(.
(.
(.
: :
)
( .
Simple Linear Regression
.
Sig.
.000a
F
32.875
ANOVAb
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
5.322
1
5.322
21.529
133
.162
26.851
134
Model
Regression
Residual
Total
)Predictors: (Constant
Dependent Variable:
) :(6
- 96 -
a.,
b.
) (6)(7
:
)(6
anova :
pv< 0.05
.
) (7 coefficients
pv< 0.05 :
Sig.
.000
.000
t
10.925
5.734
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
1.955
.179
.358
.062
.445
Model
)(Constant
7 8 -/
Dependent Variable:
1
a.
) :(7
:
= ) 0.358+1.955 (.
: :
- 97 -
)
(.
Simple Linear Regression
) (8) (9 :
F
31.199
Sig.
.000a
ANOVAb
Sum of Squares
df
5.102
1
21.749
133
26.851
134
Mean Square
5.102
.164
Model
Regression
Residual
Total
Predictors:(Constant)
Dependent Variable:
a.
b.
):(8
anova
pv< 0.05
) (8
Sig.
.000
.000
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Standardized
Coefficients
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
Beta
t
2.180
.144
15.136
.277
.050
.436
5.586
Model
1
)(Constant
Dependent Variable:
a.
):(9
:
- 98 -
= ) 0.277 +2.180 (
: :
(.
Simple Linear Regression
) (10) (11 :
pv< 0.05
anova ) (10 :
Sig.
.000a
F
31.953
ANOVAb
df
Mean Square
1
5.201
133
.163
134
Sum of Squares
5.201
21.650
26.851
Model
Regression
Residual
Total
Predictors:(Constant)
Dependent Variable:
a.
b.
) :(10
Sig.
Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
.000
.000
11.780
5.653
.440
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
.171
.061
Model
)(Constant
2.015
.345
. Dependent Variable
b.
) :(11
:
= 0.345 + 2.015
) (.
: :
(.
Simple Linear Regression
) (12) (13 :
:
anova
) (12
pv< 0.05
Sig.
ANOVAb
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
- 100 -
Model
.000a
28.710
1
133
134
4.767
.166
4.767
22.084
26.851
Regression
Residual
Total
Predictors: (Constant)
Dependent Variable:
a.
b.
) :(12
coefficients ) (13
pv< 0.05 :
Sig.
.000
.000
t
6.299
5.358
Standardized
Coefficients
Beta
.421
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized
Coefficients
B
Std. Error
1.607
.255
.504
.094
Model
)(Constant
Dependent Variable:
a.
) :(13
:
= ) 0.504 +1.607(
: :
) (.
- 101 -
) (14) (15 :
ANOVAb
F
46.767
Sig.
.000a
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
1
Regression
6.985
1
6.985
Residual
19.866
133
.149
Total
26.851
134
a.
Predictors: (Constant)
b.
Dependent Variable
) :(14
anova
)(14
pv < 0.05
.
Coefficientsa
Standardized
Coefficients
Sig.
.000
16.399
.000
6.839
Beta
.510
Unstandardized Coefficients
B
Std. Error
.129
2.111
.048
.325
Model
)(Constant
Dependent Variable:
1
a.
) :(15
coefficients ) (15
pv< 0.05 :
.
- 102 -
:
= ) 0.325 + 2.111 (
) (
):(16
0.445
0.198
0.358
32.875
0.000
0.436
0.190
0.277
31.199
0.000
0.440
0.194
0.345
31.953
0.000
0.421
0.178
0.504
28.710
0.000
0.510
0.260
0.325
46.767
0.000
0.562
0.316
0.635
61.379
0.000
) :(16
-
51%
0.260 26%
.
- 103 -
- :
)(
(.
.
Independent Samples T-test
)(17
) (18:
Group Statistics
Std. Error Mean
Std. Deviation
Mean
)(
.05241
.41267
2.7112
62
.04485
.38320
2.7430
73
.06718
.52899
2.8602
62
.04047
.34581
3.0471
73
) :(17
- 104 -
= 2.7112 2.7430
(t(101.939)= 2.383), p> 0.05
95%
Confidence
df Sig.
Mean
Std. Error
Interval
-tailed)Difference Difference
of the
Difference
L o w e rU p p e r
.10390
-.16733-
.06856
-.03171-
.644
.10480
-.16823-
.06898
-.03171-
-.460-125.868 .646
-.03681-
-.33702-
.07589
-.18691-
.015
-.03134-
-.34249-
.07843
-.18691-
-2.383-101.939 .019
Sig.
Equal
variances 3.572
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
Equal
variances 14.482 .000 -2.463- 133
assumed
- 105 -
Equal
variances
not
assumed
2.8602
= 3.0471
.
) (19) (20:
Group Statistics
Mean
)(
85
Std. Deviation
.04388
.40451
2.7925
.05074
.35877
2.6194
50
.05046
.46519
3.0084
85
.05773
.40818
2.8812
50
) :(19
- 106 -
2.7925
2.6194
.
Independent Samples T-test
Levene's Test
for Equality
of Variance
95%
Confidence
df
Sig.
Mean Std. Error
Interval
(2-tailed)Difference Difference
of the
Difference
L o w e rU p p e r
.30992
.03616
.06920
.17304
.014
.30593
.04015
.06708
.17304
.011
.28410
-.02967-
.07932
.12721
.111
.27910
-.02467-
.07667
.12721
.100
133
Sig.
Equal
variances 3.821 .053 2.500
assumed
2.580 112.867
133
Equal
variances .317 .575 1.604
assumed
1.659 113.745
Equal
variances
not
assumed
Equal
variances
not
assumed
Kruskal-Wallis H
) (21 ) (22:
Ranks
Mean Rank
46.87
47.35
90.61
113.93
38
44
31
22
135
38
44
31
22
135
20-29
30- 39
40-49
"<;:
50
43.14
57.35
80.61
114.45
Total
20-29
30- 39
40-49
"<;:
50
Total
):(21
- 108 -
Ranks
Test Statistics
52.922
64.072
.000
.000
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
.
) (Chi-Squar = 52.922, p<0.05
Kruskal-Wallis H
) (23) (24 :
- 109 -
Ranks
Mean Rank
66.08
71.41
47.19
81.50
33
86
13
3
135
33
86
13
3
135
67.32
67.72
66.77
89.00
Total
Total
):(23
Ranks
.
( Chi-Squar = 0.893), p > 0.05
Test Statistics
.893
4.772
.827
.189
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
b. Grouping Variable:
- 110 -
Kruskal-Wallis H
) (25)(26
:
Ranks
Mean Rank
44.29
42
58.53
55
5
15 - 5
15
107.92
38
46.32
135
42
63.20
55
98.91
38
Total
5
15 - 5
15
135
Total
):(25
Ranks
Test Statistics
37.501
58.268
.000
.000
Chi-Square
df
Asymp. Sig.
a. Kruskal Wallis Test
- 111 -
b. Grouping Variable:
.
(Chi-Squa = 37.501), p < 0.05
.
- 112 -
:
:
-
.
-
(.
)
(.
)
(.
-
(.
- 113 -
(.
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
- 114 -
.
-
) .(Sekheta et al, 2005: pp.7
.
] ) [(4 .
- 115 -
:
(1
)
(1977
(2
.
(3
.
(4
- 116 -
(5
.
(6
.
(7
.
(8
.
(9
.
(10
(7*) .
(11
.
(12
.
(13
- 117 -
(14
.
(15
.
(16
.
(17
.
(18
.
(19
.
(20
- 118 -
- 119 -
-1 "
"
172
2005 . 331-292
-2
"
"
:1995
.24
-3 " ( 2003 )
"
.26
-4 " ( 1991 )
"
-
..13
-5 ) ( 2004
: "
" : .
.257
- 120 -
-6 ( 1991 ) :
"
" ..180
-7 ) " ( 2001 "
.
.400-399.118
-8 " 2008
"
..18
-9 ( 2001 ) " :
"
" ..116
-10
2009
"
"
..10
-11
" (2008)
"
. . .
.41
-12
" ( 2000 )
" ) ( : .
-13
.35
-14
)1419
. .
- 121 -
-15
)(1971
. : /.
-16
1963
.
-17
1998
: .
-18
1969
: .
-19
1411
.
-20
1396
: .
-21
)(1979
: .
-22
:
.
-23
www.moe.gov.sabgu
.
-24
) " ( 1994
" 56 .132-89
-25
" 2000
"
- 122 -
: 14
1 .88-55
-26
) " ( 1994
" 16 2
.58-1
-27
" 2008
"
.
-28
2006
.
-29
"
"
www.kaheel7.com :
-30
:(1997
17 1997
.
1- Lonard R. Sayles Personnel the human problems of management George
Strauss Prentice-Hall 674 pages 1972-04-01
2- Maslach , C. and Jackson, S. ( 1981) ," the Measurement of Experienced
Burnout" , Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2, pp 99-113
- 123 -
im
Lehrerzimmer? Schwierige
aus
der
Sackgasse
in
:
www.mohe.gov.ps -2
www.kaheel7.com -3
www.internetjfs.org/articles/ijfsv6-2.pdf
- 124 -
-4
- 125 -
= EF( 1) :>G
1L ) -H I627 JK - M J
-3 4#6 7- 5
# 68 ,/
- 126 -
>8C ( C : #6P7 1 )
!=/ > )( ; B" C .% * . I + :E F
3I
"J
K 5
#C
-1
-2
-3
4 F 4N -
K 81
-4
-5
-6
-7
-8
-9
-10
K 4 %
K 8 :N
4 N/a
K 8` :
-11
-12
-13
-14
-15
-16
-17
-18
-19
-20
-21
O- %* N N-
I
K*Q
I NO- % = * F
K N
4 5 I F N" SB 8/
CK*K
N F
C= *N .8%
+
( 5 I N .8%5 C
4 5 I 8 F N K*Q
I N N" CO X5 F F ;8
C 5 C I 8= * N5
! Y K*KI
*F
I;< NZ" I
OF N F
I N + C= \ 5 [ 8;<F
I 5 #
<; I N^ Z 8; % : =
K 5 N*Q
K* % Q N" K 8+
# B B K * 5 = > N5 ;C
\ 5 ;F
I [ * 8 N
>N5
CF% "
I c<+ N * N" 5 ; :
>d N
*
5 I
[ = J d F%5 N%- * e=
>N5
% 5 I K 5 F C=
>N5
+ C 5 CK = ; C#-
N" - c OF N F
"N
g I ; :
OF N F
- 127 -
"J
*K
L
"J
L
"J
K 5
L
L
"J
" J *K
"J
"J
K 5
K 5
I3
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
-7
-R I - Q
-8
-9
-10
-11
-12
-13
-14
-15
-16
-17
I2 -C=36,
-18
-19
T S,3
-20
-21
-22
I2 -C=36,
A
,- 2
-23
-24
-25
ci+ C ( ! K 5 h + N
E
j* C Kj -j/ &> j* j 5 =j Cj
* > O
K C > N" O . C + %B ;8
E
" N K E .8%+
C & C
( Y c K*Q
E > C= > O Cd E C + k/
! hYN F
C - -* > K*g+ O I
5 /5 F K*Q
4 5 g K >+ S > # O
+ C
* 8 % K " :; .8%5 8m
+
F K %+
>&KB * E i+ # E
+ C
C 5 E .K
K EB* (* C + >& E " E
* .E 5 C/
\ 5 EB* (* C " / /a
g>&.E
i+ C ^ E E+ % = >&N" E
F
&K " N C
C >
*
%5 > & B
+ C
e / /a
&F E
E > C= ci+ *K
C8 Q * *K
C KB
*K+ B*E%
+ q ! Y "N
*K
8 + C
- 128 -
-26
-27
-28
-29
-30
-31
-32
-33
-34
-35
-36
-37
-38
-39
-40
-41
8 1
-42
-43
-44
F 5 B
-45
-46
-47
-48
-49
-50
-51
-52
-53
C
C +^ E 5 C 5 7 F4*
<5 B * E * qB % *KB+
+ C
K 4
<5 4 1 5 F+ +
+ C
; : 1 5 F . -
K EB* (* C I; N" E a+ \ 5
B F 5 h8+ + N E
5
C + C *g -7
K/ 8% 5 J E
5 KF+
<5 *
+ C
^[ .E& [d
5.
EB* (+ C[ .
5
E[8 + C * B+ B
E
+ F" 5 /5 F
+ C
K*. %
5 * [ 5 [8+
K + C F K* Q 8
C ! 8 1K "E N
B 5 5 ^ K + C 1 5 K*K N
F8 [ + E F K*Q
. * E//a+ C= K* Q K %
E
C *= % N 8 1 C N" k:
F
K C * C n/ 8 1
K/ (hY
! "
K + C E%B([ K*Q
[Y E+
[(+ C F K* Q F
d % + K/B5! E
C1 * K% N-
C1 " g . + F C/ + N
= F O q O8+
K - %+ C Ka KB+ N F5 B
ci+
C1 " N F
* "N
*
5 ^ C
K/ !hY
B N %
K 5 E8 * C K
L E g* C [ . N F
C K K* 8 % + F =(a+ N
&E
CK C -+ .4 I N" N%-
K E g* E
= KB*# O
+ C
+ N" qF C
<5 F K* Q C F
+ C
- 129 -
.N
-54
-55
-56
-57
-58
-59
-60
-61
-62
-63
-64
-65
-66
-67
^ B
-68
-69
-70
-71
-72
` *KB#
< + C s
K*Q
=
5 s + C N" FB %+ N
E+ 8
K C " 5 J F
. C * * 1 ;8
& E N F
E+ C ci+ /a
Z 5 E (+ EB* (+ C C 8 N" E
[ 8 .E
g>& E
<5 E
+ C
E
1 5 C8B % N-
E + C
K 5 .
C ( K N * [ . O5 E
F ! "
[J 8
KB + C m 5 :*K
! 1
K5 [8+
+ C" &+ C
5
+
F K %+
8 + C Z [ 4 n/a F
>d ; .
.
5
C Z= " m
a + C K " J=
N" :*K 5
E g+ C Y % " N %
!
N" C + C C I
B [(+ C \ 85 1 J- + # N
= 8& E" /a
L g 5
B+ C # 5
5 N" 5 %
C
K E
K 5 K ^ C= 7 F
+ C
#*
= 8%
- 130 -
=5 a a 5
29-20
39-30
49-40
50
30
30
12000.
12000.
X ,F W , 3
- 131 -