Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of Chemical
Engineering
ISSN 0104-6632
Printed in Brazil
www.abeq.org.br/bjche
Faculdade de Cincias Naturais, Campus de Marab, UFPA, Phone: (94) 2101-5900, Fax: (94) 2101-5901,
Folha 17, Quadra 04, Lote Especial, CEP: 68505-080, Marab - PA, Brazil.
E-mail: luizmg@ufpa.br
2
Laboratrio de Transporte Pneumtico, Faculdade de Engenharia Mecnica, UFPA, R. Augusto Correia 01,
CEP: 66075-110, Belm - PA, Brazil.
E-mail: andream@ufpa.br
(Submitted: January 26, 2012 ; Revised: May 01, 2013 ; Accepted: May 10, 2013)
Abstract - This paper presents a comparative study of the critical pickup and saltation velocities of particles
in horizontal pipelines for pneumatic conveying design. A comparative study is performed using different
existing correlations in the literature for the determination of the minimum velocity of transport as a function
of the particle and pipe diameter, particle density, solid mass flow rate and particle sphericity. Their
limitations and difficulties in predicting those critical velocities are analyzed. For the pickup velocity, an
experimental study was also carried out in order to support the analysis. Recommendations are presented on
the use of such correlations.
Keywords: Pickup velocity; Saltation velocity; Pneumatic conveying; Gas-solid flow.
INTRODUCTION
Pneumatic conveying is a process in which solid
particulate materials are conveyed by gas flow
through pipeline systems. Nowadays, this type of
transport has become a popular technique in the field
of particulate materials. Applications for pneumatic
conveying systems can be found in many industrial
areas, such as ore processing and in the chemical,
pharmaceutical, agricultural and food processing
industries.
A key parameter for successful operation of a
pneumatic conveying system is the minimum velocity required for particle entrainment, also known
as the pickup velocity. The minimum velocity to
maintain the particulate flow is called the saltation
velocity. The knowledge of these velocities is critical
for an accurate design of a pneumatic conveying
system. If the fluid velocity is much higher than is
*To whom correspondence should be addressed
36
Ws
1
= d FrSx
f USA 10
(1)
where:
FrS = US / g DT (Froude number at the Saltation
velocity), d = 1.44dp + 1.96 , x = 1.1dp + 2.5 , (d and
LITERATURE REVIEW
The minimum transport velocity is defined as the
lowest velocity at which particles can be transported
inside a pipeline in a stable manner without deposition on the bottom of the pipe. The saltation velocity
is defined as the gas velocity in a horizontal pipeline
in which the particles begin to fall from their state of
suspension and are deposited at the bottom of the
pipeline.
The pickup velocity is defined as the gas velocity
necessary to suspend the particles initially at rest in
the bottom of the pipeline (see Figure 1), or it may
be defined as the fluid velocity required to initiate a
sliding motion, rolling and suspension of the
particles.
p
d p > 1.39 DT
f
1.06
p
= 0.373
f
0.74
U
t
10 gd p
3.7
(2)
U min
10 gDT
3.61
For:
p
d p < 1.39 DT
f
(a)
1.43
dp
= 5560
DT
0.74
U min
10 gDT
3.61
(3)
(b)
Figure 1: (a) Particles at rest in the bottom of the
pipeline. Air velocity less than the pickup velocity.
(b) Particles are dragged by the air stream. Air
velocity equal to or greater than the pickup velocity.
The main correlations found in the literature that
are used for predicting the critical pickup and
saltation velocities are presented below. These
correlations are analyzed in this work.
D
US
= 0.11 T
dp
gDT
Weber (1981)
For:
0.025
p
f
0.34
(4)
Ut 3 m / s
Frmin
dp
8
= 7 + U t 0.25
DT
(5)
0.1
(1 + 30C )
0.35 2.33
Ar
V
pd p U mp
Ut > 3 m / s
Frmin = 15
For:
For:
0.25
dp
DT
37
(6)
0.1
< 2450
= 14.3 1 + 30CV0.35
2.33
Ar
(11)
0.1
f p f gd 3p
Ar =
For,
For:
1 0.1
+ 30C0.35
Gs
< 47000
Dt
(7)
f d p U mp
For:
, (Archimedes number)
2.33
Ar
0.1
1
= 1.1
+ 30C0.35
V
(12)
2.33
Ar
3/7
where,
Gs
< 47000
Dt
(8)
CV =
f
, ( solids volumetric concentration )
p + f
Ochi (1991)
U
Us
t
= 1.05fs0.47
g dp
gd p
0.82
0.25
(9)
0.70 Ar 1/5 + 1 U p0
U p0
1.25
0.5
(10)
(13)
1.5
d p 4 fs gd p p f
= 1
8 D r 3 C D f
coarse particle
CD is the drag coefficient of the particle.
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 01, pp. 35 - 46, January - March, 2014
(14)
38
-2
d 1.5
U7 2
1.54 x10-4 1- p C Df d 4p 3 po
v DT
DT
8
U 21
(15)
( fine
particle )
D
Up
= 0.0428 Re p0.175 T
dp
gd p
0.25
p
f
0.75
(16)
First Zone:
=
3
5Ar 7
Re
(17)
2.02
0.0277n Re501.96
1
Ar 3
Re
,
(19)
2.625
dp
+ 0.00635
DT
1 A h f d p
= Ar +
6
12 s22
0.375
(20)
where,
Re*p =
0.29
dp
1
fs Ar
=0
6
2
Third Zone:
= 21.8
(18)
1
fs Ar = 0
6
Fine particle
Second Zone:
Re*p
0.29
Re
, for Ar > 16.5
2.02
dp
n
C D Re p 2 + 0.1fs
8
DT
Re*p
dp
n
C D Re p 2 + 0.1fs
8
DT
f U p d p
D /D
T T50
1.5
1.4 0.8e
39
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 01, pp. 35 - 46, January - March, 2014
40
41
250
Experiments
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
200
m (g)
150
100
50
0
2
Density
(kg/m3)
Sand
2636
Alumina
3750
Size range
(m)
50-90
90-150
150-250
250-430
600-430
600-850
850-1000
1000-2360
2360-3350
3350-4360
53-90
90-125
125-150
150-205
Mean Diameter
(m)
70
120
200
340
510
730
930
1680
2860
3860
71.5
107.5
137.5
177.5
Sphericity
= 0.7
= 0.9
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 01, pp. 35 - 46, January - March, 2014
42
Table 2: Experimental data used in this paper for the pickup velocity
study and Geldart Classification.
Material
sand
alumina
glass beads
salt irregular
non-spherical glass
pasta
spaghetti
lentil
rice
bakelite
Density
(kg/m3)
2636
3750
2834
2234
2834
1200
1500
1644
1590
930
Sizes
(m)
70-3860
71.5-177.5
200-3500
200-3500
200-3500
5400
4100
3830
2940
2700
Geldart
Classification
A;B;C;D
A;B
B;D
B;D
B;D
B;D
D
D
D
D
43
12
Up (m/s)
3
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
dp (m)
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 01, pp. 35 - 46, January - March, 2014
44
mm. The materials used were spherical and nonspherical glass. The experimental data are obtained
from Cabrejos and Klinzing (1994), Hayden et al.
(2003) and Kalman et al. (2005). The densities are
2480, 2500 and 2834 kg/m3, respectively. The
sphericity of the non-spherical glass is 0.7 (Cabrejos
and Klinzing, 1994). Note that the non-spherical
glass has greater velocities than the glass spheres in
both pipe diameters of 25 and 50 mm. This is due to
the fact that, in the case of non-spherical particles,
the contact area is larger and therefore there is a
greater action of the cohesion forces (Cabrejos and
Klinzing, 1994; Hayden et al., 2003; Kalman et al.,
2005). In Kalmans correlation (Kalman et al., 2005)
the pickup velocities of spherical particles are always
larger than those for non-spherical particles, thus
showing that the reasonable agreement obtained in
the pickup velocity from experimental data was
related to its correlation with other parameters and
not necessarily with the sphericity.
CONCLUSION
45
NOMECLATURE
A
AH
Ar
CD
CV
D50
dp
DT
Frmin
FrS
fs
g
GS
mp
n
Re
Rep
Rep*
s
Umin
Ump
Up
Up0
US
Us0
Ut
WS
m2
N.m
m
m
m
m/s2
kg/m2.s
kg
m/s
m/s
m/s
m/s
m/s
m/s
m/s
kg/s
Greek Letters
f
p
porosity
solids loading ratio
gas dynamic viscosity
fluid kinematic viscosity
fluid density
solid particle density
Particle sphericity
kg/ms
m2/s
kg /m3
kg /m3
-
REFERENCES
Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol. 31, No. 01, pp. 35 - 46, January - March, 2014
46