Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A.
Situation
learning environment. Though DCIS has taken the initiative to implement reforms
in response to the changing landscape in todays education, the teachers admit that
much is still needed. The very state of their classrooms, shops, and laboratories
would speak for what they lack. How can communicative competence and skills
expected of the students to be proficient at be developed and mastered when the
facilities needed are either not provided or enough. Concepts remain as concepts
when these are not given the avenues to be put into practice in the learning
environment where these classes are conducted. They collectively point to the
urgent need for a new generation of facilities to cater for 21st century teaching and
learning needs. Innovation, they believe, is the key to updating and upgrading the
physical learning environment.
The concept of learning environment will become increasingly significant
as schools of the future become centres of lifelong learning. Learning
environment is a term used liberally in educational discourse because of the
emerging use of information technologies for educational purposes on the one
hand, and the constructivist concept of knowledge and learning on the other. As
Fisher (2009) points out, the classroom environment has a powerful influence on
learning, and children's perceptions of that environment influence their behavior. It,
thus, veers away from the traditional classrooms, conceived during the Industrial
Revolution and designed for students to passively receive information (McGregor,
2004), which were viewed as restricting students from acquiring new knowledge
for todays students. In turn, our perspectives on what constitutes world class
schooling facilities are also being challenged.
Janowska and Atlay (2008) made a stronger connection between learning
environments and student engagement. They explored the influence of a
specifically designed creative learning space on students engagement with the
learning process, their motivation to explore, experience and discover, and on them
becoming more active, autonomous learners (Janowska & Atlay, 2008). In
analysing participant students responses to working in the creative learning space
they identified the use of the following adjectives: creative, positive, interactive,
enjoyable, exciting, flexible, productive, engaging, involving, encouraging,
inspiring, stimulating, fresh, functional, comfortable, relaxing, informal, [and]
personal (Janowska & Atlay, 2008). Based on these responses, they concluded that
the creative learning space had a positive influence on students experience and
their engagement with the learning process. They also suggested that more in-depth
analysis was needed in order to better understand how creative and other spaces
could meet the needs of curriculum and students.
The State is mandated to provide a system of education for the Filipino
children and the youth. The kind of education that is envisioned in the Constitution
is "quality education," a "complete, adequate, and integrated system of education
relevant to the needs of the people and society," and the State must ensure that all
citizens can access this envisioned system of education (Article XIV, Section 1,
and Article XIV, Section 2, Sub-section 1). BATAS PAMBANSA BLG. 232, also
known as the Education Act of 1982 in Section 22 points to how the Secondary
Education aims at discovering and enhancing the different aptitudes and interests
of the students so as to equip him with skills for productive endeavor and/or
prepare him for tertiary schooling.
The implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum brings into focus a new
perspective of the Filipino learner. As Bro. Armin Luistro, DepEd Secretary
pointed out, Ang bagong Pilipino higit sa pagiging maka-tao, maka-Diyos,
maka-bayan, at maka-kalikasan ay kailangang magtaglay ng kasanayan at pananaw
na angkop sa 21st century. The K to 12 Curriculum is focused on the learners
acquisition of the 21st century skills such as Learning and Innovation skills which
take into scope creativity and curiosity, critical thinking, problem solving, and risktaking, adaptability, managing complexity and self-direction and higher-order
thinking and sound reasoning. This calls for making learning and meaning-making
multimodal. Learning and meaning is made through oral, written, visual, audio,
tactile, gestural, and spatial. All these will be possible when reflected in the very
learning environment of the students.
Undeniably, the basic structure of teaching spaces have evolved much over
the past century. This fact inspired the researcher to investigate how much has
changed in the learning environment in Music, Arts and Physical Health Education
(MAPHE) in keeping with this evolution. This study looked into how technology
and student engagement come into play in innovating the learning environment in
MAPEH classes at Domalandan Center Integrated School (DCIS).
B. Problem
This study aimed to assess the physical composition of the learning
environment in MAPEH classes at DCIS as well as how technology and student
engagement come into play in innovating todays learning environment in
MAPEH.
Specifically, it aimed to answer the following questions:
1. How do the students find the classroom arrangement in terms of student
engagement ?
2. How do they find their indoor learning space?
3. What is the extent of utilization of instructional technology to innovate MAPEH
classes?
4. What are the problems encountered by the MAPEH Teachers in the innovation
of MAPEH classes in terms of adequacy of materials?
5. What type of learning environment can be designed to innovate the MAPEH
classes at DCIS?
general and to the MAPEH teachers in particular to view the learning environment
as part of the pedagogical process in MAPEH education.
C. PLAN OF ACTION
C.1 Objectives
1. Innovate the learning environment in MAPEH instruction.
2. Train the teachers in the use/production of technology-aided activities/materials
3. Increase teachers understanding of pedagogical principles that are specific to
the use of technology in an instructional setting
C.2 Time Frame
June 2016- July 2016
Table 1
1.
Activity
Assessment of
learning
teachers
Time Frame
People Involved
Teacher- Researcher
MAPEH teachers
schools
environment
and
utilization
of
technology-based instruction or
activities
2.
session
on
Innovating
the
School Head
MAPEH Head Teacher
MAPEH Teachers
Teacher- Researcher
MAPEH Teachers
teachers
July 11-15, 2016
Teacher- Researcher
Teacher- Researcher
The following steps were followed by the researcher in gathering the needed
data in this study:
1.
Assessment of schools learning environment and teachers utilization of
technology-based instruction in MAPEH.
2.
Conducted the 3-day school LAC session on technology-based MAPEH
instruction .
3.
Developed innovative learning environment designs and technology-aided
lessons or activities.
4.
D. ACTION/IMPLEMENTATION
The descriptive method of research was employed in this study.
Documentary analysis was used, too, in determining the innovativeness of the
learning environment in MAPEH in terms of design and technology tools utilized.
The main tool used in gathering the needed data was a survey questionnaire.
Average weighted mean was used to determine the innovation done and utilized in
MAPEH.
This study purported to better engage the students in Music , Arts, and
Physical Health Education through the development of an innovative learning
environment design and consequently the conduct of training during the school
year 2016 2017.
10
11
2.28
2.70
1.84
1.78
1.95
2.64
2.14
2.10
1.92
1.76
2.06
Description
Moderately
Engaging
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
Moderately
Engaging
12
The overall rating 2.06 which translates to moderately engaging shows how
the respondents regard the learning environment they are exposed to in their
MAPEH subjects in terms of student engagement. Just as learning environment is
regarded as a motivating factor in students engagement, the data show how
MAPEH classes at DCIS is faring and is needing much innovations and reforms.
Though the learning environment allows the teachers to employ a variety of
teaching methods, it cannot be ignored how the learning environment is found
limiting and moderately engaging by the respondents. It comes not as a surprise;
therefore, that the rest of the indicators for learning environment are found
wanting. The respondents rated eight of the ten indicators as moderately engaging.
Several factors can be attributed to this one. Circulation is minimized (1.76);
teachers can move around the room interacting with individuals and groups (1.92),
teachers can make quick, clear transitions from one activity to another (2.10), team
teaching is easily facilitated(2.14); a variety of teaching methods can be used by
the teacher(2.64) and students have some opportunities to move around (2.28) are
such indicators showing how the limited learning environment keep them from
fully optimizing the much needed mobility and space characteristic of a MAPEH
class. Another factor can be attributed to the lack of a regular classroom apt for
MAPEH classes which the teachers can fully optimize for their students use.
MAPEH classes are predominantly held in the classroom and Physical Health
13
Education occasionally held outside the classroom. MAPEH classes require space,
mobility, and
F
23
17
7
32
7
4
29
29
12
10
12
38
220
%
10.46
7.73
3.18
14.55
3.18
1.82
13.18
13.18
5.45
4.55
5.45
17.27
100
14
found the indoor learning area not to their liking. This can be attributed to the data
in Table 1 which show how the respondents regarded their learning environment in
their MAPEH classes. As they found it limiting and not engaging, the very
structure or physical make up of the classroom /gym/shops/laboratories as a
learning area and a learning environment are contributory to their negative stance
on their indoor learning area. Its also why they find it static; they cannot freely
move around much as they have to be mindful of the other classes ongoing at the
gym or the limited space they have in the classroom. On the other hand, close to
those who disliked the indoor learning are those who found it pleasant (13.8);
interesting (10.46%) and inviting (3.18%). Ideally, the answers of the respondents
should lean more on the positive. The data; however; show
implies
reassessment
of
the
classes
conducted
otherwise. This
in
classrooms/
Mean
2.67
2.28
2.17
Description
Often
Seldom
Seldom
1.78
Seldom
15
discussions.
5. Teleconference whenever possible to ensure
classroom discussions.
6. Search /engines to download topics to enhance
our lessons.
7. Video/film whenever possible for purposes of
demonstration and critiquing.
8. Multimedia to supplement scarcity of
instructional materials.
9. Internet camera to present vivid pictures about
lessons in MAPEH.
10. Adobe Photoshop for drawing
Overall
1.71
Never
2.25
Seldom
2.60
Often
2.70
Often
2.21
Seldom
2.50
1.85
Seldom
Seldom
It has been stressed how the utilization of instructional technology can make
the learning environment more engaging. The data above show how the teachers
seldom utilize instructional technology to innovate their MAPEH classes. While it
is true that the MAPEH teachers often use computer-aided instruction (2.67%), use
film/video(2.60) and multimedia (2.70)to innovate their MAPEH classes, majority
of the indicators are found wanting with a rating description of seldom (Adobe
photoshop, laser video disc, search engine and digital projector. Add to this the
fact that teleconferencing has never been utilized as revealed in the data. An
engaging learning environment goes hand in hand with an innovative instruction in
MAPEH. The results show how the MAPEH teachers at DCIS could do more and
learn more about instructional technology as a tool in engaging their students.
Table 4
Seriousness of Problems Encountered by the MAPEH Teachers
in the Innovation of MAPEH Classes in terms of
Adequacy of Materials
16
Mean
Description
Internet Connectivity
2.78
Serious
Laptop/Netbook/Desktop
2.39
Moderately Serious
Video/Film
2.60
Serious
CD-Rom
2.85
Serious
Computer
2.39
Moderately Serious
Multimedia
2.75
Serious
Digital Projectors
2.78
Serious
Internet Camera
2.25
Moderately Serious
Search Engines
2.17
Moderately Serious
Teleconference
3.26
Very Serious
Laser Videodisc
3.25
Serious
Overall
2.67
Serious
(2.78), video/film
(2.60), CD-Rom
(2.85), Digital
17
moderately serious, it is a cause for concern that the provision for teleconference
(3.26) is found to be very serious. Factors contributory to the said results would be
the absence of the necessary tools that would make teleconference an innovative
way of engaging the students in their MAPEH classes and in ensuring active
student engagement in their learning environment. Though majority of the faculty
make use of their laptop or netbook, there is still a handful of faculty who do not
move with the time. These are the teachers who go with the tried and tested but
have gone stale so to speak as they ceased to be engaging. The results imply the
existence or provision of all the said technology/instructional tools. This is good. It
zeroes in on the other hand the need to ease the access and provision of these
technology/instructional tools to address the teachers concerns along this line. It
calls for upgrading of existing facilities or provisions so as to optimize its use,
access, and availability to everyone. In so doing, the overall mean rating of 2.67
which is serious will at least be reduced to moderately serious, if not, not serious.
Instructional technology does, indeed, hold a remarkable promise for
changing the quality of teaching and learning in our schools. It is the catalyst for
transformationbut this does not mean that we merely need more computers in
our classrooms. Technology also involves process. Teachers are then called to task
to bridge their teaching strategies.
Conclusions
18
The findings of the study present how the learning environment is found
limiting and moderately engaging by the respondents which consequently keep
them from fully optimizing the much needed student engagement, mobility and
space characteristic of a MAPEH class. Likewise, the indoor learning area has also
been found to be not to their liking. This is probably due to the fact that the very
structure or physical make up of the classroom/gym as a learning area and a
learning environment are contributory to their negative stance on their indoor
learning area. From the findings of the study it can be drawn that the teachers
seldom utilize instructional technology to innovate their MAPEH classes. This is
not surprising as provision for instructional technology are inadequate; thus, the
teachers cannot/do not fully innovate the learning environment in their MAPEH
classes.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study and the conclusions drawn from such
findings, recommendations are hereby offered that the learning environment in
MAPEH classes can be more stimulating and engaging if student engagement,
space and mobility are given utmost importance in the places where MAPEH
classes are held. The indoor learning area will be more contributory to learning if
MAPEH classes are specially held in rooms appropriate for lecture and/or handson activity, demonstration or play. Classes (lecture and games by two or more
19
Reflection
Overall, the classroom environment plays a crucial role in keeping students
engaged and allowing them to be successful within the classroom. This study led
me to the realization that teachers in general and MAPEH teachers in particular
can modify the environment to achieve these results. Undeniably, our classrooms
and other learning spaces in the public schools are found wanting where space and
innovation are concerned. We may find these limiting but not the ingenuity and
creativity of the teachers in which they make their classrooms engaging and
stimulating. There is a multitude of ways in which to do this. They can arrange the
desks in different patterns. They can decorate the walls with different assignments
or items.
Students can be used to help lead the classroom in the way that the teacher
wants to go. Even adapting the lighting or the temperature of the room can increase
the effectiveness of instruction in the classroom. A good teacher is aware of these
20
elements and the importance that they play in student success. It dawned on me
that without giving attention to the environment of a classroom the teacher is
setting their students up to be less engaging and successful.
REFERENCES
Books
Fitch, J. (2004). Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution
Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(1), 71-81.
Fullan, M. (2007).The three stories of education reform.Phi Delta Kappan, 81(8),
581584.
Heinich, R., Molenda, M., & Russell, J. D. (2005).Instructional media and the new
technologies of instruction. New York: Macmillan.
Lumley, D., & Bailey, G. D. (2006).Planning for technology: A guidebook for
school administrators. New York: Scholastic.
Journals and Periodicals
Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for
promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 38(3), 245-263.
Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why
21
22
23
24
APPENDIX A
Survey Questionnaire on Learning Environment
Directions: The following is the research instrument to be used in the study Learning
Environment in Music, Arts, and Physical Education at Domalandan Center Integrated School .
Please provide the information and/or data asked for. Rest assured that all information/data you
provide will be strictly kept confidential.
Please put a check mark ( ) on the column that corresponds to your perception regarding the
learning environment in MAPEH in terms of student engagement and innovations vis--vis the
provision and utilization of technology . Use the legend indicated in survey questions 1,3, and 4
to guide you in answering the questions.
I. Classroom Arrangement
LEGEND:
Choices
4
Interpretation
HE (highly engaging)
E (engaging)
ME (moderately engaging)
NE (not engaging)
1
25
II. Indoor Learning Space. Just check your answer as to how you find the indoor learning space
in the school. (Classroom, Gymnasium)
I find the indoor learning space,
Interesting
Boring
Dynamic
Static
Inviting
Repelling
Pleasant
Unpleasant
Friendly
Unfriendly
Like
Dislike
III. Extent of Utilization of Instructional Technology (IT)
to Innovate MAPEH Classes
LEGEND:
4
A (always)
thrice a week
O (often)
twice a week
S (seldom)
N (never)
once a week
never use IT
26
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Interpretation
VS (Very Serious)
S (Serious)
MS (Moderately Serious)
NS (Not Serious)
Provision of,
Internet Connectivity
Laptop/Netbook/Desktop
Video/Film
CD-Rom
Computer
Multimedia
Digital Projectors
27
Internet Camera
Search Engines
Teleconference
Laser Videodisc
APPENDIX B
LETTER TO THE VALIDATOR ON THE
QUESTIONNAIRE OF THE STUDY
December 3, 2014
_______________________________
_______________________________
_______________________________
Sir/ Madame:
Greetings of peace!
28
Sincerely,
(SGD) JESUS V. DELA CRUZ
Researcher
APPENDIX C
Innovative Learning Environment in MAPEH
Rationale
"Be the change you want to see in the world."
Nelson Mandela
Learning in health education, physical education, music, arts and home economics
helps students grow as confident, connected and involved lifelong learners, ready
to contribute to their world. It embodies the DepEd curriculums vision for our
young people to contribute to nation building . It enables them to develop the
knowledge, values, and competencies to live full and active lives.
Students learn through interactive and practical activities that draw on their own
experiences and needs, current and future. As they actively explore challenging
29
situations, students increase their knowledge and skills and develop understandings
about themselves, others, and society.
Technology is intervention by design to expand human possibilities. Almost every
aspect of daily life food, health care, transport, communications, entertainment,
our environment uses technology. Undeniably, technology plays a pivotal role in
todays innovation where the learning environment is concerned.
Students today need interactive experiences in keeping with the technological
communities of practice which are currently informing and developing our future.
Through technology education, students have the opportunity to develop a broad
technological literacy and to experience and explore a wide range of technologies
in a variety of contexts that will enable them to participate as informed participants
in an ever-changing world.
It is in view of the aforecited data that this innovation in the learning environment
in Music, Arts, Physical Education and Health is drafted and shared with the
teachers. Space may be limiting but the incorporation of technology and ingenuity
of the teachers to innovate the classroom climate will more than make up for this.
30
Visual arts
Challenge students to explore and question beliefs and assumptions
through studying and making art works.
31
32
Challenge students to take risks, think, and act outside the square
and seek innovative solutions to art making. For example, ask
photography students to produce one photograph overnight in response
to a prompt, which may be interpreted in different ways, for example:
apple (object, food item, form, symbol, brand, from a scientific
perspective)
inside out (looking from inside a room to the outside, turning an
item of clothing or a bag inside out, personal perception)
measurement (space, 3-D, time, space-time continuum, measuring
devices, precision, geometry, numbers, weight, size, volume,
density, mass, gravity, velocity, proportion, scale).
33
Connect visual arts with the ideas and content of other subject
areas.
Use Dadaist collages, for example, to learn about World War
I and post-war socio-political conditions in Europe.
Teach basic physics of the light spectrum to facilitate
understanding of the use of a light meter to measure correct exposure in
photography.
Use the Internet, mailing lists, and art museum websites for virtual
learning experiences that reach far into the world beyond the classroom.
Teachers and students can watch podcasts from the Tate
Modern that spark discussion and present new ideas.
34
Dance
The following are two examples of exploring digital technologies in
ways that both excite and engage students but also keep core dance
practices at the forefront of their learning.
35
Drama
Use a social networking site or blog site or the school intranet server to
create a class page.
If using Facebook, adjust the security settings of the page so that it is a safe,
secure, neutral ground for students and for you as the teacher where you
cant see the students personal pages and they, in turn, cannot view yours.
36
The online 'class base' can then be used to challenge students opinions
through you or the student providing subject-based, thought-provoking
statements on lesson content or the current learning context and contributing
to the resulting comment threads.
In addition, you can provide visual clips for students to view and respond to.
Discussions could also involve ongoing feedback around achievement and
group preparations.
Art history
Enhance the relevance of new learning in the art history classroom.
Students who are challenged and involved learn more effectively.
Effective teachers ask open-ended questions that create possibilities for deeper
learning.
37
Art history challenges students to think about deeper ideas from philosophy or to
form and share opinions.
Initiate debates to encourage students to develop arguments within and outside
their own experiences and knowledge. For example:
'Abstraction is a truer representation of reality than realism.'
'Once an image has gone digital or operates in a digital space it is no longer
art.'
Wide use of the Internet, list serves, and art museum websites enables virtual
learning experiences far beyond the physical boundaries of the classroom.
Google Art takes virtual tours into the great art galleries and museums worldwide,
with the capacity to zoom in close and create a personal gallery.