Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GM Prasad
General Manager (Design & Engg.)
THDC India Limited, Rishikesh
CONTENTS
Introduction
General Site Selection Criteria for Dams
General Investigations for Dam Sites
Case Study of Tehri Dam
Investigations for Tehri Dam ( Earth & Rock Fill Dam)
Investigations for Pipalkoti Dam (Concrete Gravity Dam).
5/20/2010 2
INTRODUCTION
Selection of suitable site for dams is a very important aspect of
planning for Hydro Electric Projects. It depends upon various
parameters viz., topography, geology / seismicity of the area,
foundation characteristics, water availability, availability of
required material within reasonable distance, accessibility of the
site etc.
Topography:
The River cross – section at the dam site should preferably
have a narrow gorge to reduce the length of the dam.
The gorge should open out upstream to provide large basin
for a reservoir.
In case there is a confluence of two or more rivers in the
selected reach, the dam should preferably be located
downstream of the confluence to take advantage of the flow
of all rivers.
The dam should be preferably located where the river bed is
high, so that the height and cost of the dam is reduced.
5/20/2010 4
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Foundation:
Suitable foundation should exist at the site for the particular
type of dam. If suitable foundation is not available but it can
be improved by adopting various measures, the site may be
considered for selection.
In general foundations should be free from seams, open
pockets or fault planes.
Formation of hard and soft layers alternates are not generally
good, because the penetration of water may weaken the soft
layers and lead to movement along them.
Requirements of foundation are more stringent for Concrete
Gravity dams as compared to the Earth & Rockfill dams.
Stability of concrete dam is controlled principally by the
adequacy of the engineering properties of the foundation
material such as - Load bearing capacity , Shearing strength,
Permeability and Erosion Resistance etc.
5/20/2010 5
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Seismicity of Area:
In highly seismic zones, first choice for the
construction of the dams is for Earth & Rockfill type
dams as such dams have inherent property of high
shock absorption during the event of shaking.
5/20/2010 6
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Reservoir and Catchment Area:
The site should ensure adequate storage capacity of reservoir
basin at minimum cost.
The cost of land and property submerged in the water spread
area should be minimum.
The geological conditions of the catchment area should be
such that percolation losses are minimum and maximum
runoff is obtained.
The site should be such that a deep reservoir is formed after
the construction of the dam. A deep reservoir is preferred to a
shallow reservoir because in the former the evaporation losses
are small, the cost of land acquisition is low and the weed
growth is less.
5/20/2010 7
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
The site should be such that the submerged area is minimum.
It should not submerge costly land and property. It should
not affect the ecology of the region. Monuments of historical
and architectural importance should not be submerged.
The dam site should be such that the reservoir would not silt
up quickly. The life of the reservoir depends upon the rate of
silting. The site should be selected such that it avoids or
excludes the water from those tributaries which carry a high
percentage of silt
The soil and rock mass at the reservoir site should not contain
any objectionable soluble minerals which may contaminate
the water. The stored water should be suitable for the purpose
for which the water is required.
5/20/2010 8
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Spillway site:
A good site for a spillway should exist at or near the darn site. The valley
should be sufficiently wide to locate the spillway if it is an integral part
of the dam. If the spillway is to be located separately, the best site of
spillway is that in which there is a saddle near the dam site which is
separated from it by a hillock. In that case, the main dam can be
located in the gorge and the spillway can be constructed in the saddle.
If the site conditions are such that the spillway must be located in the
main river channel, the types of dams that can accomodate an overflow
spillway should be considered.
Material:
Material required for a particular type of Dam should be available
nearby, cost of construction is quite dependent on this factor. For the
Earth & Rockfill dam, material for placement in all the zones should be
available locally. In case of concrete dams, the main requirement is for
availability of aggregates for production of concrete.
5/20/2010 9
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Accessibility:
It would be preferable to select a site which is connected
by a road or rail link or can be conveniently connected so
that Man , Machinery and other equipments can easily
be transported to the site.
5/20/2010 10
GENERAL SITE SELECTION CRITERIA FOR DAMS
Other considerations:
For the development of a particular backward area, the dam
may be constructed in that region. Sometimes public opinion
and economic consideration of the region may affect the site
selection of a dam.
5/20/2010 11
GENERAL INVESTIGATION FOR DAM SITES
5/20/2010 12
Preliminary Investigations:
To avoid expenditure on detailed investigation it is
always advisable to prepare preliminary feasibility report
on the basis of preliminary investigations.
Preliminary Investigations cover mainly the following
aspects:
Water Availability Studies
Hydrological Studies
Topographical Survey
Geological and Foundation Surveys
5/20/2010 13
Detailed investigations:
Detailed Investigations are carried out if after
preliminary investigation project is found to be feasible,
so that detailed project report can be prepared in order
to evaluate cost and benefits from project with accuracy.
5/20/2010 14
GENERAL INVESTIGATION FOR DAM SITES
5/20/2010 15
Surface Investigations:
Preliminary Surveys
Satellite Imageries.
Topographical Surveys
Geological Mapping.
5/20/2010 16
Drifts.
Geological features predicted based upon drilling and logging
can be physically verified through drifts. Drifts also provides a
facility for conducting in-situ tests.
Geophysical Investigations.
Assessment of elastic and stress strain characteristics of rocks in
the area.
In situ Tests.
In-situ tests are carried out to find actual values of various
parameters (e.g. Permeability, stress etc.) at a particular site to
take into account the influence of site conditions.
5/20/2010 17
Geotechnical Investigations Depending upon the type of Construction
Materials to be used:
Grain Size Distribution
Mineralogical composition
Atterberg Limits
Shear & consolidation Parameters
Density
Permeability
Dispersivity & erodibility etc.
Crushing value
Soundness, Alkali aggregate reactivity
Abrasivity etc.
5/20/2010 18
Based upon the Investigation data, following
information is generated:
Geological & Tectonic Data.
Flood Estimation at Dam site.
Water Availability .
Sedimentation Data
Design of foundation treatment scheme
Selection of fill materials and Design properties
Design of Diversion Structures.
Fixation of Dam height.
Design of Spillway System .
Power Potential .
Life of reservoir etc.
5/20/2010 19
Case Study
Tehri Dam Site
5/20/2010 20
Salient Features of Tehri Dam
5/20/2010 21
Tehri site was having following features which made it
an ideal location for building such a huge Gigantic
structure.
Main topographic feature which makes it ideal location
are:
The River cross – section at the dam site was a narrow gorge
and it opens upstream. Which means reduced length of Dam
and sufficient space for reservoir.
Dam is situated at the confluence of two rivers i.e. Bhagirathi
and Bhilanagana and having advantage of flow of both Rivers.
5/20/2010 22
5/20/2010 23
Material For Construction:
For construction of such a gigantic structure huge
amount of construction material (about 279.8 lac cu.m)
was required. At Tehri site, main construction materials
required for the core and shell zones of the dam i.e. clay
and sandy-gravelly material were available within a
distance of about 3 to 5 km of Dam site, which made it a
favourable site for construction of an Earth & Rockfill
dam.
5/20/2010 24
5/20/2010 25
Investigations for 260.5 m high Tehri
Dam ( Earth & Rock Fill Dam)
5/20/2010 26
After selection of ideal topographical location for the Tehri Dam,
detailed Geological investigation were carried out in the dam
foundation area and Geo-technical Investigations on the fill
materials, for finalisation of various design details.
5/20/2010 27
To determine the thickness of river borne material, at the Dam site
following geological explorations were made:
Drilling,
Drifting,
Geophysical profiling,
Geological logging of the under riverbed portion of the
foundation through exploratory drifts. etc.
5/20/2010 28
Exploration by Drill Holes
5/20/2010 31
Geophysical Investigations:
Objective of geophysical investigations was:
Identification of the thickness and state of the zones of
surface weathering and distressing;
Determination of surface of relatively sound bedrock;
Identification and aerial tracing of tectonic fault zones;
Assessment of elastic and stress strain characteristics of
rocks in the area in their bedding;
5/20/2010 32
To fulfil above mentioned objectives following works were
carried out at the Dam site:
Dam core abutment area was covered with 2774 m of
seismic profiles.
~ 2024 m of seismic shooting in the L/B.
~ 750 m in the R/B.
The main work was done with 5-6 m spread of
geophones, shot-points spaced at 25-115 m and
maximum hodograph length of 230 m.
The total number of profiles covering the left & right
bank slopes was 14 & 6 respectively.
5/20/2010 33
Main findings of the Geophysical Investigations:
5/20/2010 34
In situ water percolation tests:
5/20/2010 35
Test grouting:
To ascertain the groutability of rock mass and to develop
suitable grouting programme, Test grouting was carried
out on three platforms in the dam area in three grades of
phyllites exposed on the right bank.
A triangular pattern of trial grouting was adopted for all
the platforms.
Efficiency of grouting was measured in terms of
percentage of reduction of pre grout permeability of
inspection holes.
5/20/2010 36
5/20/2010 37
In- situ Rock Modulus Tests:
In order to determine the modulus of elasticity and the
modulus of deformation, cyclic plate load tests were
carried out in different grades of rocks in 14 drifts
located on the right bank of Tehri Dam prior to Dec.
1973. The tests were carried out across and along the
foliation planes.
5/20/2010 38
Hydrofracturing Tests in Core Foundation rocks:
To find out the reopening pressure of existing joints in
the core foundation rocks of Tehri dam, Hydrofracturing
tests using Minifrac system were conducted in about 10
nos. of drill holes.
Tested depth was upto 15m from the stripped core
surface.
Re-opening pressure as obtained from the tests had
ranged from 17.25 to 41.4 kg/cm2.
Based on these test results, maximum limit of grouting
pressure in the dam foundation was kept in between 10
to 12 kg/cm2.
5/20/2010 39
EXPLORATORY DRIFT UNDER THE RIVERBED
During the period from 1963 to 1971, a number of vertical
and inclined drill holes were put down in the river bed
section and from both the abutments.
5/20/2010 40
For making a reassessment , additional vertical and
inclined holes were put down in the river bed. The
drilling data did not indicate any prominent fault zone
in the river bed. 3 drill holes were electrically logged
observations made from which provided support to the
interpretation that the drill holes have not intersected
any major shear zone.
5/20/2010 41
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOR DAM FILL
MATERIALS:
Construction of Tehri dam required about 27.98 M Cu.m
of fill materials for the core, transition, shell & riprap
zones. In order to evaluate the suitability of these
materials, preliminary investigations at 14 different sites
for core material (within a distance of 5 to 35 km from
dam site), 2 sites for transition and shell materials and
various sites for riprap material were conducted.
5/20/2010 42
Investigations at Koti borrow area (for clay):
The area was first investigated with 40 auger holes of shallow depth
and samples collected and analysed for grain size classification.
Subsequently 22 pits were dug in the whole area, some pits were as
deep as 20 m.
Insitu wet density, Insitu moisture content and Insitu dry density of
four undisturbed samples were also determined.
5/20/2010 44
Triaxial shear tests:
Unconsolidated undrained tests
5/20/2010 45
Investigations at Dobata borrow area (for shell
material):
Shell material has been borrowed from Dobata borrow area.
For exploring the Dobata terrace, 63 & 42 nos. of pits were dug
in old and new Dobata areas respectively. Samples taken from
the pits were subjected to various tests as below:
Grain size classification .
5/20/2010 46
Investigations / Testing of filters:
Transition zone between core and shell zones has been
designed as filter. Taking into consideration of the risk of
crack formation in the core, the material used for these zones
ranged from sand to gravel size. Following investigations and
tests were conducted for selection of filter material.
Permeability tests.
5/20/2010 47
Investigations for Riprap material:
For the protection of the dam slopes and increasing stability of
slopes during seismic activity, a well graded hard blasted rock i.e.
riprap (5 mm-1200 mm) has been provided on both the slopes of the
dam. Suitability of prospective quarry sites for this material was
evaluated in terms of its rock quality, quantity and distance from the
dam site.
Tests and studies conducted in borrow areas for checking the
suitability of Riprap material were as below:
Compressive Strength.
Bulk Density.
Softening Coefficient.
Water Absorption.
Triaxial Shear Tests
Experimental Study for estimation of Seismic Pore Water
Pressures .
Ground Penetrating Radar Survey for estimation of overburden in
quarry areas.
5/20/2010 48
Investigations for Pipalkoti Dam
(Concrete Gravity Dam)
5/20/2010 49
Salient Features of Pipalkoti Dam
5/20/2010 50
For the selection of Dam site 5 different sites were
explored during the Preliminary Stage of the Project.
Upper Barrage Site (B-1)
Site was suitable for construction point of view but advantage
of discharge of two tributaries (Karmansa and Kalpa Ganga
river) of Alaknanda river meeting just downstream of this
site is not there.
Lower Barrage/Dam Site 1
This site is not taking full advantage of water head available.
Dam Site 2
This site have strong possibility of Rock Fall on the right
abutment.
5/20/2010 51
Dam Site 3
This site does not appear suitable as about 20 m thick river
borne material terrace exists above water level on both the
banks of river.
Dam Site 4
Dam Site 4 was selected to carry out the Detailed
Investigation as this site was free from the Danger of Rock Fall
as compared to other sites. Also on preliminary investigation,
anticipated depth of overburden was less as compared to
other explored sites.
5/20/2010 52
Geotechnical Explorations and Field
Investigations:
For obtaining the information with regard to geological
characteristics of rockmass and depth of overburden etc.,
detailed geotechnical explorations through exploratory drifts
and drilling were carried out at Pipalkoti Dam site.
Drifting:
In order to explore the rock condition, two exploratory drifts of
size 2 m x 1.8 m on the left and right bank of the river Alaknanda
were excavated. From these two Drifts, cross cuts have been
excavated.
In total 150 m of drifting was done at Pipalkoti Dam site.
5/20/2010 53
Drilling:
In order to decipher the depth of overburden and nature of
formation below the Dam site, ten nos. of boreholes were
done during the DPR stage. In total 500 m of Drilling is
carried out at the Dam site. Based on the investigations, depth
of overburden in the riverbed has been estimated about 20m.
5/20/2010 54
Seismic Refraction Survey:
To determine the depth of overburden, level of rock at dam
site and to infer rock quality, seismic refraction survey both on
land and underwater along five traverses was carried out.
The lengths of two land profiles for the survey was between
100 m to 115 m while the same for underwater profiles ranged
from 50 m to 120 m.
5/20/2010 55
On Land:
Top layer having compression wave velocity between 300 m/sec and
600 m/sec was inferred to be loose boulder bed (thickness 3.5 to 11
m).
Land having wave velocity between 800 m/sec and 1200 m/sec was
inferred to be compact / partially saturated boulder bed.
The quartzite rock velocity along land profiles ranged between 3000
m/sec and 4000 m/sec.
Underwater:
Velocity below 2000 m/sec was interpreted to be saturated bouldary
bed.
Layer having velocity between 2000 m/sec and 3000 m/sec may
represent compact bouldary bed / weathered quartzite rock
Rock velocity varied from 4000 m/sec to 6000 m/sec.
The depth to rock varied from 10m to 22m.
5/20/2010 56
Estimation of Geo-mechanical Properties of Rock Cores:
From the dam site, test samples were collected from three drill holes.
Based upon the laboratory testing following properties of the rock were
determined:
5/20/2010 57
5/20/2010 58