Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Civil Engineering, Power and Water University of Technology(PWUT), Tehran, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 17 July 2011
Accepted 25 August 2011
Available online 1 September 2011
Keywords:
A. Concrete
A. Nanomaterials
F. Microstructure
a b s t r a c t
In this paper, mechanical, rheological, durability and microstructural properties of high performance self
compacting concrete (HPSCC) incorporating SiO2 micro and nanoparticles have been investigated. For this
purpose, a fraction of Portland cement was replaced by different amounts of microsilica, nanosilica and
blend of micro and nanosilica as 10%, 2% and 10% + 2% respectively. Three different binder contents as
400, 450 and 500 kg/m3 with a constant water to binder ratio (w/b = 0.38) were investigated. Rheological
properties were determined through slump ow time and diameter, V-funnel ow time and L-box tests
and mechanical characteristics were determined. Durability properties were evaluated by water absorption, capillary absorption, Cl ion percentage and resistivity tests. Microstructure of the concrete was also
assessed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that the properties improved signicantly for the specimens containing micro and nanosilica. Improvement of Cl ion percentage and
resistivity results in the micro and nanosilica blended mixtures was also noticeable. From the microstructure point of view, the SEM micrographs showed more rened and packed pore structure of the concrete
containing admixtures especially at longer ages which could lead to enhancement of strength and the
durability properties of HPSCC specimens.
2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
High-performance concrete (HPC) has become an attractive
option compared to normal-strength concrete (NSC). Highperformance concrete (HPC) is a specialized concrete designed to
provide several benets in the construction of concrete structures.
HPC offers high strength, better durability properties, and good
construction. High strength is one of the important attributes of
HPC. High strength concrete, according to American Concrete Institute Committee ACI 363 R [1], is the concrete which has specic
compressive strength of 41 MPa or more at 28 days. The HPC offers
signicant economic and architectural advantages over NSC in
similar situations, and is suited well for constructions that require
high durability.
Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is considered as a concrete
which can be placed and compacted under its own weight with
little or no vibration without segregation or bleeding. It is used
to facilitate and ensure proper lling and good structural performance of restricted areas and heavily reinforced structural members. It has gained signicant importance in recent years because
of the advantages it offers [25].
Many researchers have used SCC containing admixtures to satisfy the great demand for nes needed for this type of concrete,
thereby improving its mechanical, rheological and durability properties in comparison with normal vibrated concrete (NVC).
Researchers have investigated the effects of different admixtures
on SCC properties in recent years. Siddique [6] investigated the
properties of SCC made with different amounts of y ash. El-Dieb
[7] studied mechanical and durability properties of ultra high
strength-ber reinforced concrete (UHS-FRC) with self compacting
characteristics. According to Fava et al. [8], in SCCs with ground
granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS), strength increase can be
achieved. Kulakowski et al. [9] reviewed the silica fume inuence
on reinforcement corrosion in concrete. The effect of metakaolin
on transport properties of concrete were also investigated by
Shekarchi et al. [10]. There are also some works on incorporating
nanoparticles into concrete specimens to achieve improved
physical and mechanical properties which most of them have
focused on using SiO2 nanoparticles in normal concrete [11],
generally cement mortars and cement-based materials [1215]
and self compacting concrete [16].
By combining the characteristics and advantages of HPC and
SCC, high performance self-compacting concrete (HPSCC) can be
produced which possesses the advantages in both forms of fresh
and hardened concrete, i.e. while presenting higher strength and
durability, it has a good workability and rheological properties.
390
Table 1
Chemical composition and physical properties of cement and microsilica.
Chemical analysis (%)
Cement
Microsilica
Sio2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
CaO
MgO
SO3
K2O
Na2O
Loss of ignition
Specic gravity
Blaine neness (cm2/g)
20<
6<
6<
<50
<5
<3
<1
<1
<3
3.15
3260
93.6
1.3
0.9
0.5
1
0.4
1.52
0.45
3.1
2.2
21,090
Table 2
Properties of nanosilica.
Diameter (nm)
Density (g/cm3)
Purity (%)
15 3
165 17
<0.15
>99.9
Table 3
Sieve analysis and physical properties of the ller, ne and coarse aggregates.
Sieve size (mm)
Filler
(%passing)
Fine aggregate
(%passing)
Coarse aggregate
(%passing)
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.6
0.3
0.15
0.075
Bulk density
(kg/m3)
Specic gravity
(g/m3)
Absorption (%)
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
90.9
33.7
100
100
98.38
76.45
46.65
39.32
15.26
3.62
0
1460
97.9
79.3
13.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1450
2.619
2.6
2.72
0.4
4. Mixing procedure
Since the SP plays a very important role in the owability of SCC
mixes [17], a modied mixing procedure was adopted to take the
benet of action of adsorption of molecules of poly-carboxylic
ether based SP on the cement particles for all mixes. HPSCC mixtures were prepared by mixing coarse aggregates, ne aggregates
and powder materials (cement, micro and nanosilica) in a laboratory drum mixer. The powder material and the aggregates were
mixed in dry form for 2 min. Then half of the water containing
the whole amount of super plasticizer was poured and mixed for
3 min. After that, about 1 min rest was allowed and nally rest of
the water containing VMA was added into the mixture and mixed
for 1 min.
391
100.00
90.00
80.00
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
30.00
filler
20.00
Fine aggregate
10.00
Coarse aggregate
0.00
100
10
0.1
0.01
Table 4
Mix proportions of the concrete specimens.
(kg/m3)
No
Concrete ID
w/b
Cement
Microsilica
Nanosilica
Filler
Fine aggregate
Coarse aggregate
Sp
VMA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450 MS 10%
HPSCC500 MS 10%
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450 NS 2%
HPSCC500 NS 2%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.38
400
450
500
360
405
450
392
441
490
352
396
440
40
45
50
40
45
50
8
9
10
8
9
10
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
177
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
1003
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
578
2.5
2.81
3.12
2.5
2.81
3.12
2.5
2.81
3.12
2.5
2.81
3.12
2
2.25
2.5
2
2.25
2.5
2
2.25
2.5
2
2.25
2.5
SCC prepared by EFNARC (European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and Concrete Systems) [21].
Table 6
Fresh properties of HPSCC mixtures.
Mix
no
Concrete ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
Min.
Max.
Slump ow
D
(mm)
T50
(s)
750
800
840
650
700
760
740
790
820
640
700
740
2
1.7
1.5
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.1
1.9
1.7
2.4
2.3
2.1
Slump ow
D
(mm)
T50
(s)
650
800
2
5
V-funnel ow
time (s)
L-box
H2/H1
9
5
4
10
7
5
10
6
4
12
8
6
0.73
0.78
0.84
0.81
0.9
0.96
0.75
0.8
0.85
0.84
0.93
0.98
V-funnel ow
time (s)
L-box
H2/H1
6
12
0.8
1
900
850
392
800
750
700
MS 0%
MS 10%
NS 2%
MS 10% and NS 2%
650
Electrical resistance
measurement device
Heavy wood
for fixing
the plate
600
400
450
binder content (kg/m3)
500
Fig. 3. Results of slump ow test for different admixtures and binder contents.
10 Cm
Concrete
sample
Copper
plate
(Electrodes)
2.5
Heavy wood
for fixing
the plate
Table 5
Relation between electrical resistivity and probability of corrosion
[25].
Electrical resistivity (X m)
Probability of corrosion
120<
50120
<50
Not Probable
Probable
Inevitable
T50cm (sec)
Wire
2
1.5
MS 0%
MS 10%
NS 2%
MS 10% and NS 2%
1
400
450
binder content (kg/m3)
500
Fig. 4. Results of T50 test for different admixtures and binder contents.
393
MS 0%
MS 10%
NS 2%
MS 10% and NS 2%
12
V funnel (sec)
10
8
6
4
2
400
450
binder content (kg/m3)
500
Fig. 5. Results of V-funnel test for different admixtures and binder contents.
L box
0.8
MS 0%
MS 10%
NS 2%
MS 10% and NS 2%
0.6
400
450
binder content (kg/m3)
Cl %
blended and in this way, the samples were prepared for the next
step of the test [ASTM C1218].
In this test method, total chloride content of pulverized
concrete sample is determined by the potentiometric titration of
chloride with silver nitrate [ASTM C114]. The pulverized concrete
sample prepared is solved in nitric acid solution and then if the
solution is acidic, a little of NaHCO3 is added to this solution until
pH value reaches 6 or 7. Then the K2CrO4 indicator is added so that
the color of the solution changes to light yellow. Eventually, 0.05 N
AgNO3 is added until the color of the solution turns to orangeyellow (weak brown) and the volume of the AgNO3 solution is measured. In order to determine the Cl ion percentage, the volume of
the AgNO3 solution is substituted in Eq. (1).
500
Fig. 6. Results of L-box test for different admixtures and binder contents.
3:5453V N
W
RA
L
R is the resistance (X), A the area of sample (m2), L is length of sample (m), r is the resistivity (X m).
7. Results and discussion
7.1. Fresh concrete properties
In this experimental program, workability of HPSCC was measured by slump ow (D (mm) and T50 (s)), V-funnel, and L-box
tests. Table 6 lists the test results performed on fresh concrete.
The slump ow diameters of all mixtures were in the range of
640840 mm, slump ow times were less than 2.4 s, and the
V-funnel ow times (s) were in the range of 412 s. The lowest
V-funnel ow time as 4 s was measured for the HPSCC500N2%
while the HPSCC400NS2%MS10% mixture had the highest ow
Table 7
Compressive splitting tensile strength results of HPSCC specimens.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Concrete ID
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
3 days
7 days
28 days
90 days
3 days
7 days
28 days
90 days
27.8
27.8
32.5
29.2
31.8
36.2
36.1
33.4
34.3
40.3
38.7
41
36.4
36.4
40.2
44.3
44.1
49.1
48.7
42.8
43.9
59
50.1
52.3
51.8
52
52.5
71.3
80.4
82.1
56.5
58.3
63.4
78.8
83.5
87.9
53.1
53
53.2
75.9
85.3
86.1
58.1
59.3
65.1
82.4
89.9
92.1
2.1
2.2
2.8
2
2.1
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.9
2.9
2.7
3.7
3
3.1
3.6
3.1
3.2
3.7
3.4
3.8
3.7
3.6
4.5
4.7
3.7
4.5
4.7
3.7
4.3
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.8
3.9
4.6
4.8
4.4
4.8
4.9
4.3
4.6
4.8
4.9
5.1
5.3
394
(a)
85
65
45
HPSCC,400
HPSCC,NS 2%
HPSCC,MS 10%
HPSCC,NS 2% and MS 10%
25
0
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
77
84
91
Days
(b)
Compressive strenght (MPa)
85
45
HPSCC,450
HPSCC,NS 2%
HPSCC,MS 10%
HPSCC,NS 2% and MS 10%
25
0
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
77
84
91
Days
(c)
87
47
HPSCC,500
HPSCC,NS 2%
HPSCC,MS 10%
HPSCC,NS 2% and MS 10%
27
0
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
77
84
Days
Fig. 7. Compressive strength of HPSCC samples with binder contents of (a) 400, (b) 450 and (c) 500.
91
395
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Concrete ID
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
Time (h)
0.5
Time (h)
1
Time (h)
24
Time (h)
48
Time (h)
72
Time (h)
168
2.6
2.3
2.2
1.7
1.65
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.44
1.4
1.3
1.1
3.2
3.15
3.1
2.2
2.1
1.95
2.25
2.2
1.7
1.8
1.65
1.4
5.3
4.5
4.3
2.7
2.4
2.4
2.65
2.6
2.2
2
1.9
1.6
5.5
4.7
4.4
2.8
2.6
2.5
2.7
2.64
2.3
2.2
1.8
1.7
5.6
4.8
4.6
2.85
2.6
2.6
2.74
2.7
2.4
2.3
2
1.9
5.8
4.9
4.9
3
2.8
2.7
3
2.9
2.5
2.4
2.1
2
HPSCC,400
HPSCC,400,MS10%
HPSCC,400,NS2%
HPSCC,400,NS2%MS10%
6.7
HPSCC,450
HPSCC,450,MS10%
HPSCC,450,NS2%
HPSCC,450,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC,500
HPSCC,500,MS10%
HPSCC,500,NS2%
HPSCC,500,NS2%MS10%
5.7
4.7
3.7
2.7
1.7
0.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Time (hour)
Fig. 8. Water absorption versus time for different mixtures.
time as 12 s. Incorporating MS and NS in binary and ternary systems, generally made the concretes more viscous. In order to increase V-funnel ow time of the concretes, the mineral
admixtures as MS were used in binary blends. The L-box height ratios were in the range of 0.730.98. Almost all workability test results were in the range established by EFNARC [21] except some
T50 ow times. T50 measurements of some mixtures were less than
the lower limit; however, all concrete mixtures lled the molds by
its own weight without the need for vibration. In addition to the
above properties, visual inspection of fresh concrete did not indicate any segregation or considerable bleeding in any of the mixtures containing MS and NS during the slump ow, V-funnel and
L-box tests; however, a little bleeding was observed in the control
specimens without any MS and NS. The effect of including MS and
NS with various volume fractions decreased owability characteristics; however, they can improve the consistency of concrete mixtures. Less bleeding and segregation were also observed in the
mixtures containing MS + NS. Variations of slump ow (mm), T50
(s) V-funnel (s) and L-box are shown in Figs. 36 respectively. Generally it can be inferred from the gures that rheological properties
of the mixtures containing 2% NS were close to those of the
396
Table 9
Results of capillary absorption by time.
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Concrete ID
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
Time (h)
3
Time (h)
6
Time (h)
24
Time (h)
72
2.8
2.64
2.5
2.2
2
1.8
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.9
1.7
1.5
2.82
3.5
3.4
2.7
2.4
2.3
2.5
2.2
2.16
2
1.9
1.7
6.5
5.8
5.5
3.4
3.1
2.9
3.3
3
2.9
2.8
2.5
2.1
8.6
6.9
6.6
3.6
3.3
3
3.4
3.3
3.1
2.9
2.4
2.2
HPSCC,400
HPSCC,400,MS10%
HPSCC,400,NS2%
HPSCC,400,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC,450
HPSCC,450,MS10%
HPSCC,450,NS2%
HPSCC,450,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC,500
HPSCC,500,MS10%
HPSCC,500,NS2%
HPSCC,500,NS2%MS10%
1
0
10
20
30
40
50
Time (hour)
Fig. 9. Capillary absorption versus time for different mixtures.
60
70
80
397
Concrete ID
Cl ion percentage
Mean of depth (mm)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
2.5
7.5
12.5
17.5
25
4.2
3.5
2.98
2.4
2.1
2
2.3
2.1
1.7
1.6
1.4
1.3
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.1
0.9
0.85
0.81
0.78
0.4
1
0.75
0.55
0.8
0.74
0.65
0.62
0.48
0.43
0.51
0.49
0.43
0.4
0.38
0.33
0.52
0.43
0.37
0.42
0.37
0.32
0.32
0.3
0.23
0.29
0.25
0.11
0.19
0.17
0.14
0.15
0.13
0.12
0.14
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.03
4.5
HSCC,400
HPSCC,400,MS10%
HPSCC,400,NS2%
HPSCC,400,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC,450
HPSCC,450,MS10%
HPSCC,450,NS2%
HPSCC,450,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC,500
HPSCC,500,MS10%
HPSCC,500,NS2%
HPSCC,500,NS2%MS10%
3.5
Cl ion percentage
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
0
10
15
20
25
30
398
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Concrete ID
Resistivity (X m)
HPSCC400
HPSCC450
HPSCC500
HPSCC400NS2%
HPSCC450NS2%
HPSCC500NS2%
HPSCC400MS10%
HPSCC450MS10%
HPSCC500MS10%
HPSCC400MS10NS2%
HPSCC450MS10NS2%
HPSCC500MS10NS2%
7 (days)
28 (days)
90 (days)
47
49
54
47
53
77
44
49
73
89
95
125
72
89
95
128
162
223
121
151
211
157
216
320
110
120
144
402
423
478
313
388
541
437
523
589
HPSCC, 400
HPSCC,400,MS10%
HPSCC,400,NS2%
HPSCC,400,NS2%MS10%
720
620
7.3.4. Resistivity
Considering the results presented in Table 11, at earlier ages
(7 days) with different binder contents and admixture amounts,
corrosion is probable. However, at higher ages by increase in
binder content and addition of MS and NS admixtures, probability
of corrosion occurrence decreases and approaches to the improbable level. Only for the mixtures with binder content of 400 and
without any admixture, at the age of 90 days, the electrical resistivity results fall in the range where corrosion is probable. In the
mixtures containing 2% NS, 10% MS and 10% MS + 2% NS, the
increase in electrical resistivity values are considerable and according to Table 5, the corrosion tend to become impossible. As can be
inferred from the results, resistivity values for the mixture with
binder content of 500 and without admixture obtained as 54, 95
and 144 at the ages of 7, 28 and 90 days respectively. The resistivity values for the mixture with the same binder content containing
2% NS and 10% MS increased from 125 at the age of 7 days to 320
and 589 at the ages of 28 and 90 days respectively, which are
considered to be outstanding.
In order to make the results comparison more convenient, the
resistivity results versus time are plotted in Fig. 11. It is noted from
the gure that by passing time, the resistivity values have
increased. The resistivity curves also show incremental trends by
increasing the binder content. It can be deduced from the resistivity curves that although both binder content and admixture factors
seem to be effective on resistivity values of HPSCC, however the
role of MS and NS admixtures appears to be much more inuential.
It is clear from Fig. 11 that the highest resistivity belongs to the
HPSCC500MS10NS2% mixture.
HPSCC, 450
HPSCC,450,MS10%
HPSCC,450,NS2%
HPSCC,450,NS2%MS10%
HPSCC, 500
HPSCC,500,MS10%
HPSCC,500,NS2%
HPSCC,500,NS2%MS10%
520
Resistivity (.m)
No
at longer depth, the curves get closer together and the differences
become smaller. According to this gure, again it is conrmed that
the mixture with binder content of 500 containing NS and MS has
the most desirable durability performance.
Two aspects may be noticed from the results obtained. Less Cl
ion content at longer depth of the specimens shows less contamination of the materials used, since concrete at longer depth is less
exposed to the outer environment and instead more affected by
materials forming the concrete such as aggregates. It also shows
more water tightness of the concrete which has lead to less penetration of the chloride into longer depth.
420
320
220
120
20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
time (days)
Fig. 11. Resistivity versus time for different mixtures.
70
80
90
100
399
8. Conclusion
The results obtained in this study can be summarized as
follows:
Fig. 12. SEM micrographs of HPSCC mixtures (a) without admixtures, (b) with 10%
MS, (c) with 2% NS and (d) with 10% MS + 2% NS at 7 days (series 1) and 90 days
(series 2).
Addition of micro and nanosilica materials improved the consistency of the HPSCC and reduced the probability of bleeding and
segregation.
Increase in binder content from 400 kg/m3 to 450 and 500 kg/m3
improved all rheological properties which could be due to paste
volume increase.
Compressive and splitting tensile strengths improved rather signicantly in the mixtures containing SiO2 micro and nanoparticles which may be due to accelerated CSH gel formation as a
result of increased crystalline Ca(OH)2 amount at the early ages.
Strength enhancement was achieved by increasing the binder
content.
Both water absorption and capillary absorption results showed
rather signicant decreases by addition of admixtures especially blend of micro and nanomaterials for binder content of
500 kg/m3.
The resistivity results showed increases at higher ages, especially for the mixtures containing higher percentages of admixtures. Binder content increase also had an increasing effect on
the resistivity values.
400
References
[1] ACI Committee 363 R. State-of-the-art report on high-strength concrete.
Farmington Hills, USA: American Concrete Institute; 1997.
[2] Bartos PJM. Self-compacting concrete. Concrete 1999;33(4):914.
[3] Okamura HM, Ouchi M. Self-compacting concrete. J Adv Concr Technol
2003;1(1):515.
[4] Collepardi M, Collepardi S, Ogoumah Olagat JJ, Troli R. Laboratory-test and
lled-experience SCCs. In: Proc of the 3rd international symposium on self
compacting concrete. Reykjavik (Iceland), 1720 August 2003. p. 90412.
[5] Bouzoubaa N, Lachemi M. Self-compacting concrete incorporating high
volumes of class F y ash-preliminary results. Cem Concr Res 2001;31:
41320.
[6] Siddique R. Properties of self-compacting concrete containing class F y ash.
Mater Des 2011;32:15017.
[7] El-Dieb AS. Mechanical, durability and microstructural characteristics of ultrahigh-strength self-compacting concrete incorporating steel bers. Mater Des
2009;30(10):428692.
[8] Fava C, et al. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international RILEM symposium on
self-compacting concrete, Reykjavik: RILEM Publications S.A.R.L; 2003.
p. 62836.
[9] Kulakowski et al. Carbonation induced reinforcement corrosion in silica fume
concrete. Constr Build Mater 2009;23:118995.
[10] Shekarchi M et al. Transport properties in metakaolin blended concrete. Constr
Build Mater 2010;24:221723.
[11] Ji T. Preliminary study on the water permeability and microstructure of
concrete incorporating nano-SiO2. Cem Concr Res 2005;35:19437.
[12] Jo BW, Kim CH, Tae GH. Characteristics of cement mortar with nano-SiO2
particles. Construct Build Mater 2007;21:13515.
[13] Qing Y, Zenan Z, Deyu K, et al. Inuence of nano-SiO2 addition on properties of
hardened cement paste as compared with silica fume. Constr Build Mater
2007;21(3):53945.
[14] Lin KL, Chang WC, Lin DF, et al. Effects of nano-SiO2 and different ash particle
sizes on sludge ash-cement mortar. J Environ Manage 2008;88(4):70814.
[15] Sobolev K, Flores I, Torres-Martinez LM, et al. Engineering of SiO2 nanoparticles
for optimal performance in nano cement-based materials. In: Bittnar Z, Bartos
PJM, Nemecek J, et al., editors. Nanotechnology in Construction: Proceedings of
the NICOM3 (3rd International Symposium on Nanotechnology in
Construction), Prague, Czech Republic; 2009. p. 13948.
[16] Nazari A, Riahi S. Splitting tensile strength of concrete using ground
granulated blast furnace slag and SiO2 nanoparticles as binder. Energy Build
2011;43:86472.
[17] Girish S, Ranganath RV, Vengala Jagadish. Inuence of powder and paste on
ow properties of SCC. Constr Build Mater 2010;24:24818.
[18] ACI Committee 237. Self-consolidating concrete, ACI 237R-07. Farmington
Hills: American Concrete Institute; 2007.
[19] Nagataki S, Fujiwara H. Self-compacting property of highly-owable concrete.
In: Malhotra VM, editor. Am Concr Inst SP 154 301-14 June; 1995.
[20] Khayat KH. Workability, testing and performance of self-consolidating
concrete. ACI Mater J 1999;96(3):34653.
[21] EFNARC. Specication & guidelines for self-compacting concrete. English ed.
Norfolk (UK): European Federation for Specialist Construction Chemicals and
Concrete Systems; 2002 (February).
[22] BS 1881-116. Testing concrete. Method for determination of compressive
strength of concrete cubes; 1983.
[23] ASTM C696-96, Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of
cylindrical concrete specimens. Annual book ASTM standard, vol. 4(04.02);
2001.
[24] Kropp JK, Hilsdorf HK. Performance criteria for concrete durability. RILEM
Report 12. E&FN SPON, London, UK; 1995.
[25] Audenaert K. Transport mechanismen in zelfverdichtend beton in relatie met
carbonatatie en chloride penetratie. PhD thesis. Ghent, Ghent University;
2006.
[26] Mays G. Durability of concrete structure, investigation, repair, protection. E &
FN Spon Publication; 1992.
[27] Kay T. Assessment & renovation of concrete structure. Longman scientic and
Technical Publication; 1992.
[28] McCarter JW, Forde MC, Whittington MW. Resistivity characteristics of
concrete. In: Proceeding of Institution of civil Engineers. Part 2, vol. 71,
March; 1981. p. 10717.
[29] Ghodousi P. Effects of corrosion on the bond and strength of reinforced
concrete beams, PhD thesis, Leeds University; 1992.
[30] Li H, Zhang M, Ou J. Flexural fatigue performance of concrete containing
nanoparticles for pavement. Int J Fatigue 2007;29:1292301.