Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 188
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 189
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
Wheel
speed
(N)
(RPM)
Table
Speed
(V)
(m/min)
Surface
Roughness
( Ra)
(m)
Metal
Removal
Rate
(g/min)
7.50
Depth
of cut
(d)
(m)
5.0
1250
1.03
10.75
1250
10.0
5.0
1.59
13.28
1250
10.0
10.0
1.86
18.35
1250
7.5
10.0
1.18
12.45
1250
12.5
15.0
1.58
25.35
1650
7.5
5.0
1.56
16.35
1650
12.5
5.0
1.44
15.65
1650
7.5
10.0
1.21
22.45
1650
10.0
10.0
1.63
14.15
10
1650
12.5
15.0
1.27
16.45
11
2050
12.5
5.0
1.08
12.45
12
2050
10.0
5.0
1.71
13.75
13
2050
10.0
10.0
1.36
24.25
14
2050
12.5
10.0
1.51
28.25
15
2050
7.5
15.0
1.58
18.35
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 190
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
(c)
Fig. 3- Main factors plot on Ra using Al2O3 wheel
(5.1)
Fig.4 a-bshows the three-dimensional interaction responses
surface and contour plot for the response Ra in terms of table
speed and wheel speed at a depth of cut=11m. Contour plot
plays a very important role in the study of response surface. By
generating
* Table speed
contour
* depth
plot of
using
cut Design expert 6.0 software for the
response surface analysis, it is easy to characterize the shape of
the surface and locate the optimum with reasonable precision.
From the examination of the contour plot and response surface, it
is observed that Ra decreases from 1.60m to 1.54 m with
increase in wheel speed from 1250- 1600RPM with increase of
table speed from 7.5-12.5m/min. Fig. 4d-e shows the
three-dimensional interaction response surface and contour plot
for the response Ra in terms of wheel speed and depth of cut at
table speed of 10.50m/min. It is depicted that the estimated
contour and response surface plot; it is observed that Ra (1.54m
-1.60m) increases with increase of wheel speed and depth of cut.
Fig. 4g-h shows the three-dimensional interaction response
surface and contour plot for the response MRR in terms of table
speed and depth of cut at wheel speed of 1250RPM. It is depicted
that the estimated contour and response surface plot; it is
observed that Ra (1.55m -1.60m) increases with increase of
table speed and depth of cut. In addition, Fig.4j-k displays the
normal probability plot of residuals and residual versus predicted
plots for Ra. It is observed that the residuals generally fall on a
straight line implying that the errors are normally distributed.
Furthermore, this supports adequacy of least squares fit.
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
IJSET@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 191
(c)
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
(h)
(d)
(i)
Fig. 4
(e)
(f)
(g)
IJSET@2016
Page 192
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
(a)
(b)
(a)
(c)
(b)
(c)
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 193
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
(h)
Fig. 6
(d)
7.1 Conclusions
(e)
(f)
References
(g)
IJSET@2016
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 194
IJSET@2016
ISSN:2277-1581
01 April 2016
Author details:PardeepRanga received his B.Tech
in Mechanical engineering from
Haryana college of technology and
management, kaithal (Haryana),
affiliated to kurukshetra university,
kurukshetra in 2009.
E.Mail- Pardeepranga25@gmail.com
Phone No. +91-9873333825
Guide details:-
doi : 10.17950/ijset/v5s4/406
Page 195