Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Philippines
22
Introduction
Marikina City lies within Marikina Valley and is bounded by Quezon City and the Marikina river
on the west, Pasig City and Cainta to the south, Antipolo City in the east, and by San Mateo
to the north. The city has an estimated population of 490,612 for 2008, and its major industry
is shoemaking.1 Marikina river is the major waterway in the city; it flows through the center
of Marikina Valley
between Capitol Hills
Marikina City: Location and
Figure 1
and the Sierra Madre
Boundaries
mountain range. It
also flows alongside
the Valley Fault Line,
and so Marikina faces
riverine flooding,
earthquakes from the
fault, and liquefaction
along the Marikina
riverbanks.
Marikina City began as
a town established by
Jesuit priests in 1630.
By the 19th century,
the riverbank area
evolved into the most
important hacienda
(farming estate) that
produced rice and
vegetables in great
quantities. The city
was industrialized in
the 20th century, with
a shift in emphasis
from agriculture to
s h o e m a k i n g a n d Source: http://gis.marikina.gov.ph/website/map2/viewer.htm
heavy industries. With industrialization came population increases and the conversion
of rich agricultural land into residential areas. The river became heavily polluted with
domestic sewage and industrial waste. The quarrying on the riverbanks led to scouring
and erosion. The end result was poor water quality and flooding that claimed lives and
destroyed property. Informal settlements along the riverbanks added to the pressures of
pollution and flooding.
Abstract
Urban riverine flooding can be
worsened by local urban processes
and activities that cause river flow
obstruction and pollution. This case
study presents the flood mitigation
efforts by Marikina Citys local
authority and people, with a special
focus on how the physical restoration
of the riverbanks and solid waste
clean-up contributed to flood disaster
mitigation.
Whats inside
1 Flooding by the Marikina River
1 River Rehabilitation in
Developing Countries
1 Policy Environment
1 Emergency Preparedness and
Rescue 161
1 Save the Marikina River
Program
1 Lessons Learned
August 2008
Figure 2
low
ma er
rive rikina
r
up
ma per
rive rikina
r
Vulnerability
T h e U N Wor ld Wa t e r
Development Report (2003)
states that 50% of the
population in developing
countries are exposed to
polluted water sources.
Non-Structural Mitigation
Policy Environment
Public Awareness
Organizational Structure
The resettlement of the families living within the defined easement was
a major program geared towards rehabilitating Marikina River. The
city considered the riverbank area as a danger zone, and intended
to utilize it for projects that could rehabilitate the river and mitigate
flood disasters. Ordinance 10 of 1994 combined with the resettlement
program made it possible to relocate the settlers and demolish the
houses along the river, creeks and government-owned land.
Resettlement required a combination of several activities: a citywide registration and census of informal settlers; identification
of resettlement areas in the city; demolition of illegal structures;
resettlement in new sites; and monitoring against the construction
of new ones within the easement and resettlement areas.
Census of informal settlers. A census was taken of informal settlers
from 1992 to 1994; 23,000 families were found who stayed along the
river banks, esteros and creeks, on private property, and on public
land targeted for infrastructure development.
Identification of resettlement areas. The MSO identified potential
resettlement sites through city mapping and land surveys. Since
these were usually occupied by informal settlers, the land owners
were approached and persuaded by the officials from the MSO
and the Community Mortgage Program (CMP) to sell their lands
as settlement sites. Tax incentives were given to the land owners
for their cooperation, with some bargaining over the value of the
property versus the costs of removing the informal settlers. Six
relocation sites were eventually used for the citys resettlement
program (Malanday, Nangka, Tumana, Dona Petra, Tanguile, and
Location of Settlement Areas
in Marikina City
Figure 3
cultural
Garden).
of anyone
the river
400 m3/day
690 m3/day
45%
55%
Table 2
Conclusion
Table 3
Exposed Item
1,189
Land (flooded
area)
6.36 km2
4.40 km2
555
154
Residences
10,446
4,789
Typhoid
32
Businesses
450
289
Viral hepatitis
Critical Facilities
11
Disease
2005
2006
Diarrhea
1,438
Amoebiasis
107
64
Ascariasis
152
33
Lesson Learned
Urban flood mitigation requires the coordination of efforts by multiple agencies. The governance approach promotes and recognizes
transparency and consensual decision-making by stakeholders can facilitate coordination efforts. This is supported by Marikinas
experience in establishing and maintaining the inter-agency Rescue 161 emergency operation center.
The political will exhibited by the mayors not only sustained the disaster management effort, but also motivated support from the
other key actors like the city council, the dedicated staff of the concerned departments of the city government, private companies
and NGOS, national agencies for emergency response, and the relocated communities.
It is important to integrate disaster risk reduction in all development projects. A river rehabilitation program is an example of how
to mainstream flood disaster risk reduction by removing obstructions in the waterways and riverbanks, designating compatible
land use for the floodplain area, managing solid waste, and improving water quality.
Editorial Board
References
Badilla, Roy. Flood Modelling in Pasig-Marikina
Basin, M.Sc. thesis, ITC, March 2008, http://www.
itc.nl/library/papers_2008/msc/wrem/badilla.pdf
Borje, Julie et al. 3cd Sound Practice Series.
No. 5, Marikina City Flood Mitigation
Countermeasure Program, 2004a, http://emi.
pdc.org/soundpractices/Metro-Manila/SP5MM-Flood-Mitigation-Marikina.pdf
No. 6, Save the Marikina River, 2004b, http://
emi.pdc.org/soundpractices/Metro-Manila/SP6MM-Save-the-Marikina-River.pdf
No. 7, Marikina City Squatter-Free Program,
2004c, http://emi.pdc.org/soundpractices/
Metro-Manila/SP7-MM-Marikina-Squatter-Free.
pdf
No. 8, 5-Minute Quick Response Time:
Rescue 161 in Marikina City, http://emi.pdc.
org/soundpractices/Metro-Manila/SP8-MM-5Minute-Quick-Response.pdf
Chuico-Tordecilla, C. The Gatekeepers of Marikina:
A Case of In-City Relocation and Management of a
Squatter-Free Community, a case study for the Best
Practices on the Urban Development and Housing
Act Seminar, ASG, 1998.
LLDA (2002). The Water Mondriaan: Monthly
Water Quality Status Report, January 2002, http://
www.llda.gov.ph/SD_Mondriaan/MonthlyReport_
files/2002/January_Home.htm
Fette, M., and C. Weber, A. Peter, B. Wehrli.
Hydropower Production and River Rehabilitation:
A case study on an Alpine River, Environmental
Modeling and Assessment, 12(4), 2007, pp. 257267.
Endnotes
1 http://city.marikina.gov.ph
2 This refers to the Gawad Galing Pook, an award
for innovative practices by local authorities in the
Philippines. The winners are chosen from a national
search of local governance programs, evaluated
through a multi-level rigorous screening process
based on positive results and impact, promotion
of peoples participation and empowerment,
transferability and sustainability, and efficiency of
program service delivery. Winning programs become
models of good governance. The award is conferred
by the President of the Republic of the Philippines.
Acknowledgment
Mayor Ma. Lourdes Fernando, Marikina City, 2001
- 2010
Julie Borje, Center of Excellence, Marikina City
Government
Lolita E. de Leon, Secretary of the Sangguniang
Panlungsod ng Marikina
Ory Buenaventura, Waste Management Office,
Marikina City Government
Safer Cities is a series of case studies that illustrate how people, communities, cities, governments and businesses have been able to make cities safer before
disasters strike. The series presents strategies and approaches to urban disaster mitigation derived from analyses of real-life experiences, good practices and lessons
learned in Asia and the Pacific. This user-friendly resource is designed to provide decision-makers, planners, city and community leaders and trainers with an array of
proven ideas, tools, policy options and strategies for urban disaster mitigation. The key principles emphasized throughout Safer Cities are broad-based participation,
partnerships, sustainability and replication of success stories.
The contents here may be freely quoted with credit given to the implementing institution, Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC), and to the Office of Foreign
Disaster Assistance (OFDA) of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The opinions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily
reflect the views of ADPC or USAID. The information in this series is provided for purposes of dissemination. For more details, please refer to contacts listed at the
end of this material. Publication of this case study was made possible through the support provided by the OFDA, USAID, under the terms of Cooperative Agreement
No. DFD-G-00-05-00232-00.
PROMISE
During the implementation of the Asian Urban Disaster Mitigation Program (AUDMP), ADPC recognized the importance of interventions in urban areas and accordingly
identified Urban Disaster Risk Management as one of its core thematic areas of work, experiences from which have also guided the selection of the target secondary
cities. ADPC has developed Strategy 2020 for Urban Disaster Risk Mitigation in Asia which aims to reach 200 cities by the year 2020.
The need to minimize the destructive impacts of these hydro-meteorological events on the vulnerable communities, particularly the urban communities and the
economic infrastructure through enhanced preparedness and Mitigation is therefore the main trust of the present intervention in implementation of the Program for
Hydro-Meteorological Disaster Mitigation in Secondary Cities in Asia (PROMISE).
ADPC considers PROMISE program as an opportunity to associate with many communities living in Asian cities vulnerable to hydro-meteorological hazards with the
aim of reducing the impacts of such events and demonstrate innovative applications for community preparedness and mitigation.
This case study documents the efforts under a specific program objective to increase stakeholder involvement and further enhancement
of strategies, tools and methodologies related to community preparedness and mitigation of hydro-meteorological disasters in urban
communities.
The Asian Disaster Preparedness Center (ADPC) is a regional resource center dedicated to safer communities and sustainable development through disaster risk
reduction in Asia and the Pacific. Established in 1986 in Bangkok, Thailand, ADPC is recognized as an important focal point for promoting disaster awareness and
developing capabilities to foster institutionalized disaster management and mitigation policies.
For more information, please get in touch with us at: