Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Miranda v. University of MD College Park, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Danilo Miranda's race and national origin discrimination claims under Title VII against the University of Maryland at College Park. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-05-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-1000

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Danilo Miranda's race and national origin discrimination claims under Title VII against the University of Maryland at College Park. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Miranda v. University of MD College Park, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Danilo Miranda's race and national origin discrimination claims under Title VII against the University of Maryland at College Park. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the claims. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-1000

    DANILO MIRANDA,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND AT COLLEGE PARK,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenest. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.
    (8:04-cv-02609-AW)

    Submitted: May 22, 2008

    Decided:

    May 27, 2008

    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Danilo Miranda, Appellant Pro Se.


    Elizabeth Marzo Borinsky,
    Carolyn Waters Skolnik, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
    Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Danilo

    Miranda

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his race and national origin discrimination claims under


    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
    2000e to 2000e-17 (2000).*

    We have reviewed the record and find

    no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated


    by the district court.

    See Miranda v. Univ. of MD, Coll. Park, No.

    8:04-cv-02609-AW (D. Md. entered Nov. 20, 2006; filed Nov. 21,
    2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    Although Miranda also asserted an age discrimination claim


    against Defendant under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
    1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 621 to 634 (2000), the district
    court dismissed that claim by separate order. Miranda does not
    challenge that order on appeal.
    - 2 -

    You might also like