You are on page 1of 33

Background Method Results Summary

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers


in the Santa Barbara Channel: Evaluating
Meteorological Models at the Surface
David Smith1 , Stacey Hughes2 , Don R. Blake2 , Rafe Day2
Dept. of Physics, University of West Florida, Pensacola, FL1
Dept. of Chemistry, University of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA2

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Motivation SARP 2016 Air Samples

Meteorological Models

Atmosphere is
complicated
Most complicated at
surface, coastal regions
Models reliability
fluctuates

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Motivation SARP 2016 Air Samples

SARP 2016 Air Samples


SARP 2016 Whole Air Samples
38
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

37.5
37

Latitude

36.5
36
35.5
35
34.5
34
33.5

-121 -120.5 -120 -119.5 -119 -118.5 -118 -117.5 -117 -116.5

Longitude
David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Motivation SARP 2016 Air Samples

SARP 2016 Air Samples


SARP 2016 Whole Air Samples
38
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

37.5
37

Latitude

36.5
36
35.5
35
34.5
34
33.5

-121 -120.5 -120 -119.5 -119 -118.5 -118 -117.5 -117 -116.5

Longitude
David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Motivation SARP 2016 Air Samples

SARP 2016 Air Samples


SARP 2016 Whole Air Samples
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

34.5

Latitude

34.4

34.3

34.2

34.1

34
-119.9

-119.8

-119.7

-119.6

-119.5

-119.4

Longitude
David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Motivation SARP 2016 Air Samples

Air Samples

I
I

I
I
I

Offshore station
Mohawk Kelp
Forest
Isla Vista Kelp
Forest
Platform Holly
Coal Oil Point
5m above
surface

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

Lab Analysis

I
I

Gas chromatography
Elevated levels of urban gases
I

HCFC-141b
I

I
I

Refrigerant

Trichloroethylene (C2 HCl3 )


I

Refrigerant outlawed by Montreal Protocol

HFC-152a

Degreaser for metals

Dichloromethane (CH2 Cl2 )


I

Degreaser for metals

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

HCFC-141b
HCFC-141b Measurements During SARP 2016
100
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

90

HCFC-141b (ppt)

80
70
60
50
40
30
20
ht

g
Fli

ra
rba

t2

gh
Fli

ta
an

Ba

oia
qu
Se

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

ch
an

hR

ic
gw
Se

d
iel

rsf
ke
Ba

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

HYSPLIT Trajectories

24 back
trajectories
Majority through
Central Valley
San Francisco or
Fresno source

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

HCFC-141b Comparison
RF02 and Santa Barbara Cans

RF01 and Santa Barbara Cans


100

60

37.5

37.5
90

55

37

37

36

70

35.5

60

35

Latitude

Latitude

36

50

36.5

45

35.5

40

35
50

34.5

35

34.5
40

34

30

34
30

33.5
33
-121

HCFC-141b (ppt)

80

36.5

20

-120

-119

-118

-117

Longitude

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

25

33.5
33
-121

20

-120

-119

-118

-117

Longitude

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

Dichloromethane Comparisons
RF01 and Santa Barbara Cans

RF02 and Santa Barbara Cans


110

37.5
37

100

36.5

37.5

110

37

100

36.5

90

36

80

35.5

70

35

60

70

35
34.5

60

34

50

34.5

50

34

40

33.5

33.5

30

40

33
-121

35.5

80

Latitude

Latitude

36

CH Cl (ppt)

90

33
-120

-119

-118

-117

Longitude

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

-121

-120

-119

-118

-117

Longitude

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

Ethyne:CO

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

Ethyne:CO

I
I

Same source - combustion


Lifetime of ethyne 2
weeks
Lifetime of CO 2
months
Ratio can determine
relative age of air mass
I

Higher ratio indicates


younger air

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

GC HYSPLIT VOC Comparison Ethyne:CO

Ethyne:CO Ratio Plots


RF01 Ethyne:CO

Ethyne (pptv)

RF02 Ethyne:CO

3000

3000

y = 1:82x - 7.30

y = 3:11x - 68.0

R2 = 0.893

2000
1000

1000

0
0

1000

R2 = 0.948

2000

500

1000

Santa Barbara Ethyne:CO

1000

3000

y = 2:76x + 2.70

Ethyne (pptv)

500

Isolated Flight 2 Data Ethyne:CO


y = 1:72x + 17.9

R2 = 0.997

R2 = 0.977

2000

500
1000

0
0

100

200

300

CO (ppbv)

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

500

1000

CO (ppbv)

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Source

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Source - Los Angeles

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data - 8:00 AM

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data - 9:00 AM

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data - 10:00 AM

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data - 11:00 AM

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Wind Data - 1:00 PM

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Catalina Eddy

Meteorological
phenomenon
Forms April to
September
I

Peaks in
June

Counter
clockwise
rotation

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Source Winds Catalina Eddy HYSPLIT

Revisit HYSPLIT

Majority through
Central Valley
Few trajectories
show Eddy
influence

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Summary

I
I
I
I

HYSPLIT predicted Central Valley influence


Chemical data and comparisons suggest Los Angeles
Largely influenced by Catalina Eddy
Predictions are only as good as their models
I

Always other methods to use

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Future Research

Take more data samples


I
I
I

I
I

Airborne
Coastal
Sea

Further analysis of NMHC:CO ratios


Strength of influence of Catalina Eddy

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Acknowledgments
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Stacey Hughes
Dr. Don Blake
Rowland-Blake Lab
WAS Group
Rafe Day
Dr. Emily Schaller
Dr. Heath
Dr. Fuelberg
NASA Scientists
KORUS-AQ Scientists
UND & NSERC Staff

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Questions?

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

References
I

Simpson, I.J., et al. 2010, Characterization of trace gases


measured over Alberta oil sands mining operations: 76
speciated C2 - C1 0 volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO2 ,
CH4 , CO, NO, NO2 , NOy , O3 , and SO2 . Atmospheric
Chemistry and Physics. 10: 11931-11954

Xiao, Yaping, et al., 2007, Atmospheric acetylene and its


relationship with CO as an indicator of air mass age. Journal
of Geophysical Reasearch. 112: D12305

Mass, Clifford F., Albright, Mark D., 1989, Origin of the


Catalina Eddy. Monthly Weather Review. 117: 2406-2436

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Trichloroethylene
Trichloroethylene During SARP 2016
10
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

9
8

C2 HCl 3 (ppt)

7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
ht

g
Fli

ra
rba

t2

gh
Fli

ta
an

Ba

oia
qu
Se

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

ch
an

hR

ic
gw
Se

d
iel

rsf
ke
Ba

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

HFC-152a
HFC-152a Measurements During SARP 2016
250
Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

HFC-152a (ppt)

200

150

100

50

0
ht

g
Fli

ra
rba

t2

gh
Fli

ta
an

Ba

oia
qu
Se

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

h
nc

h
wic

g
Se

Ra

iel

rsf
ke
Ba

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Dichloromethane
Dichloromethane During SARP 2016
120
110
100

CH 2 Cl 2 (ppt)

90
80
70
60
50

Flight 1
Flight 2
Kudela
Pusede
Roberts
Blake

40
30
20
ht

g
Fli

ra
rba

t2

gh
Fli

ta
an

Ba

oia
qu
Se

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

ch
an

hR

ic
gw
Se

d
iel

rsf
ke
Ba

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

Background Method Results Summary

Summary Future

Trichloroethylene Comparisons
RF02 and Santa Barbara Cans

RF01 and Santa Barbara Cans


10

37.5

37.5

2.5

37

37
8

36.5

36.5

35

34.5

34
33.5
33
-121

-119

-118

33.5

Longitude

David Smith, Stacey Hughes, Don R. Blake, Rafe Day

34.5
34

-117

1.5

35

-120

35.5

33
-121

C2 HCl3 (ppt)

35.5

36

Latitude

Latitude

36

0.5

-120

-119

-118

-117

Longitude

Determining the Source of Urban Tracers in the Santa Barbara C

You might also like