Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236595281
READS
64
1 author:
Rashmi Ranjan Das
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhub
132 PUBLICATIONS 243 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Allergies
Abstract
The atopic march refers to a typical sequence of atopic features appearing during a certain age period and persisting over several years.
In general, the clinical features of atopic dermatitis (AD) occur first, and precede the development of asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). AR
is an independent risk factor for the subsequent development of asthma, and the diagnosis of AR often precedes that of asthma. Clinical
and experimental studies suggest a similar immunopathology between the upper and lower airways in allergic subjects. In patients with
asthma, presence of concomitant AR is associated with higher total annual medical costs, increased risk of hospitalisations and
emergency visits. Treating AR results in a lowered risk of asthma-related hospitalisations and emergency visits, and improved quality of
life. The concomitant presence of AR indicates difficult-to-control asthma, with poor asthma-related outcomes. This concept of united
airways disease or allergic rhino-bronchitis has recently received attention, with some of the novel therapeutic approaches targeting
both of conditions simultaneously, rather than separately. In this paper, the author discusses current evidence for the clinically relevant
effects that allergic conditions, from food allergies to atopic march, united airways disease and AR, can have on asthma.
Keywords
Allergic rhino-bronchitis, immunoglobin E (IgE) antibody, atopic march, co-morbidity, inflammation
Disclosure: The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.
Received: 31 October 2011 Accepted: 6 December 2011 Citation: European Respiratory Disease, 2012;8(1):515
Correspondence: Rashmi Ranjan Das, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi-110029, India. E: rrdas05@gmail.com
51
Allergies
Figure 1: The Relative Prevalence of Atopic Symptoms
According to Age
6m
Rhinitis
1yr
3yr
Asthma
7yr
Food allergy
15yr
Eczema
52
Figure 2: Impact of the Nose on the Bronchus under Normal and Pathological (Inflammatory) Conditions
Normal
circumstances
Inflammation
(rhinitis)
Cytokines (IL-5)
Bone marrow
(systemic inflammatory
response)
Physical function
(air filtration, humidification
and conditioning)
Normal airway
structure and
function
Inflammatory changes
and bronchial
hyper-reactivity
eosinophils toward the airway.49,50 IL-5 also has a crucial role in the
eosinopoiesis in the bone marrow.51 In experimental AR, an
increase in eosinophil progenitors in the bone marrow has been
found after allergen challenge of the nose.52 These data add to the
evidence that both the systemic release of IL-5 and stimulation of
bone marrow eosinopoiesis after allergen inhalation are important
factors involved in the process of global airway allergy.
Nasobronchial reflex a neurogenic (nasobronchial) reflex has also
been suggested (e.g. transient bronchoconstriction resulting from
irritant stimulation of nasal mucosa). To date, there little evidence
to support this concept.
Increased oral breathing AR has adverse effects on the lower
airway as a result of the promotion of breathing through the
mouth. In AR, mouth breathing is favoured, which might lead to
inflammatory changes and increase in BHR in susceptible persons,
and bronchoconstriction in patients with asthma.53,54
Aspiration of nasal contents secretions might drip or diffuse from
the upper airway to the lower airway. Under normal conditions,
however, this mechanism does not seem to have a contributory
effect on nasobronchial interaction.
Exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) concentrations in healthy subjects, eNO
originates mainly from the upper airway (with a minor contribution
from the lower airway). In patients with AR, lower airway
inflammation can be demonstrated by increased levels of eNO.
Minimal persistent inflammation (MPI) this has been demonstrated
in both mite-induced and pollen-induced AR.55 MPI involves a weak
and persistent expression of ICAM-1 (the major receptor for human
rhinoviruses). This frequently leads to exacerbation of asthma related
to upper respiratory viral infections, primarily owing to rhinoviruses.56
53
Allergies
methacholine challenge, and of these children, 19.6 % developed
asthma during a seven-year follow up.59 In another large cohort study
of a primary care population followed up for an average duration of
8.4 years, physician-diagnosed AR increased the risk almost fivefold
for a future asthma diagnosis (HR: 4.86, p-number <0.001, 95 % CI:
3.506.73). 60 There are few studies comparing the clinical
characteristics of asthma in patients with and without AR. Patients
with either perennial or seasonal AR are more at risk of developing
BHR than are healthy control subjects, with perennial AR posing a
greater risk than seasonal AR.
The relationship between the nose and bronchi has been studied from
several angles, each elucidating a different aspect of the mechanism.
In patients with AR, inflammatory cells and mediators have been
found in the lower airway, without any apparent clinical manifestation
of lower airway inflammation. In non-asthmatic subjects with AR,
subepithelial fibrosis of the bronchi is observed, suggesting the
presence of active structural remodeling in the lower airway similar in
nature to that seen in asthma, although less marked.61 In atopic
subjects, allergen-specific nasal challenge can elicit following
responses immediate bronchoconstriction, increase in airway
responsiveness and bronchial inflammation characterised by
eosinophilic infiltrates.62,63 In non-asthmatic subjects with AR, an early
and late-phase reaction was observed after bronchial segmental
allergen challenge, suggesting that the bronchial mucosa of subjects
with AR can be triggered by allergens.64 In addition, an increase in
airways inflammation was found after segmental challenge in the
above subjects. In support of this, it has been found that asthma
exacerbations frequently occur coincident with the worsening of
nasal symptoms.65
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
54
Conclusion
AR and asthma are two different manifestations of a single disorder of
the airways. Both share common pathogenetic mechanisms, a high
prevalence in the population, negative effects on the quality of life
and certain common therapeutic approaches. Asthma and AR
frequently occur concomitantly, and the presence of AR often
precedes the development of asthma. Co-morbid AR is a marker of
difficult-to-control asthma and the greater use of asthma resources to
treat it results in better asthma-related outcomes. The united airways
disease hypothesis is clearly supported by these data, with AR having
an important effect on asthma. Therefore, diagnostic and therapeutic
approaches should target both diseases simultaneously, rather than
separately. Future directions of research in this area include the
potential for early treatment of AR to prevent progression to asthma
and the best possible strategies to treat these two co-morbidities. n
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
55