Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 13-1580
LIANG CHEN,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
Submitted:
Decided:
Troy Nader Moslemi, MOSLEMI & ASSOCIATES, New York, New York,
for Petitioner. Stuart F. Delery, Assistant Attorney General,
Francis W. Fraser, Acting Assistant Director, Justin R. Markel,
OFFICE
OF
IMMIGRATION
LITIGATION,
Washington,
D.C.,
for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Liang Chen, a native and citizen of China, petitions
for
review
(Board)
of
an
order
dismissing
his
of
the
appeal
Board
of
of
the
Immigration
Immigration
Appeals
Judges
determination
regarding
eligibility
for
asylum
or
on
the
Elias-Zacarias,
findings
of
record
502
fact,
considered
U.S.
478,
including
481
as
(1992).
findings
on
whole.
INS
v.
Administrative
credibility,
are
Li Fang
We will
483-84; see Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002).
Camera
(Because
v.
the
Ashcroft,
burden
of
378
F.3d
proof
for
361,
367
(4th
withholding
Cir.
of
2004)
removal
is
higher than for asylumeven though the facts that must be proved
are
the
samean
necessarily
U.S.C.]
applicant
ineligible
for
who
is
ineligible
withholding
1231(b)(3).).
asylum
is
removal
under
[8
Finally,
qualify
for
of
to
for
CAT
to
the
1208.16(c)(2)
proposed
(2013).
country
Based
on
of
removal.
our
review,
8
we
C.F.R.
find
that
with
contentions
are
oral
we
deny
argument
adequately
the
petition
because
presented
in
the
the
for
facts
review.
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED