Negative Temperature

Below Absolute ZeroWhat Does Negative

Temperature Mean?
Questions: What is negative temperature? Can you really make a system that has a
temperature below absolute zero? Can you even give any useful meaning to the
expression "negative absolute temperature"?
Answer: Absolutely. :-)
Under certain conditions, a closed system can be described by a negative temperature,
and, surprisingly, be hotter than the same system at any positive temperature. This
article describes how it all works.

Step I: What is "Temperature"?

To get things started, we need a clear definition of "temperature." Actually various
kinds of "temperature" appear in the literature of physics (e.g., kinetic temperature,
color temperature). The relevant one here is the one from thermodynamics, in some
sense the most fundamental.
Our intuitive notion is that two systems in thermal contact should exchange no heat,
on average, if and only if they are at the same temperature. Let's call the two systems
S1 and S2. The combined system, treating S1 and S2 together, can be S3. The
important question, consideration of which will lead us to a useful quantitative
definition of temperature, is "How will the energy of S3 be distributed between S1
and S2?" I will briefly explain this below, but I recommend that you read K&K,
referenced below, for a careful, simple, and thorough explanation of this important
and fundamental result.
With a total energy E, S has many possible internal states (microstates). The atoms of
S3 can share the total energy in many ways. Let's say there are N different states.
Each state corresponds to a particular division of the total energy in the two
subsystems S1 and S2. Many microstates can correspond to the same division, E1 in
S1 and E2 in S2. A simple counting argument tells you that only one particular

division of the energy, will occur with any significant probability. It's the one with the
overwhelmingly largest number of microstates for the total system S3. That number,
N(E1,E2) is just the product of the number of states allowed in each subsystem,
N(E1,E2) = N1(E1)*N2(E2), and, since E1 + E2 = E, N(E1,E2) reaches a maximum
when N1*N2 is stationary with respect to variations of E1 and E2 subject to the total
energy constraint.
For convenience, physicists prefer to frame the question in terms of the logarithm of
the number of microstates N, and call this the entropy, S. You can easily see from the
above analysis that two systems are in equilibrium with one another when (dS/dE) 1 =
(dS/dE)2, i.e., the rate of change of entropy, S, per unit change in energy, E, must be
the same for both systems. Otherwise, energy will tend to flow from one subsystem to
another as S3 bounces randomly from one microstate to another, the total energy E3
being constant, as the combined system moves towards a state of maximal total
entropy. We define the temperature, T, by 1/T = dS/dE, so that the equilibrium
condition becomes the very simple T1 = T2.
This statistical mechanical definition of temperature does in fact correspond to your
intuitive notion of temperature for most systems. So long as dS/dE is always positive,
T is always positive. For common situations, like a collection of free particles, or
particles in a harmonic oscillator potential, adding energy always increases the
number of available microstates, increasingly faster with increasing total energy. So
temperature increases with increasing energy, from zero, asymptotically approaching
positive infinity as the energy increases.

Step II: What is "Negative Temperature"?

Not all systems have the property that the entropy increases monotonically with
energy. In some cases, as energy is added to the system, the number of available
microstates, or configurations, actually decreases for some range of energies. For
example, imagine an ideal "spin-system", a set of N atoms with spin 1/2 on a onedimensional wire. The atoms are not free to move from their positions on the wire.
The only degree of freedom allowed to them is spin-flip: the spin of a given atom can
point up or down. The total energy of the system, in a magnetic field of strength B,
pointing down, is (N+ - N-)*uB, where u is the magnetic moment of each atom and
N+ and N- are the number of atoms with spin up and down respectively. Notice that
with this definition, E is zero when half of the spins are up and half are down. It is
negative when the majority are down and positive when the majority are up.
The lowest possible energy state, all the spins pointing down, gives the system a total
energy of -NuB, and temperature of absolute zero. There is only one configuration of

the system at this energy, i.e., all the spins must point down. The entropy is the log of
the number of microstates, so in this case is log(1) = 0. If we now add a quantum of
energy, size uB, to the system, one spin is allowed to flip up. There are N
possibilities, so the entropy is log(N). If we add another quantum of energy, there are
a total of N(N-1)/2 allowable configurations with two spins up. The entropy is
increasing quickly, and the temperature is rising as well.
However, for this system, the entropy does not go on increasing forever. There is a
maximum energy, +NuB, with all spins up. At this maximal energy, there is again
only one microstate, and the entropy is again zero. If we remove one quantum of
energy from the system, we allow one spin down. At this energy there are N available
microstates. The entropy goes on increasing as the energy is lowered. In fact the
maximal entropy occurs for total energy zero, i.e., half of the spins up, half down.
So we have created a system where, as we add more and more energy, temperature
starts off positive, approaches positive infinity as maximum entropy is approached,
with half of all spins up. After that, the temperature becomes negative infinite,
coming down in magnitude toward zero, but always negative, as the energy increases
toward maximum. When the system has negative temperature, it is hotter than when
it is has positive temperature. If you take two copies of the system, one with positive
and one with negative temperature, and put them in thermal contact, heat will flow
from the negative-temperature system into the positive-temperature system.

Step III: What Does This Have to Do With the Real World?
Can this system ever by realized in the real world, or is it just a fantastic invention of
sinister theoretical condensed matter physicists? Atoms always have other degrees of
freedom in addition to spin, usually making the total energy of the system unbounded
upward due to the translational degrees of freedom that the atom has. Thus, only
certain degrees of freedom of a particle can have negative temperature. It makes
sense to define the "spin-temperature" of a collection of atoms, so long as one
condition is met: the coupling between the atomic spins and the other degrees of
freedom is sufficiently weak, and the coupling between atomic spins sufficiently
strong, that the timescale for energy to flow from the spins into other degrees of
freedom is very large compared to the timescale for thermalization of the spins among
themselves. Then it makes sense to talk about the temperature of the spins separately
from the temperature of the atoms as a whole. This condition can easily be met for
the case of nuclear spins in a strong external magnetic field.
Nuclear and electron spin systems can be promoted to negative temperatures by
suitable radio frequency techniques. Various experiments in the calorimetry of

negative temperatures, as well as applications of negative temperature systems as RF

amplifiers, etc., can be found in the articles listed below, and the references therein.

References
Kittel and Kroemer, Thermal Physics, appendix E.
N.F. Ramsey, "Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics at negative absolute
temperature," Phys. Rev. 103, 20 (1956).
M.J. Klein,"Negative Absolute Temperature," Phys. Rev. 104, 589 (1956).