Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-4662
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
James R. Spencer, District
Judge. (3:05-cr-00249-JRS-3)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
LaWesley Donte Foxx was sentenced to thirty-six months
in prison following the revocation of his supervised release.
Foxxs counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that he has reviewed the record and
believes there are no meritorious grounds for appeal.
Counsel
brief
and
Foxx
has
failed
to
file
pro
se
court
will
affirm
sentence
imposed
after
Crudup,
district
461
court
F.3d
must
433,
438-40
consider
(4th
the
Cir.
United States
2006).
Chapter
Seven
While
policy
supervised
procedurally
release
reasonable
if
the
revocation
district
court
sentence
is
considered
the
And although the district court need not explain the reasons for
imposing a revocation sentence in as much detail as when it
imposes an original sentence, it still must provide a statement
of
reasons
for
the
sentence
imposed.
United
States
v.
Thompson, 595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation
marks
omitted).
reasonable
if
the
revocation
district
court
sentence
is
stated
proper
substantively
basis
for
is
found
procedurally
or
substantively
Only if a
unreasonable
in
we
have
reviewed
the
record
With these
and
have
obligations
under
Anders
and
have
found
no
meritorious
judgment.
writing,
United
of
This
court
requires
the
right
to
States
for
further
that
petition
review.
counsel
the
If
inform
Supreme
Foxx
Foxx,
Court
requests
of
in
the
that
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
AFFIRMED