Professional Documents
Culture Documents
P r i n t e d in the United S t a t e s
Introduction
In t h e l a s t few y e a r s a number o f models o f t u r b u l e n t h e a t and momentum
t r a n s p o r t have been d e v e l o p e d i n which t h e e f f e c t i v e t r a n s p o r t c o e f f i c i e n t s
are r e l a t e d to local values of c e r t a i n t u r b u l e n t c o r r e l a t i o n s ;
these correla-
t i o n s a r e computed s i m u l t a n e o u s l y w i t h t h e mean f i e l d v a r i a b l e s .
t h i s kind a c h i e v e s i g n i f i c a n t l y
alone.
Models o f
t han do sim-
One o f t h e more s u c c e s s -
t o p r e d i c t s w i r l i n g f l o w s , an
omission t h a t t h e p r e s e n t n o t e r e m e d i e s .
The
flow c o n s i d e r e d ( t h a t g e n e r a t e d by a r o t a t i n g d i s c i n a q u i e s c e n t atmosphere)
p r o d u c e s v e r y high g r a d i e n t s o f s w i r l v e l o c i t y i n t h e v i c i n i t y
of the disc
This
UT and r T a r e o b t a i n e d from t h e
and a u x i l i a r y e q u a t i o n s ;
131
explanation of the
132
B.]E. L a u n d e r and B . I .
Sharma
Vol. 1, No. 2
(1,2).
Turbulent viscosity:
UT = cp pk2/e
(1)
T u r b u l e n t t he r m a l o r
mass d i f f u s i v i t y
:
FT = PT/0.9p
(23
( i . e . T u r b u l e n t P r a n d t l / S c h m i d t number = 0.9)
Turbulence k i n e t i c energy equation:
(3)
- pe - zU
+ pV
where
and
2.o
8y
8y
+ ~T
(4)
0 . 0 9 exp [ - 3 . 4 / ( 1
c2
RT
(S)
+ RT/50)2]
(6)
1.44;
ok = 1 . 0 ;
~E = 1 . 3 .
The independent variables r and y are respectively the radial distance from
the disc axis and the normal distance from the disc surface.
ing velocities are U and V;
The correspond-
All
Vol. I, No. Z
(i)
SPINNING
DISC
133
The 7 are
50
50
ERIAN [6] R = 9 9 3 x l o 5
40
-\
k
3O
3O
2O
20
y~
IO
02
4
06
Ve/T~
08
12
iO
UITo~
Fig. i
Turbulent flow velocity profiles near a spinning disc
tions, the continuity equation and (for problems of heat or mass diffusion)
134
B.E.
L a u n d e r and B.I.
t h e e n t h a l p y o r chemical s p e c i e s e q u a t i o n .
Sharma
Vol. 1, No. 2
The p r e c i s e form i s
Spalding (5) p r o c e d u r e m o d i f i e d f o r t h e i n c l u s i o n o f s w i r l as o u t l i n e d i n
(4 ).
when t h e m i x i n g - l e n g t h model i s u s e d ) .
The
15% o f t h e boundary l a y e r t h i c k n e s s l e a d i n g
velocity profiles
of the rotating-disc
1-3.
flow a r e compared
The c a l c u l a t e d r a d i a l and c i r c u m f e r e n -
Erian's
(6) e x p e r i m e n t a l d a t a .
shown:
--
The m i x i n g - l e n g t h r e s u l t s
to zero f a s t e r
falling
than e x p e r i m e n t s u g g e s t s due
t o zero t oo q u i c k l y n e a r t h e o u t e r edge.
THEODORSEN
KREITH
[7]
[8]
MLH
K-E:
CM
O.OI
0002
I
IO
from (4) a r e a l s o
I
IO
1"2 ~ / v
Fig. 2
Torque coefficient for spinning disc
Vol. 1 No. 2
SPINNING
The c o r r e s p o n d i n g v a r i a t i o n
i s shown in F i g . 2.
DISC
135
of torque coefficient
w i t h Reynolds number
o c c u r s must be
apparatus; not
closely in line with the measured behaviour, the line representing predicted
behaviour falling roughly mid-way between the data of Kreith (7) and Theodorsen
and Regier (8).
Heat and mass transfer predictions are shown in Fig. 3.
There is
extremely close agreement with Cobb's measured mean Nusselt numbers over the
full range of the experiments; the data of McComas lie about 7% below this.
Agreement with the naphthalene diffusion data of Tien (ii) and Kreith (12)
is not quite as satisfactory, however.
experiment for spin Reynolds numbers up to 4 x 105 , beyond this the data
rise progressively faster than the predictions indicate.
discrepancies were noted in (4) where the mixing length hypothesis was used.
It does not seem possible to identify the cause of the disagreement in the
absence of measured profiles of species concentration near the disc.
McCOMAS [9}
COBB
[IO]
~ , /
~ /
X U /
K I~EITH
[12]
/
/
,C
0"=24
Nu
o$"
ER)
o x''O'"
i O2 - -
MLH
/o /
K -
...W-"
, ,r]lll
I
I0 5
T2c~/ ",,;
I i Illli
i0 6
Fig. 3
Heat and mass transfer from a disc rotating in still air
136
B.E.
L a u n d e r and B.I. S h a r m a
Vol. i, No. 2
Conclusion
The main conclusion is that the k~E model of turbulence, which had
been devised (1,2) specifically to predict certain low-Reynolds-number phenomena in boundary layers and duct flows, has been found to predict accurately
the flow, heat and mass transfer in the neighbourhood of a rotating disc.
The result is of significance to the problem of predicting convective heat
transfer rates in turbine discs.
Acknowledgement
This r e s e a r c h has been s u p p o r t e d by t h e S c i e n c e Research Council t h r o u g h
Grant No. B/RG/1863.
References
1.
W.P. Jones and B.E. Launder, I n t . J . Heat Mass T r a n s f e r , 15, 301 (1972).
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
(1973).
S t a n f o r d (1966).
4th I n t . C o n f e r e n c e , Heat T r a n s f e r 3,
Vol. i, No. 2
SPINNING
DISC
137
Appendix
The following is the system of mean-flow conservation equations solved
simultaneously with equations (1-61 describing the turbulence quantities.
Streamwise momentum:
au
pu ~
au
+pv
a--f
~y
(~ + ~T)
(A1)
+ p ~--
Angular momentum:
oU
a rV 0
3 rV 0
ar
pV
ay
ray
3 (n + n T)
Ty
(A2)
pU
~a@
pv
a@
a-f =
r1 aa y
Ir (r + r T)
3@
~f 3
(A3)
Boundary conditions are applied at the disc surface (y=O) and beyond
the edge of the boundary layer (y=y~) as follows:
y = O:
U = k = ~ = O;
V 0 = mr;
y = y : U = k = e = V 0 = O;
= CW
= .