Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEMORANDUM
AND ORDER
15-CV-2627 (JMA)
against defendant in the Courts ruling on the pending dispositive motions. See Reply in
Opposition (Aug. 16, 2016) at 1-2, DE #39. In addition, plaintiff renewed his request to take
discovery from other government agents. See id. at 2.
This Court granted defendants motion for a one-week extension on August 17, 2016,
with a statement of reasons to follow shortly. Electronic Order (Aug. 17, 2016). This
opinion constitutes the Courts statement of reasons.
The extension requested by defendant is quite modest, particularly given defendants
willingness to conduct an additional search of its databases for the records requested by plaintiff.
In addressing the cross-motions for summary judgment, the Court will take into account
plaintiffs challenges to all of the delays that have occurred, as well as to the adequacy of the
declarations and supplemental declaration(s). Those arguments do not, however, warrant
denying the DOJ an extension of time of only five business days within which to comply with an
order that was intended to generate a more complete record on which to resolve the pending
dispositive motions. Furthermore, if, after reviewing defendants supplemental submission,
plaintiff would like the opportunity to respond to that submission, this Court is prepared to
provide him that opportunity, at his request
Plaintiffs request for discovery from other DOJ employees is denied, for the reasons
previously stated. See, e.g., Minute Entry (Sept. 16, 2015) at 1, DE #14.
SO-ORDERED.
Dated:
Roanne L. Mann
ROANNE L. MANN
CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
-2-