Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
DOI:10.14355/ijer.2014.0301.02
PerformanceEvaluationofaSewage
TreatmentPlantUsingRhodamineTracer
NamasivayamVasudevan,JustinAroon,OdukkathilGreeshma
CentreforEnvironmentalStudies,AnnaUniversity,Chennai
greeshma.o@gmail.com
Abstract
Biologicaltreatmentisanimportantandintegralpartofany
wastewater treatment plant that treats wastewater having
soluble organic impurities. Activated Sludge Process
treatment technology, is one such option for treating
domestic wastewater. Biological treatment using aerobic
activatedsludgeprocesshasbeeninpracticeoveracentury.
Increasing pressure to meet more stringent discharge
standardsornotbeingallowedtodischargetreatedeffluent
has led to implementation of a variety of biological
treatmentprocessesinrecentyears.Inthepresentstudy,the
performance of Sewage Treatment Plant for domestic
sewagewasevaluatedintermsofBiologicaloxygendemand
(BOD), Chemicaloxygendemand(COD),Totalsuspended
solids (TSS), Total dissolved solids (TDS), and by water
tracer studies using Rhodamine. STP showed a removal
efficiency of BOD95%, COD90%, TSS87%, TDS35%. The
studyrevealedthatSTPiswellmaintainedandachievesthe
standards prescribed for effluent discharge by the Tamil
NaduPollutionControlBoard(TNPCB).
Keywords
Rhodamine; Water Tracer; Activated Sludge Process; Sewage
TreatmentPlant
Introduction
MostofthemetropolitancitiesinIndiageneratemore
than38,254millionlitresofsewageeachday.Ofthis,it
hasbeenestimatedthatlessthan30percentofwhatis
collected undergoes treatment before it is disposed
into freshwater bodies or sea[3]. As per Central
Pollution Control Board rules, a city or towns
municipality or water authority is responsible for
collecting and treating 100 percent of the sewage
generated within its jurisdiction. The level at which
thesewagehastobetreateddependsonwhereitwill
be disposed; and treatment standards are higher for
disposalintofreshwaterbodiesthanthatintothesea.
However, typically even where sewage treatment
plants (STPs) exist, sewage collection networks are
inadequate; so some portion goes for treatment and
the rest flows into nallahs and drains. Sometimes
wastewater stagnates in pools from which it leaches
ww
ww.ijer.org Intern
nationalJournaalofEnvironm
mentandReso
ource(IJER)V
Volume3Issuee1,February22014
Re
esults and Discussion
Wa
astewaterCh
haracteristiccs
Phy
ysiochemicall characterisstics of sew
wage from the
inleet tank of ST
TP were giv
ven in table1. Raw sewage
cha
aracteristics were above the CPCB tolerance
t
lim
mits
foreffluentdisccharge.
TABLE1CHA
ARACTERISTICSOFTHEWASTEW
WATER(STP)
Pa
arameters Influ
uentCharacteriistics TNPCBToleranceLim
mits
pH
TDS
TSS
COD
BOD
Chloride
C
Sulphate
6.07.5
16002700mg/L
L
300550mg/L
600800mg/L
250300mg/L
10002000mg/L
L
4050mg/L
6.09.0
2100mg/L
2
100mg/L
250mg/L
30mg/L
7502000mg/L
2mg/L
Ex
xperiments
s Design and
a
Setup
Wa
astewaterCh
haracterizattion
Th
hestudywasconductediinsewagetreeatmentplan
ntat
Alaandur in Ch
hennai distrrict, Tamilnaadu, India. The
treeatment plan
nt treated domestic
d
wastewater frrom
Alaandur municipality. Thee treatment system
s
adop
pted
acttivated slud
dge process for treatin
ng wastewaater.
Waastewaterwaascollectedffromtheinleettank,aerattion
tan
nk, and fin
nal outlet, was
w
characteerized for pH,
Disssolved Ox
xygen (DO)), Mixed Liquor
L
Volaatile
SuspendedSollids(MLVSS
S),MixedLiq
quorSuspended
ds (TDS), Total
T
Sollids (MLSS)), Total Disssolved Solid
Suspended Solids (TSS), Chemical
C
O
Oxygen
Demand
(CO
OD),Biochem
micalOxygeenDemand((BOD),Chlorride
and Sulphate as
a per standard methodss of wastewater
analysis[1].
FIG
G.1BODOFTH
HEWASTEWAT
TERINVARIOUSUNITSOFS
STP
PerformanceEvaluationoffSTP
Sam
mples were collected frrom the inlet tank, aerattion
tan
nk, and finall outlet and performancce evaluation
n of
ST
TPwascarrieedoutbasedontheremo
ovalefficiencyof
BO
OD, COD, TDS and TSS
S. Further, th
he performaance
evaaluation wass carried outt using Rhod
damineB water
traacer. Rhodam
mine was miixed with 5 L of water and
injected to thee inlet of aeeration tank of STP durring
infflowofdomeesticwastew
watertothetrreatmentsystem.
Th
he wastewatter was colllected at a
a regular time
t
intterval of 2 h
h for duratio
on of 48 h and
a
the samp
ples
weereanalyzedfortheconcentrationofthetracer.
FIG
G.2CODOFTH
HEWASTEWAT
TERINVARIO
OUSUNITSOFS
STP
PerrformanceEv
valuationof
f theIndividu
ualUnitsinthe
STP
1) BODan
ndCODRem
movalintheS
STP
BODandC
CODofthed
domesticwasstewaterdurring
InternationalJou
urnalofEnviro
onmentandR
Resource(IJER
R)Volume3Isssue1,Februarry2014 www.ijer..org
TSSofthed
domesticwasstewaterinth
hevariousun
nits
of STP also showed a rreduction fro
om 553 mg/L
L to
23mg/L.A maximumreemovalefficiencyof95.668%
was observeed during th
he study. Th
here was sliight
reduction in
n the TDS off wastewaterr in the vario
ous
units of ST
TP compared
d to the oth
her parameters.
TDS of the wastewaterr in the varrious treatm
ment
units varied
d from 1600 mg/L to 270
00 mg/L in in
nlet
tank, 1100 to
t 1900 mg/L
L in aeration
n tank and 1000
to 200 mg/L
L in the ou
utlet. A max
ximum remo
oval
efficiencyoffonly55.56%
%wasobserrved.Generaally,
TDS canno
ot be red
duced in the biological
wastewater treatment ssystem. The norms for the
discharge of effluent ass prescribed by TNPCB are
2100mg/L.
FIG.5OVE
ERALLREMOV
VALEFFICIENC
CYOFSTP
FIIG.3TSSOFTH
HEWASTEWAT
TERINVARIOU
USUNITSOFS
STP
FIG.4TDSOFTH
HEWASTEWAT
TERINVARIO
OUSUNITSOFS
STP
2) TSSand
dTDSremov
valintheSTP
TP
TSS and TD
DS removal in the vario
ous units of STP
S
arerepresen
ntedinthefiig.3andfig..4,respectiv
vely.
www.ijer.org InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume3Issue1,February2014
2.3mg/Lto2.5mg/L,whichwasslightlyabovethe
desirable range of D.O (1.52.0 mg/L). MLSS/
MLVSS ratio varied from 0.51 to 0.62, which was
alsomaintainedtothedesirableratioof0.60(table
2). F/M ratio was maintained between 0.1 0.18
(table 3). Evaluation of operating parameters like
dissolved oxygen, MLSS, MLVSS and F/M ratio of
theaerationtankrevealedthatthetreatmentunitis
maintainedingoodoperatingconditionandhence
agoodremovalefficiencyofBODandCOD.
TABLE2MLVSSANDMLSSRATIOINSTP
Durationof
Desirable
MLSS(mg/L) MLVSS(mg/L) Ratio
sampling
ratio
Day1
1994
1012
0.51
0.60
Day8
2100
1284
0.61
0.60
Day15
2150
1330
0.62
0.60
Day21
2140
1240
0.58
0.60
F/MRatio
0.16
0.14
0.15
0.15
Desirable
0.10.18
0.10.18
0.10.18
0.10.18
RhodamineBwaterTracerStudy
Thevolumeoftheaerationtankwas20,184m3andthe
volumetricflowratewas6.25m3/min,whichgavethe
theoretical mean residence time as 960 minutes. The
experimental mean residence time was 840 min,
meaning that the system has approximately 12.5%
dead volume. The water tracer study revealed that
aeration tank achieves the designed residence time
and works efficiently as far as residence time is
concerned. Lesser dead volume, will be the area of
stagnant zone within the aeration tank. According to
Farook et al[9], a negligible volume of the stagnant
zone in the aeration tank indicates that it works
efficiently as far as residence time is concerned. In
another study carried out in common effluent
treatment plant for tannery effluent, the flaws in the
aeration tank gave higher dead volume of 19.6%[10].
Rhodaminewatertracerstudiesalsorevealedthatthe
treatmentsystemwasingoodconditionmaintaininga
proper volumetric flow rate and there were no flaws
in the treatment unit. Removal efficiency of the
treatment unit also revealed that the unit is
maintainedingoodcondition.
Conclusion
All the individual units in the STP were checked for
theirdesignauthenticityandnoflawswerefoundand
hence the design wise the STP was found to be
10
REFERENCES
TABLE3F/MRATIOinSTP
Dateofsampling
Day1
Day8
Day15
Day21
InternationalJournalofEnvironmentandResource(IJER)Volume3Issue1,February2014 www.ijer.org
assessmentoftheefficiencyofsewagetreatmentplants:a
Radiotracer
sewagetreatmentplantsKathmanduUniversity.Journal
investigations
of
municipal
sewage
treatmentstations.Nukleonika,(2003),48(1):5761.
N.Vasudevan,
Justin
Aaron.P.S.
and
O.Greeshma.
plantfortanneryindustries.JournalofEcobiotechnology,
(2012),4(1):2528.
(1995),57(1)3945.
Qasim,SyedR.1999.WastewaterTreatmentPlantsPlanning,
Design,andOperation,TECHNOMICpublishingco.Inc.
Book3,ChapterA12,p.34.
11