Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3.0 km
4060 m
3045 m
2.5 m
1.6 N/mm2
SM490 A
Yielding strength y:
315 N/mm2
Allowance stress a:
215 N/mm2
Youngs modus E:
2.1105 N/mm2
Poissons ratio :
0.3
Expansion coefficient:
1.210-5
As for the design external pressure Po, the special consideration is required. Generally for deep
water tunnel, the external pressure can use the hydrostatic pressure directly estimated from the
groundwater table. However, groundwater level change with reason should be taken into
account. Moreover, the non-uniform part of hydrostatic pressure can be disregarded based on
the discussed in Chapter 3. Therefore, the design external pressure can be obtained by using the
hydrostatic pressure at liner bottom. Where, the external pressure is obtained as 0.625 N/mm2.
Moreover, for bucking design, the safety factor Fs =1.5 is taken into account. As the result, the
design external pressure is obtained as Po=0.95 N/mm2.
- 145 -
P0
3045 m
W.L.
O.D.
00
.25
I.D
4060 m
515 m
G.L.0.0
- 146 -
The tunnel structures are considered the conventional type and new type in terms of the
integrated-type structure and separated-type structure, as shown in Fig. 5.3. As for the steel
liner, only the plain steel pipe is considered for conventional type structure, whereas for the
separated-type structure, both plain steel pipe and the ring-stiffened pipe are investigated. In
addition, the gap of steel liner back is considered, the maximum gap 1.5mm is applied for
integrated-type structure on account of the material shrinkage due to temperature changing
during the backfill process, 10mm is for the separated-type structure on account of steel liner
construction capacity. Moreover, the stiffened liner is investigated as the free pipe and
restrained pipe, corresponding to the uniformly supported case and locally supported case. The
water tunnel structure can be obtained once the steel liner thickness is determined for plain steel
liner, the stiffeners for stiffened pipe.
2500
O 2500
300
Gap 1.5mm
(33503353)+2t
t 300
125
Tunnel lining
(RC Segments)
125
Backfill layer
2500
Steel liner
125
- 147 -
(27502770)+2(t+tr)
t
O2500
Steel liner
t+tr
O2500
125
2500
(27502770)+2t
tr
t+tr
125
Tunnel lining
(RC Segments)
125
Tunnel lining
(RC Segments)
Pi Di
2 a
t=
(5.1)
Substituting the design internal pressure, inner diameter and allowance stress into Eq. (5.1), the
steel liner thickness is then obtained.
t=
1.6 2500
= 9.3 mm
2 215
Where, the thickness t=10mm is adopted for structural design of steel liner, considering the
industrial standard of steel plate. Moreover, the steel erosion for long time should take into
account, where, the extra 2mm is considered. As the result, the steel liner with thickness 12mm
is used for practical construction.
5.2.2 Expansion Deformation
The expansion of steel liner due to internal pressure is discussed based on the in-extensional
deformation consideration of cylinder shell. The deformation in steel liner is finally transferred
into the radius change.
The strains in steel liner produced by internal pressure can be calculated using the following
equation.
Pi Di
2tE
(5.2)
R =
Di
2
R =
1.6 25002
=1.19mm.
4 10 2.1 105
- 148 -
(5.3)
the design external pressure, where, the maximum gap 1.5mm is applied.
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
14
5
10
15
Steel liner thickness t (mm)
20
- 149 -
into account. The defaults of backfilling for a horizontal water tunnel always occurs, and the
defect region formed at crown of steel liner vulnerably induce a fatal buckling problem. This
has been discussed in the report on buckling accident of Naka water tunnel. Therefore the defect
region should be investigated, where the schematic view and notations on defect region and the
relation between critical pressure of the designed steel pipe and the defect region are presented
as shown in Fig. 5.5 and Fig. 5.6, respectively.
As shown in Fig. 5.5, the defect region is inevitably formed when fill the void between the
liners and linings, particularly is easily formed in the vicinity of crown because of the
Tunnel lining
(RC Segments)
Defect region
15
O2500
Steel liner
Backfill layer
2
1.8
1.6
1.4
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
10
20
30 40 50 60 70 80
Backfilling defect region ()
90
100
Fig. 5.6 Relation between critical pressure and defect region (t=15mm)
- 150 -
downward flowability of backfill material. The mortar will flow down when the backfill
material is poured into the void, and only the aggregate will left at the crown. The quality of
backfill work may be improved if use the multi-step pouring procedure. However, the backfill
in tunnel is rather difficult, the completely backfill is impossible for overall long water tunnel,
even using the present high backfilling technology. Figure 5.5 shows that the buckling of steel
liner is affected by the defect range greatly. Also the steel pipe can be considered the safety if
the radial angle of backfilling region is not beyond about 50 degrees, or the single-lobe buckling
can be considered possible. However, as the surveyed results of Naka water tunnel accident, the
largest radial angle of defect region is about 60 degrees, and the backfill region with about 120
degrees at crown has relative little stiffness. How to predicate the defect region may be a vital
subjective for study on buckling of steel liner encased in integrated-type structure. In the current
study, the designed thickness is adopted without considering the defect region, because the
exact region can not be known at present.
5.3.2 Steel Liner of Separated-type Structure
As for the separated-type water tunnel structure, the buckling design of steel liner should be
carried out with respect to the supported conditions. According to the discussion above, any of
free buckling and restrained buckling has possibility to happen. Which buckling will occurs is
determined by the liners support conditions. Also as discussed in former chapters, it is
considered as the free buckling for a liner installed with rubber plate set around tunnel, namely
uniformly supported liner, whereas restrained buckling for a liner just supported at invert by
tunnel lining self or sand media, briefly locally supported liner. As for design, the free buckling
equations are used for design of a uniformly supported liner, while the single lobe buckling
equations are used for design of a locally supported liner.
Uniformly Supported Liner
The uniformly supported liner can be regarded as a free pipe since the gap uniformly
distributes around liner and its magnitude is far larger than the radial displacement of free
buckling. Moreover, since water supply line is built in rather long-distance, its liner is usually
considered as an infinite length pipes. Accordingly the buckling of infinite long pipe should be
applied in design. The detailed design for steel liner buckling is discussed with respect to the
plain liner and stiffened liner as follows.
1) Plain steel liner
Since the buckling of free plain pipe has been studied and the corresponding buckling equation
has been presented, here the existing buckling equation (Eq. (2.3)) is just applied for design.
Substituting the design external pressure and radius in Eq. (2.3),
- 151 -
0.95 =
2.1 105 t 3
4(1 0.32 )12503
The thickness of steel liner can be obtained as t=31.8mm. Herein, the steel liner with thickness
32mm is adopted.
2) Stiffened steel liner
For buckling of stiffened liner, the design should be conducted considering the second moment
of inertia and the configuration of ring stiffeners. The two stages method presented in Chapter 2
is applied, since this method can provide an accurate critical pressure of stiffened pipes. As for
the two stages method, the buckling pressures are calculated using the general buckling and
local buckling formulas, respectively in the first stage. Since the local buckling is considered the
ultimate state providing maximum resistance to external pressure, in the second stage the
buckling types can therefore be judged through comparing the buckling pressures. If the critical
pressure of local buckling is larger than that of general buckling, the buckling can be judges as a
general buckling, and the corresponding critical pressure is used as the critical pressure of
investigated pipe. As the result, the buckling type can be predicated, and the accurate buckling
pressure can be estimated. However considering water supply line is usually built in a
long-distance, the steel liner design should use buckling equations for infinite length pipe.
In addition, as for the design for buckling of stiffened liner, the new design method namely
local buckling design method is used referring the existing researcher5) and design codes6),7),8),9)
such as ASME, BS5500 and DNV. The local buckling design method is a method to design the
stiffened pipe only buckling locally by ensuring enough stiffness of stiffener. Where the local
bucking design method is conducted using the two-stage method, and respective equation of
general and local buckling of infinite pipe are discussed as follows.
For a infinite long stiffened liner, considering the buckling wave n=2 and =
R
L
0 , the
Et 3
3EI r
+
P =
2
3
4(1 ) R
SR 3
G
cr
(5.4)
On the other hand, the buckling equation of local buckling can just use the existing forms
presented in Chapter 2. The design procedure is shown as follows, where the design external
pressure Po is used, and the safe factor is taken into account for the imperfection of pipe and
hydrostatic pressure.
a) Estimate the stiffened spacing S using local buckling equation (Eq. (2.45)) and the
evaluated steel liner thickness from the design for internal pressure.
- 152 -
Po =
Et t 2 ( 2 + n2 1)2
4
+
(5.5)
b) Calculate the critical pressure of local buckling with respect to the evaluated stiffener
spacing S and pipe thickness designed for internal pressure.
PcrL =
Et t 2 ( 2 + n2 1)2
4
+
(5.6)
c) Determine the size of stiffener by estimation of the limit flexural stiffness using the general
buckling equation of infinite pipe,
PcrL =
Et 3
3EI r
+
2
3
4(1 ) R
SR 3
(5.7)
Where, the evaluated flexural stiffness should be enlarged a little to ensure the local buckling.
Substituting the estimated thickness t=10 mm and the design variations into Eq. (5.5), the
stiffener spacing S can be obtained as about 1500 mm, where the buckling waves is calculated
by Eq. (2.46) as n=8. The corresponding critical pressure is calculated as PLcr=1.01 N/mm2
through Eq. (5.7), hence the flexural stiffness is estimated and the corresponding size of
stiffener is obtained. However, the stiffener size should be calculated using Eq. (2.24), because
the estimated flexural stiffness is effective flexural stiffness. As the result, the stiffener used for
the steel liner has the cross section with thickness tr=20mm and height hr=85mm, and the
spacing S is 1500mm. The pipe designed for internal pressure is used with the thickness
t=10mm.
Locally Supported Liner
Since the buckling of locally supported liner is considered the single-lobe buckling, the
buckling design should use the buckling equations of single-lobe buckling. In Chapter 4, the
single-lobe buckling of plain pipe and stiffened pipe was discussed in terms of existing
theoretical buckling equations. For plain pipe, both Amstutz and Jacobsens buckling equations
were examined and their validation has been confirmed. However, the application of Amstuzs
equations should ensure the introduction coefficient in the range of 5 to 20, while the
Jacobsens equations can provide a consistent and conservative critical pressure. The Jacobsens
equation is finally recommended considering the safety of water tunnel, although the two
theoretical equations can be applied for design. However, as for the stiffened pipe, the new
analytical solutions are used.
- 153 -
3.5
Amustuz(=10mm)
2.5
Jacobsen (=5mm)
Jacobsen (=1mm)
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
10
15
20
Steel liner thickness t (mm)
25
30
- 154 -
spacing S=1500mm are adopted. The stiffened steel liner is designed only to ensure the
single-lobe buckling occurs after the local buckling of inter-stiffener shells. Similarly to the
design for uniformly supported liner, only the size of stiffener is required to determine, where
the thickness of stiffener is considered 20mm based on the requirement of stiffener size defined
by Eq. (2.11).
From Fig. 5.8, the abnormal behavior happened for results calculated by the Amstutzs and
Jacobsens bucking equations can be found. For the identical gap of 10mm, the decreasing
incline and a sharp increasing incline are expressed in the relationship of critical pressure and
stiffener height. On the other hand, the relation of critical pressure and stiffener height obtained
by presented solution are expressed with a gentle incline for all cases of gaps. This may identify
the invalidation of the existing buckling equations for stiffened steel liner again. Therefore, the
estimation of the stiffener thickness uses the results of presented solutions. Similarly to the
design of plain liner above, the different value is available with respect to the gap, here, the
most conservational result is used, as the hr=100mm. As the result, the designed stiffened steel
liner has the pipe thickness t=10mm, and the stiffener with the spacing 1500mm and the cross
section 20100 mm in terms of the thickness and height.
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Stiffener height h r (mm)
120
140
Fig. 5.8 Relationship between critical pressure and stiffener height (t=10mm, S=1500mm)
- 155 -
2.5 m
Overall Length:
2
315 N/mm
3 km
Allowance stress a:
2.1x105 N/mm2
Poissons ratio :
1.6 N/mm
External pressure Po
215 N/mm2
0.3
0.95 N/mm2
Necessary thickness:
t=10mm
supported:
Plain liner:
t=32mm
supported:
Plain liner:
t=21mm
From Table 5.1, it is found that the thickness of a steel liner is always determined by the
design for external pressure if use the plain pipe, no matter for which tunnel structure and
support condition. The thickness determined by internal pressure is only 10mm, while the
thickness 15mm for liner of conventional integrated-type structure, 32mm for uniformly
- 156 -
supported liner and 21mm for the locally supported liner of new separated-type structure, are
required from the design for liner buckling under the external pressure. If someone want to use
the thinner steel pipe designed for internal pressure, the pipe must be stiffened. The stiffened
liner cannot only meet the requirement of buckling under external pressure, but also can bring
great economical effects. The equivalent thickness of stiffened liner used for uniformly
supported and locally supported liners are only 11.1mm and 11.3mm respectively. Meanwhile,
the stiffened pipe can be designed using the local buckling design method, by which the steel
liner only buckles in inter-stiffener shells locally.
As for water tunnel structure, since the stiffened liner is difficult to use for the conventional
integrated-type structure because of the backfill work, while can easily be used for the new
separated structure, the application of conventional structure for deep urban water tunnel should
not be recommended. Moreover, the inevitable defect region in backfill layer is also another
great limit to utilize the conventional structure because of its unpredicted feature and the
decisive effect on the buckling resistance capacity of a steel liner. Therefore, the construction of
deep water tunnel should use the separated-type structure on account of the safety and other
advantages mentioned in Chapter 1.
However, for new separated type water tunnel, the steel liner should be discussed in terms of
installation method and liner type. From the designed results as shown in Table 1, for plain liner
the locally supported liner is rather prevail over the uniformly supported liner in terms of the
economic reasons, the thickness of former one is only 21mm, while 32mm for the later one. On
the other hand, for stiffened liner, there is no distinctive difference between the uniformly
supported and locally supported liner, both the equivalent thickness is about 11mm.
Accordingly, the installation should use the locally support if use a plain liner, the same
recommendation is also given to stiffened liner considering the extra work of setting supports
around the liner in the case of uniformly support.
Conclusively, the deep water tunnel should adopt the new separated-type structure, and the
stiffened pipe should be used and installed with locally support.
- 157 -
References
1) Tunnel Engineering Committee (TEC): Standard Specifications for Tunneling: Shield Tunnel,
2006 Ed., Tunnel Engineering Committee, JSCE, Tokyo, 2007.
2) JSCE: Design Standard for Steel structurePART B
3) Japan Water Research Center: Rep. Study on the cost reduction of deep water tunnel
construction2003
4) Kanto Regional Development Bureau: Rep. Investigation of Naka Water Convey Tunnel,
2004.
5) Kendrick, S.: Design for external pressure using general criteria, Int. Jour. of Mech. Sci., Vol.
24, Issue 4, pp. 209-218, 1982.
6) ASME: Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Nuclear components, Code Case N-284, New
York, 1980.
7) British Standards Institution: BS 5500, Specification for unfired fusion welded pressure
vessels, London, 1997.
8) DNV: Recommended practice DNV-RP-C202, Buckling Strength of Shells, Hvik, Norway,
2002.
9) DNV: Rules for the Design, Construction and Inspection of Offshore Structures, Appendix C:
Steel Structures, Hvik, Norway, 1982.
- 158 -