Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plaintiffs,
CASE NO:
v.
2016-CA-1794
Defendants.
-------------- - -I
ORDER DENYING VENUE MOTIONS, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART TEMPORARY INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND ORDER
SETTING EVIDENTIARY BEARING ON BOND AMOUNT AND
CONDITIONS AND ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND
OTHER DEADLINES
Page 1of51
Page 2 of 51
Venue
2.Leon County being the county in which the State
Education Defendants have their headquarters, the six
County School Board Defendants being indispensable
parties to this action, and having agreed in the
federal court to the appropriateness of a single case
going forward in Tallahassee, venue is proper in Leon
County.
The venue motions are denied, for the reasons set
forth above and herein.
Injunctive Relief
Factual Background
3.Not wanting their children to take the mandatory
Florida Standards Assessment (FSA] test, the Plaintiff
Parents told their children to attend the required
test, break the seal on the test materials, write their
Page 3of51
It is in the public
Page S of 51
To the
4th
grade
At a
[Exhibit 58,
Page 7 of 51
While County
The request of Ms. Rhea and B.R. for declaratory relief is not presently before the Court and has not been fully
briefed; there appear to be arguments that both sides could make if the Orange County School Board and Ms.
Rhea are unable to get their disputes resolved. See. e.g., Godwin v. State of Florida, 593 So.2d 211(Fla.1992) and
Montgomerv v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 468 So.2d 1014 (Fla. 1t DCA 1985).
Page 8 of 51
1008.25(4)and(S), Florida
Statutes.
9. The evidence shows that the Hernando Plaintiff
Parents and their children were adversely and
improperly harmed by the Hernando County School Board
and State Education Defendants' conduct. The evidence
established that the School Board did not send any
notices of deficiency, and offered no remediation, even
though none of the students scored a Level 3 on the
FSA.
Page 9of51
Page 11of51
It is clear the
While
4th
and
5th
Section
Page 14 of51
4th
Page 16 of 51
27.
6th
equivalent level.
Page 17of51
Page 18of51
33.
Page 19of51
3rd
grade
Page 20 of 51
[Ms.
Page 21of51
in Pasco County.
In
Page 22 of 51
39.
Page 23of51
Sections
The Commissioner
Page 24 of 51
Page 25 of 51
Page 27of51
First,
Second, the
supra.
Confidentiality
Page 32of51
[Exhibit 35].
The legislatively identified purposes for the
Page 34of51
to notify
Page 37 of 51
A student
case are in subsections 1008 .25 (6) (b) (3) and (4).
69.
Page 39 of 51
Page 40of51
3rd
graders.
Page 43 of 51
The statutes
[If their
Students with no
The evidence
Rulinqs
Based on the foregoing findings of fact,
determinations of credibility of the witnesses and the
conclusions of law, and the totality of the evidence in
the case, the arguments of counsel, and being otherwise
fully advised in the premises, it is hereby
ORDERED as follows:
1. The motions for dismissal based on the claimed
lack of jurisdiction over the County School Boards are
denied. The plaintiff served the County School Boards
as directed by the Court at the August 12, 2016
hearing. No issue regarding defects in service having
been raised either at the federal court level [to which
the County School Board Defendants and State Education
Defendants removed the case] or at the August 22, 2016
hearing, the motions regarding any claimed lack of
jurisdiction over the person are without merit at this
time, and are denied.
The Education
By October
ORDERED this
ry,
lb:aay
o f August, 2016 in
KAREN GIEVERS
Circuit Judge
Copies furnished to:
Andrea Flynn Mogensen, Esq.
Amogensen@sunshinelitigation.com
mbarfield@sunshinelitigation.com
Pam Stewart, Esq.
Commissioner@fldoe.org
c/o Matthew H. Mears, General Counsel
Matthew.Mears@fldoe.org
State Board of Education
c/o Matthew H. Mears, General Counsel
Matthew.Mears@fldoe.org
School Board of Orange County
c/o Diego Rodriguez, General Counsel
woody.rodriguez@oops.net
School Board of Hernando County
c/o Dennis Alfonso, General Couns e l
eserve@McClainAlfonso.com
School Board of Osceola County
Page SO of 51
..
Page 51of51