Professional Documents
Culture Documents
biomedical applications
Maria S. Savelyeva,1 Anatoly A. Abalymov,1 German P. Lyubun,1 Irina V. Vidyasheva,1
Alexey M. Yashchenok,1 Timothy E. L. Douglas,2 Dmitry A. Gorin,1,3 Bogdan V. Parakhonskiy1,2,4
1
Remote Controlled Theranostic Systems Lab, Educational Research Institute of Nanostructures and Biosystem, Saratov State
University, Astrakhanskaya, 83, Saratov, 410026, Russia
2
Department of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University,
Coupure Links 653, Ghent 9000, Belgium
3
RASA Center in Tomsk, Tomsk Polytechnic University, 634050, Tomsk, Lenin Avenue, 30, Tomsk 634050, Russia
4
A.V. Shubnikov Institute of Crystallography Russian Academy of Science, Leninskiy prospect 59, Moscow 119333, Russia
Received 31 May 2016; revised 4 August 2016; accepted 17 August 2016
Published online 00 Month 2016 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35870
Abstract: The process of porous calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
covering on electrospun poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) fibers is
described in this study. Uniform CaCO3 coatings, composed
of vaterite microparticles and its aggregates, were formed
on PCL fibers by mineral precipitation from solution under
ultrasonic treatment. The porous structure of CaCO3 in vaterite polymorphic form is useful for loading of various substances (drugs and nanoparticles), and this property makes
vaterite an appropriate material for design of drug delivery
systems. Such mineralization was implemented to attain
therapeutic and/or biological activity of tissue engineering
scaffolds based on electrospun PCL, by means of CaCO3
coatings. Various structures and polymorphs of CaCO3 coatings were obtained by variation of growth conditions (time
of fiber incubation in work solution, ultrasonic treatment of
Key Words: calcium carbonate, electrospun scaffolds, composite fibers, functional coating, tissue engineering
How to cite this article: Savelyeva MS, Abalymov AA, Lyubun GP, Vidyasheva IV, Yashchenok AM, Douglas TEL, Gorin DA,
Parakhonskiy BV. 2016. Vaterite coatings on electrospun polymeric fibers for biomedical applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part
A 2016:00A:000000.
INTRODUCTION
SAVELYEVA ET AL.
Sigma-Aldrich Chemie, Germany) with 9.4% wt concentration was prepared by dissolving PCL pellets in a solvent
mixture of dichloromethane CH2Cl2 (DM, ComponentReactive, Russia) and N,N-dimethylformamide C3H7NO
(DMF, Component-Reactive, Russia) (weight ratio 77:23) followed by stirring for 3 h at room temperature to obtain a
homogeneous spinning solution. Then, the obtained mixture
was poured into a syringe, which was placed in an experimental electrospinning setup. The formation of nonwoven
material was conducted for 3 h under an applied voltage of
17 kV and at a feeding rate of 0.5 mL/h. The distance
between the needle and the collecting screen was 25 cm.
Treatment of brous material and CaCO3 coating
formation
To carry out the mineralization of PCL bers, a typical process of CaCO3 particles crystallization from a mixture of
CaCl2- and Na2CO3-saturated solutions was applied (solutions were prepared using calcium chloride dihydrate
CaCl22H2O, sodium carbonate Na2CO3, all Sigma-Aldrich
Chemie, Germany). Pieces of electrospun PCL mats were
incubated in such a working solution, so that the polymeric
bers acted as substrates for directed growth of CaCO3. To
study the effect of growth conditions on the resulting CaCO3
structures, three experimental methods were used. In all of
them, material samples of 1 3 1 cm and 1 mL of each salt
solution with equal concentrations (1 M or 0.33 M) were
used. Before the mineralization was carried out, all PCL
scaffolds were preliminarily treated with CaCl2 solution in
an ultrasonic bath for 10 min.
In the rst experiment, the scaffold was placed in CaCl2
solution, after which the Na2CO3 solution was added. The
system was settled for 10 min, after which the scaffold was
taken out, washed twice with deionized water, and dried in
a drying oven at 408C for 20 min. The second experiment
was carried out the same way, but the scaffold was incubated in working solution for 30 s, after which it was taken
out, settled for 1 min on a glass slide to complete the crystallization process, washed, and dried the same way as
described above. In the third experiment, the PCL scaffold
and 1 mL of CaCl2 solution were placed in an Eppendorf
tube, which was then placed in an ultrasonic bath (Sapr,
Russia). One milliliter of Na2CO3 solution was added to the
Eppendorf tube upon ultrasonic treatment. The experiment
was performed at working frequency 35 kHz and radiation
intensity 0.64 W/cm2. This system was subjected to ultrasound for 30 s, after which it was removed from the bath
and set aside for completion of the crystallization process.
Finally, the treated scaffold was washed and dried in the
same way.
The formation of CaCO3 uniform ber coatings was carried out by performing repeated successive treatment
stages. The repeated treatment was accomplished by the
third method of CaCO3 mineralization of scaffolds; the material was subjected to one treatment stage, was processed
further in a second stage by the same way, then in a third
stage, and so forth. In such a manner, seven treatment
stages were realized. The material (1 3 1 cm) was
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
FIGURE 1. SEM images of pure PCL scaffold with fiber size distribution (A) and PCL scaffolds treated by using following methods: incubation in
working solution for 10 min (B); incubation in working solution for 30 s (C); incubation in working solution for 30 s under ultrasonic agitation
(D). Circular curves point to shell-like CaCO3 agglomerates; square curve arrows point to CaCO3 spherulites, similar to those of which the shells
consist.
FIGURE 2. SEM images of the scaffold treated with 0.33 M salt solutions (A); scaffold treated with 1 M salt solutions (B) and scaffold subjected
to two treatment stages with 1 M salt solutions (C).
SAVELYEVA ET AL.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
FIGURE 3. The scheme of fibrous material mineralization under ultrasound treatment and corresponding SEM images of blank PCL fibrous material (A), PCL material on initial mineralization stage (B), and scaffold with uniform CaCO3 coating after second treatment and cross-section of
this scaffold (C).
FIGURE 4. SEM images of PCL scaffolds mineralized by one treatment stage (A), two (B), three (C), four (D), five (E), six (F), and seven (G) treatment stages.
FIGURE 7. Results of cytotoxicity tests of PCL/CaCO3 and PCL substrates on NHDF. Error bars show standard deviation. Values labeled
with an asterisk (*) are significantly different from the control based
on the ANOVA test.
FIGURE 5. The increase of the CaCO3 mass on PCL nanofibrous material (1 3 1 cm) depended on number of treatments. Error bars show
standard deviation calculated from 5 measurements for sample in
each treatment stage.
SAVELYEVA ET AL.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
FIGURE 8. SEM images of PCL/CaCO3 scaffolds after culturing NHDF for 24 h (A, B) and 48 h (E, F); and control PCL scaffolds after culturing
NHDF for 24 h (C, D) and 48 h (G, H) with overview (A,C,E,G) and high magnification (B,F,D,H). Red arrows are highlighted the cells.
vaterite microparticles formation was studied. When solutions containing Ca21 and CO22
3 ions are mixing, amorphous
calcium carbonate (ACC) nanoparticles form initially. These
nanoparticles have sizes in the range from a few to tens of
nanometers. In agglomerates of nanoparticles, the growth
centers appear and there vaterite particles start to form.
Decomposition of ACC around growth centers provides
delivery of Ca21 and CO22
ions to growing vaterite par3
ticles. ACC transformation to vaterite is described by the
mechanism of spherulitic growth of polycrystalline particles,
where new particles grow via the continual nucleation of
misaligned structurally equal crystallites on surfaces of
growing spherulites.49 This process results in formation of
spherical polycrystalline particles consisting of crystallites
of approximately equal sizes. The further evolution of the
spherical CaCO3 particles is described by means of the classical Ostwald ripening process, which accounts for the
growth of larger particles at the expense of dissolution of
smaller particles.48,50 In this case, the increase of vaterite
crystallites size occurs via a dissolutionreprecipitation
mechanism, and this process nally leads to calcite crystallization. To prevent the fast recrystallization of metastable
vaterite to calcite and inhibit it to an extent, particles
should be stored in an environment with sufciently low
humidity. In some studies, for example, in Ref. 51, the vaterite formation was considered as an aggregation of primary
ACC nanoparticles to spherical microparticles. However,
nonuniformity of size of the resulting particles can hardly
be explained by nanoaggregation. On the contrary, it can be
described by the supposed spherulitic crystal growth.52
In a great number of previous articles, the effects of various experimental conditions on nal CaCO3 morphology
and polymorph have been studied. The use of supersaturated salt solutions promotes the increase of the number of
growth centers. As the amount of reactant in the system is
nite, the nal particles sizes will decrease as a result.48,52
In the study of L. Dupont et al.,53 it was shown that vigorous agitation of working solution during CaCO3 particle formation, which aids rapid homogenous distribution of
reagents in the volume, leads to the occurrence of a larger
number of growth centers. The cavitation effects in solution,
occurring from ultrasonic impact, sustain the intensive stirring of the solution and have the same inuence.54 The
ultrasound prevents formation of big particles and their
aggregates in the bulk solution and stimulates their dissolution, and at the same time sustains a free circulation of
Ca21 and CO22
ions in the system. In addition, the ultra3
sonic treatment provides the penetration of solutions into
pores and interior of the brous material, which facilitates
the homogenous mineralization of the scaffold.
In our case, the bers serve as the growth centers for
CaCO3 crystallization, and ACC or/and forming nuclei are
precipitating on bers and are organizing growth centers
for vaterite particle formation. The vaterite particles, some
of which formed on the bers and some of which formed in
the bulk solution and then precipitated on the bers, also
can serve as sites for agglomeration with other particles.
Figure 2 shows the bers with CaCO3 structures which indicate the mechanism of calcium carbonate coating formation.
The bers treated with 0.33 M salt solutions [Fig. 2(A)]
exhibit the CaCO3 spherical particles with sizes <1 lm,
located on bers and tending to agglomeration on the ber
surface. The increasing of solution concentrations to 1 M
causes an increase of the amount of CaCO3 produced, and
therefore it causes an increase in the number of forming
vaterite particles [Fig. 2(B)]. In addition, an increase in the
size of some particles occurred. The particles are organized
in agglomerates on the ber surface, which cover the bers,
and thus form the shell-like structure. The bers on Figure
2(C) were treated twice by the same way as the previous
ones. They have a CaCO3 coating with slightly different morphology. In this case, it is difcult to distinguish the outlines
of spherical particles in some CaCO3 formations. They
seemed to consist of crystallites which are similar to those
of which vaterite particles are composed. These formations
can be composed of associations of incompletely formed
spherulites and their aggregations with formed particles. In
such a manner, the shell-like structures, located on bers,
can be formed by growth and organization of vaterite particles and crystallites on bers. The nal CaCO3 structures,
resulting from complicated associations of agglomerates
consisting of microparticles and crystallites, make up the
uniform ber calcium carbonate shells.
The scheme in Figure 3 illustrates the described mechanism of ber mineralization. In this way, the uniform CaCO3
shell-like ber coatings over the whole material can be
obtained by using ultrasound treatment in CaCO3 synthesis
[Fig. 3(C)]. It should be noted that the CaCO3 was
SAVELYEVA ET AL.
precipitated on inner bers as well [Fig. 3(C), the crosssection of PCL scaffold after second treatment].
The realization of successive treatment stages can allow
uniform vaterite coatings on bers to be achieved and can
allow the observation of the changes of CaCO3 coating morphology to be carried out. The number of vaterite-coated
bers increases during the second and third mineralization
stages [Fig. 4(B,C)]; after the second stage, the vaterite covers almost the whole surface of bers.
The increase of sample mass (Fig. 5) conrms the addition of CaCO3 to PCL material. Thus, two mineralization
stages are sufcient to produce uniform coatings. The third
stage causes an enlargement and densication of preexisting shells, which can be explained by the precipitation
of CaCO3 on the existing CaCO3 structures which are serving
as sites for crystal growth, which was also conrmed by the
corresponding increase of sample mass (Fig. 5). The vateritecalcite transformation in CaCO3 initiated by the fourth
treatment can be explained by the Ostwald ripening process,
which is occurring during each repeated treatment stage in
parallel with the CaCO3 precipitation. When the size of
vaterite crystallites becomes critical, the process of recrystallization from vaterite to calcite takes place.48 The
increases of scaffold mass by CaCO3 coating mass increments (Fig. 5) are steadily occurring during the fourth to
the sixth treatment stages. This fact also conrms the
replacement of vaterite by calcite, as vaterite has a lower
density than calcite due to its porosity. Thus, uniform CaCO3
ber coatings in the electrospun scaffold can be obtained by
using two stages of treatment.
The cytotoxicity test conducted with NHDF (Fig. 7) show
that PCL/CaCO3 scaffolds do not have an inuence on the
cytotoxicity. Moreover, based on ANOVA test studies, the
NHDF cell viability on the scaffold is comparable with the
cell viability in control culture medium at all time points,
thus it can be concluded that cells have the sufcient activity and ability to ssion in the PCL/CaCO3 scaffold, along
with control culture medium. SEM images of cultured scaffolds (Fig. 8) show cells with a morphology typical for
spreading broblasts. Fibroblasts are attached with their
pseudopodia to scaffold bers and exhibit sufcient cell
adhesion to scaffold and homogeneous distribution. The
scaffold cultured for 48 h [Fig. 8(E,F)] contains cell aggregates and substances, which are cross-linked bers of material, indicating the activity of living broblasts in the
scaffold. In the case of control PCL scaffolds, there is lower
cell viability in comparison with mineralized scaffolds and
control culture medium, though pure PCL bers also demonstrate well-spread and attached broblasts. It can be supposed that cells are better able to adhere to mineralized
bers.
CONCLUSIONS
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
13. Lee YS, Arinzeh TL. Electrospun nanofibrous materials for neural
tissue engineering. Polymers (Basel) 2011;3:413426.
14. Powell HM, Boyce ST. Engineered human skin fabricated using
electrospun collagen-PCL blends: morphogenesis and mechanical
properties. Tissue Eng Part A 2009;15:21772187.
15. Blackwood K. a, McKean R, Canton I, Freeman CO, Franklin KL,
Cole D, Brook I, Farthing P, Rimmer S, Haycock JW, Ryan AJ,
MacNeil S. Development of biodegradable electrospun scaffolds
for dermal replacement. Biomaterials 2008;29:30913104.
16. de Valence S, Tille J-C, Mugnai D, Mrowczynski W, Gurny R,
ller M, Walpoth BH. Long term performance of polycaprolacMo
tone vascular grafts in a rat abdominal aorta replacement model.
Biomaterials Elsevier Ltd; 2012;33:3847.
17. Kolambkar YM, Peister A, Ekaputra AK, Hutmacher DW, Guldberg
RE. Colonization and osteogenic differentiation of different stem
cell sources on electrospun nanofiber meshes. Tissue Eng Part A
2010;16:32193330.
18. Shafiee A, Soleimani M, Chamheidari GA, Seyedjafari E, Dodel M,
Atashi A, Gheisari Y. Electrospun nanofiber-based regeneration of
cartilage enhanced by mesenchymal stem cells. J Biomed Mater
Res A 2011;99:467478.
19. Fujihara K, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Guided bone regeneration
membrane made of polycaprolactone/calcium carbonate composite nano-fibers. Biomaterials 2005;26:41394147.
20. Zhang Y, Reddy J, El-turki A, Ramakrishna S, Su B, Teck C. Electrospun biomimetic nanocomposite nanofibers of hydroxyapatite/
chitosan for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008;29:4314
4322.
21. Wutticharoenmongkol P, Sanchavanakit N, Pavasant P, Supaphol
P. Preparation and characterization of novel bone scaffolds based
on electrospun polycaprolactone fibers filled with nanoparticles.
Macromol Biosci 2006;6:7077.
22. Erisken C, Kalyon DM, Wang H. Functionally graded electrospun
polycaprolactone and beta-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites
for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 2008;29:4065
4073.
23. Obata A, Hotta T, Wakita T, Ota Y, Kasuga T. Electrospun microfiber meshes of silicon-doped vaterite/poly(lactic acid) hybrid for
guided bone regeneration. Acta Biomater. Acta Materialia Inc.;
2010;6:12481257.
24. Dror Y, Salalha W, Khalfin RL, Cohen Y, Yarin AL, Zussman E.
Carbon nanotubes embedded in oriented polymer nanofibers by
electrospinning. Langmuir 2003;19:70127020.
ro
^ me C, Detrembleur C, Mouithys-Mickalad A,
25. Stoilova O, Je
ro
^ me R. C60-containing nanostructured
Manolova N, Rashkov I, Je
polymeric materials with potential biomedical applications. Polymer (Guildf) 2007;48:18351843.
26. Prikhozhdenko ES, Lengert EV, Parakhonskiy BV, Gorin DA,
Sukhorukov GB, Yashchenok AM. Biocompatible chitosan nanofibers functionalized with silver nanoparticles for SERS based
detection. Acta Phys Pol A 2016;129:247249. Available from:
http://przyrbwn.icm.edu.pl/APP/PDF/129/a129z2p24.pdf
27. Mickova A, Buzgo M, Benada O, Rampichova M, Fisar Z, Filova E,
Tesarova M, Lukas D, Amler E. Core/shell nanofibers with embedded liposomes as a drug delivery system. Biomacromolecules
2012;13:952962.
28. Yang F, Wolke JGC, Jansen J a. Biomimetic calcium phosphate
coating on electrospun poly(E-caprolactone) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Chem Eng J 2008;137:154161.
29. Araujo J V, Martins a, Leonor IB, Pinho ED, Reis RL, Neves NM.
Surface controlled biomimetic coating of polycaprolactone nanofiber meshes to be used as bone extracellular matrix analogues.
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 2008;19:12611278.
30. Liu L, He D, Wang GS, Yu SH. Bioinspired crystallization of
CaCO3 coatings on electrospun cellulose acetate fiber scaffolds
and corresponding CaCO3 microtube networks. Langmuir 2011;
27:71997206.
31. Hadisi Z, Nourmohammadi J, Mohammadi J. Composite of
porous starch-silk fibroin nanofiber-calcium phosphate for bone
regeneration. Ceram Int 2015;41:1074510754.
32. Choi MO, Kim YJ. Fabrication of gelatin/calcium phosphate composite nanofibrous membranes by biomimetic mineralization. Int
J Biol Macromol 2012;50:11881194.
10
SAVELYEVA ET AL.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.