1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Like

Share

search...

ArithmeticAptitudeDataInterpretation
LogicalReasoningVerbalReasoningNonVerbalReasoning
GeneralKnowledge
SudokuNumberpuzzlesMissingletterspuzzlesLogicalpuzzlesPlayingcardspuzzlesClockpuzzles
CProgrammingC++ProgrammingC#ProgrammingJavaProgramming
MicrobiologyBiochemistry
BiotechnologyBiochemical
Engineering
Electronicsand
CommunicationEngineering
CivilEngineeringMechanical
EngineeringChemical
EngineeringNetworking
DatabaseQuestions
ComputerScienceBasic
ElectronicsDigitalElectronics
ElectronicDevicesCircuit
SimulationElectrical
EnigneeringEngineering
MechanicsTechnical
Drawing
PlacementPapersGroupDisucssionHRInterviewTechnicalInterviewBodyLanguage
AptitudeTestVerbalAbilityTestVerbalReasoningTestLogicalReasoningTestCProgrammingTestJavaProgrammingTestDataInterpretationTest
GeneralKnowledgeTest
DataStructuresOperatingSystemsNetworkingDATABASEDatabaseBasicsSQLServerBasicsSQLServerAdvancedSQLServer2008JAVACore
JavaJavaBasicsAdvancedJavaUNIXUnixFileManagementUnixMemoryManagementUnixProcessManagemntCInterviewQuestionsTheC
LanguageBasics.NETInterviewQuestions.NETFrameworkADO.NETASP.NETSoftwareTesting
Home
Aptitude
LogicalReasoning
VerbalAbility
GK
Puzzles
Engineering
Interview
OnlineTest

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)
choice?
@:Home>GroupDiscussion>PoliticsDiscussionRoom

Pointstorememberbeforeyouparticipateinthisdiscussion:
Assume,youoneofthememberofarealgroupdiscussion.
Taketheinitiativetoparticipateandcontributeyourthoughts.
Expressyourpositiveattitudetowardsprovidingthesolution.

PratikKumarMahantasaid:(Wed,Jan21,201510:49:35AM)

ThewayofmyopinionisthataboutNOTAisnotright.Becauseofnoonecanidentifywhichoneistheright
candidatetoformagovernment.IfmajorityofthepeoplevoteforNOTAthenwhatwillhappen?SoNOTAwould
notbesuitable.
Ratethis:+3

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

1/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Dipksaid:(Wed,Jan21,201508:59:45AM)

Hellofriends,
AsweknowtheNOTAistheoptionforchoosingthenoneofthelistofcandidates.ButweseetodaythatNOTAis
notplayingtheirpartinpoliticalchanges.Ifwedislikeallcandidatesinthelist,thenwechooseNOTAoptionbutit
doesnotmakeanydifference.BecausethecriteriaofNOTAisdifficulttoachieve.SoIthinkweshouldnotwaste
ourourvotebychoosingNOTAoption.Wecanselectthebettercandidateinthelistforchoosingourleader.Itwill
bemorereliableoption.
Ratethis:+3

Anonymoussaid:(Wed,Jan21,201512:39:45AM)

NOTAisimportantbecause,
Supposeafamilyof4membersareeligibleforvoting,nowmostly2membersoffamilyareinterestedinpolitics
andothers,theyif:
1.InamiddleclassfamilytheyeithercastevotebytappingNOTAbuttonorbyaskingtheirotherfamilypersons
whomtocastefor.
2.Inapoorfamilytheysurelycastevotesandhaveano.ofwishesattachedfromtheupcominggovernmentand
theycollectivelycasteforthesamepartywhichwillbebetterfortheirlifestyle.
So,thepointistochooseacorrectleaderandnottochooseanywrongleaderisallinthehandsofNOTAasfor
choosingacorrectcandidateNOTAiscastedinlargenos.ForReelectionsandsavesthepeoplefromchoosing
wrongleaders.
Ratethis:+1

Amitsaid:(Wed,Jan21,201512:09:43AM)

BringingNOTAgovernmenthasdoneagoodthing.FewadvantagesofbringingNOTA:
1.Thosewhositathomeenjoyingvotingdayasaholidaybecausetheydonotwanttogivetheirvotetothe
candidateswhoarecontestingelection,cancomeandvotebypressingNOTA.
2.Wehaveseenmanycaseswherepeoplearecastingvotesofothers.
Ratethis:+2

KaviPriyasaid:(Tue,Jan20,201503:16:05PM)

IthinkNOTAisarightoptionforthevoterswhohavenofaithinanyofthecandidates.Furtherthisoption
preservesour"Righttovote"andpreventstheabuseofourvotebysocialDevils.
Ratethis:+14

Kumareshsaid:(Tue,Jan20,201501:48:01PM)

HithisisKumaresh.
NOTAisthesymbolofunsatisfactionofthepeopleamongthecandidatesofdifferentparties.Soforknowingthe
satisfactionofthepeopleamongthecandidatesweshouldhavetheNOTA.
Ratethis:+3

Deepikasaid:(Tue,Jan20,201510:37:05AM)

Hellofriends,
AccordingtomeNOTAvoteshouldbeencouraged.Becausewehaverighttoselectacorrectleaderforoursociety.
Iftherearenogoodleadersitisacorrectoption.Ourleadersmaychangeandmayrectifytheirfaults.Notonly
thechangeinleadersbutalsowecanseeIndiaasadevelopedcountry.
Ratethis:+4

Shalusaid:(Tue,Jan20,201509:53:54AM)

Well.IthinkNOTAisagoodoption.Indiaisademocraticcountryandeverypersonhasfreedomofexpression.
NOTAisreallyusefulforthosepeoplewhoareawareandconsciousoftheirrightsbutfeelsnoneofthecandidate
asdeserving.

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

2/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Thanks.
Ratethis:+4

Pankajsaid:(Tue,Jan20,201501:16:37AM)

IthinkNOTAshouldbeaoptionforvotersasitisawasteoftimeandvoteaswell.IfpeoplecasteaNOTAvoteor
donotcasteavote,bothissame.Thisoptionisnotbeabletobringchangeinvoting.
Ratethis:+7

Evasaid:(Mon,Jan19,201511:44:51PM)

Haifriends,
ThechoiceofNOTAisapartofbecomingmoredemocraticorgivingthevotermorerightsintheprocessofelecting
arepresentative.Thevoterswhoarenotsatisfiedwiththecandidates,havethetendencytonotusehis/her
"righttovote".
Sothissystemhavehelpedsuchvoterstoavoidthissituationincastingtheirvotes.Butweknowthatsuchvotes
arenotgoingtomakeanychangesinabigdemocraticcountrylikeIndiawithsomanywidevarietiesofparties.
Butitisalsothematterofselfsatisfactionandone'srights.
ThankYou.
Ratethis:+1

Lohitasaid:(Mon,Jan19,201511:29:14PM)

Asmanyofustold,evenIgowiththesamethingNOTAisnotatallrequiredinvoting.Ifinsuchcaseitis
consideredthenwhatistheuseofvotingaseveryoneknowthepartiespriorwhatarethepartiesandwhomto
vote.Itsbetternottovoteifpeopledon'twanttochooseamongtheparties.
Ratethis:+2

AkshataIyengarsaid:(Mon,Jan19,201511:18:39AM)

Hellopeople,
ThisismyperspectiveregardingNOTA.
Well.Ithinkit'snotagoodoptionandsimplyawasteofavote.Thefutureofourcountryisourhands.Sowhy
not?Voteacorrectperson.Therearemanypeoplewhostandintheelection.Youjusthavetoselectonebased
ontheirpreviousperformanceswecanvoteoneofthem.Wecan'tjustconcludethatallthecandidatesare
corrupt.Somearegoodtoo.Selectacorrectpersonsowhynotgrabthisopportunityandvoteforthewise.
InsteadofkeepingNOTAasanoption.
Ratethis:+20

SaurabhGuptasaid:(Mon,Jan19,201512:29:00AM)

Helloeveryone,
SinceIndiaisademocraticcountry,everypersonhasarighttoselectthepartyoraparticularleaderofhis/her
ownchoice.Therewouldbeinstanceswhereaparticularpersonwouldn'tliketogowiththeavailablechoices.
ThereforeNOTAoptionbecomesamustkeepinginmindsabouttherightsofthepeople.
Ratethis:+8

Shruthysaid:(Sat,Jan17,201509:16:36PM)

No.Itwillbegoodaswastingavote.Ifwecanmakesomegooddecisiononvotingitwillmakeourcountrybetter.
AndIdonotagreewiththistopic.Itisbetteryoudon'tvoteifyouhaveNOTA.

Ratethis:+1

Prasannasaid:(Sat,Jan17,201504:31:55PM)

HitoEveryone,
IagreethatvotersshouldbegivenNOTAchoicebecauseitwilldecreasetheprobabilityofaninhumanepolitician
togetthenationintohishands.Ifsuchanoptionisnotprovided,theneachandeveryvoterwilldefinitelyvotefor
anyoneofthem,whichmakesthemgetmorepowerful,AlsonowadaysPoliticshavebecomeamodernbusiness,
butit'saonewordonwhichourentirenationrespects.Sobyprovidingsuchachoicetopeoplewillactlikea
weaponforthem,i.e.It'slikeaswordforawarriorduringtheend!

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

3/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Solet'shopethechoicewillbeprovidedforourbetterfuture.
Ratethis:+17

VivekSinghsaid:(Sat,Jan17,201512:34:55PM)

HiFriends,
AccordingtomeifweintroduceNOTAprovisionthentheremustbeacriteriathatifacontestantgetvoteswhichis
atleastthatmuchpercentoftotalvotersregistered,canonlybedeclaredasawinnerinaelection.Becauseifwe
introduceNOTAwithoutanyconditionthenanycontestantgettingmerely1520%voteswillbedeclaredaswinner
becauserestofthevotershadfoundnoneofthecontestantdeservingandthusdidnotcastedtheirvote.And
onlythepeoplewhoareflatterersofthepoliticianswillcasttheirvoteandthatcontestantwillwintheelection
easily.
Ratethis:+7

Himanisaid:(Fri,Jan16,201511:54:56PM)

Hellofriends,
IthinkNOTAisabetteroption.Wehaverighttoselectadeservingcandidate.Ifwethinkthatthecandidate
doesn'tdeservetowin,weshouldnotvotehimorher.BeforeNOTAoptionwehavegiventhevotesto
undeservingcandidatesbecausewedidn'twanttowasteourvotesbutnowwecanvoteaccordingourchoice.
Wecanuseourrighttovotewithoutselectinganycandidate.Itwillaffectthecandidateswhowillnotgetgood
votes.Theywillsurelytrytoimprovethemselves.
Ratethis:+4

AkankshaTiwarysaid:(Fri,Jan16,201511:08:59PM)

IthinkNOTAisgoodforourvotingsystem.Thisgivestotaltransparencyinvotingsystem.Weallknowhow
preciousisourvote,soitisgoodtobehavingNOTA,sothatpoliticiansshouldimprovetheirworkinginaparticular
place.BecauseallwewantistobeINDIAinthelistofdevelopedcountriessowefranklyusethebuttonNOTA.
Ratethis:+2

YogeshSharmasaid:(Fri,Jan16,201509:30:10PM)

Hifriends.
AccordingtomypointofviewthevotersshouldnotusetheNOTAbecauseitislikenottocastthevote.Supposeif
twocorruptpersonarefightingtheelectionthenwedon'twanttoanyoneorgiveittoNOTAthenonewillsurely
winbutifwewillgiveittolesscorruptthanourvotewilltrytogetlesscorruptpersonwon.Apartofthistheuse
ofNOTAwillcreatesomeideathatthepeopledon'tlikethecandidates,sotheywilltrysotaketheclean
candidatesinelectionsnexttime.

Ratethis:+3

Prudhvisaid:(Fri,Jan16,201508:07:43PM)

Hifriends.ThisisPrudhvi.
AccordingtomeNOTAshouldbetherewhybecausemostofthepeoplearebecomingpoliticiansfortheirselfuses
andmakingIndiacorrupted.SothemeaningoftheNOTAshouldbechangedforthatinsuchawaythat.
Noneofthepersonareeligibletobealeaderandwewantareelectionwithnewpersons.
Ratethis:+3

Shwetasaid:(Fri,Jan16,201505:46:09PM)

IthinkthatNOTAisagoodoptionfoundbythegovernmentwhichmeansnoneoftheaboveoptions.Ipersonally
thinkthatifthepeoplethinkthatnopartyidworthdevelopmentthenunnecessarilyvotingforthatpartyisnot
fair.Itwilljustincreasethevotesandthewelfareanddevelopmentpartwouldbeleftaside.
Ratethis:+0

Laxitasaid:(Fri,Jan16,201503:23:53PM)

IthinkNOTAisareallygoodoptionforpublic.Becausepoliticiansasktopublicforvoteandthentheyaskwedone
somefavourorwewillprovidesomefacilitiesandsatisfiesallyourneedsafterwewin.Butafterelectionifthey
wintheyforgotaboutallthatpublicfacilitiesandpublicneeds.FrommysideNOTAisbestoption.
Ratethis:+0

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

4/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

PavanKumarsaid:(Fri,Jan16,201503:19:15PM)

Hifriends!
IthinkNOTAisdefinitelyusefulandeffectiveinourcountry.Inmyopinionithastwoadvantages:
Itclearlyshowsthedissatisfactionofcontestantsamongvoterswhichmayforcethepartiestoselectbetter
candidatesifonceonegetsamajorityduetoNOTA.
Itcanalsoincreasevotingrateconsiderablyasmanypeoplewhoarefedupwiththeirleaderscomeoutand
showtheirdissatisfaction.ButifthereisnoNOTAoption,theywouldsimplysitintheirhomes.
Butyes,itdoeshaveitsownsetofdisadvantages.
ConsideracasewhereweneedtoconsiderreelectionbecauseofNOTA,thatwouldleechawayourfinancial
resources.
Whatisthepoliticalpartiesallowsthesamecontestanttoparticipateinreelection?Then,wepeoplewillgetfed
upandwouldvoteforthoseundeservingcandidates.ThisclearlyiswasteofNOTAoption.Andevenpeoplewill
losefaithinthissystem.
Sowhatshallwedotoimprovethissystem?
Inmyview,itwouldbebetterifwewon'tallowthesamecontestantstoparticipateinreelectionwhichhas
occurredduetoNOTA.Here,thecontestantsarenotallowedtoparticipateinjustthethat"reelection".
Andfinallywecantightenlawssoastopreventcheatsfromcontestinginelection.Thiswouldreduceusageof
NOTAoptionwhichinturnreducesfinancialburden.
Sofriends,Letshopethatonedaywedon'teventhinkaboutusingNOTAoption.
Thankyou.

Ratethis:+8

Sivaramsaid:(Fri,Jan16,201511:31:34AM)

Hifriends,
Accordingtomyopinion,NOTAisnotagoodideabecausetheremaybeachanceofselectingawrongcandidate.
IftheNOTAisintroduced,thepercentageofvoterswillbereduced.Thepeoplewhosupportthewrongcandidate
willbemoreandtheirwinningpercentagewillbemore.ThecurrentEVS(ElectronicVotingSystem)isbetter.
Ratethis:+13

14

Arushsaid:(Fri,Jan16,201512:09:30AM)

Hellofriends.
Ithinkthatasacitizenofademocraticcountryitisourrightgiveavoteifwedon'tlikeanycandidatestandingas
ourrepresentativeratherthangivingourprestigiousvotetoarandomincapableperson.Asweallknowthatthe
increaseinthepercentofvoteinfavorofNOTAcanhelpinreelectionandthiscanhelpustogetbettercandidate.
Ratethis:+17

Vikassaid:(Thu,Jan15,201510:13:40PM)

Hello!thisisVikas.
AccordingtomeNOTAisnotusefulbecausetogivethevoteforNOTAisequaltonottocastthevote.Apartfrom
thismostofthepersonalwayscastthevotetoexistpartieswhoareparticipatedinelection.Itellonethingabout
myself,IcastesmyfirstvoteinLokshabaelectionwhichwererecentlyheld,andIvotedtotheNOTA,butafter
castingmyvoteIunderstoodthatperhapsthiswasmymistake.
Ratethis:+1

Vaibhavjsaid:(Thu,Jan15,201507:58:40PM)

Hifriends,
We'llIthinkNOTAoptioninEVMshouldbethere.BecausethecountofNOTAwillgiveknowledgeelection
commissioninturngovernmentthattheremustbesomethingwrongaboutthatmuchcandidatesinparticular
area.
SoelectioncommissionmusttakethiscountseriouslyandtrytominimizethisNOTAfactorbychangingthesystem
ofchoosingcandidateinelections.Transparencymustbetherebetweensocietyandchoosingit'scandidate.

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

5/18

1/21/2015
Ratethis:+8

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Ashwatisaid:(Thu,Jan15,201507:23:32PM)

Everycoinhastwosides.SohavingaNOTAoptioninvotingalsohasbothprosandcons.Accordingtomehaving
aNOTAoptionalsohassomeadvantages.Thismeansthatifavoterdoesfeelthatthecandidatesarenotupto
thepositionandallofthemarenotabletofulfilltheirrequirementsthentheycanusetheNOTAbutton.
Itseemsnothingwronganvotingmeansweshouldonlychoosethosecandidateswhocanfulfilltherequirements
ofacommonmanandifwefeelthatnoonefromtheabovearenotsuitablefortheresponsibilitythenweshould
obviouslychoosetheNOTAbutton.
Ratethis:+19

AjeetSinghsaid:(Thu,Jan15,201511:26:22AM)

Hifriends.
IhavedifferentopinionaboutNOTAisnotgoodoptioninvoting.Fordemocracyofcountrycandidateshouldright
utilitiesvotechooserightcandidateratherthanlossyourvote.IfcandidatechoseoptionNOTAnoonepartyin
majorityduetojointgovernmentismade.SonoonecandoworkproperlyA'stheywant.
Ratethis:+2

Akshatsaid:(Thu,Jan15,201501:44:47AM)

IthinkNOTAisagreatpowergiventoIndianvoters.Butitwillbemoreeffectiveandusefulifthecandidate
rejectedbyvoterswillbotbeallowtoparticipateinelectionnexttime.Itwillpressurizepoliticalpartytochoose
candidateswhichhavenocriminalbackgroundandareeducated.
Ratethis:+16

Parikshitsaid:(Wed,Jan14,201507:25:02PM)

IthinkNOTAisthebestdecisiontakenbytheelectioncommissionbecauseitwouldattracttheyouthinour
countryncouldpreventtheyouthfromnotcastingvote,alsoitwouldbuildmorepressureonthepoliticiansto
performorperish.
Ratethis:+3

RanjitShindesaid:(Wed,Jan14,201501:30:05PM)

Hi!
NOTAoptionshouldnotbepresentinEVM.Insteadofthisifanyvoterisnotvotingthenhis/hervoteconsiderasa
NOTA.Usingthiswayvotingpercentageineveryelectionis100%.
Presentvotingsystem:
Consideronestatehaving1lakhsvotersifvotingpercentageis45%fromthat45%(45000voters).60%voter
votetoXcandidatemeansfrom1lakhsonly27kvotersvotetoxcandidate.
Fromthisway:
Votingpercentageis100%&55%votersarenotselectinganyoneoftheaboveoption.Fromthiswaywegetone
leaderwhichischosenbyatleast50%(50000)voters.

Ratethis:+3

Chogcsaid:(Wed,Jan14,201512:30:23AM)

HelloEveryone,
WeallknowthatIndiaisademocraticcountryinwhichonehasrighttoelecthisrepresentativeonhischoice.But
letustakeastatisticalanalogy.X,Y,Zarethreecompaniesintheraceofelections.WesayXwinsiftheresults
aredeclaredasX50%,Y30%Z20%voteswon.Butlookcarefullyhere50%votersarenotreadytoacceptthe
ruleofXparty.So,DefinitelyNOTAwillhelpustoselecttheexactpersonorpartythatwelikethemosttorule.
Elsenoneoftheabove.
Ratethis:+2

Vaibhavsaid:(Tue,Jan13,201510:44:41PM)

No,Idon'tthinkNOTAoptionhavetobetheir,becauseasitistheirbutwhatstheuseofitasweseeincurrent

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

6/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

electionsinmanyofconstituenciesNOTAwasat2ndpositionandwinningcandidateonlygot25%30%ofvote
sharethatmeans70%ofvotersdon'twantwinningcandidateastheirrepresentativeinassembly.Insteadof
thatifNOTAisnottheirpeoplecanchooseoratleastvoteaccordingtotheirchoiceamongthecandidate's&may
betheresultissomewhatdifferent.
Ratethis:+3

SourabhMishrasaid:(Tue,Jan13,201507:32:46PM)

LettherearecandidateswithcriminalchargesortheyareinvolvedinillegalactivitiesinaparticularCity.Then
votershaveonlytwooptionseithertheyvoteforcriminalorskipvoting.
Inboththecasesthatcandidateisgoingtowin.So,atleastweknowfromNOTAthatparticularcityhave
candidateswhompeopledon'tliketobetheirleader.
Ithinkit'sbettertohavereelectionthanhavingacandidatewhowillspendabigamountofmoneyinillegalwork.
Ratethis:+17

Vijaysaid:(Tue,Jan13,201506:17:20PM)

IthinkwithnoproperimportancetoNOTAoptionitisjustlikeasurveytoknowhowmanypeoplearenotsatisfied
withthecandidates.Ofcourseitcoulddrawvoterstotheboothbutonlytowastetheirtimestandinginthecue.
IfimportanceisgiventoNOTAitcouldleadtorepollinginsomeareasandthiswillforcepoliticalpartiestoselect
deservedcandidates.Costofelectionswillincreasebutforagoodpurpose.
Thankyou.

Ratethis:+7

VivekChouhansaid:(Tue,Jan13,201510:33:43AM)

YesNOTAwillbebestoptionitwillpressuretopartiesthattheyhavetoworkfairlyaccordingtotheirpromises
beforeelection.Itisbestoptiontovoterswhowantsrightcandidatefortheelection.
Ratethis:+13

Adityasaid:(Tue,Jan13,201512:14:40AM)

Inmyopinion,NOTAshouldbeanoption.Therightofspeechandexpressionisafundamentalrightanditgives
votersawayofexpressingtheiropinionthattheydon'tlikeanycandidate.NOTAalsoputspressureonpolitical
partiestoprojectcleancandidates.
Althoughitisequivalenttonotgoingtovote,votersgettoexpresstheirviewsbychoosingNOTAwhichisnotthe
caseiftheydon'tgotovote.
Ratethis:+6

Arjunsaid:(Mon,Jan12,201512:10:00PM)

Itishardtodenythefactthatthisintroductionwillattractnewvotersasthepeoplewhothinkthattheirvote
shouldnotbewastedandshouldalsomakeadifferencewillconsiderthisasawinwinsituation.
Thismovewillalsogiveallthepoliticalpartiesariseintheirconsciousnessforbeingcloselyexaminedforgivinga
chancetoanotsohonestcandidate.
ButIdon'treallythinkthatthepoliticalpartiesdoreallycareaboutthepercentageofNOTA,becausethey
ultimatelyknowthatnoteverybodyisgoingtosupportthepointofgoingtothebooth,standinginalineandin
theendnotvotingforanybody.SoatsomepointIfeelthatthischoiceofnotvotingforanybodyisgoodandbad
aswell.
WhatIfeelasapropersolutionstothisisthatthereshouldbeanoptionofusingNOTAagainstindividual
candidates,ifthatparticularcandidategetsanampleamountofnegativevotesthenheshouldberemovedand
anothercandidateshouldbegivenachanceinhisplaceisheisacceptablebythepeopleviasmsvotingor
something.
Ratethis:+21

Anonymussaid:(Mon,Jan12,201511:27:58AM)

Hifriends.
IthinkNOTAcanbeusefulifitisexercisedproperlybythegov.Ireadsomewherethattheresultshavedeclared
onlyonthebasisofpositivevotes.ThereisnoeffectoftheNOTAVOTESonitthenwhatistheuseofNOTA.

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

7/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

AccordingtometheseNOTAvotesshouldbedeductedfromthetotalvotesandthentheresultshouldbedeclared
fromtheremainingvotes.
Ratethis:+11

RahulRajputsaid:(Mon,Jan12,201512:31:56AM)

NOTAisnotanoptionasfarasdevelopmentisyourgoal,becausesomeortheotherpersonisgoingtostandfor
thepositionandifoneisnothappywiththepreviouscandidate,thepersonshouldsurelygiveachancetosome
othercandidate.
ThinkingofbenefitofholidayorpressingtheNOTAfordilutingyourangeronthepreviouscandidateisnotgoing
tohelpdevelopmenteither.Choosingacandidatewillensureanattempt,andcausesnoharm.(studythenew
candidate,andopthim/herout).
"NOTADOESN'THELP".
Ratethis:+5

Samsaid:(Sun,Jan11,201509:53:35PM)

IthinkNOTAoptionshouldnotbeconsidered,thisisirrelevantbecauseifpeoplethinktherearenoonewhocan
theyvotefororwhotheythinkisdeserving,thenitisrealshameforthecandidatesandalsotheelecting
procedure.AselectioncommitteeisspendingsomuchmoneyfortheelectionNOTAisjustawasteofeconomyand
resources.
Ratethis:+7

Vikashsaid:(Sat,Jan10,201504:09:26PM)

Electionisoneofmostimportantthingstoruleacountrybyitspeople.Peoplegivevotetotheirleaderfordrive
theircountryinIndiaourconstitutiongiverighttopeopletoformmanypartyastheyliketherearemanypartyin
India.
Ourcountryhavedifferentlanguagecultureitproblemvaryplacetoplacethatwhyourconstitutionmakergive
righttoformdifferentpartyinIndiatherearemanydifferentregionalparty.
Althoughabovefacilityourcountryisnotgrowingwellbecauseofcorruptpoliticiantheyarelootingpublicmoney
forpersonause.InmanyruralareacriminalcandidatearecontestingelectiontherenumberarehugeinIndian
politicstherearemanyplaceinourconstituencywhere.
Peopledoesnotliketheircandidatebuttheyhavetovoteoneofthemwithouttheirintention.Becausethyhave
nooptionthisrightwillgiveinelectionandpeoplehaverighttorejecttheircandidatewillbringsomechangein
theeraofIndianhistory.
Ratethis:+7

Virusaid:(Sat,Jan10,201504:02:13PM)

NOTAisgoodoptionprovidedbygovernment.Everyonehasitsrightstovoteifsomeonefeelsthatthecandidate
itnotgoodorcapableofbecomealeaderthenhe/sheshouldhavetochooseNOTAoption.Withthe%ofNOTA
thepoliticalpartiescanmakeimprovementinthenexttime.
Ratethis:+4

PriyankaVermasaid:(Sat,Jan10,201503:06:39PM)

AccordingtomethereshouldnotbegivenanyNOTAoptiononEVMbecauseifmajorityofvotegiventoitthenit
willresultinlossofmoneyandtimeandalsotherewillbeachanceofpoliticalandeconomicalimbalanceinthe
country.
Asweallknowsthatchildrenwithoutguardianiscalledorphan,samethingwouldhappenthatcountrywithout
governmentisalsobecameorphanifmajorityofvotegoestoNOTAandalsoitwillgiverisetochaosand
disturbanceinthecountry.

Ratethis:+32

12

AnannyaBosesaid:(Sat,Jan10,201502:54:18PM)

AccordingtomeNOTAisjustawaytoexpressnoconfidenceinanyofthechoicesofgovernmentwhoclaimtobe
futureefficientrunnersofthegovernment.Thisinawayisenhancingtheexpressionofviewsofthepeopleof
Indiawhoarebecomingmoreinclinedtowardsjudicioususeoftheirrightsandwhoaremakingitapointtokeep
acheckontheprocessofrunningtheircountry.
However,anotheraspectofthisisthatatthisstageofimmenseinternationalcompetitionwearenotreallyina

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

8/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

positiontoaffordmereappreciationonexpressionofviewsbuttoactthemoutinstead.Thegovernmentneedsto
takeafewlargeandquickjumpstoreachthelatter,tobuildadevelopedandsuccessfulnation.
Ratethis:+4

Smithsaid:(Sat,Jan10,201512:50:08PM)

VotersList
ElectionVoters
VotersChoice

NOTAisgoodoptiongivenbygovernment,iftherearenogoodcandidateinelectionwhywegivevotetoanyone.
IfthepercentageofNOTAishighthenthenreelectionwillbeheldandthentheremightbegoodcandidateto
vote.
Ratethis:+12

PratikTiwarisaid:(Sat,Jan10,201511:59:55AM)

Friends,Canwehavelookonthis,NOTAoptionsomewhereislosinganimportantvote.WemayusethisNOTA
optionasaNEGATIVEVOTING.Ifthenominatedpersonsisnotyourchoices,thanyoucangivethemNEGATIVE
VOTE.
Theresultshouldbeannouncedonthebasisofoutcomesafterdeductingnegativevotesfrompositivevotes.
Throughthiswearegivingvaluetothosehowaresomewhereunderestimated.
Thankyou.
Ratethis:+13

Shreeshail.Nsaid:(Fri,Jan9,201509:38:54PM)

HiFriends.
AccordingtomeNOTAisabeststeptakenbytheElectioncommissionwiththisNOTAyoungergenerationcanbe
attracted(BecauseeverytimeYoungsterskeepsonsayingthatwhatistheuseofvotingtounwantedperson
insteadofthatmissthevotingwhichisabsolutely"WRONG"decision).
ECcandoevenbetterbyAMENDINGlawssuchasrejectingallcandidateinwhichthereisNOTAvoteshareabove
30%(IknowitisnotEconomicallyRight)butbydoingthiswecanelectGoodcandidateinsteadofselecting
DummyorWastecandidate.
AlongwiththatTheGovhasbringsomechangesinlawssuchastherehastobesomeeducation/Experience
Qualificationforthecandidate.
Forex:
1.ForbecomingDefenseMinisterHe/sheshouldbeservedinarmyforatleast5years.
2.EducationMinistershouldhavePh.Ddegree.
ThenonlytheycanknowindeptknowledgeoftheField.

Ratethis:+16

DeepakKushwahsaid:(Fri,Jan9,201501:37:30PM)

HiGuys.
IthinkNOTAisnothingitsonlywasteoftimeandmoneyandmostcostlyviewofthinkingwhichisnotgivethe
votetothecandidate.BecauseinIndiaeverypersoniseligiblefortohavingaparticipantifhehavenocriminal
recordandhavingarightage.
Everycandidatewantstobewinandanditsalwaysbedone.Thereisapersonwhogetwinsohehavetothere
bythepowerofvoterssoIthinkifthosepersonwhoselectNOTAwhattheydidtheywasteoftheirpowersomy
pointofviewisthatNOTAisnotacorrectchoicebecauseitsdecreasethevotingpercentageforawining
candidateanditseffectnegativeonacandidate.
Ratethis:+8

CommonVotersaid:(Fri,Jan9,201512:37:19AM)

Yeah.NOTAisusefulforbringingusagoodleaderanyway.REELECTIONwillnotmattershere.Whatweultimately
wantistohaveagoodleader.Whatistheuseofthegettingbadoneasleaderfor5yearsjustfortheavoidingof
thereelectionprocess(oneconomybasis)?
Wemayalsohavesomeprobableconditions:
1.WhereNOTAgetsithighestmarkofpercentage.ThetotalCANDIDATESwhoparticipatedthattimeshouldnot
beparticipatewithin23yearperiod.Becausenewonedeservesopportunity.

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

9/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

2.Negativevotingfortheparticipantprobablycan'tbethebestone.Becausetheremaybesomepersonwhodo
itfortheirownsakeandtodiminishothers.Eventheoppositewilldothiswithoutanyhesitation.
Ratethis:+8

AdityaMittalsaid:(Fri,Jan9,201512:34:06AM)

Helloeveryone.
AccordingtomeNOTAisoneofthebestoptionforthosecandidatewhomerelygivevoteforfun.Itakeexampleof
mine.Inpreviouselectionofmystate,Iwascastingmyvoteforthefirsttime.Imerelyknowanycandidateinthe
votinglistandintheinfluenceofothersIgivevoteforcertainparty.Itwasjustawastageofmyvote.
Allpeopleshouldbegiventheirrightstovoteforanyoneandspecificallyifhe/shedoesnothaveanyinterestin
politics.ThenInthatcaseNOTAwillbeaverygreatoption.
Ratethis:+2

Shivamsaid:(Thu,Jan8,201510:11:08PM)

NOTAisbecomeveryfamousnowadays.Iwanttosupportthistermbecausewecan'tbackoutfromourvoting
duties.Itsourrighttocontributeinourcountry'sfuturebecauseweliveindemocraticcountry.Wehaverightto
rejectanycandidateanditsnotaboutindividualitsaboutmandate.SoIaminfavourofNOTA,itsprettygoodidea
torejectwrongpeople.
Shivam.
Ratethis:+7

SurajBansalsaid:(Thu,Jan8,201506:25:28PM)

Hello,
NOTAisaveryimportantchoiceforavoterwhilecastinghis/hervotebecauseitpreventsavotefromgoingtothe
wrongcandidate.
Everycitizeninourcountryhasrighttochooseapoliticalleaderofhisownchoice.Avotercastshisvotetothat
persononlywhomhebelieves,thatthispoliticalleaderisgoodforourarea/city.Andwillputhiseffortsin
development&growthofthatparticularregion.Soifyouarenotfoundanyoneappropriatetobecomeleader,you
cangoforNOTAandcanmakeitcleartoGovernmentthatnoneofthepersoninthisareaisreliable.
Ratethis:+6

Alaguduraisaid:(Thu,Jan8,201503:40:33PM)

WhyNOTAhasbeenintroduced?becauseanyonewillnotleadtoournationingoodway.Soelectioncommission
introducetheNOTA.InmypointofviewwhoonewillleadtogoodwayinournationNOTAoptionisnotrequire.
Ratethis:+6

MohamedKhalifsaid:(Thu,Jan8,201503:06:53PM)

HiALLfriends.
InmypointofviewthatNOTAisgoodforelection,becauseitgiveschancetopeoplewhoareagainstall
candidatestobeelected.
Ratethis:+5

Snehasaid:(Thu,Jan8,201502:55:52PM)

Hifriends.ElectioncommissionhasclearlysaidthatNOTAcannotaffectthefinalresults,ultimatelythecandidate
whohastowinwilldefinitelywin.Butaspersupremecourtitsthewayofexpressingournegativevotewhichwill
forcethepoliticalpartiestoprojectcleancandidatesandtheywouldbemorealertnexttimeandwouldprojecta
goodcandidate.
SoinmyopinionNOTAisgoodformofourfundamentalrightofrejectingacandidatewhichneedscertain
improvementsinitlikeifits%exceedsbeyondcertainlimit,reelectionshouldbeconducted.
Ratethis:+38

Suryasaid:(Thu,Jan8,201502:14:35PM)

Itisaknownfactthateveryvotecastintheelectionsisinfluencedbybribery,religionorcastdiscrimination.With
suchfactorsinfluencingavoter,implementationofNOTAwillhardlyhaveanyimpactontheelectionoutcome.

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

10/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

IfNOTAisthevoiceofanation,itshouldbeheardloudandclear.Onlywhenmutingofthisvoicebythenameof
monetaryandreligiousbeliefsisshunned,willtherebeameaningandpurposeofthetermNOTAintheelection
procedure.
Ratethis:+6

VinayakMalisaid:(Thu,Jan8,201512:04:36PM)

Hifriends,
Inmyopinion,NOTAisnotgoodforoureconomy,insteadofNOTAgovernmentcanapplystrictrulesforthe
candidate.Mostofthepeoplethinksthat,ifeveryoneiscorruptedthenwhyIgofortheclickingthebuttonof
NOTAandwhyIwastemytime.
Ratethis:+16

Shreyas.K.Ssaid:(Thu,Jan8,201507:33:45AM)

Hifriends,
SomorenumberofouraresupportingNOTAandsomeofmyfriendsareagainstit.
ButaccordingtomeNOTAisjustwasteofavote,whichisconsideredasourPower.UntilunlessNOTAshouldbe
reformedwithcertainlaws.Like,
1.IfNOTAgets25%ofwinningcandidatevotesthenthereelectionshouldbeconducted.
2.ThecompleteawarenessshouldbegiventothevillagepeopleaboutNOTA.
IfthesepointsaredonethenNOTAwillsurelyworks.
Thankyouguys.
Ratethis:+11

Priyasaid:(Thu,Jan8,201507:15:20AM)

NOTAisdefinitelyarequiredoption.WiththeincreasingnumbersinfavorofNOTA,itshowsthatIndiansare
clearlynotsatisfiedwiththepresentbunchofpoliticalleaders.Butthisisjustnotenough.
OnceaprovincewitnessesamajorityvoteforNOTA,theleadersforthatprovincemustbesuspended:thisalone
wouldgivevotersthepower.Insteadifthenextmajoritypartyissentintopower,itsharshinjusticedoneto
voters.
TheElectionCommissionmustensurethatNOTAisanoptionavailable.Alsobasedonthenumberofvotesfor
NOTA,necessarythingsmustbedone.
Ratethis:+7

DebayanGhoshsaid:(Thu,Jan8,201512:37:52AM)

IaminfavourofvotersgivenaNOTA.Iwillliketotakeanexampletoexpressmyviewpoint.
Supposetherearetwocandidatesandifsomeonefeelsthatnoneiseligibleforthepostthenwhomdoeshe
vote?WithoutNOTAheendsupvotingsomeonewhomightnotbedeserving.NOTAgiveshimtheopportunityto
reciprocatehisopinion.Maybeitwon'tcountintheendbutatleasthe/shedoesgetachancetoexpresshis/her
ownviews.
Ratethis:+10

NiteshRanasaid:(Wed,Jan7,201510:59:05PM)

NOTAisvitaltotheelectoralprocessasitenablestheelectoratetoexpressdissentwithallthecandidatesthat
havebeenfieldedbythepoliticalparties.Thismovecouldhavecomealotsooner.
Lookingatourpoliticallandscapetherearealotofcandidateswithcriminalrecordscomingthroughand
sometimesthesituationissograveInsomeconstituenciesthatallthecandidatesintherunningfortheelection
arepeoplewithcriminalhistory.
Thisoptionwillinnervatetheelectorateandprecludeabsurdscenarioofcriminalsmakinglawsinthelawmaking
institutions.
Ratethis:+3

KirtikaYadavsaid:(Wed,Jan7,201509:26:24PM)

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

11/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

IthinkNOTAisveryimportantasittellsouropinionclearly.Forthepeoplewhodonotwanttovoteforeither
parties,theycanselectthisoptionnowifoneisnotduetowhomvoteistobegiven,thenalsowehavetocast
ourvote.SoinordertopreventthisNOTAisveryimportantandthisshouldbeappliedineveryvotingschemes.
Ratethis:+1

VijayKarhalesaid:(Wed,Jan7,201505:17:15PM)

NOTAgoodidea,becauseatleastwegettheideaabouthowmuchvoteissharedinpercentagetoeach
candidateandNOTA.Andpeoplegetoptionincaseofiftheydon'tlikecandidatesthosewhoarecontestingfrom
thereconstituency.
Ratethis:+1

RitishKumarsaid:(Wed,Jan7,201503:28:13AM)

Hii,I'mRitish,
NOTAissuchavitaloptionforeverycitizeninIndia,whichallowsustofeelfreefromvotinganuncertain
candidate,aswebelievessometimethatthecandidatewhoareintheelectionasnomineesarerealunfitforour
societyandalsoforbeingasleadersofoursociety.
Todayweallareabitmoreunderstandingthecurrentsituationsinourcountryregardingallpoliticalpractices.
HencewecanalsogiveourdecisionofdeniedintheformofNOTA.
Ratethis:+7

Akshatsaid:(Tue,Jan6,201502:43:58PM)

Iagreetoitandwouldrathergowiththetermcalled"NOTA".Therearecaseswhenpeopleareunabletodecide
whomshouldtheyvote.Inthatcase'NOTA'canberecognized.Andofmyopinionshouldbeimplemented
everywherespeciallyinplaceswherewecannotactuallyjudgewho'stherightcandidate.Therearemanyofus
whodonotkeepaclearideaaboutpoliticsandinthatcasewecaneventuallyfollowthisterm.
Ratethis:+10

SandeepSinghsaid:(Tue,Jan6,201512:23:55PM)

YespeopleshouldgetNOTAasaoptionbecauseiftheyarenotsatisfiedwiththingsofferedbythepartiesthen
theyshouldnotgivetheirvotestoanyoftheseparties.Bydoingthistheyareshowingtheirdisagreement.Ithink
weshouldbeindependenttogivevotesthisisourrightbygivingvotestoNOTAwearedoingourjobforthe
countryaspertheconstitution.
THANKYOU.
Ratethis:+2

Sriramsaid:(Tue,Jan6,201512:46:34AM)

Ishouldgowithit!
NOTAnotonlygivesanextraoptionbutalsogiveachancetocommonpeopletoexpresstheirfeeling.Supposea
badpersonbecamethecandidateandpressurizestheothercandidatewithmoneyorpowertoleavethefield.
Andpeopledon'tlikehimbuttheydonotanyotherchoiceatthattimethisNOTAwillplayitsrole.Alsoitwillcreate
awayforallkindofpeopletocomeandparticipateinthisbiggestfestiveofdemocracy.
Ratethis:+11

Kvjysaid:(Mon,Jan5,201510:16:28PM)

Hifriends.
ForsupposeIfeltnopoliticianinmyconstitutionisworthofavotehowcanIexpressthesamewithoutaNOTA
option.AssaidbyourSCNOTAoptionwon'teffecttheelectoralresultsinanywaythatismajoritywillwin.Itis
onlyexpressingourfeeling.EvenIdonotmindgivingpowertoitsinceitdoesnotmakesensetogivepowertoa
candidatewhenmajoritypeoplevotedagainsthim.
Ratethis:+2

DhineshKumarsaid:(Mon,Jan5,201509:19:16PM)

HelloEveryone.IamDhinesh.
AccordingtomypointofNOTAoptionisgoodthingbecauseNOTAisimportantpartofthepolitical.Theleaderwill

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

12/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

selectthecorrectperson,becausethatpersonorganizewholecontrolofareaorwholelocationofcountry.Sothe
correctpersonwillnotpresentintheelectionperiodtheNOTAvoteisenteredinelectionchoice.Sothepeople
selectNOTAoptionthatreasonisonlyrightthing.
Ratethis:+1

DhruvaHanda`said:(Mon,Jan5,201502:25:08PM)

Hi.
IthinkNOTAisagoodwayofexpressingourviewthatthepresentgovernmentisnotdoingtheirdutieswelland
yetweareunclearabouttheothergovernance,thereforewecanhaveourrighttosaythatwearenotsure
whichcandidateisbetterthentheother.
AndinthiswayifthepercentageofNOTAis>thepercentageofvotestotheexistinggovernancethenitssure
thatthisgovernanceisindangerandtheotherwillhavetheirchancetowiniftheyassuresuswithRealpromises,
butthenitwillbeamatteroftime.
Ratethis:+13

Gauthamsaid:(Mon,Jan5,201511:06:24AM)

NOTAisawayofsayingthatnoneofthecandidatesaregoodenough.Itisveryimportantespeciallyinacountry
likeIndiawheremostofthecandidatesarecorruptandhavecriminalcasesagainstthem.Candidateswithlesser
numberofvotesthanNOTAshouldnoteligibleforcontestingintheelection.
Ratethis:+6

Mvksaid:(Sun,Jan4,201508:41:43PM)

Ithinkit'sgoodoption.Weliveindemocraticcountry,ifIhaverighttochoosemyleaderthenIshouldalsohave
righttorejectanycandidatetowhomIamnotsatisfied.IfIfeelthatnoneofthecandidatewillfulfilour
requirements,ourneedsthenwhat'sthepointtochooseanycandidateonlybecausewedon'thaveanychoice.
Ratethis:+12

Juliatsaid:(Sun,Jan4,201506:45:18PM)

Hellofriends.
AccordingtomypointofviewgivingtheoptionofNOTAisnotcorrect.Becauseitleadstoreelectionwhichalso
affectsoureconomy.InsteadofNOTAthereshouldbeanoptionofnegativevotesothatpeoplegivetheiropinion.
AsoptionofNOTAisuselessbecauseithasn'tanyeffectonelection.SoNOTAshouldnotbethereintheelection.
Insteadofthisgovernmentshouldhavestrictrulesforthecandidateregardingeducationqualification,criminal
activitiesetc.
Thankyou.
Ratethis:+14

DurgeshTiwarisaid:(Sun,Jan4,201504:59:24PM)

HelloFriends,
AllofyougaveagoodreasonthatNOTAisgoodorbadforPolitics.Iwanttoaddsomethingfrompositiveside.It
isfirsttimewhengovernmentgaveusanoptiontorejectthecandidatebecauseofhisnature.DuetoNOTA
citizenshaveapowertorejecttheallcandidateifallarenotgood.Itisnotwastageoftimebutitisabeautyof
election.IknowthatmostofthepeoplecasttheirvoteforsomeonebutthosewhousetheNOTAthatmeanshe
hassomenegativityforthatcandidate.

Ratethis:+2

ShivamSonisaid:(Sun,Jan4,201504:39:40PM)

HelloFriends,
AccordingtomeNOTAisgoodoptionandalongwithitVotingshouldbemadecompulsorysothatmoreandmore
peoplecanbeinvolvedactivelyinelections,sothattheycangetawareofwhoistherightcandidateornotandin
thelongrunNOTAwillbebeneficialbecauseitwillhelpinbringingoutthecorrectopinionofthepeople.
Ratethis:+3

Shreyassaid:(Sun,Jan4,201509:45:18AM)

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

13/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Hellofriends,
YesIfeelthattheNOTAoptionisaveryessentialtoolinapowerfuldemocracylikeIndia.Wehavemany
candidateswhoarenoteligibletocontestelectionsandwiththeoptionofNOTAitdefinitelyprovidesagood
optionforvoterstousetheirvotewiselyaseverysinglevoteisprecious.
YesIagreewithmanyofmyfriendsthattheNOTAoptionhavenotbeenabletoproduceaseriousimpacton
electionsbuteverynewthingrequirestimetogetadapted.
AtlastIwouldliketoconcludebysayingthattheoptionNOTAstrengthensourdemocracyandonceagainshows
theworldthathowacountrywithmanyreligions,culture,traditionandlanguagescansuccessfullypractice
democracy.
Ratethis:+5

PawanKumarsaid:(Fri,Jan2,201509:47:57PM)

IthinkNOTAoptionintheelectionisagoodone.Speciallyforthosepeoplethosedon'tvotejustbecausethey
don'tlikeanyofthecandidates.NOTAhasnoimpactontheresultoftheelection.Soforthosepeoplewhowant
tovotethisisjustthewasteoftheirvote.
ButNOTAshouldhaveitsimpactontheelection.Likethecandidate(s)getlessvotethanNOTAcanneverbe
eligibleforelection.BecauseNOTAmeansnoneofthesecandidatesareeligibleforbeingtheMLAorMP,andwhen
amajorityofpeoplethinkthatthantheyshouldbenoteligible.
AtthepresenttheNOTAisjustnothingbutthewasteofthevotebecauseithasnoimpactontheelectionbutit
canbegreatandveryhelpfulforcleanandfairpoliticswithimprovedversionofit.
Ratethis:+25

Ashusaid:(Fri,Jan2,201509:03:05PM)

ISupportNOTA.
Butinthetermsthat,thereshouldbesomeconditions.FirstlyifNOTAvotesareinlargeno.Thereisnoharmin
spendingmoneyagainforreelectionsbecauseLeaderischosenforthepeoplebythepeopleandifpeople
dislikesallthecandidatestheyshouldhavetheoptiontovote.SecondlyifpeoplehavepressedNOTAinlarge
numberthereshouldbereelectionsandthepreviouscandidatesshouldnotbeallowedtostandinelectionsin
furthertimes,andnewcandidatesshouldgetchance.

Ratethis:+33

Sachinsaid:(Fri,Jan2,201507:35:24PM)

Hellofriends.
YesIagreewith@PankajandIwanttoaddsomethingthatNOTAistherightforthedemocraticpeopletoputhis
voteaccordingtohisownopinion.Ipersonallyaskpeoplethatifyoudon'tsatisfiedwithcandidatesthendon't
restonthebedathometheyshouldhavetoputtheirdecisioninEVM.
Ratethis:+3

Karansaid:(Fri,Jan2,201502:07:24PM)

FriendsIbelieveNOTAisanimportantpartofourrighttovote.Wemightthinkthatitisinconsequentialbutthe
importantthingisthatitisthere.Wehavetherighttochooseourcandidateandalsotherighttorejectifwedo
notthinkanyoneamongthecandidatesisworthy.Iagreethatprovisionofsomesorttostrengthentheoptionwill
beinbestinterestofdemocracybutIalsobelievethatthisoptionnowtakesawaythereasongivenbymany
peoplefornotparticipatingintheprocess.Itisastepintherightdirection.
Ratethis:+5

Poojasaid:(Fri,Jan2,201501:15:36PM)

IthinkNOTAisthebestandinnovativeoptionforthepeoplewhodon'twanttovoteanycandidate,whothey
don'tlike.Asthepeoplehavetherighttovoteaspertheiropinion.NOTAwillteachlessontoothersandwillhelp
tochangetheirmindset.NOTAwillalsoindicatethatanyoneoftheaboveleaderisnotcapabletohandletheir
economy.
Ratethis:+3

Manishsaid:(Thu,Jan1,201510:17:59PM)

Hifriends.
AccordingtomyopinionsNOTAisnotgoodfordemocracy.Becauseitharmfulforeconomyaswellaspolitics.Our

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

14/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

electioncommissionhasmakesastrongrulesforcandidate.Rulesisthisthosecandidatewhohasgovernment
nominationforanymemberheshouldnotinvolveinanycriminalactivities.
Policyhasallreadymade.AsfarasNOTAconcernseitherpeoplewillcastthevoteornot.Thenreelection.It
meanswastageofmoney.Sothatitisgovtresponsibilitytomakeastrongacttopreventsuchtypeofthing.
Ratethis:+11

Nehasaid:(Thu,Jan1,201509:08:02PM)

Well,Iappreciatemyfriends'viewaboutNOTAi.e.NONEOFTHEABOVEoptioninourvotingmachines.
Clearly,thisoptionwasaddedtoincreasetheno.ofvotersbutlogicallythisoptionwassimplymeanttoinvolve
thosewhoarereallynotinterestedincastingtheirvotes.So,thisoptionshouldn'tbeapartofourelectoral
system.Fromvoterssideeithertheanswershouldbeaclear"YES"or"NO".Otherwisewastingmoneyonre
electionswouldcostusmuchmore.
AndtohaveacheckoncrookpoliticianstheremustbeaSTRICTLAW(forthis,ourjudiciarysystemshouldtake
thismatterseriously).
Ratethis:+5

Sayoushisaid:(Thu,Jan1,201507:38:12PM)

Takingitinapositiveside.AccordingtomeNOTAmakessenseinthewaythatpeoplewhoreallyseetheircityor
country'sdevelopmentduringvotinggetachancetoexpresstheirviewswhentheydonotfindanycandidate
suitable,thoughitdoesn'tbringanychangeasmyfriendstoldbutitgivesthecandidate'sarealitycheckabout
wherehe/shestandinthepeople'seyeintheareawherehehastowork.
Ratethis:+5

Punitsaid:(Thu,Jan1,201504:07:40PM)

IfpeopleshouldnotwanttogivetheirvotestoanypoliticalpartythanNOTAbuttonisthebestoptionforthem.
Andthosepeoplewhodonotalwaysgoforvoting.SoNOTAbuttonisthebestoptionforthemandwhilethey
wouldnothavesatisfiedtopoliticalparty.SotheycouldgivetheirvotebyNOTAbutton.
Ratethis:+2

Jaysaid:(Thu,Jan1,201502:06:37PM)

GuysIthinkthatthereshouldbeaNOTAchoice.Becauseitmaybepossiblethatallthecandidatesarefakeand
theymayactjustforthesakeofelections.Publicarenotfools.Theygettoknowthatwhoarebeingloyaland
whoarefake.
Sotheremustbeaoptionofnoneoftheabove.Itsimplyindicatesthatpublicarenotsatisfiedwiththe
candidates.Itmayactasatoolagainstthatpoliticianswhocheatandbuyvotes.
Ratethis:+4

Ramneeksaid:(Thu,Jan1,201512:51:09PM)

FriendsIthinkNOTAcouldbeagoodsuggestioniftheyincludesomepoints.
1.Ifthereisahigherno.ofvotestoNOTAthenreelectionshouldbeheld.
2.Ifreelectionsheldthepreviouscandidatesshoulddisqualifiedandnewcandidatesshouldcomeout.
Ratethis:+15

PriyamPatelsaid:(Wed,Dec31,201406:32:47PM)

NOTAisthegoodoption,Becausegenerallyliteratepersonthinkthatnotasinglecandidateisappropriatefrom
hispointofviewforvotesohewillnotgoforvoting,Sotoavoidthissituationgovernmentgivethemnewchoice
asNOTA,meanstheydidnotsupportanycandidate.
SoNOTAisthebestoptiontoincreasevoting.

Ratethis:+2

Ranjitsaid:(Wed,Dec31,201401:21:18PM)

Iftwocandidatesparticipatinginaelection:

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

15/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

Candidate1:Alreadywasinthepostandwasfamousforcorruption.
Candidate2:Tilldateinthepostbutdidnothingtothesociety.
Nowwhatthepeopleshoulddo?
IfNOTAoptionistherepeoplecancometovoteforNOTA.
IfNOTAisnotherepeoplecanstayathome.
Whichoneisbetter?
Ratethis:+32

Mohinisaid:(Tue,Dec30,201408:38:44PM)

Hifriends,inmyopinion.
Ithinktherearethepositiveandnegativesideofeverything.So,doesNOTAhave.
ItotallybelievethatNOTAwouldhardlybringanychangebutitcanatleasthelpusinexercisingourdemocracy.
Ourrighttoexpress.Itsawasteageoftimeasbutinsteadofnotvotingatleastweareexpressingourviewsand
notvotingoptionisstillthereeventhoughwehaveNOTA.
Itcanincreasepublicinterestinvotingandincreasevotecount.Whichlatebutwillsomedaymakesomechange.
Ratethis:+13

Shanmukhasaid:(Tue,Dec30,201406:37:49PM)

HaithisisShanmukha.
AccordingtomypointofviewNOTAisuselessasitdoesn'teffectourelectionsystembutbyexercisingthisoption
noonecancastourvote.
Ratethis:+2

Yogeshsaid:(Tue,Dec30,201402:12:27PM)

NOTAisgoodoptioneventhoughitdoesn'thaveanypowertoreelectordisqualifycandidate.
Ifamong100people99votedforNOTAandonlyonepersoninthefavorstillthatcandidatewintheelection.Butit
clearlyshowsthatyouarenotourrepresentative.
Mostofthevotersarepoorandalmostallcandidatebelongtowealthyfamiliesthereisnowaytoexpressthat
trend.SomaybethisNOTAoptionwillhelp.

Ratethis:+14

VijayYadavsaid:(Mon,Dec29,201410:56:29PM)

HiFriends,
Idon'tliketheoptioncalledNOTA,asitdoesnothaveanypowerunlessourGovernmenttakethisinto
consideration.ThosewhovoteforNOTA,Iwouldsuggestdon'tvoteit.Itwouldbebetterifwehavesomegood
eligiblecriteriaforourPoliticalCandidates.

Ratethis:+4

AshlieFernandessaid:(Mon,Dec29,201405:06:33PM)

HelloFriends,
YesNOTAoptionshouldnotbeentakenintoconsideration.Becauseitssimplywasteofvoteourvoteisimportant
insistentitslikeapersonnotvotingandparticipatinginelection.NOTAoptionshouldberemovedbecausearight
candidateshouldbeselectedforwellbeingofoursocietyandourcountry.Votearightcandidateforchange,
insteadbeingheadingadirectionwhichwon'tbringchangetoourcountrybyclickingonNOTAoption.
Jaihind.
Ratethis:+3

Ravalisaid:(Mon,Dec29,201403:46:15PM)

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

16/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion

IacceptwithNOTAoptionbecausethepeoplearenotinteresttovote.Theirarefearaboutthevotingprocessing
theirwillnotvotemeansanotherpeople.Willgivingyourvotelikepoliticiansidepeopleandrowdieswilltaking
theChanceandtheirwinningtheseats.Thegovernmentdidthegoodjobforputtingtheseoption.
Ratethis:+2

Shubhrasaid:(Mon,Dec29,201411:54:44AM)

Hellofriends,
Idon'tthinkthevotersshouldbegivenNOTAbecause,IbelieveNOTAdoesn'tdescribeonesdecision.Ifavoter
pressNOTAthenitdoesn'tspecifyhisdesiresanditcannotsatisfyhisneedsaswell.Ialsobelievethatifitis
puttedtothevotingmachinethentopeopleitbecomesaconfusionandhewouldbeunabletoelecttheright
government.
Thankyou.
Ratethis:+5

Snehasaid:(Sat,Dec27,201408:36:44PM)

IthinkNOTAisnotagoodoptionbecauseitdoesnothaveanypower.ThoughNOTAhasgothighestnumberof
votesitdoesnotmakeanydifferencesowhattheyshoulddoistotakeNOTAintoaccountanddisqualifythe
candidatesinthatareawhereNOTAhasgothighestnumberofvotesandgoforreelection.Iagreethatcostforre
electionwouldbehigherbutitwouldnotbehigherthanwhatthatcorruptedleaderwouldtakeifelected.
Ratethis:+22

Sindhusaid:(Sat,Dec27,201407:41:32PM)

IthinkNOTAisverymuchnecessary.Itexpressthatthepersondoesn'tliketoelectthecandidates.Itshowsthat
thecandidatesareinsomepointdoneanythingwrongordonenothinggood.Ifgovernmenttakethisalsointo
accountthenitwillmakeagreatdifferenceinthedevelopmentofthenation.
Ratethis:+9

SpeakYourMind:

...

Pleasedonotusechatterms.Example:avoidusing"grt"insteadof"great".

Submit

Relatedtopics:
CapitalismisaveryFlawedSystembuttheothersaresomuchworse
BrainDrainhastobestopped
SixBillionandOneBronze!
RetirementAgeforPoliticians
DowereallyNeedEducationtobeSuccessful?

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

17/18

1/21/2015

ShouldvotersbegivenaNOTA(NoneOfTheAbove)choice?GroupDiscussion
20082014byIndiaBIX T echnologies.AllRightsReserved|Copyright|T ermsofUse&PrivacyPolicy
Contactus:info@indiabix.com
Bookmarkto:

Followusontwitte r!

http://www.indiabix.com/groupdiscussion/shouldvotersbegivenanotanoneoftheabovechoice/

18/18