Professional Documents
Culture Documents
infrastructure and decrease the load on existing landfills and incinerators. The
problem of high rate of water absorption of the fiber could be reduced by coating the
fibers with oil. Moreover the fibers being natural in origin are ecologically
sustainable and can bring down the global carbon footprint quite effectively.
This study aimed at analyzing the variation in strength of coconut fiber (oil coated
raw and oil coated processed fibers) reinforced concrete at varying fiber contents and
to compare it with that of conventional concrete. The various strength aspects
analyzed are the flexural, compressive and tensile strength of the coconut fiber
reinforced concrete at varying percentages (1%,2%,3% by the weight of cement) of
fiber. The influence of shape of fiber on strength is also studied by testing on coconut
fiber mesh of predetermined dimensions. The optimal percentage of both the
processed fiber strands and raw fiber meshes were found out by trial and error and the
optimum percentage of superplasticizer needed for the required workability was also
determined.
Keywords : Compressive strength, Split Tensile strength, CFRC, steel reinforcement,
coconut coir.
ii
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
PAGE NO
i
ABSTRACT
ii
LIST OF TABEL
LIST OF FIGIRES
LIST OF ABBREVATIONS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
1.2 NEED FOR STUDY
1.3 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.4 METHODOLOGY
1.5 ORGANISATION OF REPORT
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 OVERVIEW
2.2 FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
2.3 COCONUT FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
3. MATERIAL AND METHODS
3.1 STUDY ON MATERIAL USED
3.1.1 OVERVIEW
3.1.2 CEMENT
3.1.3 FINE AGGREGATE
3.1.4 CORSE AGGREGATE
3.1.5 WATER
3.1.6 COCONUT FIBER
3.1.7 RAW FIBER
3.1.8 PROCESSED FIBERS
3.1.9 TEST ON MATERIALS
3.1.10 SUMMARY OF MATERIALS PROPERTIES
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
7
7
7
9
9
10
10
10
11
15
3.2 METHODOLOGY
3.2.1 GENERAL
3.2.2 COLLECTION OF RAW MATERIALS
3.2.3 MATERIALS TESTS
3.2.4 TEST ON CEMENT
3.2.5 TEST ON COARSE AGGREGATE
3.2.6 TEST ON FINE AGGREGATE
3.2.7 MIX DESIGN
3.2.8 MIXING OF CONCRETE
3.2.9 CASTING AND CURING
3.2.10 CASTING PROCESSECED FOR FIBER RIENFORCED
17
17
18
18
20
21
23
23
23
CONCRETE
3.2.11 TESTING ON SPECIMEN
3.3 CASTING AND TESTING OF CONCRETE SPECIMEN
3.3.1 TEST ON FRESH CONCRETE
23
24
26
26
1
0
3.3.2
3.3.3
3.3.4
3.3.5
3.3.6
3.3.7
3.3.8
SLUMP TEST
TEST ON HARDENED CONCRETE
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST
SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTHTEST
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
MIX DESIGN
CASTING PROCEDURE
26
26
26
27
28
28
34
38
38
44
5. CONCLUSION
48
6. REFERENCE
51
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 3.1: Robot sand
10
19
22
22
25
26
27
28
34
35
36
1
1
36
37
40
41
43
43
44
Figure 4.6: Graph showing vation of split tensile strength and % of fiber
46
Percentages
of fiber(processed)
46
fiber
47
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3.1: properties of cement
16
16
17
31
33
38
39
40
42
Table 4.5: Split tensile strength for processed plain concrete cylinders
45
45
1
2
1
3
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
FRC
1
4
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
The construction industry is revolutionizing in two major ways. One way is the
development of construction techniques, such as using automated tools in
construction. The other is the advancement in high-performance construction
materials, such as the introduction of high strength concrete. Among these highperformance materials, fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) is gradually gaining
acceptance from civil engineers. In recent years, research and development of fibers
and matrix materials and fabrication process related to construction industry have
grown rapidly. Their advantages over other construction materials are their high
tensile strength to weight ratio, ability to be moulded into various shapes and potential
resistance to environmental conditions, resulting in potentially low maintenance cost.
These properties make FRC composite a good alternative for innovative construction.
Their application in construction includes both upgrading existing structures and
building new ones, which can apply to various types of structure, for example
offshore platforms, buildings and bridges (Thou, 2005).
A major roadblock towards development of high performance concrete using steel
fibers is the high costs involved, availability and also problem of corrosion. Coconut
fiber being the most ductile among all natural fibers (Majid Ali et al.,2012) has the
potential to be used as a reinforcement material in concrete. It is biodegradable so the
impact on environment will be minimal. This is also a way to dispose off the fibers
which are derived as waste materials from coir based manufacturing units to produce
high strength materials .They are also non-abrasive in nature ,cheap and easily
available. Research work is being carried out to find the possibility of coconut-fiber
ropes as a vertical reinforcement in mortar-free interlocking structures. This is
believed to be a cost-effective solution to earthquake-resistant housing.
The aim of this study was to identify the improvement in strength characteristics of
concrete with the addition of oil coated coconut fiber. In the study, coconut fiber is
added to concrete and Plain Cement Concrete (PCC) is used as reference to study its
effect on flexural, compressive and tensile strength properties and also drying
shrinkage. Fiber is coated with oil so as to decrease the water absorption. Some of the
MREC (A)
Page 1
MREC (A)
Page 2
MREC (A)
Page 3
the
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 OVERVIEW
This chapter deals with various research works done on fiber reinforced concrete
including CFRC. The properties of various fibers were studied and the advantages of
coconut fiber over other fibers were highlighted to justify its selection in this research
work.
Page 4
Page 5
MREC (A)
Page 6
OPC
Fine aggregate
R-sand
Coarse aggregate
sieve
Coconut fiber
Water
Potable water
3.1.2 CEMENT
IS 1489 1991 Part I defines either by grinding together Portland cement clinker
and pozzolana with addition of gypsum or calcium sulphate, or by intimately and
uniformly blending Portland cement and fine pozzolana. The pozzolanic materials
generally used for manufacture of PPC are clcined clay or fly ash. Portlandpozzolana cement produces less heat of hydration and offers greater resistance to the
attack of aggressive waters than normal Portland cement. Moreover, it reduces the
leaching of calcium hydroxide liberated during the setting and hydration of cement.
Page 7
Natural sand: Fine aggregate resulting from the natural disintegration of rock
and which has been deposited by streams or glacial agencies.
ii.
iii.
MREC (A)
Page 8
3.1.5 WATER
According to IS 456 : 2000, water used for mixing and curing shall be clean and free
from injurious amounts of oils, acids, alkalis, salts, sugar, organic materials or other
substances that may be deleterious to concrete or steel. Potable water is generally
considered satisfactory for mixing concrete. The pH value of water shall be not less
than 6
MREC (A)
Page 9
3.1.8
PROCESSED FIBERS
They are properly washed and drawn into strands before use. Treatment of fibers
removes dust and other residual particles left on the fiber so as to augment the surface
of contact between the fiber and mix resulting in better binding between the
reinforcement and concrete and ultimately higher strength. The fiber is washed in tap
water for 30 minutes so as to loosen the fibers and to remove the coir dust. Fibers are
then washed and soaked again for 30 minutes. This process is to be repeated three
times The softened fibers are straightened manually and combed with a steel comb.
MREC (A)
Page 10
MREC (A)
Page 11
Soundness of Cement
Experiment was done by Le Chatelier method and the obtained value of soundness of
cement is 1mm.According to IS 269:1989-Clause 6.2, the expansion of cement must
not exceed 10 mm for ordinary rapid hardening and low heating portland cement.
Page 12
INFERENCE
As per IS code 2386-part III -1963, the obtained value of bulk density of
aggregates lies within the range of 1.2-1.8kg/l.
Specific Gravity of Coarse Aggregate
The experiment was carried out as per IS code 2386 part-III-1963 and IS 383.
Weight of saturated aggregate suspended in water with the wire
basket,A1=2800g
Weight of empty wire basket suspended in water,A2=1550g
Weight of saturated aggregate in water=A1-A2=2800-1550=1250g
Weight of saturated surface dry aggregate in air,B=1992g
Weight of oven dried aggregate in air,C=1985g
Specific gravity= 2.72
Apparent specific gravity=2.75
Water absorption = 0.04685
INFERENCE
As per IS code 2386-part III -1963, Average value of specific gravity
should lies between 2.6-2.8
Page 13
MREC (A)
Page 14
INFERENCE
As per IS code 2386-part III -1963, the value of bulk density of aggregates lies within
the range of 1.2-1.8kg/l. The obtained value if bulk density is 1.78 kg/l which is
within this range and hence can provide sufficient rigidity to the concrete mix
Specific Gravity of fine aggregate
The experiment was carried out as per IS code 2386 part-III-1963 and IS 383.
Weight of empty pycnometer =636g
Weight of pycnometer + Msand A =1136g
Weight of pycnometer + aggregate+ water B =1718g
Weight of pycnometer + water C=1395g
Specific gravity=2.706
INFERENCE
As per IS code 2386-Part III -1963 the specific gravity of fine aggregate ranges from
2.65 to 2.68. The obtained value is 2.706 is within the range.
PROPERTIES OF CEMENT
Properties of Cement is shown in Table 4.4.
Value Obtained
70 minutes
>30
Soundness (expansion)
1mm
<10mm
Density
3.09 g/cc
3.15
Fineness
7%
<10%
INFERENCE
The values obtained for properties of cement are within the range specified by IS
code. So the given cement is suitable for construction.
Value Obtained
Specific Gravity
2.706
2.6-2.8
Bulk Density
1.78g/cc
1.2-1.8 g/cc
INFERENCE
The properties obtained for fine aggregates are within the range given by IS code. So
the fine aggregates are good for concreting.
Value Obtained
Bulk Density
1.37g/cc
Specific Gravity
2.72
2.6-2.8
INFERENCE
The properties of coarse aggregates are within the range given by IS code. So the
aggregates are good for concreting.
The next chapter titled casting and testing deals with the casting, curing and tests on
concrete specimen.
3.2 METHODOLOGY
3.2.1 GENERAL
Based on the previous research work, a comparison of strength properties of fiber
reinforced concrete is made with respect to conventional concrete and the influence of
shape and length of fibers on strength are also studied. Tests are conducted using
processed coconut fibers of length 5cm and raw fiber meshes of size 5cm x 5cm after
coating with coconut oil at varying fiber contents of 1%, 2%, 3%. A similar quantity
of raw untreated fiber is also used to compare the influence of shape and length of
fibers.
Bharathi cements
Sand
Robot sand
Coconut fiber
Processed
fiber
Collected
from
rope
shop.
Water
Coarse aggregate
Standard Consistency
The standard consistency of a cement paste is defined as that consistency which will
permit the Vicat plunger of 10 mm diameter and 50 mm length to penetrate to a point
5 to 7 mm from the bottom of the Vicat mould Figure 3.1. The experiment was done
as per IS 4031-Part IV.
Soundness of Cement
The testing of soundness of cement is to ensure that the cement does not show any
applicable subsequent expansion. Unsoundness in cement is due to excess of lime,
magnesia or excessive proportion of sulphates. Experiment is done by Le Chatelier
method. And the value of soundness is 1mm.
3.2.10
CASTING OF
REINFORCED CONCRETE
RAW
AND
PROCESSED
COIR
FIBER
The calculated amount of cement and fine aggregate are mixed together until a
uniform mix is obtained. Fibers at varying amounts of 4%, 5% and 6% to that of
weight of cement are taken. Coir fiber strands are cut into a length of 5cm washed and
while the raw fibers are cut into square meshes of 5cm x 5 cm, coated with coconut
oil and dried in sunlight for 24 hours
It is then added to the mix until a uniform colour is obtained. Coarse aggregates are
then added to the same and mixed, followed by addition of water. Care should be
taken to add water slowly in stages so as to prevent bleeding which may affect the
strength formation of concrete. Admixture is added towards the end of mixing
procedure so as to avail sufficient time for mixing before the concrete hardens. It is
placed in the moulds of standard dimensions, compacted and finished
COLLECTION OF MATERIALS
TESTING OF MATERIALS
MIX DESIGN
MOULDING
TESTING OF SPECIMEN
The next chapter deals with the study of various materials used and the material tests
3.3
strength of concrete cubes for the plain concrete and fiber reinforced concrete are
found out using Compression testing machine. Three cubes were cast for each
percentage of fibers and the average of the two compressive strength values was
taken. A Compression testing machine is shown in Figure 5.2.
M20
Type of cement
OPC
300 kg/m
0.55
Workability
100mm(slump)
Exposure condition
Degree of supervision
Good
Type of aggregate
450 kg/m
: OPC
: 34%
:70 min
: 300 min
: 3.09 g/cc
Chemical admixture
Specific gravity of
1) Coarse aggregate
: 2.72
2) Fine agggregate
: 2.706
Water absorption of
1) Coarse aggregate
: 0.5%
2) Fine aggregate
: 1%
: Nil
b) Fine aggregate
: Nil
Bulk density of
a) Coarse aggregate
: 1.37 kg/l
b) Fine aggregate
: 1.78 kg/l
f ck = fck+ 1.65 s
where
Maximum Size of
Percentage of Volume of
Aggregate(mm)
Concrete
10
20
40
The water content and percentage of sand in total aggregate by absolute volume
are determined from Table 2 of IS 10262 : 2009
Maximum water content
(for 20 mm aggregate)
slump range)
Estimated water content for 100mm slump
The cement content per unit volume of concrete may be calculated from free
water cement ratio and the quantity of water per unit volume of concrete.
Water cement ratio
C
= 0.5
ement content
From Table 5 of IS 456, minimum cement content for severe exposure condition
= 320kg/m
3
=1m
= (mass of cement / (specific gravity of cement
3
c. Volume of water
1000))
d. Volume of chemical
admixture
e. Volume of all in aggregate
3
0.675 m
f. Mass of coarse aggregate
gravity of
coarse aggregate * 1000
= NIL
= (a - (b + c + d)) = 1 (0.1275 + 0.197 + 0) =
= e * volume of coarse aggregate * specific
MIX PROPORTION
Cement
Water
Coarse aggregate
Fine aggregate
Water cement ratio
=
=
=
=
=
394kg/m
3
197 kg/m
3
1138 kg/m
3
687 kg/m
0.5
Mix 1
(Plain
Concr
ete)
Cement
(Kg)
9.5
Water (Kg)
4.75
Coarse
Aggregate (Kg)
Fine Aggregate
(Kg)
Mix 2 (1%
fiber)
processed
9.5
4.75
27
16.5
Fiber (Kg)
Steel
reinforcement(kg)
Processed
9.5
4.75
27
16.5
27
16.5
Mix 4 (3%
fiber)
processed
9.5
4.75
27
16.5
0.38
0.475
0.57
1%
1%
1%
Concrete is mixed either by hand Fig 5.4. In this casting process is used. Concrete is a
mixture of Cement, Water, Coarse and Fine Aggregates and Admixtures. The
proportion of each material in the mixture affects the properties of the final hardened
concrete. These proportions are best measured by weight. Measurement by volume is
not as accurate, but is suitable for minor projects. The dry ingredients are mixed and
water is added slowly until the concrete is workable. This mixture may need to be
modified depending on the aggregate used to provide a concrete of the right
workability. The mix should not be too stiff or too sloppy. It is difficult to form good
test specimens if it is too stiff. If it is too sloppy, water may separate (bleed) from the
mixture.
For casting, all the moulds were cleaned and oiled properly. There were securely
tightened to correct dimension before casting. Care was taken that there is no gaps
left, where there is any possibility of leakage of slurry. Careful procedure was adopted
in the batching, mixing and casting operation. The coarse aggregate and fine
aggregate were weighed first. The concrete mixture was prepared by hand mixing on
a water tight platform. On the water tight platform cement and fine aggregates are
mixed thoroughly until a uniform colour is obtained, to this mixture coarse aggregate
was added and mixed thoroughly. Then water is added carefully making sure no water
is lost during mixing. While adding water care should be taken to add it in stages so as
to prevent bleeding which may affect the strength formation of concrete rising of
water required for hydration to the surface. Clean and oiled mould for each category
was then placed on the vibrating table respectively and filled in three layers.
Vibrations were stopped as soon as the cement slurry appeared on the top surface of
the mould. Fig 5.5 shows cube specimen placed on table vibrator.
The calculated amount of cement and fine aggregate are mixed together till a uniform
mix is obtained. The amounts of fiber adopted are 4%, 5% and 6% of cement. Raw
and non uniform coir fibers are cut into square chips of of 5cm x 5cm. They are then
washed, oil coated with coconut oil and dried in sunlight for 24 hours and added to
the mix until a uniform colour is obtained. Coarse aggregates are then added to the
same and mixed followed by addition of water. Care should be taken to add water
slowly in stages so as to prevent bleeding which may affect the strength formation of
concrete rising of water required for hydration to the surface. Admixture is added
towards the last stage of addition of water so as to avail sufficient time for mixing
before the concrete hardens It is placed in the mould and compacted. 6 cubes each of
the same are prepared and cured. The compressive strength for 7day and 28 day is
determined.
SLUMP TEST
Table 4.1 : Slump test on Trial Mixes
Trial
Trial 1
Trial 2
Trial 3
w/c ratio
Slump
Remarks
Value(mm)
0.4
30
0.45
50
0.55
120
INFERENCE
From the table it is observed that the desired slump value is obtained for trial 3 at
water cement ratio = 0.55. Hence we fix it as the design ratio. Trial 1 and 2
yielded very low slump values which may be either due to inadequate paste available
for binding the mix or due to improper mixing procedure.
4.2
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH
Specimen
w/c ratio
Slump Value
(mm)
24.88
1
2
0.55
120
25.1
25.1
3
Average
25.03
INFERENCE
2
For the table the average of value from the 3 observations is 25 N/mm , is taken as
compressive strength of plain concrete cube
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CFRC (PROCESSED)
Coconut fiber reinforced concrete was added to concrete at varying proportions (4% ,
5%, 6% of that of weight of cement) at a water cement ratio of 0.5 The desired slump
value and compressive strength was obtained for conventional concrete at this ratio .
However, when fiber is added to the mix low workability was observed. The
result of compressive strength of fiber reinforced concrete and slump test results are
shown in Table 5.5 and is shown graphically in Fig 5.9 and Fig 5.10.
Specimen
w/c
ratio
strength(N/mm )
Percentage of
coconut fiber
added
7 day
1%
0.55
2%
25.7
16.3
28.3
15.02
26.2
105
28.
3
27.5
23.5
14.6
105
29.5
25.5
26.2
25.
7
21.5
7 day
19.5
28 day
17.5
16.
3
15.5
13.5
day
110
3%
Compressive Strength (N/mm2)
28
14.
6
0%
15.0
2
1%
3%
2%
4%
% of fiber added
Figure 4.1: Finished fiber reinforced concrete cubes
30
25
25.03
23.
2
22.1
21.82
20
15
10
5
0
0%
4%
6%
5%
INFERENCE
The value obtained for 5% addition of coconut fiber water cement ratio 0.5 yielded
highest results for compressive strength. However, the compressive strength
decreased on the increase in fiber addition. This may be due to the fact when fibers
are added initially the finer sized fine aggregates enter into the surface pores in the
fiber creating a better bonding between the fiber and mix, however further addition of
fibers causes formation of bulk fiber in the mix decreasing the bonding. Hence there
is an optimum value of fiber to cement ratio, beyond which the compressive strength
decreases. Hence 0.5 was taken as the optimum water cement ratio and optimum fiber
content was taken as 5%.
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CFRC (RAW)
Coconut fiber reinforced concrete was cast at a water cement ratio of 0.5 at which
desired slump values and compressive strength were obtained for conventional
concrete. However, when fiber is added the mix showed very low workability. Hence
Specimen
w/c
ratio
1
2
0.5
Percentage
of coconut
Slump
strength(N/mm )
Value
fiber added
(mm)
1%
108
23.2
2%
102
22.1
3%
100
21.82
7 day
28 day
INFERENCE
From the table a decreasing trend in compressive strength is observed with a
maximum at 4% fiber addition. On further addition of fibers compressive strength
values way below that of conventional concrete is obtained. This is due to formation
of zone of transition, which creates a weak zone around the fiber making the entire
specimen weak. Moreover the thickness of the fibers can hinder better packing of the
constituents of concrete thus making it weak.
23.2
21.82
22.1
20.5
18.5
16.5
7 day
13.7
14.5
28 day
12.96
12.5
1
12.5
10.5
3%
4%
6%
7%
5%
30
25
25.03
23.
2
22.1
21.82
20
15
7 day
28 day
10
0
0%
4%
6%
5%
INFERENCE
Also, the compressive strength value is still less than that of plain concrete .This can
also be due to the presence of dust and other impurities on the surface of fibers which
may interefere with proper bonding of mix and subsequent strength formation.
Another important factor is the influence of shape of fibers. Only properly combed
fiber strands can be used for reinforcing concrete as presence of bulk fibers can result
in improper compaction
Table 4.5: Split tensile strength for processed Plain Concrete cylinders
Specimen
w/c ratio
Slump Value
28 day strength
(mm)
(N/mm )
3.39
1
2
0.5
3.46
120
3.46
3.44
Average
Specimen
w/c
ratio
1
2
3
0.5
Percentage
of coconut
Slump
Value
Split Tensile
2
strength(N/mm )
fiber added
(mm)
1%
110
3.8
2%
105
4.57
3%
105
4.14
Average = 4.17
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0% 2% 4% 6%
(N/mm2)
4.5
7
4.5
4
3.5
4.14
3.
8
1%
3%
2%
% of fiber added
INFERENCE
From the graph it is seen that when fiber content is increased there is an increase in
split tensile strength with a maximum at 5% of fiber. However when the fiber content
is increased beyond this value a downward slope of the graph is observed. This is due
to the fact that tensile failure occurs due to the dislocation of atoms and molecules
present in concrete. However when the fiber is added it acts as a binder holding them
together.
COMPARISON OF CRACKING PATTERN IN CONVENTIONAL AND FRC
CYLINDERS
5.
CONCLUSION
Coconut fiber is available in abundance at the test site, which makes it quite viable as
a reinforcement material in concrete. Further, it acts as a source of income for the
coconut producer who gets the benefits of the new demand generated by the
construction industry. In addition to this, it is an efficient method for the disposal of
coir mattress waste which will reduce the demand for additional waste disposal
infrastructure and decrease the load on existing landfills and incinerators. Coconut
fibers being natural in origin, is ecologically sustainable and can bring down the
global carbon footprint quite effectively.
The objectives of this work were:
1. To find out variation in compressive, tensile and flexural strengths of CFRC
using processed fiber strands and raw fiber meshes at varying fiber contents
and to compare it with that of conventional concrete
2. To determine the influence of shape of fibers on strength of concrete
The scope of this project was limited to rural residential constructions.
The major conclusions from this study are
1.
2. When the fiber content is increased there is an increase in split tensile strength
with a maximum at 5%. However when the fiber content is increased beyond
this value a reduction in tensile strength is observed. This is due to the fact that
tensile failure occurs due to the dislocation of atoms and molecules present in
concrete. However when the fiber is added it acts as a binder holding them
together.
mesh shaped fibers. This is due to formation of weak inter transition zone
around these fibers, making the entire specimen weak. Moreover the thickness
of the fibers can hinder better packing of the constituents of concrete thereby
making it weak. The presence of dust and other impurities on the surface of
fibers can also be another reason for this reduction in strength which may
interfere with the bonding of mix and subsequent strength formation.
4. The tensile properties and cracking pattern of CFRC shows that it can be
particularly useful in construction activities in seismic zones due to its high
tensile strength and post peak load behaviour, which offers sufficient warning
to the inhabitants before complete collapse of the structure.
5. Due to its relatively higher strength and ductility, It can be a good replacement
for asbestos fibers in roofing sheets, which being natural in origin pose zero
threat to the environment
7. Since higher strength is attained at a lower design mix. It can be used to
manufacture building blocks at relatively lower costs in comparison to plain
concrete blocks thus making it suitable for rural residential buildings upto 10m
height or as protection walls around buildings.
8. It can also be used as the reinforcement material in cement fiber boards which
can act as a good backing to tiles thereby improving its impact resistance and
also in faux ceilings. The advantage of cement fiber boards is its ability to
survive under moist environments unlike paper based gypsum board
FUTURE SCOPE
The effect of coconut fibers on high strength concrete should be studied and thus the
use of CFRC can be extended to industrial and commercial buildings. Since the
corrosion study is not done, the applicability of CFRC in reinforced constructions
could be tested.
Coconut fiber is a good insulator in itself and as such it can improve the thermal
properties of concrete. This is particularly useful in a tropical country like India where
the mercury levels are quite high for most part of the year, so as to maintain the room
temperatures within comfort levels of its inhabitants. It can also reduce the load on air
conditioning systems thus reducing the power consumption.
The acoustic properties of concrete reinforced with other natural fibers have been
studied in the past using an impedance tube apparatus and the results are fair enough
to justify the use of coconut fibers as an alternative which is a good absorbent due to
the presence of surface pores.
6.
REFERENCES
1. Majid Ali, Nawawi Chouw (2012),Experimental investigations on coconut-fiber
rope tensile strength and pullout from coconut fiber reinforced concrete,
Construction and Building Materials, 41, 681690
2. Reis J.M.L (2005),Fracture and flexural characterization of naturalfiber-reinforced
polymer concrete, Construction and Building Materials 20 (2005) 673678
3. Majid Ali, Anthony Liu, HouSou, Nawawi Chouw (2011),Mechanical and
dynamic properties of coconut fiber reinforced concrete Construction and Building
Materials 30 (2011) 814825
4. Noor Md. Sadiqul Hassan, Habibur Rahman Sobuz (2012),Use of coconut fiber in
production of structural light weight concrete, Journal of applied sciences 12(9) 831839, 2012
5. Vijay Chavada, A.A Parikh (2013), An application review of coir fiber reinforced
concrete, Vol. 2 Issue 4 ISSN: 2278-7844
6. A Zuraida, H Zahurin, I Sopiyan (2011),Effect of fiber length variation on
physical and mechanical properties of coir fiber reinforced concrete,Materials
Physics and Mechanics 16 (2013) 107-117
7. P Nibasumba, X L Liu (2011),Recent developments in fiber reinforced concrete
and their effect on concrete columns analysis, Construction and Building Materials
2011;18(7):54958
8. Joanna M Ferraz, Sabrina A Martins, Claudio H.S Del Menezzi (2013), Effect of
coir fiber treatment and coir-fiber ratio on properties of cement bonded composites,
Bio Resources 6(3), 3481-3492
9. Dr.M.Sivaraja (2009), Application of Coir Fibers as Concrete Composites for
Disaster prone Structures International Journal of Civil and Environmental
Engineering Sci., Vol. 33, No. 6, December 2009, pp. 719729.
10. Izad Amir Bin Abdul Karim (2012),Effect of coconut waste on concrete
structure componentARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 30(2012).
2538 2547.
11. Yalley, P. P. and Kwan, A.S K (2008), Use of coconut fiber as an enhancement
of