Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The attached
copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research
and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution
and sharing with colleagues.
Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or
licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party
websites are prohibited.
In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the
article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or
institutional repository. Authors requiring further information
regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are
encouraged to visit:
http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 June 2013
Accepted 1 September 2013
Keywords:
Photovoltaic generator
MPPT
Battery storage
Five level diode clamped inverter
Space vector modulation
Supervision
a b s t r a c t
This paper aimed to evaluate the use of photovoltaic-battery storage systems to supply electric power in
the distribution grid through a multilevel inverter. The proposed system is composed by four PV generators with MPPT (P&O) control, four battery storage systems connected to each capacitor of the DC link
and a ve level diode clamped inverter connected to the grid by a traditional three phase transformer.
The proposed control has a hierarchical structure with both a grid side control level to regulate the power
and the current injected to the grid and four input side regulation units. The system operator controls the
power production of the four PV generators by sending out reference power signals to each input side
regulation unit, the input side regulation units regulate the voltage of each capacitor of the DC link, regulate the voltage and the state of charge of each battery storage system.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
With the increasing concern about global environmental protection, the need to produce pollution-free natural energy such
as solar energy has received great interest as an alternative source
of energy for the future since solar energy is clean, pollution-free
and inexhaustible. In an effort to use the solar energy effectively,
a great deal of research has been done on the grid connected photovoltaic generation systems [18]. In PV systems connected to the
grid, the inverter that converts the output direct voltage of the solar modules to the alternate voltage (AC) is receiving increased
interest in order to generate power to utility.
In order to inject power on demand, certain energy storage devices must be added into the system. These devices must Store PV
energy in excess of electricity demand and subsequently meet
electricity demand in excess of PV energy. The conventional leadacid battery is the most common energy storage device at the present time [9].
Another very important aspect of the systems connected to the
grid is to select a proper power factor according to the grid demands: active or reactive power. The most efcient systems are
those, which allow variation in the active and reactive power injected into the grid, depending on the power grid requirements
[10]. In this scenario, we propose a control strategy for a photovoltaic-battery storage system connected to the grid with a ve level
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: Himour.kamal@hotmail.fr (K. Himour), kghedamsi@yahoo.fr
(K. Ghedamsi), emberkouk@yahoo.fr (E.M. Berkouk).
0196-8904/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.09.001
99
Iph
Rsh
exp
V I Rs
m KT
q
#
1
V I Rs
Rsh
I Np Iph Np Is exp
Np
V Rs I
Np
Rsh Ns
1
V Rs I
1
m K T=q
Ns
Np
2
DC Bus
DC/DC
Converter
MPPT
Udc1
DC/DC
Converter
MPPT
Udc2
Five
level
DC/DC
Converter
MPPT
Udc3
DC/DC
Converter
MPPT
Udc4
R t, Lt
G
R
I
D
DCI
Battery Bank
Converter
Battery Bank
Converter
Battery Bank
Converter
Battery Bank
Converter
Input side
regulation unit 4
P ref4
Input side
regulation unit 3
Input side
regulation unit 2
P ref3
P ref2
Pg ref
Ppv glob
Charge
"
I
V
Id
I Iph Is
Rs
System operators
Input side
regulation unit 1
P ref1
100
P (k)=I(k)*V(k)
P=P(k)-p(k-1)
V=V(k)-V(k-1)
Yes
No
P>0
Yes
Yes
No
No
V>0
V>
V (k+1)= V(k) +V
V (k+1)=V(k)-V
V (k+1)=V(k)-V
V (k+1)=V(k) +V
SOC model
Capacity
model
Voltage
model
Gassing current
Loss model
SOC
where IMR is the main battery reaction current (A), Ibb is external
battery current (A), and Igas is battery gassing current (A).
The capacity model of the battery does not limit the charge or
discharge current. Operation of the system with excessive charge
or discharge currents has to be prevented by the selection of
appropriately sized components and the implementation of a suitable control strategy. The actual battery capacity can be determined as:
C b t
t0
where Cb is the actual battery capacity (Ah), and Cb,i is Initial battery
capacity (Ah).
The state-of-charge can be calculated by referring the actual
capacity to the rated capacity of the battery:
SOCt
C b t
100%
C 10
101
Table 1
The states of one leg of the ve level DCI.
Eb t E0;d AD Xt
Etat
Sx1
Sx2
Sx3
Sx4
Sx5
Sx6
Sx7
Sx8
Vxo
P2
P1
O
N1
N2
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
Udc/2
Udc/4
0
Udc/4
Udc/2
Battery state-of-charge.
Internal battery resistance.
Magnitude and direction of battery current.
Xt
C C Xt
Q max;C
C b t
Q max IMR t
Xt
DC XtEFC
Eb t E0;C AC Xt
C d Xt
Dd XtEFd
Q max;d Q max;d C b t
Q max IMR t
102
Table 3
Second correction of reference voltage vector.
Hexagon
Component V 0
d
Component V 0
q
V 0
d 1=4
V 0
q
V 0
d 1=8
V 0
q
V 0
d
V 0
d
V 0
d
V 0
d
V 0
q
V 0
q
V 0
q
V 0
q
4
5
6
1=8
1=4
1=8
1=8
p
3=8
p
3=8
p
3=8
p
3=8
11
V b t Eb t R0;C IMR t
Fig. 7. Decomposition of ve level space vector diagram.
V b t Eb t R0;d IMR t
V 0
d
V d
V d
V d
V d
V d
V d
2
3
4
5
6
V 0
q
1=2
V q
1=4
V q
V bb t Bs V b t
1=4
p
3=4
p
V q 3=4
1=2
V q
1=4
V q
1=4
p
3=4
p
V q 3=4
13
The voltage of a string of batteries is given by multiplying the battery voltage with the number of 12 V batteries in series:
Table 2
First correction of reference voltage vector.
Hexagon
12
10
14
103
Table 4
System parameter values.
Photovoltaic array [20]
Pmax
150
Vop
34.5
Iop
4.35
Voc
43.5
Icc
4.75
Ns
5
Np
0
W
V
A
V
A
Maximal power
Optimal voltage
Optimal current
Open circuit voltage
Short circuit current
Number of series arrays
Number of parallel arrays
DC bus
Udc
480
DC bus voltage
Filter
Rt
Lt
3
0.05
O
H
Filter resistance
Filter inductance
Grid
Vs
f
380
50
V
Hz
voltage
frequency
Ah
V1
K1
A
Ah
Ah
mO
mO
V
h/A2
h/A
h
Ah
h/A2
h/A
h
Ah
104
Five
Rt, Lt
G
R
I
D
level
Udc
DCI
Is1,2,3
DC Bus
Vs1,2,3
ABC
Inverter control
SVM
dq
Q ref
P ref
dq
V td ref
Power Control
I td ref
V sd, V sq
Isd, I sq
ABC
V tq ref
I tq ref
Curent Control
Lt. s
PI
Lt. s
PI
Vt d_ref
vb d_ref
Cid
-
Bidirectional DC-DC
I bat dc
converter
Battery bank
Vsd
DC
It d_ref
V bat
DC
s.Lt
Isd
I bat
s.Lt
Vt q_ref
vb q_ref
Ciq
-+
Compensation
PI
P bat ref
It q_ref
Vsq
Decoupling
D bat
Isq
Correcteur
Fig. 7. This modication can reduce considerably the computational time and reduce the algorithm complexity [17].
2.4.2.2. Second correction of reference voltage vector. Having the selected three level inverter and the location of the translated vector,
one hexagon is selected among the six small hexagons that contain
this three level diagram. We make a translation of the reference
~
V 00
s . Table gives the components d and q of the reference voltage
~
V 00
s .
2.4.2.1. First correction of reference voltage vector. Having the location of a given reference voltage vector, one hexagon is selected
among the six small hexagons that contain the ve levels space
vector diagram.
Each hexagon is identied by a number s dened as given by:
2.4.2.3. Determination
of dwelling times. Ones the corrected refer!
ence voltage V 00
s and the corresponding hexagon are determined;
we can apply the conventional two level space vector Modulation
method
to calculate
the #
dwelling times,
"
8
8
1
>
>
>
>
>
2
>
>
>
<3
s
>
4
>
>
>
>
>
>5
>
:
6
if
p
3
if
if
if
if
if
6 h 6 p3
6h6
2
p 6 h 6 5p
2
6
5p
6 h 6 76p
6
7p
6 h 6 32p
6
3p
6 h 6 116 p
2
15
After selection of one hexagon, we make a translation of the reference vector V s towards the center of this hexagon (see Tables 24).
>
>
>
T1 4
>
>
>
<
p
jV 00
s j T s sin 3 a
sin p
3
!
jV 00
s j T s
sina
>
>
T2 4
>
sin p3
>
>
>
:
T3 Ts T1 T2
16
2.4.2.4. Conversion and! sequence of the switching states. The reference voltage vector V 00
s is approximated using the nearest three
states which are nodes of the triangle containing the vector identied as X, Y and Z. the optimum sequence of these states is selected
so as to minimize the total number of switching transitions [17].
105
Yes
Yes
No
Excess power
inject to grid
No
Yes
SB charge by
excess power
SB charge by
PV power
No
inject to grid PV
power and deficient
power from SB
1.4
Irradiance 1
400
Irradiance (sun)
1.2
Irradiance 2
Irradiance 3
Irradiance 4
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
200
-200
-400
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
1.6
1.8
Time (s)
Time (s)
Fig. 12. Prole irradiance of each PV generator.
3500
29.5
3000
2500
Global PV power
Power of GPV 1
Power of GPV 2
Power of GPV 3
Power of GPV 4
2000
1500
1000
500
29
28.5
SOC of battery bank 1
SOC of battery bank 2
28
27.5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
Time (s)
Time (s)
2.5.1.1. Power control. The active and reactive power (Pg, Qg) can be
both expressed by using Park components of supply voltage (Vtd, Vtq) and line current (Itd, Itq) as follows:
prefi
ppv
ppv
pg
ref
17
Pg V td Itd V tq Itq
Q g V td Itd V tq Itq
18
global
Reference currents Itd ref ; Itq ref which allows setting the desired
reference active and reactive powers Pgref ; Q gref , as follows:
122
Mag (% of Fundamental)
106
120
Voltage of battery bank 1
Voltage of battery bank 2
118
116
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Harmonic order
Time (s)
120.05
120
Udc 1
119.95
0.2
0.4
Udc 2
0.6
0.8
Udc 3
1.2
1.4
Udc 4
1.6
1.8
5
0
-5
Time (s)
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
Time (s)
2000
grid voltage (Fig. 9). The electric equations of the lter (Rt, Lt) connected to the grid are given below:
1000
V tq Rt Itq LT
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
Time (s)
Fig. 18. Phase 1 output voltage of 5 level inverter (V).
>
>
>
: Itq
dItq
dt
xs LT Itq V gq
20
-1000
-2000
8
>
>
>
< Itd
ref
P gref b
V td Q gref b
V tq
bV 2 bV 2tq
td
ref
19
P gref b
V tq Q gref b
V td
bV 2 bV 2tq
td
Mag (% of Fundamental)
500
1000
1500
Frequency (Hz)
Fig. 21. THD analysis of phase 1 grid current.
2000
107
4000
4. Conclusion
3000
This paper proposed the study and the control of photovoltaicBattery storage grid connected system, the use of a ve level DCI
with his simplied space vector modulation as a grid interface
gives a good results in term of THD and power quality, also, the
aim was in this work to inject to the grid a xed power whatever
solar irradiance and temperature condition. The results obtained
from this performance analysis conrm that the control strategy
adopted achieves the specied performance objectives.
2000
Grid active power
Reference power
1000
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Time (s)
Acknowledgments
2
0
References
-2
Grid reactive power
-4
Reference reactive power
-6
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
Time (s)
Fig. 23. Grid reactive power (var).
600
Grid voltage
Grid current*40
400
200
0
-200
-400
0.8
0.85
0.9
0.95
1.05
1.1
1.15
1.20
Time (s)
Fig. 24. Zoom of grid currant (A) and grid voltage (V).
3. Results simulation
In this section, the photovoltaic grid connection system is simulated using SIMULINK-MATLAB. PV generators have different irradiance proles and temperature. Each PV generator is composed of
ve series connected arrays.
Each PV generator has a prole of irradiance and temperature different from other as shown in Fig. 12 and the photovoltaic power
output is the sum of the four PV generators powers (Fig. 13). Results
simulation show the contribution of storage ingrid connected photovoltaic systems. Withbattery storage units, we can balance the
DC bus as shown in Fig. 17 and the strategy adopted allows controlling the level of storage of each storage unit when the photovoltaic
productions are different and compensate the uctuations of the
photovoltaic poweras illustrated in Figs. 14-16. Also, the results
show that the connection of multiple generators using a single multilevel inverter can inject more power to grid as shown in Figs. 22
and 23. The output current of the multilevel inverter has a good quality (Fig. 21). The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the inverter
control by the simplied space vector modulation as shown in
Fig. 18 and Fig. 19. Fig. 20 shows that when the reference power
changes from 2 to 3 KW the current injected by the inverter changes.
Fig. 24 show a zoom of grid current and voltage.