Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Design Criteria for Development of the Span-Load Charts
Related Publications
Manufacturing Tolerances
8" Bare Hollow Core Span-Load Chart
8" Topped Hollow Core Span-Load Chart
12" Bare Hollow Core Span-Load Chart
12" Topped Hollow Core Span-Load Chart
12" Bare Hollow Core Span-Load Chart
8" Hollow Core Residual Camber
12" Hollow Core Residual Camber
General Notes
Blockouts
Allowable Ripped Slab Widths
Dimensions for Detailing
Dimensions for Safe Drilling
2/10/14
2
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2/10/14
2/10/14
2/10/14
450
8"
475
425
400
3'-117 8"
(4'-0" Nominal Width)
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
7 Strands
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44
1,666 in4
57
psf
St =
yt =
417
4.00
in3
in
Sb =
yb =
417
4.00
in3
in
A=
e=
214
2.25
in2
in
NOTES:
1. The values given in this chart are in compliance with ACI 318-11.
2. The values given in this chart are based on hollow core slabs without shear reinforcement. See SHEAR
for discussion.
3. Refer to DEFLECTIONS for discussion of deflection criteria.
4. This Span-Load Chart is intended as an aid to preliminary sizing only, and must be interpreted using
sound engineering judgment.
2/10/14
525
500
212"
See Note 5
450
8"
475
425
400
3'-117 8"
(4'-0" Nominal Width)
375
350
325
300
275
250
225
200
175
7 Strands
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38
3,336 in4
90
psf
Stc =
ytc =
972
5.05
in3
in
Sbc =
ybc =
612
5.45
in3
in
Sif =
yif =
1,308 in3
2.55 in
NOTES:
1. The values given in this chart are in compliance with ACI 318-11.
2. The values given in this chart are based on hollow core slabs without shear reinforcement. See SHEAR
for discussion.
3. Refer to DEFLECTIONS for discussion of deflection criteria.
4. This Span-Load Chart is intended as an aid to preliminary sizing only, and must be interpreted using
sound engineering judgment.
5. Interface shear governs the design of composite topped hollow core slabs above this line.
2/10/14
950
900
12"
850
800
750
3'-117 8"
(4'-0" Nominal Width)
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
11 Strands
350
10
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60
5,270 in4
77
psf
St =
yt =
878
6.00
in3
in
Sb =
yb =
878
6.00
in3
in
A=
289
in2
NOTES:
1. The values given in this chart are in compliance with ACI 318-11.
2. The values given in this chart are based on hollow core slabs without shear reinforcement. See SHEAR
for discussion.
3. Refer to DEFLECTIONS for discussion of deflection criteria.
4. This Span-Load Chart is intended as an aid to preliminary sizing only, and must be interpreted using
sound engineering judgment.
2/10/14
1050
212"
1000
950
12"
900
850
800
750
3'-117 8"
(4'-0" Nominal Width)
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
See Note 5
350
9
8
300
250
11 Strands
200
150
100
10
50
0
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
8,656 in4
111 psf
Stc =
ytc =
1,844 in3
6.90 in
Sbc =
ybc =
1,140 in3
7.60 in
Sif =
yif =
1,965 in3
4.40 in
NOTES:
1. The values given in this chart are in compliance with ACI 318-11.
2. The values given in this chart are based on hollow core slabs without shear reinforcement. See SHEAR
for discussion.
3. Refer to DEFLECTIONS for discussion of deflection criteria.
4. This Span-Load Chart is intended as an aid to preliminary sizing only, and must be interpreted using
sound engineering judgment.
5. Interface shear governs the design of composite topped hollow core slabs above this line.
2/10/14
1100
1000
1212"
1050
950
900
850
3'-117 8"
(4'-0" Nominal Width)
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
11 Strands
400
10
350
300
250
200
150
100
6
4
50
0
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62
6,136 in4
84
psf
St =
yt =
1,019 in3
6.02 in
Sb =
yb =
947
6.48
in3
in
A=
313
in2
NOTES:
1. The values given in this chart are in compliance with ACI 318-11.
2. The values given in this chart are based on hollow core slabs without shear reinforcement. See SHEAR
for discussion.
3. Refer to DEFLECTIONS for discussion of deflection criteria.
4. This Span-Load Chart is intended as an aid to preliminary sizing only, and must be interpreted using
sound engineering judgment.
2/10/14
NUMBER OF STRANDS
-"
-"
-"
-1"
3
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
Figure 1
Positive Residual Camber
(N.T.S.)
C
L
Sym.
212" Topping
Residual Camber
(Add'l Topping)
NOTES:
Figure 2
Negative Residual Camber
(N.T.S.)
1. Residual Camber is defined as the camber remaining in the hollow core slabs just after the topping slab
has been placed. The contours shown above reflect the upward deflection due to prestress force,
downward deflection due to the hollow core slab self-weight and downward deflection due to the plastic
(wet) topping weight.
2/10/14
10
+
10
NUMBER OF STRANDS
-1"
-"
-1"
-"
5
-"
4
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
Figure 1
Positive Residual Camber
(N.T.S.)
C
L
Sym.
212" Topping
Residual Camber
(Add'l Topping)
NOTES:
Figure 2
Negative Residual Camber
(N.T.S.)
1. Residual Camber is defined as the camber remaining in the hollow core slabs just after the topping slab
has been placed. The contours shown above reflect the upward deflection due to prestress force,
downward deflection due to the hollow core slab self-weight and downward deflection due to the plastic
(wet) topping weight.
2/10/14
11
VOID DAMS - Void dams are provided by CTC to restrict the flow of C.I.P. concrete into the
slab voids. Typically, the dam is placed six inches from the ends of the slab at voids without
pour slots. The dam is placed two feet from the ends of the slab at voids with pour slots. This
distance can be modified as required for embedment of reinforcement or to increase the slab
end shear strength. To facilitate the placement and consolidation of the concrete fill, CTC
recommends and provides blockouts in the top of the voids at locations where endfill length
exceeds 1'-6".
BEARING - The recommended design bearing dimension is three inches with a field
installation minimum of two inches. CTC recommends and furnishes a 3/8" x 1/4" neoprene
end bearing strip to provide uniform bearing during erection. Final bearing is provided when
C.I.P. concrete fills the remaining space.
GROUT KEYS - The longitudinal keys between adjacent slabs must be filled with grout to fully
develop the concentrated load distribution and shear friction capacity of the Hollow Core slab
system. CTC recommends a mix consisting of one (1) part cement to three (3) parts paving or
builder's sand by weight, with a maximum water content of five (5) gallons per sack of cement.
RESISTANCE TO LATERAL LOADS - Lateral loads may be transmitted through Hollow Core
slabs to resisting elements, such as frames or shear walls, by diaphragm action. When
concrete topping is to be installed over the slabs, the diaphragm is normally designed to be in
the topping. In this case, shear transfer takes place by shear friction, based on WWR or other
reinforcement in the topping. For untopped systems, diaphragm action is developed by means
of shear friction reinforcement at the ends of the slabs, as described in CTA Technical Bulletin
80B3. It is important to detail this reinforcement such that it is effectively anchored into the
lateral force resisting system, such as by reinforcement hooked into shear walls.
VOID DRAIN HOLES - Void drain holes will be installed in Hollow Core slabs. Cap top holes
prior to soil backfill or topping pour to prevent material from washing into void and plugging
drains. Drain holes must be cleaned out after end closure concrete pours are complete. The
contractor may patch holes, if necessary, once structure is weather proofed.
CONSTRUCTION LOADS - The hollow core slabs for the vault lid are designed to carry the
"Design Loads" only after vault construction is complete, all design concrete and grout
strengths have been achieved and all cover has been placed over the vault within the limits
specified on CTC's production drawings. For contractor's evaluation of construction loads,
allowable uniform loads on the bare slabs can be obtained from CTC's website
www.concretetech.com.
ASPECT RATIO - A minimum of three each, four-foot nominal width hollow core slabs are
required in a bay. Additionally, the ratio of hollow core span length to cumulative width of
adjacent slabs in a bay shall be 2.0 or less.
10/1/14
12
2/10/14
13
< 2'-2"
UNACCEPTABLE
2'-2" WIDTH
2'-7"
ACCEPTABLE
2'-7"
< WIDTH
3'-1" WIDTH
3'-6" ACCEPTABLE
< 4'-0"
UNACCEPTABLE
WIDTH
< 1'-6"
UNACCEPTABLE
1'-6" WIDTH
1'-9"
ACCEPTABLE
3'-6"
< WIDTH
8" ULTRASPAN
1'-9"
< WIDTH
2'-1" WIDTH
2'-4"
< WIDTH
2'-8" WIDTH
2'-4" ACCEPTABLE
< WIDTH
< 3'-4"
UNACCEPTABLE
3'-4" WIDTH
3'-7"
ACCEPTABLE
< WIDTH
< 4'-0"
UNACCEPTABLE
2'-11"
3'-7"
2/10/14
14
8" ULTRASPAN
12" ULTRASPAN
12" ULTRASPAN
2/10/14
15
8" ULTRASPAN
2/10/14
16