Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract In this paper, we introduced the concept of -Hv-modules, which is a generalization of -modules and Hvmodules. The notion of
investigated.
Keywords Hyperoperation, Algebraic hyperstructure, -Hv-module,
,q -fuzzy Hv-submodule.
I. INTRODUCTION
The algebraic hyperstructure is a natural generalization of the usual algebraic structures which was first initiated by Marty
[1]. After the pioneering work of F. Marty, algebraic hyperstructures have been developed by many researchers. A short
review of which appears in [2]. A recent book on hyperstructures [3] points out their applications in geometry, hypergraphs,
binary relations, lattices, fuzzy sets and rough sets, automata, cryptography, codes, median algebras, relation algebras,
artificial intelligence and probabilities. Vougiouklis [4] introduced a new class of hyperstructures so-called Hv-structure, and
Davvaz [5] surveyed the theory of Hv-structures. The Hv-structures are hyperstructures where equality is replaced by nonempty intersection.
The concept of fuzzy sets was first introduced by Zadeh [6] and then fuzzy sets have been used in the reconsideration of
classical mathematics. In particular, the notion of fuzzy subgroup was defined by Rosenfeld [7] and its structure was thereby
investigated. Liu [8] introduced the notions of fuzzy subrings and ideals. Using the notion of belongingness
and
q of fuzzy points with fuzzy sets, the concept of , -fuzzy subgroup where , are any two
of , q, q, q with q was introduced in [9]. The most viable generalization of Rosenfelds fuzzy
subgroup is the notion of , q -fuzzy subgroups, the detailed study of which may be found in [10]. The concept of an
,q -fuzzy subring and ideal of a ring have been introduced in [11] and the concept of ,q -fuzzy subnear-ring
quasi-coincidence
and ideal of a near-ring have been introduced in [12]. Fuzzy sets and hyperstructures introduced by Zadeh and Marty,
respectively, are now studied both from the theoretical point of view and for their many applications. The relations between
fuzzy sets and hyperstructures have been already considered by many authors. In [13-15], Davvaz applied the concept of
fuzzy sets to the theory of algebraic hyperstructures and defined fuzzy Hv-subgroups, fuzzy Hv-ideals and fuzzy Hvsubmodules, which are generalizations of the concepts of Rosenfelds fuzzy subgroups, fuzzy ideals and fuzzy submodules.
The concept of a fuzzy Hv-ideal and Hv-subring has been studied further in [16, 17].The concept of (, q)-fuzzy
subhyperquasigroups of hyperquasigroups was introduced by Davvaz and Corsini [18]; also see [19-24]. As is well known,
the concept of rings was first introduced by Nobusawa in 1964, which is a generalization of the concept of rings. Davvaz
et.al. [25] introduced the notion of
II.
BASIC DEFINITIONS
We first give some basic definitions for proving the further results.
Definition 2.1[27] Let X be a non-empty set. A mapping : X [0, 1] is called a fuzzy set in
denoted by
X . The complement of
G. Where A B
aA, bB
a b, A, B G.
G ,
A hyperstructure
is called an Hv-group if
(i) is weak associative.
a G = G a = G, a G (Reproduction axiom).
( R, , ) with two hyperoperations satisfying the ring-like axioms:
Definition 2.3[28] An Hv-ring is a system
(ii)
a R R a R a R;
ii ( R, )
iii
is an Hv-semigroup;
( x ( y z )) ( x y x z ) ,
(( x y) z ) ( x z y z ) .
Definition 2.4[26] Let R be an Hv-ring. A nonempty subset I of R is called a left (resp., right) Hv-ideal if the following
axioms hold:
( I , ) is an Hv-subgroup of ( R, ) ,
(ii) R I I (resp., I R I ).
( R, , ) be an Hvring and a fuzzy subset of R . Then is said to be a left (resp., right) fuzzy
Definition 2.5[26] Let
Hv
(1) min{ ( x), ( y )} inf{ ( z ) : z x y}x, y R,
-ideal of R if the following axioms hold:
(i)
{x X | (x) t}
Let be a fuzzy subset of a non-empty set X and let t (0, 1]. The set t
is called a level cut of .
Theorem 2.2[15] Let R be an Hv-ring and a fuzzy subset of R. Then is a fuzzy left (resp., right) Hv-ideal of R if and only
if for every t (0, 1],
When is a fuzzy Hv-ideal of R, t is called a level Hv-ideal of R. The concept of level Hv-ideal has been used extensively
to characterize various properties of fuzzy Hv-ideals.
III.
-HV-MODULES
1 x y R,
2 (x y) z (x z y z) , x( )y (x y x y) , x (y z) (x y x z) ,
3 x (y z) (x y) z .
In
what
R, ,
be a
1 a m1 m2 a m1 a m2 ;
2 a b m1 a m1 b m1 ;
3 a m1 a m1 a m1 ;
4 a b m1 a b m1 .
is a
-subgroup of
2 r x A, for all r R,
and
x A.
X be a non-empty set. The set of all fuzzy subsets of X is denoted by F X . For any A X and r (0, 1], the
r
fuzzy subset A of X is defined by
r if x A,
rA x
0 otherwise,
rA
A;
rA
x X.
Let
for all
In particular, when r = 1,
or
xr q .
x r 1
For
, then we write
F X ,
x yA y .
written as
xr
xr q
) if
A fuzzy point
x r
, F X , q
if and only if
r , r ,.....r 0,1 ,
x r 1
). If
x r
For any
if and only if
define the relation on F(X) as follows:
, F X ,
xr
(resp.,
For any
(resp.,
xr .
when A = {x},
xr
implies
and
M r1 , r2 ,.....rn ,
xr q
for all
q.
r1 r2 ..... rn
for
q means
n
all 1 2
does not hold and q implies
is not true.
Lemma 4.1[30] Let X be a non-empty set and , F(X). Then q if and only if (x) M ((x), 0.5) for all x X.
Lemma 4.2[30] Let X be a non-empty set and , , F(X) be such that q q. Then q.
Clearly, Lemma 4.1 implies that if and only if M((x), 0.5) = M((x), 0.5) for all x X and , F(X), and it follows
from Lemmas 4.1 and 4.2 that is an equivalence relation on F(X).
Now, let us define some operations of fuzzy subsets in a Hv-module M.
Definition 4.3. Let , F(M) and . We define fuzzy subsets
and
by
Page | 36
z zx y M x , y
.
It is worth noting that for any
Lemma 4.4. Let
and
M x , y
zx y
xr , ys F M , xr ys M r , s x y
1 , 2 , 1 , 2 F R
1 1 q2 2
such that
1 q 2
and
and
xr ys M r , s x y .
1 q 2 .
Then
1 1 1 q2 2
and
for all .
2 1 1 q2 2 .
1 , .
2 , .
3 ,
for
4 , for all
all
all .
Proof. The proof of (1)(4) is straightforward. We show (5). Let x R and . If
.
for
x 0 x . Otherwise, we have
x M y , z M y , M p , q
M y , p , y , q
M a , b
M y , z x .
x y z
x y z
x y z , z p q
z p q
xa b , a y p ,b y q
x y z
Hence
.
IV.
In this section, using the new ordering relation on F (M), we define and investigate (, q)-fuzzy left (right) Hvsubmodules of Hv-module.
Definition 5.1. A fuzzy subset of M is called an ( , q)-fuzzy left (resp., right) Hv-submodule if it satisfies the
following conditions:
(F1a)
q ,
(F2a)
xt , as
(F3a)
xt , as
x a y and yM r , s q ,
zM r , s q ,
x z a
and
R
(F4a) R
(resp.,
) for all .
A fuzzy subset of M is called an ( , q)-fuzzy Hv-submodule of M if it is both an ( , q)-fuzzy left and an ( ,
q)-fuzzy right Hv-submodule of M.
Before proceeding, let us first provide some auxiliary lemmas.
Lemma 5.2. Let F (M). Then (F1a) holds if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
(F1b)
(F1c)
xr , ys
implies
M r , s x y q
z M x , y ,0.5
zx y
for all x, y M.
Page | 37
xr , ys
z zab M a , b M x , y M r , s .
M r , s x y q .
zM r , s
Hence
and so
z x y, we have
M r , s x y q .
by (F1c), we have 0.5 > (x) M ((y), (z), 0.5), which implies (x) M((y), (z)).
r x M a , b x x ,
xa b
xa b
Hence we have
a contradiction. Hence (F1a) is
satisfied.
Lemma 5.3. Let F (M). Then (F2a) holds if and only if the following condition holds:
xa y
xt , at
but
yt q ,
x a y , we have (y) < (x) (a). Choose t such that (y) < t < M ((x), (a)).
x a y , we have (y) < M ((x), (a), 0.5). Then x0.5 , a0.5 , but y0.5 q ,
x , a .
q.
Therefore, M t ,r
Hence (F2a) holds.
Lemma 5.4. Let F(M). Then (F3a) holds if and only if the following condition holds:
(F3b) for all x, a M there exists z M such that x z a and M ((a), (x), 0.5) (z).
Proof. It is similar to the proof of Lemma 5.3.
Lemma 5.5. Let F(M) and . Then (F4a) holds if and only if one of the following conditions holds:
(F4b)
xr
implies
ry x1 q
(resp.,
rx y1 q
(F4c) zx y
(resp., zx y
Proof. The proof is similar to the proof of Lemma 5.2.
[ ] {x R | x q}
r
r
Let be a fuzzy subset and r (0, 1]. Then the set
is called the q-level subset of .
The next theorem provides the relationship between ( , q)-fuzzy left (resp., right) Hv-submodules of Hv-module and
crisp left (resp., right) Hv-submodules of Hv-module.
F(M). Then
(, q) -fuzzy left (resp., right) Hv-submodule of M if and only if r ( r ) is a left (resp., right) Hvr (0, 0.5].
submodule of M for all
(1) is an
(, q) -fuzzy left (resp., right) Hv-ideal of R if and only if [ ]r ([ ]r ) is a left (resp., right) Hv-ideal of
r (0,1].
R for all
(2) is an
Page | 38
r (0, 0.5].
r (0.5,1].
r (0, 0.5]. We have 1 r 0.5 r and so (z) M(r, r, 0.5) = r or (z) M(r, 1 r, 0.5) = r or (z) M(1
z x y. Hence z r for all z x y.
r, 1 r, 0.5) = 0.5 r for all
Case a: Since
Case b: Since
r (0.5,1]. We have 1r < 0.5 < r and so (z) M(r, r, 0.5) = 0.5 or (z) > M(r, 1r, 0.5) = 1r or (z) >
z r q
z [ ]r
z x y.
z x y.
Hence
for all
for all
z x y. Similarly we can show that there exist y,z [ ]r such that x a y and x z a for all x, a [ ]r and
x y [ ]r
[ ]r
x M, y [ ]r
.
that
for all
and
Therefore,
is a left Hv-submodule of M.
Conversely, let
x, y [ ]r
but
z [ ]r
Let
x, y M. If there exists z M
z x y. Similarly we can show that there exist y, z M such that x a y, x z a, (y) M((x), (a),
x, y M and . Therefore, is an
0.5) and (z) M((x), (a), 0.5) and that (xy) M((y), 0.5) for all
(, q) -fuzzy left Hv-submodule of M by Lemmas 5.25.5.
for all
[1] F. Marty, Sur une generalization de la notion de groupe, in: 8th Congress Math. Scandianaves, Stockholm, 1934, pp. 4549.
[2] P. Corsini, Prolegomena of Hypergroup Theory, second ed., Aviani Editor, 1993.
[3] P. Corsini, V. Leoreanu, Applications of Hyperstructure Theory, in: Advances in Mathematics (Dordrecht), Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht,2003.
[4] T. Vougiouklis, The fundamental relation in hyperrings. The general hyperfield, in: Proc. 4 th
International Congress on Algebraic
Hyperstructures and Applications, Xanthi, 1990, World Sci. Publishing, Teaneck, NJ, (1991), 203-211.
[5] B. Davvaz, A brief survey of the theory of Hv-structures, in: Proc. 8th Int. Congress AHA, Greece Spanids Press, 2003, pp. 3970.
[6] L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Inform. Control, 8 (1965), 338-353.
[7] A. Rosenfeld, Fuzzy groups, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 35 (1971) 512517.
[8] W.J. Liu, Fuzzy invariant subgroups and fuzzy ideals, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 8 (1982) 133139.
[9] S.K. Bhakat,
(, q) -fuzzy normal, quasinormal and maximal subgroups, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 112 (2000) 299312.
(, q)
Hv
Hv
[15] B. Davvaz, On
Hv
Hv
Hv
v -ideals in
v -rings, Korean J. Compu. Appl. Math., 8 (2001), 685-693.
[17] B. Davvaz, Product of fuzzy
[18] B. Davvaz, P. Corsini, Generalized fuzzy sub-hyperquasigroups of hyperquasigroups, Soft Comput. 10 (11) (2006) 11091114.
[19] B. Davvaz, P. Corsini, Generalized fuzzy hyperideals of hypernear-rings and many valued implications, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 17 (3)
(2006) 241251.
[20] B. Davvaz, P. Corsini, On (, )-fuzzy Hv-ideals of Hv -rings, Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 5 (2) (2008) 3547.
Page | 39
[21] B. Davvaz, J. Zhan, K.P. Shum, Generalized fuzzy Hv-submodules endowed with interval valued membership functions, Inform. Sci.
178 (2008) 31473159.
[22] O. Kazanc, B. Davvaz, Fuzzy n-ary polygroups related to fuzzy points, Comput. Math. Appl. 58 (7) (2009) 14661474.
[23] J. Zhan, B. Davvaz, K.P. Shum, A new view of fuzzy hyperquasigroups, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 20 (45) (2009) 147157.
[24] J. Zhan, B. Davvaz, K.P. Shum, A new view of fuzzy hypernear-rings, Inform. Sci. 178 (2008) 425438.
[25] B.Davvaz, J.Zhan, Y.Yin, Fuzzy Hv-ideals in -Hv-rings, Computer and Mathematics with Applications 61 (2011) 690-698.
[26] B. Davvaz, W. A. Dudek, Intuitionistic fuzzy
pp- 1-11.
[27]
[28]
[29]
[30]
Hv
Page | 40