Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aliya and Rincossi are members of the United Nations (UN). Convention on
the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export, and
Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property (CPC), United Nations
Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), United Nations Convention
against Transboundary Organized Crime (UNTOC), Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
It was July 2014, Ambassador Pam Cusi (Cusi) traveled to a port on the
coast of Aliya as part of a diplomatic mission. Several days later, Cusi
returned to Rincossi and was found in possession of 25 kg of illegal ivory,
which was immediately confiscated.
Rincossi then notified Aliyan officials, and the Parties decided to jointly
investigate the incident.
In November 2014, the investigation revealed that the Barnum Uritovsky
(BU) private group of Rincossi citizens involved in the international
transport business was involved in Cusis ivory purchase. Rincossi has been
monitoring BUs activities for years, leading to several arrests.
On 11 March 2015, the joint investigation revealed that the subject ivorys
DNA matched the DNA of Thornon elephants in Aliyas National Park. On the
same day, Aliya sent a diplomatic note to Rincossi requesting the return of
the ivory to Aliya.
On 17 April, Rincossi countered Aliyas claims, citing Article VIII(1)(b) of
CITES, which provides the choice of confiscation or return. Rincossi further
noted that CITES Resolutions 9.9 and 9.10 support destruction as the
preferred treatment.
Rincossi cited paragraph 15(II) of the London Declaration as further support
for the destruction of illegal ivory. Rincossi then announced 7 July 2015 as
the date for the ivorys public destruction.
I.
Rincossi fully complied with any international obligations and customary
international law regarding the prosecution of Ambassador Cusi and Barnum
Uritovsky for their alleged act of entering in to an illegal elephant ivory trade.
Rincossi did comply with the necessary prosecutorial actions under the
domestic law of their state.
II.
Rincossi did not violate international law by refusing to return ivory to
Aliya. International law permits Rincossi to publicly destroy the ivory.
Rincossi, as a sovereign State, has the authority to destroy the ivory, which
further supports its domestic priorities while also fulfilling its international
obligations. The said Thornon Elephant Ivory is deemed not to be part of the
cultural property of Aliya. Pursuant to the provisions of CPC.
Therefore, the ivory cannot be considered as a cultural property of Aliya.