Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
1536-1225 2015 IEEE. Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission.
See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.
951
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
952
Fig. 4. (a)
congurations.
mm (
of the rst CP band at 4.6 GHz in the upper
frequency band), the antenna exhibited the best performances
in terms of impedance matching and AR bandwidths for upper
band operation. However, the distance from the antenna to the
reector in the lower band (2.4 GHz) was less than a quarterwavelength. This resulted in poor antenna performances around
this frequency band caused by the image current effect.
B. Crossed Barbed-Shape Dipoles and Crossed Bowtie
Dipoles Over the AMC
To achieve better antenna characteristics at 2.4 GHz, the
AMC ground plane was employed as a replacement for the
metallic reector because of its unique reection-phase feature
that varied continuously from to
depending on frequency.
Study [8] demonstrated that the phase ranged from
to
with the magnitude of the surface impedance exceeded
the impedance of free space produces in-phase image currents
rather than out-of-phase image currents. Thus, it allowed
antenna elements to lie directly adjacent to the AMC surface
without being shorted out. Moreover, by properly combining
the directly radiated wave from the antenna with the reected
wave from the AMC structure, broadband operation features
were obtained. We designed and utilized an AMC surface that
worked in the frequency range of 22.7 GHz. The antenna
designed with the AMC ground plane is shown in Fig. 1, while
its characteristics are shown in Fig. 4, which compares this
antenna to the antenna that was used over the metallic reector.
Obviously, the antenna used over the AMC reector achieved
better performance in the lower band than the antenna used
over the metallic reector. In terms of impedance bandwidth,
the antenna yielded a wide operation of 36.7% (22.9 GHz) and
48% (3.86.2 GHz) at the lower and upper bands, respectively.
For the AR response in the lower band, the antenna used over
the metallic reector exhibited only one CP resonance radiated
by the fundamental mode of a barbed-shape dipole. When the
AMC reector was utilized, the antenna achieved a much better
performance of 20% (2.252.75 GHz) with an additional CP
band at 2.7 GHz generated by the AMC ground plane. It is also
noted that the additional CP band can be controlled by changing
the AMC size and decreasing the number of AMC cells made
this CP resonance shift upwards [12]. In the upper band, the
proposed antenna over the AMC and PEC reectors showed
953
V. CONCLUSION
This letter proposed a dual-band crossed dipole on an AMC
reector with wideband characteristics of AR and impedance
bandwidths. The antenna was composed of barbed-shape
dipoles and bowtie dipoles and placed over a nite AMC
surface. The measured results agreed well with the simulation
results, showing that the antenna has wide AR (
dB)
bandwidths of 19.3% and 33.8% in the lower and upper bands,
respectively, and impedance bandwidths (
dB) of
40% and 49.5% in the lower and upper bands, respectively.
The average gains for these bands were 6.6 and 7.4 dBic in
the lower and upper bands, respectively, and the antenna also
showed good right-handed CP (RHCP) radiation patterns in the
broadside direction.
REFERENCES
Fig. 7. Radiation patterns of the antenna at (a) 2.4, (b) 5.2, and (c) 5.8 GHz.