Professional Documents
Culture Documents
number of good reasons for the high ranking. The company looks for better ways to
develop sustainable production of its coffee. It has set in place some guidelines it
calls C.A.F.E Practices, ensuring environmental leadership, economic accountability,
and product quality. Starbucks also supports Ethos Water, which provides clean
water to more than a billion people.
Disney
Disney is a name known around the world, and though the company has been
around for a long time, its reputation is still a glowing one. The Walt Disney
Company largely focuses on a few areas of social responsibility, namely community,
the environment, and volunteerism. Disney has been a major provider of aid after
natural disasters, such as the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. The company also takes an
interest in protecting the environment, giving proceeds from nature films to plant
trees in the rain forest and protect thousands of acres of coral reef.
Recommended for You
Webcast, September 14th: Time Mastery for Marketers
NuSkin
NuSkin is a personal care company with a big focus on helping communities around
the world. One of the companys major initiatives is called Nourish the Children. The
program was started in 2002 and allows company sales leaders, employees, and
customers to donate nutrient-rich meals to needy children. In March 2014, NuSkin
announced that it had surpassed 350 million donated meals. The company also
operates the Force For Good Foundation, which works to offer children relief from
illiteracy, disease, and poverty.
Microsoft
Microsoft is another major company that takes great effort in giving back. The
company was even named the best at Corporate Social Responsibility by the
Reputation Institute. One way Microsoft is helping out is through its annual
Employee Giving Campaign, where employees attend fundraising events for
nonprofit organizations. The campaign has been held every year since 1983 and has
raised more than $1 billion in contributions to more than 31,000 organizations.
TOMS Shoes
TOMS Shoes might not be as well known as some of the other companies on this
list, but its charity work is still impressive. The entire company was founded on the
idea of giving back. For every pair of shoes sold, another pair is donated to a child in
need. More than 10 million pairs of shoes have been donated, and that charitable
effort has now extended to vision care for kids.
For these companies and many others, business isnt all about the bottom line. They
make strides to be a caring part of the community and help out those who live in
less fortunate circumstances. Theyre companies that know how important
Corporate Social Responsibility can be to others.
>>attitudes of business to env.?
Businesses damage the environment when they take natural resources from the
Earth and dispose of waste. All of this is done within the natural environment, a kind
of ecological system or ecosystem. Ecology refers to the science of the
interrelationships among organisms and their environments. The operative term is
interrelationships, implying that an interdependence exists all entities in the
environment (397). For example, a pond is an ecosystem that contains a large
number of living organisms that exist in a complex web of dependence and
interdependence.
Businesss traditional attitudes towards the environment
Businesses have traditionally shown egregious indifference towards the
environment. Environmental protection was rarely seen as an issue. A company
would harm the environment to whatever extent was profitable, and they often
harmed the environment despite the fact that it was unwarranted to do so. Shaw
discusses the attitudes of businesses that lead to unwarranted environmental
damage. In particular, people saw the natural world as a free and unlimited good
(398). People at one point thought that the worlds resources could be taken without
end and without any morally significant harm done. Pollution could damage the
environment, but the damage done was considered to be insignificant because the
world was seen as such a large place.
However, resources arent unlimited and many people and animals are harmed from
environmental damage. In Garrett Hardins parable, The Tragedy of the Commons,
he describes the importance of the environment to human interests based on the
fact that its limited (399). He describes villages who share a pasture and let farm
animals graze indiscriminately. The meadow eventually loses all its grass and the
villagers are left with a serious problem of having no way to feed their animals.
Hardins parable is often relevant to real life issues, such as overfishing (ibid.). If the
fish population is depleted by fishermen, then the fishing industry will go out of
business.
The ethics of environmental protection
How is the environment relevant to business ethics? First, its in our interest to
protect the environment insofar as we are human beings and we are often harmed
by environmental damage and measures to protect the environment can benefit us
all (400). Second, many people dont feel responsible for harming the environment
because they dont personally do much harm to it (ibid.). Third, companies that
harm the environment have externalities (and harm others) that they unfairly
benefit from, which can violate our right to non-injury (ibid.). I would like to add that
externalities can also be in the formfo harm done to nonhuman animals.
<assessment?
Abstract
Companies in the mining and oil and gas (MOG) industries operate in diverse
institutional contexts, including developed and developing countries. The
companies face significant environmental and social challenges ranging from
pollution to community relation issues and must adhere to the requirements of
several different national, international, and industry-wide institutional frameworks
and standards. They have responded to these challenges by developing corporate
social responsibility (CSR) practices. Drawing on new institutional and management
standards literature, we develop and explain the concept of regulatory scripts,
defined as the practices shared by a group of organizations in an industry in
response to international frameworks and standards, which we call institutional
expectations. We examine a data set of international CSR-leading MOG companies
and a set of interviews with experts in these industries. Our study contributes to the
existing body of literature in the field by mapping and identifying the main CSR
institutional expectations in the MOG industries, identifying the regulatory scripts
that appear in response to these institutional expectations across 20 firms in four
areas and 29 sub-areas of CSR, and evaluating the managerial reach/scope and
limits of these regulatory scripts.