Running head: RESEARCH PROPOSAL

The Determinants of innovation performance in the Retail Industry: A case of New Zealand's
Retail Sector
Students Name:
Institution Affiliation:
ID number:

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

Introduction
Innovation performance is the outcome and benefits the process of innovation generates
(Kamasak, 2015). The word innovation finds origin in the Latin term Innovare connoting to
renew, initiate change, and start again
1.1 Background of the Retailing Business in New Zealand
The retail business in New Zealand experienced a commercial progress in 2015,
unending the regaining the market appreciated throughout the period of review ("Retail trade",
2016). The financial recovery paid to growth in confidence among customers and companies
alike, as work levels grew, and price fractuation was preserved("Retailing in New Zealand",
2016). As an outcome, the purchaser relationship with local products and vendors in New
Zealand was bound, partly as clients wished to shop local. Nonetheless, the attraction of
broader ranges and inexpensive products has attracted many to overseas online retailing. Global
brands charm New Zealanders with no cost and tax shipping on goods below NZ$450. This has
steered many local retailers to challenge exclusively on price, as they endeavor to retain their
consumer base.
Internet retailing rose meaningfully in the last portion of the review era, driven essentially
by mobile online retailing, as tablets and smartphones persisted popularity grow. This surge in
action delivered strong rivalry to cloths retail channels, eventually leading to a drop in outlet
figures in late 2015("The New Zealand Sectors Report 2014: Main report | Ministry of Business,
Innovation and Employment", 2016). In the look of this, the growth of Omni-channel
approaches, whereby retailers pay attention on both physical and online trade, has matured
(Zealand, 2016). Leaders in retail, including Kmart and Progressive Enterprises, have capitalized
in the design of phone apps that guarantee that the shopping practice is completely easier and
extra pleasant.
Some business are suffering from consolidation, that is, main players like Kmart are
taking gain of markets of balance to price out contenders in categories that are principally driven
by cost competition, while the rest are more fragmented, mostly internet trade("Industry and
product information | The University of Auckland - Libraries and Learning Services", 2016).
This is attributable to the small start-up capital linked with the category, and the qualified ease of
entrance ("Role of Innovation in Economic Growth in a New Zealand Context - Speech - 21

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

October 2010 The Treasury - New Zealand", 2010). Expenses are low since there is no
requirement for an actual store presence (2016). Price governance largely resolved shopper
purchasing conduct and the key players, such as Kmart and PAKnSAVE ("Retail Centres",
2016), remained able to influence their leads in the form of investments for consumers.
1.1.1The Purposes for measuring Innovation Performance
The abstract custom of innovation performance material has a weighty effect on quality
of management, selection of project and the success of economic innovation ("How you Measure
Innovation Results do and Outcomes? | Innovation Management", 2016). If workers are given
access to capacity results and corresponding learning circles are put in place, there will be a
boost to overall corporate administrative efficiency. Therefore, system of measuring innovation
performance is an aid and facilitator for discovering and locating specific flaws among a
companys innovation competences ("Taking the measure of your innovation performance",
2016). Second is centering teams attention on the correct projects, the true activities, and
behavior. Third is selecting the right objectives and relevant motivations to drive worker
involvement, eventually growing innovation competence, and effectiveness.
1.2 Research problem:
There is no accurate determinant (or measurement) for innovation performance
regardless of the vast amount of measures available (Kamasak, 2015). Most are designed along a
range of dimensions. The so-called Inputs-Process-Outputs-Outcomes model is the earliest and
classic models. In this model, a businesss innovation commotion is measured as a system around
the Research & Development lab where outputs (rights, produces, processes, etc.) are because of
inputs (resources, ideas, persons, etc.). These in turn are elevated by manufacturing, advertising,
and other commercial functions, ultimately leading to yields such as trades, price savings, or
produce enhancements. However, this ideal relies on urbane feedback rounds and a total
appreciation of a businesss innovation course that is neither continuously perfect nor necessary
for managing everyday innovation.
The Innovation-centered Balanced Scorecard is an alternative capacity framework
with an advantage of separating KPIs into leading arrays and providing complete, yet late
evidence indicators (Bettencourt, Trancik, & Kaur, 2013). Nevertheless, the overall sets are

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

incomplete as features such as tactical measures (intentional fit, objective satisfaction) or data
management (expanding and misusing a companys knowledge vile) are absent.
The innovation management measurement areas framework is the most recent and
best all-inclusive approaches ("The International Handbook on Innovation, 2016). The series
and categorization of innovation events may differ across groups and projects, but their fruitful
management is affected by an assured sum of factors at the core of this extent framework.
However, the prominence on the whole company and its ability to create change involves serious
constructs from innovation research and organization theory. Compared to traditional KPIs, these
can also pose considerable challenges in terms of operationalization and implementation: A
multi-item scale relying on survey answers is more complex to deploy than merely counting the
number of patent filings.
From the elaborations above, it becomes apparent that most current models are
limited in that they do not cover all relevant aspects and/or overemphasize financial outcomes of
innovation activity. To overcome these issues, there is need for a synthesized approach primarily
based on the measurement areas framework. This is the holistic six-dimensional model of
innovation management measurement that focuses on key activities and success factors of the
innovation task transcending the traditional focus on hard outcome metrics alone.
1.4 Research Questions
The researcher will assume and exploited the research questions below to make certain the
elements of innovation performance in the New Zealands Retail Industry.
i.
ii.
iii.

What are the essentials of innovation performance globally and in New Zealand?
What are the prevailing determinants of innovation performance in New Zealand?
What should the New Zealand Retail Industry do to improve on innovation
performance?

Significance of the Study

The importance of the outcomes is at personal, international, and national levels. It will

also benefit in company policy reforms, boosting the countrys retail infrastructure and
restriction financial leakages. In addition is data proliferation. The results will grow the scope
and standard of literature for upcoming scholars. Company policy experts and executives

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

especially those involved in the retail and national trade practices are anticipated to profit from
the outcomes of the study.
Conceptual Framework

A conceptual framework as a graphical illustration of an assumptive interconnection of the

researchs variables ("What is a conceptual framework? definition and meaning", 2016). This
abstract model classifies two variables sets. The independent variable is Innovation performance,
while the dependent variable is the effect/determinant. The assumptive interconnection herein is
that, although the given element of innovation performance methodology has a set standard, it
may be affected by a given determinant model.
Independent Variables

Innovative Performance
Aspire
Choose
Discover
Evolve:
Accelerate
Scale
Extend
Mobilize

Figure 1.1:

Dependent variable
Determinants
Innovation Output and Rate
Measures
Stock of Ideas
Tech push vs. Demand Pull
Certainty of technology
Structure of Market and
Firm size
Firm type

Concept of ascertaining determinants of innovation performance in New

Zealands retail industry.

1.7

Theoretical Framework
According to, Amin 2005, a theoretical framework is an evaluation of the broader theory

alongside the study with which it is established. In this case, the researcher will consider the
essential theory as the fundamental principles attempt to describe, appreciate, or even forecast
this interrelationship amongst the study variables.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL
1.7.1

Offshore sourcing Theory

In the theory, off shoring consist of voyage over domestic boundaries to procure imports

and services. This resolution is based essentially on supply of producers with operational
competences, relative cost lead, and reasonable eminence culture and insight in delivery. It can
be observed that these may create a companys lead over another. This theory is applicable to this
study to the level of its capacity to rationally, bring out these prompting factors even though the
theory is extensive, generically developed and cross cutting across sectors than retail.

Literature Review
In the review of existing literature on innovation and innovation performance, I will develop a
succession of hypotheses.
3. The Determinants
3.1 Hypothesis 1: The increase in stock of Ideas results in the rise in rate of new ideas
production
3.1.1 Stock of Ideas
According to Romers model, the companys desire to innovate by accumulating
knowledge drives growth. Since monopolistic rivalry (patent system) makes information a partly
excludable input, retail businesses profit from their staff innovations. Romer proves that
companies cannot endure settings of impeccable competition if they are reliant on some degree
of no rival inputs (availability of free knowledge) ("Exploring the motives and determinants of
innovation performance of Malaysian offshore international joint ventures: Management
Decision: Vol 49, No 10", 2016). Romers ideal specifies that awareness is outcompeting and that
the growth rate in the companys economy as a whole profit from data spillovers, that is, small
retail companies in New Zealand are able to create use of rises in their total store of knowledge,
to profitably exploit fresh produces or processes thus their economic growth
3.1.2 Innovation Rate and Output Measures
Mairesse & Mohnen, 2002, in analyzing European Communal Innovation Reviews
associated innovation in seven states of Europe using innovative sales shares as an innovative
output indicator (Jeong, Park, & Yoon, 2016). They define it as the sales due to new products for

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

the firm (not essentially for the market) in the past three years. Other rate and output explanatory
measurement variables investigated comprise trade classification, employees numbers,
competition strength, vicinity to elementary research, presence of cooperation in R&D intensity
and innovation.
3.1.2 Hypothesis 2 Investment in innovation is determined jointly by technological
opportunity and market demand
3.1.2.1 Demand Pull versus Technology Push
(Di Stefano, Gambardella, & Verona, 2012) back the demand-pull and tech push
approach stating, the innovation process represents the convergence of technological
competences and market wants within the structure of the innovating company. While it is
widely acknowledged that diverse businesses face different hi-tech opportunities, there is no
overall agreement on how these openings must be measured. A clear approach is to treat hi-tech
prospects as the pliability of unit cost with veneration to Research & Development spending.
3.1. 3 Hypothesis 3: Increased certainty of technology inspires innovative activity.
3.1.3.1 Certainty of technology
Retail Companies like Kmart or Wal-Mart do not typically initiate development of new
merchandise or a process until the major technological uncertainties are removed by a low cost
research piloted either, internally or elsewhere (Hoppmann, 2014). However, none of all this
changes the chief deductions that investment in uncertain activities such as R&D, in the lack of
market intervention, is anticipated to be sub-optimal.
3.1.4 Hypothesis 4: Increase the level of Research & Development commenced is due to
entry barriers, higher turnover levels, and economies of balance in R&D mostly. This
resulting in tenacity of innovation.
3.1.4.1 Structure of Market and Firm Size
The qualitative variances between the inventive activities of small and large retail
enterprises with up-to-date R&D workshops proposes most remarkably firms like Kmart,
capitalize in new merchandises and practices because they anticipate this allows them attain
monopoly and abnormal profits. Meanwhile, time initiatives that have attained monopoly

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

control are more probable to be able to practice resources in unrestricted ways including
stocking in R&D ("Research and development", 2016). This results into the proposal that
obstacles to entry, advanced profit levels, and markets of scale in R&D mostly increase the
R&D level accepted leading to tenacity of innovation. On the other hand, these situations may
cheer retail businesses to become unworried and fair-minded to change.
3.1.5 Hypothesis 5: Innovation rate and output vary with retail company type.
3.1.5.1 Firm Type
Retail companies mainly in electronics and pharmacies are comparatively big, and
cultivate innovations over a variety of explicit product sets within their major sector, but
moderately few external. These individualities and variations use a three-part nomenclature of
companies like supplier domination, intensive production, or science founded. Similarly, it can
be argued that specific types of retail firms may be extra innovative than the rest for the reason
that retail businesses have different competences and insights that tip them to chase different
arrays of tactics to innovation performance
3.2 Essentials of innovation performance in New Zealand
3.2.1 Aspire and Inspire
An innovation aspiration meets financial growth objectives of a company (Kamasak,
2015). The vast majority of New Zealand companies do not quantify the innovation-led progress
requirement over time. They do not do this as part of their strategy and design processes. Its only
when this is quantified that a company is able to guarantee that directors make the appropriate
trade-off to initiate innovation together with other commercial activities and lay in place the
suitable metrics to track advancement. Retail companies in New Zealand should quantify and
sum all the non-innovation progress levers and complement this to the momentum, forecast("The
eight essentials of innovation", 2015). The resulting innovation development gap is the worth a
business needs to generate through innovation performance. On how to aspire or even inspire,
executives need to communicate an inspiring vision to staff and customers, Set a strong goal for
innovation-led advance and align leadership and work promotion around the criticality of
innovation.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

3.2.2 Choose
Company Executives must have a strong intellect of wherever the top current and
prospect market openings can be initiated and then find the optimal selection equilibrium for all
their enterprises across time, threat, and rate. Lack of confidence is a common obstacle to
making such choices. Aligning the portfolio of innovation plans with business financial goals and
business policy, and Making sure the company is clear on the innovation refrains pursued are
some of ways of choosing.

Methodology
Research Design:
This study will be carried out in the city of Rotorua, New Zealand because many retail
companies are set out in the city. The study will carry a survey that exploits a cross-sectional
design. Material for the primary data will be collected from customers, employees, and retail
professionals in various establishments within city of Rotorua while the secondary information
will be gathered from the review of literature relevant on the question of the study.
Population of the Study
The study population will include public retail customers and professionals including
CEOs, Project Managers, employees, and I.T Engineers, both in the public retail and private
sectors.
Sample size and Sampling Techniques
A sample size of 120 respondents will be used for this study. This sample will be obtained
using the simple random sampling technique. This is because the researcher believes that all the
fundamentals of the study population are proficient of giving significant replies to the questions
requested.
Method of Data Collection
Data collected for this study will be from both the secondary and primary sources. The
researcher will design a well-structured questionnaire to be used to collect primary data from the
respondents. The researcher will administer these questionnaires on the respondents with the aid

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

10

of some professional colleagues. The secondary data for the study on the other hand will be
gathered through an appraisal of articles published by relevant expert journals.
Data Analysis and Presentation
The number of questionnaires to be dispersed for analysis will be seventy-five (75). I will
use the SPSS computer software package and the descriptive statistics statistical tool, which
include the use of tables, percentages and mean scores. Quantitative data will be studied, and
presented using evocative statistics like simple frequencies and offered in tables and figures.
Qualitative data will thematically be accessed using approaches like direct verbatim quoting

Conclusion
Companies are not accidentally principal innovators; an outstanding chief innovator is yet
tougher still. The principal steps to structuring an innovative business need appreciating where
your status and then evaluating the gap to whom you want to turn out to be. The Innovation
fingerprint is a measure of the extent to which a business follows the finest practices personified
in the Eight Essentials. By illustrating input from all thru the business in an organized way, retail
companies in New Zealand can gain a measurable sense of their present capabilities and instigate
a measure of the gap to principal performance.

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

11

References
(2016). Retrieved 23 September 2016, from https://www.newzealandnow.govt.nz/investing-innz/opportunities-outlook/economic-overview
Bettencourt, L., Trancik, J., & Kaur, J. (2013). Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in
Energy Technologies. Plos ONE, 8(10), e67864.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067864
Di Stefano, G., Gambardella, A., & Verona, G. (2012). Technology push and demand pull
perspectives in innovation studies: Current findings and future research directions.
Research Policy, 41(8), 1283-1295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.021
Exploring the motives and determinants of innovation performance of Malaysian offshore
international joint ventures: Management Decision: Vol 49, No 10. (2016). Management
Decision. Retrieved from
http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/00251741111183799
Hoppmann, J. (2014). The Role of Deployment Policies in Fostering Innovation for Clean
Energy Technologies: Insights From the Solar Photovoltaic Industry. Business & Society,
54(4), 540-558. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650314558042
How do you Measure Innovation Results and Outcomes? | Innovation Management.
(2016).Innovationmanagement.se. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.innovationmanagement.se/imtool-articles/how-do-you-measure-innovationresults-and-outcomes/
Industry and product information | The University of Auckland - Libraries and Learning
Services. (2016). Library.auckland.ac.nz. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.library.auckland.ac.nz/guides/business/industry-and-product-information
Jeong, Y., Park, I., & Yoon, B. (2016). Forecasting technology substitution based on hazard
function. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 104, 259-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.014

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

12

Kamasak, R. (2015). Determinants of innovation Performance: A Resource-based Study.Procedia

- Social And Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1330-1337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.311
Kamasak, R. (2015). Determinants of innovation Performance: A Resource-based Study.Procedia
- Social And Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1330-1337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.311
Research and development. (2016). Stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/businesses/research_and_development.aspx
Retail Centres. (2016). Veolia Australia and New Zealand. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.veolia.com.au/our-services/services/commercial-buildings/retail-centres
Retail trade. (2016). Stats.govt.nz. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/industry_sectors/RetailTrade.aspx
Retailing in New Zealand. (2016). Euromonitor.com. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.euromonitor.com/retailing-in-new-zealand/report
Role of Innovation in Economic Growth in a New Zealand Context - Speech - 21 October 2010
The Treasury - New Zealand. (2010). Treasury.govt.nz. Retrieved 23 September 2016,
from http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/media-speeches/speeches/innovationecogrowth
Taking the measure of your innovation performance. (2016). Bain.com. Retrieved 23 September
2016, from http://www.bain.com/publications/articles/taking-the-measure-of-yourinnovation-performance.aspx
The eight essentials of innovation. (2015). McKinsey & Company. Retrieved 23 September
2016, from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporatefinance/our-insights/the-eight-essentials-of-innovation
The International Handbook on Innovation. (2016). Google Books. Retrieved 23 September
2016, from https://books.google.co.ke/books?
id=5UFLw_IMc_kC&pg=PA521&lpg=PA521&dq=There+is+no+accurate+determinant+

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

13

(or+measurement)
+for+innovation+performance&source=bl&ots=hrTh1fAyEn&sig=UexDlfKCvGPl6WK
bdjiaPmEypuU&hl=en&sa=X&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=There%20is%20no
%20accurate%20determinant%20(or%20measurement)%20for%20innovation
%20performance&f=false
The New Zealand Sectors Report 2014: Main report | Ministry of Business, Innovation and
Employment. (2016). Mbie.govt.nz. Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.mbie.govt.nz/info-services/business/business-growth-agenda/sectors-reportsseries/published-report
What is a conceptual framework? definition and meaning. (2016). BusinessDictionary.com.
Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.businessdictionary.com/definition/conceptual-framework.html
Zealand, T. (2016). Trends Shaping the Future of Grocery in New Zealand. Nielsen.com.
Retrieved 23 September 2016, from
http://www.nielsen.com/nz/en/insights/news/2015/trends-shaping-the-future-of-groceryin-nz.html