Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/jfoodeng
a,*
, Esteban A. Brignole
Abstract
The group-contribution with association equation of state (GCA-EoS) is applied to represent high-pressure phase equilibria in
mixtures of supercritical gases (carbon dioxide, propane) with fatty oil derivatives, such as mono- and di-glycerides, fatty acids and
fatty acid esters.
Association eects in these mixtures are described by a group-contribution approach using three dierent association groups: the
hydroxyl group, the acid group and the ester group.
Satisfactory predictions of vaporliquid equilibria, liquidliquid equilibria and c1 of binary and ternary mixtures of high-molecular weight triacyglycerides and their derivatives with carbon dioxide or propane are obtained.
It is shown that the GCA-EoS is a powerful engineering tool for the design and optimization of extraction and fractionation
processes of fatty oil derivatives with supercritical uids.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Fatty oils; Phase equilibria; Thermodynamic modelling; Association; Group-contribution
1. Introduction
The design of extraction, fractionation and purication processes involving fatty oils and their derivatives,
using near critical or supercritical uids as solvents, requires the existence of thermodynamic models that are
able to represent these highly complex mixtures that include high-molecular weight triglycerides and their
derivatives with low-molecular weight solvents.
Usually, these natural products mixtures are described using cubic equations of state like Peng and
Robinson (1976) or Soave (1972). Some authors (Yu,
Zou, Bhaskar, Rizvi, & Zollweg, 1993) used the Peng
*
Robinson EoS with the Panagiotopoulos and Reid mixing rules to correlate vapourliquid equilibria (VLE) of
ternary mixtures of CO2 + methyl oleate + oleic acid.
Two interaction parameters for each pair of components
were estimated. Other researchers (Fuente, Fornari,
Brignole, & Bottini, 1997) have applied the SRK-EoS
with quadratic mixing rules to correlate vapourliquid
and liquidliquid equilibria (LLE) data for mixtures
containing sunower oil with ethane and propane. In
order to predict the appearance of a liquidliquid split,
binary interaction parameters for both the attractive energy parameter and the co-volume were introduced.
However, it was not possible to describe quantitatively
both VLE and LLE using only one set of parameters
for the co-volume, which indicated the limitations of
the van der Waals repulsive term to describe these asymmetric mixtures. More recently, the PengRobinson EoS
580
581
Table 1
GCA-EoS pure group and binary interaction parameters used in this work
Group
Ti* (K)
g**
g0
600
600
600
600
600
512.6
600
304.2
0.848
0.540
1.728
1.420
1.224
1.124
3.948
1.261
316910
356080
831400
831400
999600.5
787954.0
346350.0
531890.0
0.9274
0.8755
1.0930
1.0930
0.0
0.3634
1.3460
0.578
Group i
Group j
kij
k 0ij
aij
aji
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0382
g00
0.8520
1.0000
1.1000
0.9592
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0382
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CH2OH
CH3/CH2
COOH
0.8500
1.0383
0.0
0
11.90
0
1.62
0
CO2
CH3
CH2
CH3COO/CH2COO
TG
0.898
0.874
1.115
1.094
0.0
0.0
0.094
0.1120
0.0
0.0
1.615
1.651
0.0
0.0
1.615
1.651
CH2COO
CH3/CH2
CH2OH
0.8690
1.0000
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TG
CH3/CH2
0.8600
0.0
0.0
0.0
Table 2
GCA-EoS self and cross-association parameters
Groups
Self-association
COOH
OH
eij/k (K)
jij (cm3/mol)
6300.0
2700.0
0.0200
0.8621
Cross-association
i
eij/k (K)
jij (cm3/mol)
COOH
COOR
OH
COOR
3248.8
4500.0
2105.3
0.7786
0.1313
0.9916
OH
The GCA-EoS parameters used in this work (Espinosa et al., 2000; Ferreira et al., 2004; Gros et al., 1996)
are given on Tables 1 and 2.
2.1. Repulsive term
The critical diameter of components where the group
described in the attractive term coincides with the molecule (H2O, CH3OH, CO2) is given, rigorously, by the
equation (Skjold-Jrgensen, 1988):
dc
0:08943
RT c
Pc
13
2
associating groups) is characterized through two parameters: volume j and energy of association e/k. In some
cases where there is more then one associating group
present in the mixture, cross-association can occur
(e.g. acidhydroxyl; acidester). For these cases it is also
necessary to dene the cross-association parameters.
From the association point of view, the fatty oil mixtures considered in this work contain at least one of
three groups that can hydrogen bond: the ester, the alcohol and the acid group. The corresponding self-and
cross-association parameters used in this work are presented on Table 2 (Ferreira et al., 2004).
320
P (bar)
582
lauric acid, 60 C
caproic acid, 35 C
160
80
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CO mole fraction
2
Fig. 2. Binary VLE of CO2 and fatty acids. Exp. data: n d (Bharath
et al., 1993); (Byun et al., 2000); GCA-EoS prediction.
320
240
P (bar)
3. Predictions
40 C
60 C
80 C
160
80
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
CO mole fraction
2
Fig. 3. Binary VLE of CO2 and oleic acid: exp. (Bharath et al., 1992);
GCA-EoS prediction.
360
300
oleic acid
linoleic acid
P (bar)
240
60
180
120
100 C
150 C
200 C
P (bar)
40
60
0
0.0
20
0
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
CO mole fraction
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.2
0.4
0.6
CO 2 mole fraction
0.8
1.0
Fig. 4. Binary VLE of CO2 and unsaturated fatty acids at 40 C. Exp.
data: d oleic acid (Bharath et al., 1992); s linoleic acid (Chen et al.,
2000); GCA-EoS predictions.
Fig. 1. Binary VLE of CO2 and palmitic acid: Exp. data (Yau et al.,
1992); GCA-EoS predictions.
583
60
98 C
Pressure (bar)
91:1
C).
LCEP
It should be mentioned that all the parameters were
estimated using vapour pressure data of n-carboxylic
acids (from acetic to heptanoic acid) and binary lowpressure VLE data for small acids with alkanes (heptane
91 C
98 C
92 C
40
84 C
20
0
0.6
0.7
0.8
propane mole fraction
0.9
1.0
Fig. 5. Binary VLE and LLE for propane and oleic acid. Exp. data
(Hixson and Hixson, 1941); GCA-EoS predictions.
Table 3
Innite dilution activity coecients of n-heptane and ethyl acetate in palmitic acid, mono-, di- and tri-palmitin: comparison between experimental
data and model predictions
Solvents
T (K)
Solutes
n-Heptane
Ethyl acetate
Exp.
GCA-EoS
Error (%)
Exp.
GCA-EoS
Error (%)
Palmitic acid
355
366
374
1.51
1.54
1.59
1.20
1.21
1.21
20
21
24
1.36
1.32
1.34
1.25
1.23
1.21
8
7
10
Monopalmitin
355
365
375
2.07
2.02
2.02
1.72
1.68
1.64
17
17
19
1.33
1.28
1.15
1.17
1.17
1.18
12
9
3
Dipalmitin
355
365
375
0.99
0.96
0.96
0.95
0.91
0.88
4
5
9
0.72
0.69
0.68
0.91
0.87
0.85
26
27
25
Tripalmitin
351
361
368
0.61
0.61
0.61
0.63
0.63
0.63
3
3
3
1.23
1.06
1.11
1.37
1.34
1.31
11
26
18
584
Oleic acid
0.00 1.00
0.25
0.75
0.50
0.50
Cottonseed oil
0.75
1.00
0.00
0.50
0.75
nCH2
nCH@CH
0.25
0.30
0.45
42
42
36
0
3
6
39.3
3.60
0.00
1.00
Propane
xi
Palmitic acid
Oleic acid
Linoleic acid
Average value
0.25
0.25
Fatty acid
Cottonseed oil
The uidliquid equilibria of the ternary system supercritical carbon dioxide with several mixtures of oleic acid
and methyl oleate was studied (Yu et al., 1993). Fig. 7
shows the GCA-EoS predictions at the two temperatures
for which data are available: 40 and 60 C.
As can be seen, the GCA-EoS predicts the sharp increase in the solubility for both components as carbon
dioxide becomes supercritical: the solubilities for both
components decrease with temperature (at constant
pressure) and increase with pressure (at constant temperature). The model is also able to predict the higher
solubility of the ester relatively to the acid at a given
temperature and pressure. No additional parameters
were estimated for this system. For pressures higher
than 30 MPa, the GCA-EoS model predicts a curvature
on the solubility of oleic acid, which is not observed
experimentally.
3.6. Ternary system of CO2 + triolein + oleic acid
Carbon dioxide can be used as a solvent to remove
fatty acids from oil mixtures. With this purpose, some
researchers (Bharath, Inomata, Adschiri, & Arai, 1992)
R=1.00
R=0.75
R=0.50
R=0.25
R=0.00
30
20
40
T = 40 C
P(MPa)
P(MPa)
40
10
20
T = 40 C
R=1.0
0
R=0.7
5
R=0.5
10
0
0.97
0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
CO2 mole fraction
40
1.0
10
0
0.0
P(MPa)
20
R=1.00
R=0.75
R=0.50
R=0.25
R=0.00
0.5
CO2 mole fraction
1.00
T = 60 C
30
20
10
1.0
0.98
0.99
CO2 mole fraction
40
T = 60 C
30
P(MPa)
30
0
0.97
R=1.00
R=0.75
R=0.50
R=0.25
R=0.00
0.98
0.99
CO2 mole fraction
1.00
Fig. 7. VLE for the system CO2 + methyl oleate + oleic acid for several mixtures with overall xed mole fractions (R = oleic acid mole fraction on a
CO2 free basis). Exp. data: h n (Yu et al., 1993); (Inomata et al., 1989); d (Bharath et al., 1992); GCA-EoS predictions.
585
Fig. 8. Ternary VLE of CO2, oleic acid and triolein at 250 bar: j exp. (Bharath et al., 1992); GCA-EoS prediction.
measured data on the systems CO2, oleic acid and triolein (OOO), which are shown on Fig. 8, together with
the GCA-EoS predictions at two temperatures.
Even though the CO2 solvent power predicted by the
model is lower than indicated by the measured data
(Bharath et al., 1992), the selectivity is correct, i.e., the
equation shows the higher anity of CO2 for the fatty
acid.
4. Conclusions
Phase equilibria of supercritical gases in fatty oil
derivatives (fatty acids, fatty acid esters, mono- and diglycerides) were predicted using the GCA-EoS model
that specically takes into account association eects.
The parameters obtained at low pressures (using binary mixtures of carboxylic acids, alcohols, esters, water
and alkanes) and at high pressures (CO2 and acids) were
used to model the phase behaviour of mixtures of fatty
oils and their derivatives with supercritical uids. A satisfactory comparison with experimental data was
achieved.
The GCA-EoS model shows great exibility to represent phase equilibrium behaviour in very asymmetric
mixtures with respect to size and energetic interactions
which suggest its use as an engineering tool to optimize
and design extraction and fractionation processes of
fatty oil derivatives with supercritical uids.
Acknowledgements
O. Ferreira acknowledges nancial support from the
PRAXIS program, FCT, Lisbon, Portugal (SFRH/BD/
879/2000). E.A. Brignole acknowledges nancial support from CONICET, Argentina and the Universidad
Nacional del Sur.
Appendix A
The residual energy of Helmholtz can be written as a
sum of three terms: the repulsive term (rep), the attractive term (attr) and the association term (assoc):
AR AR rep AR attr AR assoc
A:1
The repulsive contribution is represented by the extended CarnahanStarling equation for mixtures of
hard spheres developed by Mansoori and Leland
(1972) and it is a function of the hard spheres diameter
per mol of component i(di):
R
k1 k2
A =RT rep 3
Y 1
k3
!
k32 2
A:2
Y Y ln Y n ln Y
2
k3
PNC
3 1
and kk i1 ni d ki .
where Y 1 pk
6V
In these equations, n is the total number of moles, ni
is the number of moles of component i, V is the total
volume and NC is the number of components. The temperature dependence of the diameter di is given by
d i 1:066d c i1 0:12 exp2T ci =3T
A:3
AR =RT
attr
NG
^z X
nj qj
2RTV j1
PNG
qgkj skj
k1 hk ~
PNG
l1 hl slj
A:4
586
where
nj
PNC
i
ni mij ;
~
q
PNC
j
nj qj ;
hj
nj qj
~
q
and
aij g g ~
q
exp jkRTV kk ij .
sjk
The surface area qi and the dispersive energy gii are
the pure group parameters. The attractive energy
parameter gjk quanties the attractive interactions between the segment groups j and k with the correspondent asymmetrical random parameter ajk. In the above
expressions
nj is the total number of moles of group j;
~q is the total number of surface segments; hj is the surface fraction of group j, mij is the number of groups of
type j in molecule i; ^z is the number of nearest neighbours to any segment (set equal to 10).
The attractive energy gij is calculated from the energy
between like-group segments through the following
combination rule:
gij k ij gii gjj
0:5
A:5
where the binary interaction parameter kij is symmetrical (kij = kji). Both, the attractive energy between like
segments and the binary interaction parameter are temperature dependent:
j
k
gjj gjj 1 g0jj T =T j 1 g00jj ln T =T j
A:6
n
h
io
k ij k ij 1 k 0ij ln 2T =T i T j
A:7
nk
ln X
Mk
2
RT assoc
2
Ak
k1
A:8
where nk is the number of moles of the association group
k. The mole fraction of group k not associated at site A,
X Ak is given by
X Ak
Mj
N
GA X
X
j1
!1
qj X Bj D
Ak Bj
A:9
l1
A:10
References
Araujo, M. E., & Meireles, M. A. A. (2000). Improving phase
equilibrium calculation with the PengRobinson EOS for fats and
oils related compounds supercritical CO2 systems. Fluid Phase
Equilibria, 169(1), 4964.
Bharath, R., Inomata, H., Adschiri, T., & Arai, K. (1992). Phase
equilibrium study for the separation and fractionation of fatty oil
components using supercritical carbon dioxide. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 81(12), 307320.
Bharath, R., Yamane, S., Inomata, H., Adschiri, T., & Arai, K. (1993).
Phase equilibria of supercritical CO2fatty oil component binary
systems. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 83(2), 183192.
Bottini, S. B., Fornari, T., & Brignole, E. A. (1999). Phase equilibrium
modelling of triglycerides with near critical solvents. Fluid Phase
Equilibria, 160, 211218.
Byun, H.-S., Kim, K., & McHugh, M. A. (2000). Phase behavior and
modeling of supercritical carbon dioxideorganic acid mixtures.
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 39(12), 45804587.
Chapman, W. G., Gubbins, K. E., Jackson, G., & Radosz, M. (1990).
New reference equation of state for associating liquids. Industrial
and Engineering Chemistry Research, 29(8), 17091721.
Chen, C.-C., Chang, C.-M. J., & Yang, P.-W. (2000). Vaporliquid
equilibria of carbon dioxide with linoleic acid and a-tocopherol
and triolein at elevated pressures. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 175(12),
107115.
Coniglio, L., Knudsen, K., & Gani, R. (1996). Prediction of supercritical uid equilibria for carbon dioxide and sh oil related
compounds through the equation of stateexcess function (EoSgE) approach. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 116(12), 510517.
Espinosa, S., Foco, G. M., Bermudez, A., & Fornari, T. (2000).
Revision and extension of the group contribution equation of state
to new solvent groups and higher molecular weight alkanes. Fluid
Phase Equilibria, 172(2), 129143.
Espinosa, S., Fornari, T., Bottini, S. B., & Brignole, E. A. (2002).
Phase equilibria in mixtures of fatty oils and derivatives with near
critical uids using the GC-EOS model. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 23(2), 91102.
Ferreira, O., Brignole, E. A., & Macedo, E. A. (2004). Modelling of
phase equilibria for associating mixtures using an equation of state.
The Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics, 36, 11051117.
Ferreira, O., & Foco, G. M. (2003). Innite dilution activity
coecients of solvents in fatty oil derivatives. Latin American
Applied Research, 33(3), 257260.
Foco, G., Bermudez, A., & Bottini, S. (1996). Innite dilution activity
coecients in mono-, di-, and tripalmitin and palmitic acid. Journal
of Chemical and Engineering Data, 41(5), 10711074.
Formo, M. W., Jurgemann, E., Norris, F. A., & Sonntag, N. O. V.
(1982). Baileys industrial oils and fats. New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
Fuente, J. C. B. d. l., Fornari, T., Brignole, E., & Bottini, S. (1997).
Phase equilibria in mixtures of triglycerides with low-molecular
weight alkanes. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 128(12), 221227.
Gros, H. P., Bottini, S., & Brignole, E. A. (1996). Group contribution
equation of state for associating mixtures. Fluid Phase Equilibria,
116(12), 537544.
Hixson, A. W., & Bockelmann, J. B. (1942). Liquidliquid extraction
employing solvents in the region of their critical temperatures.
Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 38,
891930.
Hixson, A. W., & Hixson, A. N. (1941). Extraction of fatty acids from
rosin acidfatty acid mixtures by means of liquid propane. Transactions of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 37, 927957.
Huang, S. H., & Radosz, M. (1990). Equation of state for small, large,
polydisperse, and associating molecules. Industrial and Engineering
Chemistry Research, 29(11), 22842294.
587