Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
scaterbone@live.com
717-669-2163
Stanley J. Caterbone
APPELLANT
:
:
:
:
:
At about 7:00pm on
Monday September 26, 2016 a Lancaster City Police Officer appeared at the residence of
the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF, which the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF ignored. Previously the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF has filed several complaints of misconduct and obstruction of
justice against the same said police department, including Chief Kieth Sadler and
Detective Clark Bearinger.
The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF
10; and public officials that has been ongoing since blowing the whistle on International
Signal and Control, plc, or ISC in 1987. The APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF was in lagitimate
fear for his life, and has in the past survived at least 2 attempts on his life surrounding
the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC executives, and the public disclosure by Ted Koppel
and ABC News Nightline in 1991 of the black ops program of the Central Intelligence
Agency, or CIA. There are currently 2 such cases in Pennsylvania Appellate Courts,
Superior Court Case No. 1219 MDA 2016, and Supreme Court Case No. 496 MAL 2016.
There are several Cases in the U.S. District Court that have been WITHDRAWN
WITHOUT PREJUDICE for reasons but not limited to computer hacking; harassment;
assaults;
vandalism
to
real
property;
and
threats
of
violence
against
the
THE
PAST
AND
WAS
NOT
GOING
TO
LET
IT
HAPPEN
AGAIN.
The
was
finally
given
the
case
no.,
which
is
CI-16-08472.
On
Friday,
the
and
using
the
Red
Rose
Transit
Authority.
On
August
3,
2016
the
The
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF as 11 phone calls back and forth up to and including yesterday, August 30,
2016. In June of 2015 the APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF borrowed some $12,000 for the auto, a 100,000
mile warranty and GAP Insurance.
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF FINALLY received the payout from NATIONWIDE insurance and accepted
full liability, documented the Honda CRV as Totaled.
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF'S front end was demolished, again by a suspicious incident causing the
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF insurer to pay over $5,000 in repairs. In August Huntington Bank tried to
convince the APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF that payment was due for July and August, yet in July of
2016 there was not one communication from Huntington Bank. On or about August 18, 2016 the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF gave the Huntington Bank Loan Officer a routing number and account
number to a checking account with over $9,000 in available cash to make a payment.
The
Huntington Bank Loan Officer refused to process the payment and instead, as usual KEPT
HARASSING
the
APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF.
On
Sunday,
August
20,
2016
the
On
Sunday, August 28, 2016 another suspicious incident occurred and left the front end
severely damaged. On Monday the APPEALLANT/PLAINTIFF drove the Honda CRV to a
parking garage in Harrisburg, notified Huntington Bank, the Senior Risk Management
Officer via Linkdin Messaging, and took a train home to Lancaster.
In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to do an
unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice with intent
to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United States v. Holck, 389
F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the following:
Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an indictment
and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which attracts different
members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance
of an overall plan. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The
underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of
constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious
constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring
violations and to strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement
and protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985,
1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.
Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481
Where RICO laws might be applied1
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or
against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
1
References
RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December
2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregonriaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology
The courts may also consider that the following allegations have been
proven:
1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Collusion to Commit Assault and Battery in Easton, Pennsylvania
4. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
5. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
6. Libel and Slander
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit
Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 153400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284 Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
Appeal; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4641 Petition for Habeus
Corpus; Case No. 16-cv-4014 2005 Conitued Case; Case No. 16-cv-49 Chapter 11
Appeal; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 495 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster County
Residents; Case No. 496 MAL 2016 Caterbone v. Lancaster City Police Dept.; Case
No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349,
CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 16-10157
EXHIBIT
&!
(((
&&"
"
!"" # $
'"
!
&
)#
!
THEY WANT TO KILL ME
,*
+
+
,
+
+
* +
+-
..................................................
"# $ ! %
& &
'
# &
(
) * $
+ $
# &
# &
%
$ !
& &
$ #
#
# ' &
&
# % #
$ , % &
$
(
- .
/
' 0& 1 ' 1
! '
'
, %
&
/ %
*
'
&
' ## ! $
*
* #
&
1
+ $
#
& 13(3 "4, #
0&
"- 410 ,0 5 ,40"(3 063 4 0713 4
))13 "4, 14- 063 0 10
"+
/
+
+ , **
+
12$
14 5 /
*
++
+ +
$/
$
' *&
& &
$ !%
&
!
&
*
$
"#
$
#
&
$ ! %
&
( $
%&
0
' &
& /!
'!
( $
& '
' %
*
) * $ +$
!
&
%& %
&
*
& %
$ / /
2!
. ) * $
$
% & ! 2
#
&
-4 0
063
4 "(3 4 "(31
8 "0 9
06 0 4
++
+ *0
+
+
+
'
%
/
+
3
+
+ / *0
'
+ +
/
'
$
+
,+
0 ,-
++
+
/ - /
"
VERY IMPORTAT - PLEASE READ THE ABOVE
DECLARATION AND STATEMENT
+/
#! $
...........6 6............
$
*! !&
!""
&!
%%%
'"
**
# $
!/
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
!
5
:
!#
'7
(
"
!8!
!&
"!
+(!
, ,
3 "
*
#
"!
!
!
'5
!
!
'
! #
!
!
#
*
# 4
! &
"
" ! #
(! !
* '
5
"'
!
$%
"!#
9#"
%# & "
"
#
+.
0
,
. ) (
'1
" "
#
' +(!
#
!
2 &3
!
!
"
%
!
'+
,
#
,
"
'
6
)
!
3
"
! *
! !!
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
78
'#'
(!
* "
* & ; !<
# '
(! ,
. ) (
#
'
&
9
5
&
!
#
1
"
9
!
!
*
!
"&
!
" ! &
' +>
*
:%
%
*
#
(! ,
, "
#
!
+(!
,
; !
'
&
!
! &
'> !
'
!
; #
#
*
'
! &
! !
' +(!
"
:: ;' <
5
& &
#
' !
# , "
#! !
'5
* *
&
'
*,
'+
#
' (!
* +
"
'
&
! &
#5
# #
#
" !
' +(! !
9
"' (!
1
,
'
'
! #' (!
" # !
"
9
"
#
!
#
'. ) (
* & ; !<
# & ; !<
*
! #'
! , *
*
#
!
"
+ =
*
+
!
+!
'
! *
5
"
,
5 &!
+
!
%
! , *
!
=
" "
'
A% ! *
B #
A% "
.
, )'
'
! *
"! !
)
!#
! " "
@ " 2
# !
&
* ! *
'
# '> !
' (! * * ! 5
! &
* &
!
"5
(!
"
! '
& !
,
! &
" (
&
! & "
!
. ,
"!
#
!
!
#
'>
! '. ) (
'
!
(!
(! $%
7 '#' !
. ) (
9
!
0 "
'
4
+
; #
!
#
!
"
5
'
'
" (
! !
# ' (!
"
#
"
'+
! ! #'+
,
!
!
"
& !
! #
! &
+
! ! &
,
/
##
! #
+ !
C :
""
'
5
#
! ! #
! #'+
!
, "
,
9
&
'
/!
! &
! 5
5
4 * ! ,
!
+
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
(!
)
5
! 5
. ) (
=
' (!
! &
'
+@
##
5
!
#
'
&
" !
"
!
E! &
(!
*
!
" "
#*
)
! (
!
*
4 ! , !
'
1
'
'
%"
1
4 ,
+*
4
#
"
,
+ #
#
"
'
. ) (
! &
! &
'>
! !
#
%
"
"
+
*
&
&' +> #
'
5
# &'
&
; #
! , *
+
"
! #
*
+!
"
!#
*
"#
"
"
'
% ,
"
%
"
*
&
"5
9
!#*
!
! (
&
&
!
0
! #'
!#
'
!
!
!<
" D
!
'
* * ! 5
;
!
# *
"+
& +!
'
##
!
"
!! &
9
1
'; #
* (
; #
'
& !
! (
'
) & "
#
'
' (!
!; #
!5
!
; #
'
+>
4
! ,
,
' (!
4
5
"!
5
'
!#
& . ) (
! 'A %
! 4 " "
E5
! &
!
=
# #
'+
"
! ! &
&!
'. ) (
! *
"
4 F#
+
#
+* !
!
' (! 4, "
"!
!
!
! ! !
'>4
!9
,
,
! !
##
"" *
!
. )
4
"
!
"
+(!
!5
#
<
!
"
(!
*
5
'
#
"*D
#*
!1
"
(!
* #
"5
!
"!
&
! !
! "
(
* *'
"
* '
5
" , !
# *
#
, &
' (!
,
!
!
,
# '
'
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
"
! !
'
5
5
3
1
+
4
&
!
, #
+ "!
=
,
* " ! ,
"
"'+
'
. ) (
9 ! "
(!
!
!
'. ) (
!
!
&
**
!
$$$
'
'
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
CHAPTER
DIVIDER
Tuesday,
Tuesday September 27, 2016
THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT re Lancaster City Police Continance of September 27, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Lancaster
Case
No. 495/496
City Police
MALv.2016
Supreme
CATERBONE
Court
Motion
of For
Pennsylvania
Continuance
Page
Page14
1 of
of82
18
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016
2. My father (Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.) graduated form Lancaster Catholic High School with
honor society grades, secretary or treasurer of his class, outstanding basketball player, and
he even played a musical instrument. I have original records.
3. In 1943, in Lancaster Newspaper Article, my father graduated from the Naval Air Gunners
School with Honors in Florida. It's training manual, which I have, describes the Air
Gunners as the most psychically and mentally fit servicemen in the U.S. Armed Forces with
double the pay compared to other servicemen.
4. In the 1960's my father went through a rigorous series of involuntary psychiatric
commitments and electro shock therapies initiated by the Lancaster City Police
Department; with stays at Embryville Psychiatric Hospital.
5. During the 1960's my father traveled the world including Hong Kong, Lebanon, Lisbon,
Mexico, Egypt, etc. while still operating Sam Caterbone Cleaners.
6. The Dry Cleaning Association of America awarded my father a Certificate of Recognition for
inventing a filtration system for the Dry Cleaning Industry.
7. In 1972 The Lancaster City Police arrest my father for forging a $200.00 check from
Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc. because the only signatory at that time was his wife,
Yolanda RODA Caterbone.
8. In 1972 the Lancaster City Police arrest my father for stealing $2,000.00 from the
basement of his parents home, Book Road in Lampeter, from Joseph Ricupero, his nephew.
9. At trial my father appears Pro Se and is found guilty of the forgery charge and not quilty of
the theft charge. My father spent some 2 months in prison before being released
on bail and is sentenced to 1 year probation. The $200.00 check was made out to
James Coho, the Lancaster Attorney, with Divorce Proceedings written in the
memo.
10.In August of 1973, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas President Judge Johnstone
ORDERS my father vacate the vicinity of Lancaster County. In essence throwing him out
of Lancaster County. He had no other criminal record.
11.In that same year my fathers properties at 1470 Mahniem Pike are transferred to Jack and
Agnes Silverhorne for $140,000.00 Without any attempts to sell the property; no real
estate for sale sign, Just my mother's cousin Valley Palumbo representing both my mother
and Jack Silverthorne in the transaction. I am alleging that the property was worth at least
$500,000. My father owned the Dry Cleaners, plus 4 store fronts, and two houses which
stretched from the fence line at Alcoa to about 40 feet from the Park City Light. My
mother would ask me to sit in on the meetings and I kept asking her why can't we rent the
property rather than Jack Silverthorne Valley Palumbo had already negotiated the Triple
Net Leases before the settlement ever took place.
12.By the 1960's my father had worked his business and had no debt on 1250 Fremont Street
or his properties on Manhiem Pike.
13.Those incidents left my mother with no income, just the $70,000.00 which made her get a
job at Price Elementary School's cafeteria.
14.My father leaves town and moves to the Bahamas. My mother continues as a low level
Cafeteria Aid, having to start work at 5:30 am while raising me and my 3 younger
brothers.
15.In 1976 I am caring for my mother as she suffers from a clinical depression while attending
to my oldest brother, Sammy, who is trying to cope with his victimization of U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, specifically the LSD Experiments of MK-ULTRA while in the U.S. Air Force,
as he is in seclusion in the Mt. Vernon Motel on route 72 near Manhiem. Later my mother
and Uncle Ben Roda would demand he leave Lancaster and place him on a bus en route to
California.
16.In 1981 while walking to a church in Miami where my brother Steve lives, he finds my
father taking his daily walk. Before that time my father's father and sister have passed,
with no one being able to find his location or contact him.
17.In 1982 my father returns to Lancaster and lives with his mother on Book Road before
being approved for the Low Income apartment at Apartment 309 in the Church Street
Lancaster
Case
No. 495/496
City Police
MALv.2016
Supreme
CATERBONE
Court
Motion
of For
Pennsylvania
Continuance
Page
Page15
2 of
of82
18
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016
Towers in 1983. My mother immediately files for divorce when my father arrives back in
Lancaster in 1982.
18.Christmas Day of 1984 my oldest brother, Sammy, is murdered in Santa Barbara,
California, verified and confirmed by officials of the County of Santa Barbara to me in my
meeting in a Santa Barbara County Office in August of 2005.
19.In 1987 I am arrested by the Manheim Township Police Department for 4 felonies
and 3 Misdemeanors for essentially stealing my own files out of my own property,
which I had a personal guarantee obligation to the owners, Herb Fisher and Marty
Sponougle, and spent 10 days in prison, 10 days in the St. Joseph Psychiatric Ward only to
have ALL CHARGES DISMISSED IN MARCH OF 1988, WELL AFTER THE
ISC/FERRANTI MERGER WAS COMPLETED IN DECMEMBER OF 1987.
20.April 29, 1996 my youngest brother, Thomas P. Caterbone is found dead in a cottage
in Kill Devil Island, North Carolina.
21.In 2006 I am sent to the LANCASTER COUNTY PRISON for 60 days, (October 30 to
December 28) for absolutely nothing; the director of the Bail Supervision Deparmtment
Lied under OATH and Judge Allison MAILCIOIUSLY reinstated my Bail to SECURED rather
than UNSECURED and it took my APPEAL filed while incarcerated to finally free
me. My home at 220 Stone Hill Road was purposefully SOLD AT SHERRIF SALE
ON DECMEMBER 20, 2006 WHILE I COULD NOT FILE APPROPRIATE COURT
DOCUMENTS TO THWART THE ILLEGAL SALE BY FULTON BANK.
22.FAST FORWARD TO 2010 AND THE PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER....THE JULY 9, 2015 PSYCHIATRIC
COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER...AND
FINALLY THE FEBRUARY 19, 2016 PSYCHIATRIC COMMITMENT BY LANCASTER
CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER.
23.THEN WE HAVE THE INCIDENTS OF 2015 TO TODAY, AUGUST 6, 2016.
___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
Lancaster
Case
No. 495/496
City Police
MALv.2016
Supreme
CATERBONE
Court
Motion
of For
Pennsylvania
Continuance
Page
Page16
3 of
of82
18
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Saturday
September
August27,
6, 2016
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
No. 495/496
Cityv.Police
City
MAL
Supreme
ofv.
Lancaster,
2016
CATERBONE
Court
Motion
PA
of For
Pennsylvania
Since
Continuance
1904
Page
Page
Page17
41 of
of
of82
233
18
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Saturday
September
August
March27,
8,
6, 2016
" !
!
!
"
#
$
%& & & " #
#!
#
"
)
"
%
#
$
"
"
"
!'
#
&
"
"
"
1
#
&
'
#
(
*
% ## ! .
"
#
/
%
"
$
)
!(
"#
"
"
,
"#
!
!
"
"
00
#
"
1
"
"
2,
%
"
"
1
* !
333333
#
+,
#
""
)
"#
#
33333
#
'
5 "
7
"
"
##
6
#
"
CATERBONE
Lancaster
Case
No. 495/496
Cityv.Police
City
MAL
Supreme
ofv.
Lancaster,
2016
CATERBONE
Court
Motion
PA
of For
Pennsylvania
Since
Continuance
1904
Page
Page
Page18
52 of
of
of82
233
18
Tuesday,
Tuesday
Saturday
September
August
March27,
8,
6, 2016