Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Read the following information. Thoroughly address each Activity and Question section
for your project. These sections are colored in beige.
Genetic Technology
Here are the opening paragraphs from two websites introducing genetic engineering which one
is Greenpeace and which is Monsanto?
1. Today, biotechnology holds out promise for consumers seeking quality, safety and taste in their food
choices; for farmers seeking new methods to improve their productivity and profitability; and for
governments and non-governmental public advocates seeking to stave off global hunger, assure
environmental quality, preserve bio-diversity and promote health and food safety.
2. Genetic engineering enables scientists to create plants, animals and micro-organisms by
manipulating genes in a way that does not occur naturally. These genetically modified organisms (GMO)
can spread through nature and interbreed with natural organisms, thereby contaminating non 'GE'
environments and future generations in an unforeseeable and uncontrollable way. Their release is
'genetic pollution' and is a major threat because GMOs cannot be recalled once released into the
environment.
Answer:
1) Monsanto
2) Greenpeace
When faced with issues of genetic engineering (GE) we have an extra question - Can we afford to get it
wrong? - as well as whether or not GE is morally "right".
Key GE technologies are:
Reproductive cloning
The basic process
Cloning is simply making genetic copies.
Gardeners clone when they take cuttings;
identical twins are natural clones, and frogs were first cloned by scientists working to establish the events
of early embryonic development in vertebrates in 1952. Cattle breeders have been producing clones by
splitting embryos for over 20 years. But when on 27th February 1997
the
news broke of the birth of Dolly the cloned sheep, there was
tremendous media interest, because this was the first time that a
mammal had been cloned.
This picture shows Dolly with her birth, but not genetic mother, and the diagram right explains how she
was created:
You can read more detail about this at http://www.synapses.co.uk/science/clone.html.
Cloning
History
The production of a live lamb from a cell from the mammary gland of an adult sheep turned over one of
the basic ideas of developmental biology. Until Dolly was born, it was thought that once a cell had
differentiated during embryonic life, the process could not be reversed.
As soon as the news of Dollys arrival broke, the Pope condemned the practice of cloning, and President
Clinton ordered an immediate and rapid enquiry into the ethical and legal implications.
Questions:
Why were both the Pope and the President of the USA so concerned about this scientific first?
In 1998 the first human embryonic cells were isolated and made to divide in the laboratory (cell culture).
This re-ignited the medias interest in the possibility of human cloning, but also represented the first step
in using stem cells to help cure disability and disease.
The possibilities
use in research into basic developmental biology, e.g. to further our understanding of
differentiation and how this can be reversed;
use in testing of products, including new medicines: genetically identical animals would eliminate
any error due to genetic difference;
conserving useful characteristics in domestic animals, e.g. better meat or milk production in
cattle;
Do you agree that cloning should become a routine procedure?
Since Dolly was born, scientists around the world have successfully cloned more sheep, and also mice,
cattle, goats, pigs cats and, after many unsuccessful events, the first equine species: a mule. However,
Recently, a Californian genetics company has started to offer a cat cloning service for
$50,000 (about 27,000) per animal. Do you think this is ethical?
Commodification of humans;
Uncertainty about the future physical and mental health of anyone produced by cloning;
Interference in the natural process of human procreation, which produces an infinite genetic mix.
Therapeutic cloning has opened up quite a debate, many scientists believe that the latest developments
in creating stem cells from skin rather than embryonic tissue are a welcome way forward.
Questions
What are the ethical arguments for and against using early embryos in research?
Why might a cloned human suffer psychologically, after all identical twins dont usually have a
problem?
Many religious people believe that humans are made in the image of God. Would this be any
different for a cloned person?
Thought Experiment:
The actor Christopher Reeve suffered a devastating accident in which his spinal cord was injured at the
level of his second cervical vertebra (C2). This meant that he was permanently paralysed from the neck
down and could not even breathe without a ventilator. He campaigned very hard to raise money for stem
cell research, but he met with a lot of opposition.
This came from those people who did not believe that it was right to create embryos for research. They
believe that embryos should have protection as potential human beings in their own right.
"Welcome to the BioEthics Education Project." Teaching Controversial and Social Issues in
Science / Biology: BEEP BioEthics Education Project. Web. 16 Mar. 2016.
You can go to the website for further information: http://www.beep.ac.uk/content/1.0.html