Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LESSON PLAN
ANALYSIS
Jessica Hayter
Student ID: 18139336
CONTENTS
Original Lesson Plan .........1
Adapted Lesson Plan ....2
Lesson Plan Analysis .4
Modified Lesson Plan .7
Reflection ..9
Academic Justification ..10
Learning Portfolio Web Link .12
Resources ...13
References ..15
I was given this lesson plan by a local teacher called Sharon Wilson. She is happy for me to
use it on my assessment.
Stage of Learner:
Stage 4
Location Booked:
Syllabus Pages:
Lesson Number:
Outcomes
Assessment
Students learn
about
Students learn
to
EN5-4B
Effectively transfers
knowledge, skills and
understanding of language
concepts into the new and
different contexts
Not assessed
will form the basis
of further study
Persuasive language in
advertising
EN5-6C
Investigates the
relationships between and
among texts
3
Intellectual Quality
This refers to pedagogy focused on producing deep understanding of
important, substantive concepts, skills and ideas. Such pedagogy treats
knowledge as something that requires active construction and requires
students to engage in higher-order thinking and to communicate
substantively about what they are learning.
Quality Learning Environment
This refers to pedagogy that creates classrooms where students and
teachers work productively in an environment clearly focused on
learning. Such pedagogy sets high and explicit expectations and
develops positive relationships between teacher and students and
among students.
Significance
This refers to pedagogy that helps make learning more meaningful and
important to students. Such pedagogy draws clear connections with
students prior knowledge and identities, with contexts outside of the
classroom, and with multiple ways of knowing all cultural perspective.
1.4 Higher-order
thinking
1.5 Metalanguage
1.6 Substantive
communication
3.1 Background
knowledge
3.2 Cultural
knowledge
3.3 Knowledge
integration
3.4 Inclusivity
3.5 Connectedness
3.6 Narrative
4
How are the quality teaching elements you have identified
achieved within the lesson?
Teaching
element
Higherorder
thinking
Metalangua
ge
Time
20 min
15 min
15 min
Social
Support
This activity requires group work. Students are also required to share their
ideas with the class.
Student
direction
The class hinges upon group work and class discussion by students in
order to achieve learning outcomes.
Organisation
Teacher:
Student: Groups
Resources: Roll
Teacher:
Student: Groups
Resources: Advertisements
Teacher:
Student: Individual
Resources: Writing
implements
Centr
ed
T/S
2 Know the
content and
how to
teach it
3 Plan for
an
implement
effective
teaching
and
learning
Evaluation score
Comments incl. evidence for evaluation score (2 sentences
1 (poor) 5
maximum)
(excellent)
1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of students
1.2 Understand how students learn
1.3 Students with diverse linguistic, cultural,
Not included in the lesson plan
1 2 3 4 5 NA
religious and socioeconomic backgrounds
1.4 Strategies for teaching Aboriginal and
Not included in the lesson plan
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Torres Strait Islander students
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific
Not included in the lesson plan
learning needs of students across the full
1 2 3 4 5 NA
range of abilities
1.6 Strategies to support full participation of
Not included in the lesson plan
1 2 3 4 5 NA
students with disability
2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the teaching area
2.2 Content selection and organisation
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Creative selection for learning metalanguage. Content is relevant for
years 7 & 8.
2.3 Curriculum, assessment and reporting
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Links to curriculum. No assessment or reporting applicable.
2.4 Understand and respect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to promote reconciliation between Indigenous and non-Indigenous
Australians
2.5 Literacy and numeracy strategies
2.6 Information and Communication
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Interaction with videos from the internet & slideshows.
Technology (ICT)
3.1 Establish challenging learning goals
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Asks students to identify and describe metalanguage, and present
ideas to the class.
3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning
1 2 3 4 5 NA
The sequence is planned to smoothly transition to next activity.
programs
3.3 Use teaching strategies
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Not included in the lesson plan
3.4 Select and use resources
1 2 3 4 5 NA
Not explicitly highlighted in the lesson plan. Advertisements require
Youtube access; this and slideshows require smartboard or digital
overhead projector.
3.5 Use effective classroom communication
3.6 Evaluate and improve teaching programs
6
4 Create
and
maintain
supportive
and safe
learning
environmen
ts
5 Assess,
provide
feedback
and report
on student
learning
1 2 3 4 5 NA
1 2 3 4 5 NA
1 2 3 4 5 NA
6 Engage in
professiona
l learning
7 Engage
professiona
lly with
colleagues,
parents/car
ers and the
community
7
Section 2: NSW Quality Teaching Model
Dimensio
n
Element
Intellectu
al quality
Deep knowledge
Deep understanding
Problematic knowledge
Higher-order thinking
Metalanguage
Substantive communication
Quality
learning
environm
ent
Significan
Background knowledge
Code
(refer to QT
model
documentation
for criteria for
each number)
12345
NA
12345
NA
12345
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
2345
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
2345
2345
2345
2345
2345
2345
2345
2345
2345
8
ce
NA
Cultural knowledge
Knowledge integration
Inclusivity
Connectedness
Narrative
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
1
NA
2345
2345
2345
2345
12345
NA
Topic area:
Language techniques
Stage of Learner:
Stage 4
Date:
To be taught 9/5/16
Location Booked:
Lesson Number:
Classroom with access to
2/10
technology
Total Number of students Printing/preparation
28
Prepare Youtube links to ads
Access Powerpoint slides
Print 28 Word worksheets
Time:
50 minute lesson
Outcomes
EN5-4B
Effectively transfers
knowledge, skills and
understanding of language
concepts into the new and
different contexts
EN5-6C
Investigates the
relationships between and
among texts
EN4-8D
Identifies, considers and
appreciates cultural
expression in texts
Assessment
Syllabus Pages:
https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/englis
h/english-k10/outcomes/
Students learn
about
Students learn
to
Diagnostic
Persuasive language in Identify and unpick
assessment
advertising
persuasive language in
evident in opening Sustainability vs
advertisements
question.
Be critical of stereotypes
consumerism.
in general.
Cultural context of
Group discussion
Be aware of
advertising.
aids teacher in
consumerism.
formative
Be aware of cultural
assessment.
differences in
marketing.
The informal
assessment is also
the summative
assessment
evident in the
group
presentations.
ACEEN025
evaluating the effects of
rhetorical devices, for
example, emphasis,
emotive language and
imagery in the construction
of argument
1.
2.
3.
10
11
Highlighted items are the modifications from original lesson plan:
Time
10 min
20 min
10 min
10 min
Organisation
Youtube
buy unnecessary items ie. sustainability
Behaviour issues & Extension activities see appendix
Worksheet
Writing implements
Each group shares one key idea with the class.
Teacher: Discussion
facilitator
After presentations, ask students if the ad would work as
Student: Group
well anywhere else in the world? Or is it aimed at western
presentations
culture?
Resources: Worksheet,
slides-Captain Morgan
Spiced Rum advertising
logo story.
Individually, students write up one concise sentence for
Teacher: Move about the
each technique discussed in their groups. Highlight which
room & assist students as
ad, and the technique and describe how it is used to
required.
persuade the consumer.
Student: Individual
Resources: Writing
implements
Centr
ed
T/S
Teacher
Student
Student
Student
APPENDIX:
12
There are minimal health and safety risks in this lesson over and above
those normally encountered in day-to-day social science classrooms.
Management of student behaviour is a key difference between minimal risk
and high risk; such as projectiles or inappropriate use of school furniture. The
teacher must also take note of electricity in the use of technology (Safe Work
NSW, 2016).
13
REFLECTION:
I have learnt that there are many contributing factors to be considered when
preparing lessons. As a teacher, we must maintain the core syllabus, while
managing behaviour, considering Cross-Curriculum themes and General
Capabilities, as well as maintaining an engaging lesson where learning will
occur. Planning for a single lesson is quite involved. The Australian
Professional Standards of Teaching, (APST), and the NSW Quality Teaching
model, (QT model), aid teachers in generating lesson plans in conjunction
with ACARAs National Curriculum and the NSW syllabus.
Although a lot of the planning is done in preparation for the class, there may
be alternate scenarios where students do not engage with the provided
material, or the class is poorly behaved on the day; this requires extra
teacher planning. One class of 55 minutes, requires double the planning, just
in case the first lesson fails.
This assessment template demands much detail. I understand that reality
does not demand as much; however, upon examining the original lesson
plan, which I initially thought was good, I discovered that very little of the
APST were incorporated into the written evidence. This does not mean the
teacher did not adhere to the APST in their classroom practice. Much can be
assumed. However, since documentation of the APST aids teachers in
gaining professional advancement, the APST should be noted in all lesson
plans.
How am I measuring the outcomes of this lesson?
Learning Outcome
EN5-4B - effectively
transfers knowledge,
skills and
understanding of
language concepts
into the new and
different contexts
EN5-6C - investigates
the relationships
between and among
texts
ACEEN025
-evaluating the effects
of rhetorical devices,
for example,
emphasis, emotive
language and imagery
in the construction of
argument
EN4-8D - identifies,
considers and
14
appreciates cultural
expression in texts
15
ACADEMIC JUSTIFICATION:
Through the analysis of the APST and the QT model, it is
apparent that the original lesson plan is weaker in certain areas and
stronger in others. The weaker areas have been strengthened using
recommendations from the APST, the QT model, and other academic
sources.
According to Wilkerson & Lequia (2015), small group work
capitalises on peer support (p.227). Heterogeneous groups are mixed
ability groups, which provide students with learning opportunities
directly from fellow students. There are many benefits to group work;
such as academic achievement, motivation, self-efficacy, social
development, and promotes peer inclusion (p.227-229). The original
lesson plan already contained group work; so the modified lesson
plan augmented the group work, to be based on prearranged
heterogeneous groups, which lessens the opportunity for behavioural
issues, makes for quicker group formation, and also broadens
students academic prospects through differentiation (Standard 1.5,
APST, AITSL, 2016).
Standard 5.1 Assess student learning (AITSL, 2016).
Assessment was the weakest part of the original lesson plan; nonexistent, except for the note that this lesson would form the basis of
further study. How can a teacher move onto the next lesson, without
comprehending whether the foundational lessons were understood?
Whether it is formal or informal, assessment is key in measuring
students learning (Brookhart, 2014). It aids teachers in evaluating
16
what may need to be modified or strengthened within the lesson, for
future use. The original lesson plan included diagnostic assessment
in
the
opening
question,
which
determined
students
prior
to
recording
the
informal
assessments
added,
the
17
the event that discussion leads off track, having the instructions on
the board gives the students a reference point to continue student
centred learning (Severiens, Meeuwisse & Born, 2015). Repetition,
and reiteration of expectations, are employed by the teacher to
imbed the lesson goal. Repetition is evident within the modified
lesson plan through the opening discussion points on what works in
advertising, then identifying the techniques and how they are
effective, and then discussing these ideas with the class. Finally,
students note down key ideas in their textbooks.
Cultural Knowledge (NSW Department of Education &
Training, 2003). The original lesson plan did not venture into cultural
background differences. The modified lesson plan now includes the
syllabus outcome, EN4-8D, which is aimed at critically engaging
students in acknowledging the cultural differences in educational
materials (BOSTES, 2016). As seen in the modified lesson plan,
cultural differences are now explicitly addressed as a discussion
point. Since advertising is based on contextual societies, and target
markets, it follows that advertising would differ between cultures. An
example was provided for students in the powerpoint slides, as
follows:
In America, market responses were gathered for the Captain Morgan
Spiced Rum logo. Anglo-Saxon responses were positive. However,
Hispanic responses were negative, stating the pirate looked like an
oppressor (Hoag, 2015). Underlying these responses is the postcolonialist theory, that European settlers oppressed the native
18
people. Note how it is invisible to the Anglo-Saxon respondents. The
Captain Morgan example was provided for students to unveil some
cultural differences in advertising.
The modified lesson plan now explicitly addresses multiple
APST Standards and QT model areas. Standard 4.3, Standard 5.1,
along with QT model areas, Explicit Quality Criteria and Cultural
Knowledge have been explored in detail. The modified lesson plan is
now an encompassing lesson plan that is effective for student
learning.
19
RESOURCES:
From Appendix:
Powerpoint slides
20
From Appendix:
Word Worksheet this one has some answers to direct a substitute teacher to example answers:
21
REFERENCES
ACARA. (2016). Senior secondary curriculum. Retrieved Sep 24, 2016, from English
curriculum:
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/seniorsecondary/english/english/curric
ulum/seniorsecondary#page=1
ACARA. (2016). Sustainability overview. Retrieved Sep 24, 2016, from Crosscurriculum priorities:
http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/crosscurriculumpriorities/sustainability
/overview
22
AITSL. (2014). Australian professional standards for teachers. Retrieved Sep 6, 2016,
from Australian institute for teaching and school leadership:
http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-forteachers/standards/list?c=graduate
BOSTES. (2016). Outcome coding. Retrieved Sep 24, 2016, from English K-10
syllabus: https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/english/english-k10/english-key/
BOSTES. (2016). Stage 4 statement. Retrieved Sep 24, 2016, from English K-10
syllabus: https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/english/english-k10/stagestatements/
BOSTES. (2016). Table of objectives and outcomes - Continuum of learning. Retrieved
Sep 24, 2016, from English K-10 syllabus:
https://syllabus.bostes.nsw.edu.au/english/english-k10/outcomes/
Brookhart, S. (2014). Multiple measures in classroom assessment. In R. E. Slavin,
Proven programs in education: Classroom management and education (pp. 1619). SAGE Publications. Retrieved Sep 29, 2016, from
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/lib/uwsau/detail.action?
docID=1696669
Gore, J. (2007). Improving pedagogy. In J. Butcher, & L. McDonald (Eds.), Making a
difference: Challenges for teachers, teaching and teacher education (pp. 1532). Sense Publishers.
Hoag, C. (2015). Issue: Hispanic marketing. Hispanic marketing, 1-20.
doi:10.1177/2374556815588527
Morgan, H. (2014). Maximising student success with differentiated learning. The
clearing house: A journal of educational strategies, issues and ideas, 87(1), 3438. doi:10.1080/00098655.2013.832130
23
NSW Department of Education & Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public
schools: A classroom practice guide.
NSW Government. (2016). Managing safety. Retrieved Sep 24, 2016, from Safework
NSW: http://www.safework.nsw.gov.au/health-and-safety/manage-workplacesafety/your-responsibilities
Severiens, S., Meeuwisse, M., & Born, M. (2015). Student experience & academic
success: comparing a student-centred & lecture-based course programme. High
Education, 70, 1-17. doi:10.1007/s10734-014-9820-3
Wilkerson, K. L., & Lequia, J. L. (2015). Maximising the benefits of working
cooperatively with peers. In L. H. Meltzer, The power of peers in the
classroom: Enhancing learning and social skills (pp. 224-250). Guilford
Publications. Retrieved Sep 28, 2016, from
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com.ezproxy.uws.edu.au/lib/uwsau/reader.action?
docID=1981158