You are on page 1of 7

CRITERIA

1. Long term Sustainability of


the project product:
- Sustainability over the
long term, beyond the
completion of course of
-

the projections/forecast.
Growth potential of the
industry under which the

project is categorized.
2. Soundness and reliability
of all bases, i.e.
assumptions/estimates,
surveys, facts and data
used in the study to
establish technical and
economic feasibilities.
3. Quality of project study
report:
- Organization-logical
-

presentation of thoughts
Style- simple but

precise, clear
Format- widely accepted

or standard
4. Thoroughness in details
manifesting diligent
I.

research work.
GENERAL

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

II.

MARKETING ASPECT
CRITERIA
1. Realism of market
data/validity of
2.

assumptions:
Demand
Supply
Market Share
Appropriateness of market

survey design:
- Purpose/Objective of the
-

survey
Questionnaire- relevance

to purpose
Cross section of

respondents
Representativeness of

the sample
Inferences from survey

result
3. Soundness of marketing
program or strategy.
4. Rationality of pricing
policy.

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

5. Competitive edge of
product:
- Design
- Quality
- Price

III. TECHNICAL ASPECT


CRITERIA
1. Efficiency of production
operations
- Facilities layout
- Strategic location of
-

production site
Reasonable degree of

mechanization
2. Realistic production rates,
yields and cost.
3. Quality control integration
with the production
operations.

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

4. Safety considerations.
5. Environmental impact.
- Pollution control
- Waste disposal
- Utilization of indigenous
materials with unlimited
or replenishable source

IV. FINANCIAL ASPECT


CRITERIA

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

The market projection was

The group recommends that

projections with the

based on the surveys

an explanation or short

technical and market

conducted by the group.

discussion be provided after

projections.

Market projections, as well

every table to interpret and

1. Consistency of financial

as the technical aspect,

specify how such financial

were used by the

projections were derived. An

proponents as basis of their

emphasis on the specific

financial projections. The

variables of the financial

researchers presented that

analysis and the projected

sales are projected to

financial information would

increase by 5% per year.

be better since only the

With this, selling expenses

general basis of the

would also increase by 5%

projections were presented

every year. Such financial

by the proponents. The

projections were formulated

group also recommends the

in consistency with the

use of the industry averages

availability and the capacity

and ratios.

of their target market, and


the operational aspect of the
2. Economic
viability/feasibility in terms
of IRR, NPV and/or
payback period is within
acceptable and realistic
range for the industry.
3. Sensitivity of economic
feasibility to
changes/variabilities in the
values of the forecast
parameters.
4. Appropriateness and
accuracy of the valuation
of economic feasibility and
the attendant financial
statements.

business.
The economic viability and
feasibility

V. ORGANIZATION MANAGEMENT
CRITERIA
1. Identification and staffing
of key result areas of the
organization
2. Effectiveness of
organizational structure
towards attainment of
corporate objectives
3. Policies formulated in
accordance with the
accepted principles of
professional management.

FINDINGS

RECOMMENDATIONS

You might also like