1) Annualizing returns allows investors to compare returns over different lengths of time by expressing all returns on an annual basis.
2) To annualize a simple return over a holding period of T years, the formula is: rA = (1 + rs)1/T - 1, where rA is the annualized return and rs is the simple return.
3) This formula works because it sets the annualized return rA so that the change in wealth over T years is the same as if you earned rA as a return every year for 1 year.
Original Description:
Annualizing Interest Rates for useAnnualizing Interest Rates for useAnnualizing Interest Rates for use
1) Annualizing returns allows investors to compare returns over different lengths of time by expressing all returns on an annual basis.
2) To annualize a simple return over a holding period of T years, the formula is: rA = (1 + rs)1/T - 1, where rA is the annualized return and rs is the simple return.
3) This formula works because it sets the annualized return rA so that the change in wealth over T years is the same as if you earned rA as a return every year for 1 year.
1) Annualizing returns allows investors to compare returns over different lengths of time by expressing all returns on an annual basis.
2) To annualize a simple return over a holding period of T years, the formula is: rA = (1 + rs)1/T - 1, where rA is the annualized return and rs is the simple return.
3) This formula works because it sets the annualized return rA so that the change in wealth over T years is the same as if you earned rA as a return every year for 1 year.
I was looking through week 2s lecture and realized I actually didnt
understand how you annualized the HPR. I know what the formula is, but why does it work? As in, how was it derived what does each component mean? Annualizing holding period returns is no different than annualizing other returns. Lets start by considering simple returns. These measure net changes in wealth and are not adjusted for the time period over which these changes occur. For instance, lets assume that we have a flat and constant term structure and that we buy a three-year annual coupon bond (paying some coupon c) at t = 0, reinvest all coupons until t = 2 and sell the bond at t = 2. Our cash flows would be: CF0 = P CF2 = c(1 + y) + c + P2 = c(2 + y) +
FV + c 1+y
Our simple return would be:
i h V +c c(2 + y) + F1+y 1 rs = P There are a lot of variables there, but all we are doing is calculating how much our wealth have changed as a result of the investment. This is fine but in order to compare different returns we need to take the time it took to earn the return into account. A return of 2 % may be very good over a day, but much less impressive over 10 years. We often normalize the return, so as to express the annualized return, i.e. the return we would have made if we had the same rate of change in our wealth, but kept it up for exactly one year. Lets denote this annualized rate rA for now. In order to make the comparison fair, we should let rA work over the same time period as rs , i.e. two years. We then choose rA so that the change in wealth is equal: (1 + rA )2 = 1 + rs 1
(1 + rs ) 2 1 = rA 1
This is the equation we had in the lecture slides (although we wrote X 2 as
X). We can make this formula more general by substituting some arbitrary
number of years, T , for 2:
1
rA = (1 + rs ) T 1
Note that the we do not require T to be an integer. If we want to annualize a